[Federal Register: May 28, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 102)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31611-31615]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28my03-9]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
[FRL-7490-6]
Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Authority for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal
Sites Not Operated After July 9, 1981: State of New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 31612]]
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services' (NHDES) request for partial rule
substitution for inactive waste disposal sites pursuant to section
112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This action will be effective July 28, 2003, unless EPA receives
relevant adverse comments by June 27, 2003. If EPA receives such
comments, then it will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect. The incorporation by reference of certain publications in this
rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 28,
2003.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed concurrently to the
addresses below: Steven Rapp, Chief, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor
Programs Unit (CAP), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA 02114 and Philip J.
O'Brien, Ph.D., Director, Waste Management Division, New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services, 6 Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95,
Concord, NH 03302-0095. Copies of the requests for approval are
available for public inspection at EPA's Region I Office, Air Permits,
Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, during normal business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics,
and Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. EPA Region I, One Congress St., Suite
1100 (CAP), Boston, MA 02114, (617) 918-1653, mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION is organized as follows:
I. Background and Purpose
II. What Requirements Must a State Rule Meet To Substitute for a
Section 112 Rule?
III. Why is NH DES Seeking Partial Rule Substitution?
IV. When Did the Authority To Implement and Enforce Section 112
Standards Become Effective in New Hampshire?
V. Opportunities for Public Comments
VI. Summary of EPA's Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) first promulgated
standards to regulate asbestos emissions on April 6, 1973 (see 38 FR
8826), and added requirements for the control of asbestos emissions at
inactive waste disposal sites on October 14, 1975 (see 40 FR 48299).
These standards have since been amended several times and re-codified
in 40 CFR part 61, subpart M, ``National Emission Standard for
Asbestos'' (Asbestos NESHAP). On June 28, 2002, NH DES submitted a
partial rule substitution request to implement and enforce its
regulation entitled ``Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal Sites
Not Operated After July 9, 1981'' in lieu of some sections of the
Asbestos NESHAP rule as they apply to certain inactive waste disposal
sites. NH DES's request for approval was submitted pursuant to the
provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart E and was found to be complete on
July 30, 2002.
II. What Requirements Must a State Rule Meet To Substitute for a
Section 112 Rule?
Under CAA section 112(l), EPA may approve State or local rules or
programs to be implemented and enforced in place of certain otherwise
applicable Federal rules, emissions standards, or requirements, when
the State or local rules are determined to be no less stringent than
the corresponding Federal rules or requirements. The Federal
regulations governing EPA's approval of State and local rules or
programs under section 112(l) are located at 40 CFR part 63, subpart E
(see 58 FR 62262, November 26, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 55810,
September 14, 2000). Under these regulations, a State air pollution
control agency has the option to request EPA's approval to substitute a
State rule for the applicable section 112 Federal rule (National
Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)). Upon
approval, the State agency is given the authority to implement and
enforce its rule in place of the NESHAP.
Section 112(l)(5) of the Act requires that a State's NESHAP program
contain adequate authorities to assure compliance with each applicable
Federal requirement, adequate resources for implementation, and an
expeditious compliance schedule. These are also requirements for an
adequate operating permits program under 40 CFR part 70. On September
24, 2001, EPA promulgated full approval of the State's operating
permits program as administered by NH DES (see 66 FR 48806). In
addition, on May 16, 2001, EPA provided ``up-front'' approval of NH
DES's request to implement and enforce alternative requirements in the
form of title V permit terms and conditions for subpart S, ``National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper
Industry'' (Pulp and Paper MACT I), and subpart MM, ``National Emission
Standards for Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda,
Sulfite and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills'' (Pulp and Paper MACT
II) (see 66 FR 27032). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has
satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the
previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria
for any subsequent submittals. NH DES has affirmed that it still meets
the up-front approval criteria.
Additionally, the ``rule substitution'' option requires EPA to
``make a detailed and thorough evaluation of the State's submittal to
ensure that it meets the stringency and other requirements'' of 40 CFR
63.93 (see 58 FR 62274). A rule will be approved if EPA finds: (1) The
State or local rules are `no less stringent'' than the corresponding
Federal regulations, (2) the State or local government has adequate
authorities to implement and enforce the rules, and (3) the schedule
for implementation and compliance is ``no less stringent'' than the
deadlines established in the otherwise applicable Federal rule. See 40
CFR 63.93(b). After reviewing NH DES's partial rule substitution
request and equivalency demonstration for the Asbestos NESHAP as it
applies to certain inactive waste disposal sites, EPA has determined
this request meets all the requirements necessary for approval under
CAA section 112(l) and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93.
