[Federal Register: December 17, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 242)]
[Notices]
[Page 77249-77250]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17de02-41]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL00-95-071, et al.]
San Diego Gas & Electric Company, et al.; Electric Rate and
Corporate Filings
December 10, 2002.
The following filings have been made with the Commission. The
filings are listed in ascending order within each docket
classification.
1. San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Complainant, v. Sellers of Energy
and Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California
Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange,
Respondents
[Docket No. EL00-95-071]
Investigation of practices of the California Independent System
Operator and the California Power Exchange.
[Docket No. EL00-98-060]
Public meeting in San Diego, California.
[Docket No. EL00-107-013]
Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc., Dynegy Power Marketing,
Inc., and Southern Energy California, L.L.C., Complainants, v.
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Respondent.
[Docket No. EL00-97-007]
California Electricity Oversight Board, Complainant, v. all sellers
of energy and ancillary services into the energy and ancillary services
markets operated by the California Independent System Operator and the
California Power Exchange, Respondents.
[Docket No. EL00-104-012]
California Municipal Utilities Association, Complainant, v. all
jurisdictional sellers of energy and ancillary services into markets
operated by the California Independent System Operator and the
California Power Exchange, Respondents.
[Docket No. EL01-1-013]
Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE), Complainant, v.
Independent Energy Producers, Inc., and all sellers of energy and
ancillary services into markets operated by the California Independent
System Operator and the California Power Exchange; all scheduling
coordinators acting on behalf of the above sellers; California
Independent System Operator Corporation; and California Power Exchange
Corporation, Respondents.
[Docket No. EL01-2-007]
Investigation of wholesale rates of public utility sellers of
energy and ancillary services in the Western System Coordinating
Council.
[Docket No. EL01-68-026]
Take notice that on December 2, 2002, the California Independent
System, Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered for filing a compliance
filing made in compliance with the Commission's October 31, 2002, Order
on Compliance Filing and Compliance Report. The compliance filing
revises section 5.11 of the ISO's tariff, in accordance with the
October 31 Order.
The ISO states that this filing has been served on all entities
that are on the official service list for these dockets.
Comment Date: January 2, 2002.
2. New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
[Docket Nos. ER00-3591-015, ER00-1969-017, ER00-3038-008, ER02-2081-
002and EL00-70-009]
Take notice that on December 2, 2002, the New York Independent
System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) tendered for filing a compliance filing
in accordance with the Commission's October 31, 2002, order in the
above-captioned proceedings.
The NYISO has served a copy of this filing upon all parties
designated on the official service lists compiled by the Secretary in
these proceedings.
Comment Date: December 23, 2002.
3. Southern California Edison Company
[Docket No. ER03-247-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Southern California Edison
Company (SCE) tendered for filing a three-party letter agreement
between SCE, Pure Power Energy Company, LLC (Pure Power Energy), and
Wintec Energy, Ltd. (Wintec).
The purpose of the letter agreement is for SCE, Pure Power Energy
and Wintec to agree upon a short-term arrangement pursuant to which SCE
will engineer, design, and install additional protection equipment
necessary to interconnect the demonstration project at SCE's Buckwind
Substation; and for SCE to provide short-term, temporary
interconnection service via the existing interconnection facilities at
Buckwind Substation. SCE respectfully requests that the letter
agreement become effective on November 29, 2002.
Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California, Pure Power Energy, and Wintec.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
4. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[Docket No. ER03-248-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (PG&E) tendered for filing a revised Appendix B to service
agreement no. 42 for Network Integration Transmission Service (NITS)
and an agreement for installation or allocation of special facilities,
both between PG&E and the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
(BART).
The revised NITS Appendix B reflects changes due to the BART-San
Francisco International Airport Extension Project. The SFA permits PG&E
to recover the ongoing costs associated with owning, operating and
maintaining certain special facilities required by BART for
interconnection with PG&E's system. As detailed in the special
facilities agreement, PG&E proposes to charge BART an equivalent one-
time payment cost of ownership charge equal to the rates for
transmission-level, customer-financed facilities in PG&E's currently
effective electric rule 2, as filed with the California Public
Utilities Commission (CPUC). PG&E's currently effective rate of 0.31%
for transmission-level, customer-financed special facilities is
[[Page 77250]]
contained in the CPUC's advice letter 1960-G/1587-E, effective August
5, 1996, a copy of which is included as attachment 3 of this filing.
