[Federal Register: August 28, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 167)]
[Notices]
[Page 51777-51780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28au03-47]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7550-7]
Applicability of the Safe Drinking Water Act to Submetered
Properties
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking public
comment on revising the current policy regarding regulatory
requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of submetered
properties. The draft revised policy is shown in the Supplementary
Information section below, in the memorandum form it would take if the
policy is made final. Under SDWA section 1411, the national primary
drinking water regulations apply to public water systems (PWS) that
have their own water source, treat, or ``sell'' water. EPA staff and
program managers have previously issued memoranda stating that any
building or property owner who meets the definition of a PWS and
receives water from a regulated public water system, but bills tenants
separately for this water, is ``selling'' the water and therefore is
independently subject to SDWA's drinking water requirements. As a way
to promote full cost and conservation pricing to achieve water
conservation, the EPA now proposes to change its interpretation of
section 1411 as it applies to a limited aspect of
[[Page 51778]]
submetering and direct billing of residential tenants. EPA believes
this change in interpretation would not adversely affect public health
protection for consumers served by these submetered systems.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 27, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail to: Water Docket,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 4101T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. OW-2003-0065.
Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed instructions as provided in section
I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information please contact
Ronald Bergman at bergman.ronald@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Draft Revised Policy
If the revised policy is made final, the following statement will
be announced by EPA Assistant Administrator for Water, G. Tracy Mehan
III, to the Regional Administrators
Draft Memorandum
From: G. Tracy Mehan, III, Assistant Administrator, Office of Water
To: Regional Administrators Regions I-X
Subject: Applicability of the Safe Drinking Water Act to Submetered
Properties
Water conservation is an integral part of watershed protection,
particularly in arid and drought-stricken areas. In recent speeches, I
have called for full cost and conservation pricing to achieve water
conservation. The use of water meters by which to measure consumption
is a necessary prerequisite to using these price mechanisms. For those
15% of Americans who live in apartments, submeters are needed if their
water consumption is to be linked to prices. Throughout the country,
submetering of apartment buildings has been found to be an effective
but little-used tool to support water conservation.
Some owners of multifamily housing, however, have expressed concern
that, under EPA's current policy, the installation of submeters
subjects them to the full regulatory requirements of the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA). In 1996, Congress also expressed concern about EPA's
policy in this specific situation, and, in response, EPA agreed to
reconsider the matter and issue further guidance.\1\ This memorandum
represents the promised further guidance on this issue and sets out a
revised policy with respect to residential properties such as apartment
buildings that submeter for water.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ H. Rep. 104-632 (104th Cong., 2d Sess.) at 55 and 134
(1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the revised policy, a property owner who had not previously
been (or would not be) subject to SDWA national primary drinking water
regulations through SDWA section 1411, and who installs submeters to
accurately track usage of water by tenants on his or her property, will
not then be subject to SDWA regulations solely as a result of taking
the action to submeter and bill. The water being provided would already
meet drinking water standards because the water would be coming from a
regulated public water system.
Background
Section 1401 of SDWA defines a public water system (PWS) as a
system that provides water through pipes or other constructed
conveyances to the public for human consumption, if the system has at
least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 people.
Under SDWA section 1411, the SDWA national primary drinking water
regulations apply to PWSs that have their own water source, treat, or
``sell'' water. EPA staff and program managers have issued several
memoranda stating that any building or property owner who meets the
definition of a PWS and receives water from a regulated public water
system without adding further treatment, but bills tenants separately
for this water, is ``selling'' the water and therefore is independently
subject to SDWA's drinking water requirements. Today's memorandum
reflects a change in EPA's interpretation of section 1411 as it applies
in the specific context of submetering and direct billing of tenants.
The EPA memoranda referenced above were based on a single statement
in the 1974 legislative history for the SDWA in which Congress
explained its intent in enacting section 1411. In that legislative
history, the Committee report states that it ``intends to exempt
businesses which merely store and distribute water provided by others,
unless that business sells water as a separate item or bills separately
for water it provides.''\2\ Under EPA's interpretation to date, an
apartment building or similar residential property that is exempt under
section 1411 but that merely installs a submeter and bills the tenants
for the water, or simply begins billing tenants (even without a
submeter), would become a fully regulated public water system, even
though there had been no other change relevant to the delivery or
potential health concerns associated with the water. This application
of the legislative history has been cited as a discouragement to
submetering and, as a result, to water conservation measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ H. Rep. 93-1185 (93rd Cong., 2nd Session), reprinted in A
Legislative History of the Safe Drinking Water Act, Committee Print
Serial 97-9 (1982) at 549.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After further review, we no longer believe that Congress intended
the legislative history to be applied in this manner for the following
reasons:
[sbull] The legislative history from 1974 does not specifically
address the submetering of apartment buildings for water conservation
purposes. Rather, the legislative history was one Committee's attempt
to explain broadly what the term ``selling'' water in section 1411
might mean. The statute itself does not define the term ``selling'' or
suggest an interpretation that any billing of water would automatically
trigger full SDWA regulation.