III. Why Is NH DES Seeking Partial Rule Substitution?
In New Hampshire, virtually all known inactive waste disposal sites
not operated after July 9, 1981, are concentrated in two neighboring
communities, Nashua and Hudson. Due to dumping practices by a former
asbestos manufacturing plant, over 250 sites are known to exist in
these two areas on properties that are actively in use for residential,
commercial, industrial, recreational and public purposes. The asbestos
manufacturing plant operated in Nashua, and until the late 1970's
disposed of its asbestos containing waste by delivering it to the
property owners for use as fill (i.e., in low-lying areas). The
material exists in and around schoolyards, roadways, parking lots, and
shopping centers as well as within wooded areas, along riverbanks, and
within conservation areas.
The requirements of 40 CFR 61.151, the portion of the Asbestos
NESHAP that applies to inactive waste disposal sites, were established
with traditional industrial/commercial dumpsites in mind, rather than
dumpsites spread throughout a developed and active community setting.
Consequently, certain aspects of Sec. 61.151 are not well suited for
inactive waste disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981 in New
Hampshire.
[[Page 31613]]
For example, Sec. 61.151 of the Asbestos NESHAP requires unfenced/
non-posted sites to be covered with a minimum of six inches of soil if
vegetated or a minimum of 24 inches of soil if not vegetated. If the
site is not fenced and posted, other viable capping materials can be
used but only with EPA approval pursuant to 40 CFR 61.151(c). This
means that neither asphalt nor concrete can be used as a surface
treatment without EPA approval. In these communities, asbestos waste is
currently buried beneath parking lots, driveways, and sidewalks. NHDES
is substituting performance based specifications for the ``one-size-
fits-all'' cover specifications in 40 CFR 61.151.
As another example, 40 CFR 61.151(d) requires the owner/operator of
an inactive waste disposal site to supply notice at least 45 days in
advance of excavating or disturbing any asbestos-containing waste at
the site. Due to the built-up nature of these inactive waste disposal
sites, the need to disturb asbestos on short notice is a common
occurrence and needs to be addressed. For instance, asbestos waste
often must be disturbed to replace broken water lines as well as to
repair or replace cover materials exposed due to storm water runoff.
NHDES's proposed substitute rules reduce the length of the notice
period but also require all persons who disturb asbestos waste to be
qualified and to employ specific safe work practices and engineering
controls.
In addition, the general provisions of 40 CFR part 61, subpart A
generally apply to new stationary sources that are not yet constructed
or to existing stationary sources that are actively operating. Inactive
waste disposal sites are already constructed and are no longer
operating or allowed to emit pollutants. Therefore, NHDES is proposing
to substitute general requirements that are more relevant to inactive
waste disposal sites. For example, the alternative rules address site
monitoring, maintenance, and reporting requirements in a manner
appropriate to closed nonoperating sources that by their nature cannot
be constructed or modified to increase their emissions.
NH DES is seeking partial rule substitution because its alternative
rules apply only to a subset of the inactive waste disposal sites
subject to 40 CFR 61.151, namely those inactive waste disposal sites
not operating after July 9, 1981.
IV. When Did the Authority To Implement and Enforce Section 112
Standards Become Effective in New Hampshire?
On October 2, 1996, EPA approved New Hampshire's program under
section 112(l)(5) and 40 CFR 63.91 for receiving delegation of section
112 standards that are unchanged from Federal standards as promulgated.
This delegation mechanism only applied to part 70 sources (see 61 FR
51370). On May 9, 2002, the NH DES submitted a request to EPA to
receive straight delegation of authority to implement and enforce
NESHAPs and New Source Performance Standards (NSPSs) for both major and
area sources under a new delegation mechanism. NH DES sought to take
delegation of these standards by incorporating the standards into NH
DES's regulations. On September 19, 2002, EPA approved this delegation
mechanism (see 67 FR 59001). Among other standards, NH DES incorporated
by reference the Asbestos NESHAP, with the exception of 40 CFR 61.151,
standard for inactive waste disposal sites for asbestos mills and
manufacturing and fabricating operations.
NH DES did not request straight delegation of Sec. 61.151 because
it had submitted a partial rule substitution pursuant to 40 CFR 63.93
for a portion of that rule. NH DES's request for rule substitution
applies only to those inactive waste disposal sites not operating after
July 9, 1981 which are subject to 40 CFR 61.151 (i.e., sites operated
by certain asbestos mills, manufacturers, and fabricating facilities).