PG&E has requested certain waivers. Copies of this filing have been
served upon BART, the California Public Utilities Commission and the
California Independent System Operator Corporation.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
5. Illinois Power Company
[Docket No. ER03-249-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Illinois Power Company
(Illinois Power), filed an interconnection and operating agreement
entered into with Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLC and subject to
Illinois Power's open access transmission tariff.
Illinois Power requests an effective date of November 17, 2002, for
the agreement and seeks a waiver of the Commission's notice
requirement. Illinois Power has served a copy of the filing on Franklin
County Power of Illinois, LLC.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
6. Northern Indiana Public Service Company
[Docket No. ER03-250-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Northern Indiana Public
Service Company (Northern Indiana) filed a service agreement for
network integration transmission service, a network operating
agreement, and an electric distribution service agreement with the
Indiana Municipal Power Agency (IMPA).
Northern Indiana has requested an effective date of February 1,
2003. Copies of this filing have been sent to IMPA, the Indiana Utility
Regulatory Commission, and the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer
Counselor.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
7. CinCap IX, LLC.
[Docket No. ER03-251-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Cincap IX, LLC tendered for
filing a notice of cancellation, pursuant to 18 CFR 35.15, giving
notice of cancellation of its market-based electric tariff filed with
the Commission.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
8. Tampa Electric Company.
[Docket No. ER03-252-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, Tampa Electric Company (Tampa
Electric) tendered for filing notices of cancellation of a power sales
agreement with Hardee Power Partners Limited (HPP) and two related
transmission service agreements with HPP under Tampa Electric's open
access transmission tariff. Tampa Electric proposes that the
cancellations be made effective on January 1, 2003.
Copies of the filing have been served on HPP and the Florida Public
Service Commission.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
9. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
[Docket No. ER03-254-000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2002, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
(PJM), submitted for filing amendments to the amended and restated PJM
operating agreement (operating agreement) to amend the ``Membership
Requirements'' provisions (1) to delete the requirement that the
additional member agreements executed by new members of PJM be filed
with the FERC; and (2) to permit entities to become members of PJM
effective as of the date the supplemental membership agreements are
countersigned by the president of PJM rather than the date specified by
the Commission. A new schedule 12 also is added to the operating
agreement listing all current of PJM members.
Pursuant to section 35.15 of the Commission's regulations, 18 CFR
35.15, and sections 4.1(C) and 18.18.2 of the operating agreement, PJM
also submits for filing notice that several entities have withdrawn
their memberships in PJM and a notice of cancellations for the
additional member agreements that have FERC rate schedule designations
and are being cancelled due to the PJM member withdrawals.
Copies of this filing were served upon all PJM members and each
state electric utility regulatory commission in the PJM region.
Comment Date: December 27, 2002.
10. Midwest Energy, Inc.
[Docket No. ES03-15-000]
Take notice that on December 3, 2002, Midwest Energy, Inc.
submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power
Act seeking authorization to incur up to and including $37,714,286 of
debt and requesting an exemption from the Commission's competitive
bidding requirements in order to purchase certain regulated electric
transmission and distribution systems from Westar Energy, Inc.
Comment Date: January 2, 2003.
11. ISO New England Inc.
[Docket No. OA97-237-000]
Take notice that on December 5, 2002, ISO New England Inc. tendered
for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission)
its ``Quarterly Report for Regulators,'' as required by New England
Power Pool Market rules and procedures 17, for the fourth quarter.
Comment Date: December 26, 2002
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to be hear or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of practice
and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to
intervene. All such motions or protests should be filed on or before
the comment date, and, to the extent applicable, must be served on the
applicant and on any other person designated on the official service
list. This filing is available for review at the Commission or may be
viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``FERRIS'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number filed to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866)208-3676, or for TTY,
contact (202)502-8659. Protests and interventions may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-31636 Filed 12-16-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P