[Federal Register: October 27, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 61241]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27oc03-113]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Commercial Space Transportation; Suborbital Rocket Launch
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains two corrections to a notice and request
for comments that was published in the Federal Register on Monday,
October 20, 2003 (68 FR 5997). Federal Register Document 03-26373,
published October 20, 2003 (68 FR 59977), clarifies the applicability
of FAA licensing requirements to suborbital rocket launches, in
general, and suborbital RLVs, in particular, so that a vehicle operator
can determine, in advance of consultation with the FAA, whether it must
obtain a launch license. This correction revises a paragraph addressing
a suborbital trajectory. This action also corrects footnote 2, by
adding the full FAA Docket number.
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Commercial
Space Transportation; Suborbital Rocket Launch, as published in the
Federal Register on Monday, October 20, 2003 (68 FR 59977), (FR Doc.
03-26373) is corrected as follows:
1. On page 59979, Column 3, the third full paragraph beginning,
``The FAA rulemaking regarding RLV * * *'' is corrected to read as
follows:
The FAA rulemaking regarding RLV missions, concluded in 2000,
addressed ``suborbital trajectory'' in the context of RLVs. The FAA
regards a suborbital trajectory as the intentional flight path of a
launch vehicle, reentry vehicle, or any portion thereof, whose vacuum
instantaneous impact point (IIP) does not leave the surface of the
Earth. The IIP of a launch vehicle is the projected impact point on
Earth where the vehicle would land if its engines stop or where vehicle
debris, in the event of failure and break-up, would land. The notion of
a ``vacuum'' IIP reflects the absence of atmospheric effects in
performing the IIP calculation. If the vacuum IIP never leaves the
Earth's surface, the vehicle would not achieve Earth orbit and would
therefore be on a suborbital trajectory.
2. On page 59980, column 2, footnote 2, Docket No. FAA-2000, is
corrected to read Docket No. FAA-2000-7953.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2003.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulation.
[FR Doc. 03-27023 Filed 10-22-03; 1:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P