NH DES's request seeks no change in delegation relative to inactive
asbestos waste disposal sites operating after July 9, 1981 (i.e., NH
DES will continue to regulate such facilities according to Sec. 61.151
standards).
V. Opportunities for Public Comments
EPA views the approval of NH DES's request to use its regulation
for inactive waste disposal sites as a partial rule substitute for
applicable requirements in the Asbestos NESHAP as a noncontroversial
action since the State program is in operation and is no less stringent
than the Asbestos NESHAP. EPA anticipates no adverse comments.
Therefore, EPA is publishing this direct final rule without prior
proposal. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal for this action should relevant adverse comments
be filed. This action will be effective July 28, 2003, without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comments by June 27, 2003.
If EPA receives such comments, then it will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. All public comments received
will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule. Any
parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such
comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be
effective July 28, 2003, and no further action will be taken on the
proposed rule.
VI. Summary of EPA's Action
After reviewing the request for approval of the NH DES's
Administrative Rules for Management and Control of Asbestos Disposal
Sites not operated after July 9, 1981, EPA has determined that this
request meets all of the requirements necessary to qualify for partial
rule substitution approval under CAA section 112(l) and 40 CFR 63.91
and 63.93. EPA has determined that NH DES's asbestos rule is equivalent
to or not less stringent than the Federal Asbestos NESHAP. Therefore,
EPA hereby approves NH DES's rule to be used in place of the Federal
Asbestos NESHAP, as it applies to those inactive waste disposal sites
not operating after July 9, 1981, that are subject to 40 CFR 61.151. As
of the effective date of this action, NH DES's asbestos rule is
enforceable by the EPA and citizens under the CAA. Although NH DES has
primary implementation and enforcement responsibility, EPA retains the
right, pursuant to CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable
emission standard or requirement under CAA section 112.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review.'' This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled,
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks,'' because it is not an ``economically significant'' action under
Executive Order 12866.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
[[Page 31614]]
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C.
601 et. seq. generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit
enterprises, and small governmental entities with jurisdiction over
populations of less than 50,000. This final rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because
approvals under 40 CFR 63.93 do not create any new requirements, but
simply allows the State to implement and enforce equivalent
requirements in place of the Federal requirements that EPA is already
imposing. Therefore, because this approval does not create any new
requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate,
or to the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205,
EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent
with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a
plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or to the private sector.
This Federal action allows New Hampshire to implement equivalent
alternative requirements to replace pre-existing requirements under
Federal law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the
private sector, result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action simply allows New
Hampshire to implement equivalent alternative requirements to replace a
Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.''
This final rule does not have tribal implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
This Federal action allows the State of New Hampshire to implement an
equivalent regulation to replace pre-existing requirements under
Federal law and does not have tribal implications. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under
Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does
not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning
[[Page 31615]]
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C.
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This
action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA did not
consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 28, 2003. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section
112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412.
Dated: April 15, 2003.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are amended as follows:
PART 61--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. Section 61.04 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 61.04 Address.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Inactive waste disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981
within the State of New Hampshire must comply with the New Hampshire
Regulations Applicable To Hazardous Air Pollutants, March 2003. The
Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may
obtain a copy from the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
U.S. EPA, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC. You may examine this material at the above EPA office or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite
700, Washington, DC.
* * * * *
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
4. Section 63.14 is amended by adding paragraph (d)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.14 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air
Pollutants, March, 2003. Incorporation by Reference approved for Sec.
63.99(a)(29)(iii) of subpart E of this part.
* * * * *
Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal
Authorities
0
5. Section 63.99 is amended by adding paragraphs (a)(29)(iii) to read
as follows:
Sec. 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(29) New Hampshire.
(i) * * *
(ii) * * *
(iii) Affected inactive waste disposal sites not operated after
July 9, 1981 must comply with the New Hampshire Regulations Applicable
to Hazardous Air Pollutants, March, 2003, (incorporated by reference as
specified in Sec. 63.14) as described as follows:
(A) The material incorporated in the New Hampshire Regulations
Applicable to Hazardous Air Pollutants, March, 2003, (incorporated by
reference as specified in Sec. 63.14) pertains to inactive waste
disposal sites not operated after July 9, 1981 in the State of New
Hampshire's jurisdiction, and has been approved under the procedures in
40 CFR 63.93 to be implemented and enforced in place of the Federal
NESHAPs for Inactive Waste Disposal Sites (40 CFR 61.151).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 03-13174 Filed 5-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P