[Federal Register: August 15, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 158)]
[Notices]
[Page 48890-48891]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15au03-50]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Draft Environmental Impact Statement--Supplement 1.0 for Lower
Mud River at Milton, West Virginia, Milton Local Protection Project
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), Huntington District has prepared this Limited Reevaluation
Report and Environmental Impact Statement--Supplement 1.0 (LRR/SEIS) in
response to Section 580 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
(WRDA) which authorizes the USACE to ``* * * conduct a limited
reevaluation of the watershed plan and environmental impact statement
prepared for the Lower Mud River, Milton, W.V., by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, pursuant to the Watershed Protection
and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) and may carry out the
project,'' and Section 340 of the WRDA of 2000, which reads: ``Modifies
Lower Mud River project at Milton authority (Section 580 of WRDA of
1996) to direct the COE to construct the project as selected in the COE
reevaluation report.'' This report focuses on providing flood
protection for the City of Milton, Cabell County, WV against flooding
such as occurred in December 1978, March 1997, and February 2003. In
accordance with the requirements of NEPA, the potential impacts to the
natural, physical, and human environment associated with proposed flood
damage reduction measures for the City of Milton (Milton Local
Protection Project) are evaluated.
The flood of record for the City of Milton occurred in March 1997.
The flood had an estimated return frequency of 3.7% chance (27-year)
flood event, causing over $23 million dollars in damage (1997 price
level). The need for local flood protection at Milton is well
documented as flooding has played a significant role in the town's
history. Milton lies approximately 19 miles upstream from the
confluence of the Mud River with the Guyandotte River. Within the town,
approximately 736 structures (both residential and nonresidential)
stand within the 100-year floodplain and potential annual damages for
this reach of the Mud River are estimated to be $3.58 million (2003
dollars).
In addition to evaluating the flood damage reduction measures for
Milton and the surrounding area, the natural resources that will be
impacted by these measures have been examined. Potential significant
impacts from the final levee alternatives include those to aesthetics,
aquatic and terrestrial resources, and socioeconomic resources. Social
impacts associated with construction of a project include principally
traffic and noise impacts, economic gains and losses, impacts to
community cohesion due to acquisition of residences and businesses to
construct a project, and aesthetic impacts from the visual prominence
of the levee in the community. The document includes a detailed
description of the existing
[[Page 48891]]
environment and describes impacts anticipated from the final flood
damage reduction alternatives considered, including the no action
alternative.
DATES: Comments should be submitted by September 30, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by letter to: Mr. S. Michael Worley, Chief,
Planning Branch, Planning Programs and Project Management Division,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, 502 Eighth Street,
Huntington, WV 25701-2070; FAX: 304-529-5136; or e-mail:
Michaelw@Lrh.usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
proposed project, contact Mr. Louis Aspey, Project Manager, PM-P, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, 502 Eighth Street,
Huntington, WV, 25701-2070, telephone: 304-528-7446, or e-mail:
Louisa@Lrh.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background
Under authority of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention
Act (Pub. L. 83-566), the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS), formerly Soil Conservation Service, began an investigation of
land and water resource problems, including flooding, in the Lower Mud
River watershed in 1972. This early investigation culminated with
completion of the Lower Mud River Watershed Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement in May 1993, in which a channel modification project
of the Mud River in the vicinity of Milton was recommended. Section 580
of WRDA 1996 and Section 340 of WRDA 2000 provided the USACE authority
to re-evaluate that study and construct a project.
A notice of intent to prepare a SEIS was published in the Federal
Register on August 14, 2002 (67 FR 52959). The USACE invited full
public participation to promote open communication and better decision-
making. Persons and organizations interested in the Mud River flooding
problems as they affect the community of Milton, WV and the affected
environment were urged to participate in this public environmental
analysis process. To keep the Milton community informed throughout the
study process, a citizen's action group consisting of community members
in the vicinity of Milton was formed and the first meeting held in
November 2002, with the USACE as an invited guest. They have continued
meeting on the fourth Thursday of each month at 9:30 a.m. in the Milton
City Hall. Members include the City Council, West Virginia Conservation
Agency, Cabell County Floodplain Coordinator, and concerned citizens.
Meetings are informal and open to the public. Assistance will continue
to be provided upon request to anyone having difficulty with learning
how to participate.
As stated in the notice of intent, public comments are welcomed
anytime throughout the NEPA process. Formal opportunities for public
participation include: (1) Public meetings held near the community of
Milton; (2) Anytime during the NEPA process via mail, telephone or e-
mail; (3) During review and comment on the draft LRR/SEIS--
approximately August 11 through September 30, 2003; and (4) Review of
the final LRR/SEIS--winter 2003-2004. Schedules and locations for
public meetings will be announced in local news media. Interested
parties may also request to be included on the mailing list for public
distribution of meeting announcements and documents.
To ensure that all issues related to the proposed project are
addressed, the USACE has conducted an open process to define the scope
of the LRR/SEIS. Recommendations from interested agencies, local and
regional stakeholders and the general public were encouraged to provide
input in identifying areas of concern, issues and impacts to be
addressed in the LRR/SEIS, and the alternatives that would be analyzed.
2. Alternatives Considered
Detailed project studies have included consideration of a number of
local flood damage reduction alternatives including tributary
impoundments, floodwall/levee combinations, channel modification and
various nonstructural measures. As part of the study, various
alternatives considered were found effective for protecting Milton from
flooding, including a floodwall, levees, floodproofing, and floodplain
evacuation options. More detailed evaluations determined that none of
the alternatives were economically feasible except a protective levee
on the north bank of the Mud River (Plan B) and a protective levee with
relocation of a segment of the Mud River channel (Plan D). These two
alternatives along with the No Action alternative have been evaluated
in detail and the results documented in the LRR/SEIS.
The primary planning objective was to develop the most economically
feasible plan and the most environmentally acceptable plan to reduce
flood damages at Milton. Plan B provides a high level of protection,
but includes modification to the Mud River channel. Plan B has the
greatest net benefits and is the National Economic Development (NED)
plan. Plan D provides a lower level of protection, to approximately
that of the 1997 flood; however, the project first cost is about 30
percent less than Plan B. Although Plan D affects several businesses
and residences, the impacts on the natural environment are minor;
therefore it is the environmentally preferred plan. Because Plan B
provides the highest level of flood protection, has the greatest net
benefits, and all significant environmental impacts can be mitigated by
special project features, Plan B is the selected plan.
3. Availability of the Draft LRR/SEIS
USACE has distributed copies of the draft LRR/SEIS to appropriate
Members of Congress, State and local government official in West
Virginia, Federal agencies, and other interested parties. Copies of the
document may be obtained by contacting USACE Huntington District Office
of the Corps of Engineers at 304-529-5712. Comments pertaining to the
documents should be sent to the address above. Copies of the draft LRR/
SEIS are also available for inspection at the locations identified
below:
(1) Cabell County Library, 455 Ninth Street Plaza, Huntington, WV
25701.
(2) Milton Public Library, 11401 Smith Street, Milton, WV 25541.
(3) Barboursville Public Library, 728 Main Street, Barboursville,
WV 25504.
(4) http://www.lrh.usace.army.mil/.
After the public comment period ends (see DATES), USACE will
consider all comments received, revise the draft SEIS as appropriate,
and issue a final LRR/SEIS.
Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 03-20912 Filed 8-14-03; 8:45 am]