[Federal Register: November 17, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 64895-64898]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no03-94]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7585-9]
Proposed Reissuance of the NPDES General Permit for the
Territorial Seas of Texas (TXG260000)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed NPDES general permit reissuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Regional Administrator of EPA Region 6 today proposes to
issue the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
general permit for the Territorial Seas of Texas (No. TXG260000) for
discharges from existing and new dischargers and New Sources in the
Offshore Subcategory of the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source
Category as authorized by section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The
permit will supercede the previous general permit (TX0085651) issued on
September 15, 1983 and published in the Federal Register at 48 FR
41494. That permit authorized discharges from exploration, development,
and production facilities located in and discharging to the territorial
seas off Texas. Through this reissuance, EPA proposes to include
current technology and water quality based effluent limitations
consistent with National Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Federal Ocean
Discharge Criteria, and State Water Quality Standards.
[[Page 64896]]
DATES: Comments must be received by January 16, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Director, Water Quality
Protection Division, Region 6, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted via e-mail to the following address: smith.diane@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Diane Smith, Region 6, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733. Telephone: (214) 665-7191.
A complete draft permit and/or a fact sheet more fully explaining
the proposal may be obtained from Ms. Smith. In addition, the Agency's
current administrative record on the proposal is available for
examination at the Region's Dallas offices during normal working hours
after providing Ms. Smith 24 hours advance notice. Additionally, a copy
of the proposed permit, fact sheet, and this Federal Register notice
may be obtained on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6wq/6wq.htm
.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated entities. EPA intends to use the proposed reissued permit
to regulate oil and gas extraction facilities located in the
territorial seas off Texas. These generally include oil and gas
platforms, but other types of facilities such as drill ships may also
be subject to the permit. To determine whether your (facility, company,
business, organization, etc.) may be affected by today's action, you
should carefully examine the applicability criteria in Part I, Section
A.1 of the draft permit. Questions on the permit's application to
specific facilities may also be directed to Ms. Smith at the telephone
number or address listed above.
Permit Summary. The permit contains limitations conforming to EPA's
Oil and Gas extraction, Offshore Subcategory Effluent Limitations
Guidelines at 40 CFR part 435 and additional requirements assuring that
regulated discharges will cause no unreasonable degradation of the
marine environment, as required by section 403(c) of the Clean Water
Act. Limitations and conditions are also included to ensure compliance
with State Water Quality Standards. Specific information on the
derivation of those limitations and conditions is contained in the fact
sheet.
Specifically, the draft permit proposes to prohibit the discharge
of drilling fluids, drill cuttings and produced sand. Produced water
discharges are limited for oil and grease, 48-hour acute toxicity, and
24-hour acute end-of-pipe toxicity. In addition to limits on oil and
grease, the proposed permit includes a prohibition of the discharge of
priority pollutants except in trace amounts in well treatment,
completion, and workover fluids. A limit of ``No Free Oil'' is proposed
for miscellaneous discharges, such as non-contact cooling water and
ballast water, and on deck drainage discharges. Discharges of seawater
and freshwater which have been used to pressure test existing pipelines
and piping, to which treatment chemicals have been added, are also
proposed to be authorized. Those seawater and freshwater discharges are
proposed to be subject to limitations on free oil, concentration of
treatment chemicals, and acute toxicity.
Other Legal Requirements
Oil Spill Requirements. Section 311 of the CWA, ``the Act'',
prohibits the discharge of oil and hazardous materials in harmful
quantities. Discharges that are in compliance with NPDES permits are
excluded from the provisions of section 311. However, the permit does
not preclude the institution of legal action or relieve permittees from
any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties for other, unauthorized
discharges of oil and hazardous materials which are covered by section
311 of the Act.
Endangered Species Act. The Environmental Protection Agency has
evaluated the potential effects of issuance of this permit modification
upon listed threatened or endangered species. Based on that evaluation,
EPA has determined that authorization of the new discharges is not
likely to adversely affect any listed threatened or endangered species.
The proposal contains extensive controls to minimize the quantity and
toxicity of discharged pollutants. While including limits which will
minimize the discharge of toxic pollutants such as polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons and prohibiting the discharge of drilling fluid and drill
cuttings, the proposal additionally limits the toxicity of discharged
produced water and chemically treated seawater and freshwater. The
proposed authorization of the new discharge of chemically treated sea
water or fresh water which has been used to hydrostatically test
existing piping and existing pipelines includes controls on the amount
of treatment chemical used and toxicity of the discharge and prohibits
the discharge of free oil. Requirements proposed for both these new
discharges are consistent with Ocean Discharge Criteria (40 CFR part
125, subpart M) and ensure that sensitive marine species are protected.