[sbull] A Congressional committee expressed its concern that this
application of SDWA might discourage the practice of submetering, as
owners of a multifamily housing property (e.g., apartment buildings
and/or complexes, mobile home parks) would become subject to national
primary drinking water regulations if they billed separately for water.
Congress asked that EPA review its guidance on this matter to prevent
unnecessary requirements that do not further public health protection
and that might inhibit water conservation efforts.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ H . Rep. 104-632 at 55 (1996)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[sbull] EPA's approach in previous memoranda--simply applying the
concept of ``sell'' to every billing transaction--may have created a
disincentive to water conservation, which can undermine water quality
over the long term.
[sbull] Finally, it makes no sense, as a matter of statutory
interpretation, health protection, or SDWA implementation policy, to
subject an entity to the full suite of SDWA requirements simply as a
result of a decision about who sends a water bill, especially when the
water is already coming from a regulated public water system. As a
result, we no longer consider that the blanket approach to defining
``sell'' as meaning any type of billing in any circumstance is
appropriate.
[[Page 51779]]
Revised Policy
Consistent with Congressional requests to reconsider this matter,
we now believe that, if a property owner, who had not previously been
(or would not be) subject to PWS national primary drinking water
regulations, installs submeters to accurately track usage of water by
residential tenants on his or her property, that owner should not then
be subject to regulations solely as a result of taking the action to
submeter and bill. Likewise, a property owner who does not submeter,
but charges tenants for water based on a ratio utility billing or other
apportioning system, would also remain exempt from full SDWA
requirements.
The addition of a submeter, or direct billing, should not in any
way change the public health protections provided to water consumers on
the property, as they are still subject to plumbing codes and provided
water from a PWS that is fully regulated by SDWA. The PWS providing
water to the property is still responsible for providing public
notification under 40 CFR 141.201(c) (or approved State equivalent) to
consumers and making ``good faith'' efforts to provide the tenants with
the annual Consumer Confidence Reports under 40 CFR 141.155(b). A
submetered property would still be considered a PWS under SDWA section
1401, hence States and EPA would retain the ability to take corrective
action under SDWA's emergency powers authority (section 1431) if public
health risks arise.
Although EPA is not requiring that submetered systems be tracked,
each State has flexibility to determine whether, and how, to best track
multifamily residential properties that submeter. For example, in
Alabama, the State defines a submetered property as a ``segmented
public water system'' and requires that it have access to a certified
operator. Texas requires that submetered properties allow access to the
property by the public water system providing water, register with the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and follow regulations for
submetering. Other States may place submetered properties under the
jurisdiction of public utility commissions.
While submetering and billing for water usage may positively induce
water conservation actions, States may still want to take other steps
to ensure that apartment owners convert to water efficient fixtures and
appliances. For example, Texas requires that apartment buildings have
water-efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances as a condition of
approval of a submetered billing system.
This memorandum clarifies EPA's policy change and reconfirms our
strong interest in advocating water conservation. Any previous EPA
statements or policy memoranda on this issue are superceded by this
memorandum.
1. Request for Comments
While comments will be accepted on any portion of the draft revised
policy, EPA would specifically appreciate comments on the following
issues:
i. Should the parent public water system be required to have access
to submetered properties for the purposes of monitoring, inspection,
repair, etc., to assure compliance with SDWA?
ii. Are there public health risks raised by this submetering policy
that EPA has not taken into consideration?
iii. Should EPA maintain the limitation of the draft revised policy
to residential properties such as apartment buildings, or is it
appropriate to extend the SDWA exemption for submetering to other
property types?
iv. Does data exist that indicates submetering may present a
disincentive to landlords to convert to water efficient fixtures and
appliances, or could this approach impact other methods that promote
water conservation?
B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under Docket ID No. OW-2003-0065. The official public docket
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received, and other information related to this action.
Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not
include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket
is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at
the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
Water Docket is (202) 566-2426). For access to docket materials, please
call (202) 566-2426 to schedule an appointment.
2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,''
then key in the appropriate docket identification number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent
feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in
EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the
index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you
may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through
the docket facility identified in section I.B.1.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the Docket will
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph
will
[[Page 51780]]
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief
description written by the docket staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket identification number in the subject line on the
first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not
required to consider these late comments. However, late comments may be
considered if time permits.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket
, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. To
access EPA's electronic public docket from the EPA Internet Home Page,
select ``Information Sources,'' ``Dockets,'' and ``EPA Dockets.'' Once
in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in Docket ID No. OW-
2003-0065. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to OW-
Docket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID No. OW-2003-0065. In contrast to
EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an
``anonymous access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to
the Docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's
e-mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in section I.C.2. These
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
2. By Mail. Send three copies of your comments to: Water Docket,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 4101T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. OW-2003-0065.
3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to:
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West,
Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Attention Water
Docket ID No. OW-2003-0065. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Docket's normal hours of operation as identified in section I.B.1.
D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide any technical information and/or data you used that support
your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you arrived
at your estimate.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternatives.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
8. To insure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket
identification number in the subject line on the first page of your
response. It would also be helpful if you provided the name, date, and
Federal Register citation related to your comments.
Dated: August 22, 2003.
G. Tracy Mehan III,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 03-22053 Filed 8-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P