Based on the available information and analysis of the discharges
described in the Fact Sheet for this proposed modification EPA Region 6
has determined that authorization of the proposed discharges is not
likely to adversely affect listed threatened or endangered species. EPA
is seeking written concurrence from the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on this
determination.
Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation. For discharges into waters of
the territorial sea, contiguous zone, or oceans CWA section 403
requires EPA to consider guidelines for determining potential
degradation of the marine environment in issuance of NPDES permits.
These Ocean Discharge Criteria (40 CFR part 125, subpart M) are
intended to ``prevent unreasonable degradation of the marine
environment and to authorize imposition of effluent limitations,
including a prohibition of discharge, if necessary, to ensure this
goal'' (45 FR 65942, October 3, 1980). Since this proposed permit will
contain significantly more stringent limits than the previous permit,
which are intended to protect water quality and reduce the discharge of
toxic pollutants to the marine environment, the Region finds that
discharges proposed to be authorized by the general permit reissuance
will not cause unreasonable degradation of the marine environment.
Coastal Zone Management Act. EPA has determined that the activities
which are proposed to be authorized by this permit are consistent with
the local and state Coastal Zone Management Plans. The proposed permit
and consistency determination will be submitted to the State of Texas
for interagency review at the time of public notice.
Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. The Marine
Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) of 1972 regulates the
dumping of all types of materials into ocean waters and establishes a
permit program for ocean dumping. In addition the MPRSA establishes the
Marine Sanctuaries Program, implemented by the National Oceanographic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which requires NOAA to designate
ocean waters as marine sanctuaries for the purpose of preserving or
restoring their conservation, recreational, ecological or aesthetic
values. Pursuant to the Marine Protection and Sanctuaries Act, the NOAA
has not designated any marine sanctuaries within the area covered under
the permit.
State Certification. Under section 401(a)(1) of the Act, EPA may
not issue an NPDES permit until the State in which the discharge will
originate grants or waives certification to ensure
[[Page 64897]]
compliance with appropriate requirements of the Act and State law.
Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the Act requires that NPDES permits contain
conditions that ensure compliance with applicable state water quality
standards or limitations. The proposed permit contains limitations
intended to ensure compliance with state water quality standards and
has been determined by EPA Region 6 to be consistent with Texas Water
Quality Standards and the corresponding implementation guidance. The
Region has solicited certification from the Texas Railroad Commission.
Executive Order 12866. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has exempted this action from the review requirements of Executive
Order 12291 pursuant to section 8(b) of that order. Guidance on
Executive Order 12866 contain the same exemptions on OMB review as
existed under Executive Order 12291. In fact, however, EPA prepared a
regulatory impact analysis in connection with its promulgation of
guidelines on which a number of the permit's provisions are based and
submitted it to OMB for review. See 58 FR 12494.
Paperwork Reduction Act. The information collection required by
this permit has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., in submission made for the NPDES permit program and
assigned OMB control numbers 2040-0086 (NPDES permit application) and
2040-0004 (discharge monitoring reports).
This reissued permit will not significantly change the reporting
and application requirements from those under the previous general
permit, which authorized discharges to the territorial seas off Texas.
Since this permit is very similar in reporting and application
requirements and in discharges which are required to be monitored as
the Western Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) general permit
(GMG290000), the paperwork burdens are expected to be nearly identical.
When it issued the OCS general permit, EPA estimated it would take an
affected facility three hours to prepare the request for coverage and
38 hours per year to prepare discharge monitoring reports. It is
estimated that the time required to prepare the request for coverage
and discharge monitoring reports for this permit will be the same.
However, the alternative to obtaining authorization to discharge
under this general permit is under an individual permit. The
application and reporting burden of obtaining authorization to
discharge under the general permit is expected to be significantly less
than under an individual permit.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq, requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for regulations that have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As indicated below, the permit
modification proposed today is not a ``rule'' subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act . EPA prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis,
however, on the promulgation of the Offshore Subcategory guidelines on
which many of the permit's effluent limitations are based. That
analysis shows that issuance of this permit modification will not have
a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law 104-4, generally requires Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their ``regulatory actions'' on
State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. UMRA uses
the term ``regulatory actions'' to refer to regulations. (See, e.g.,
UMRA section 201, ``Each agency shall * * * assess the effects of
Federal regulatory actions * * * (other than to the extent that such
regulations incorporate requirements specifically set forth in law)''
(emphasis added)). UMRA section 102 defines ``regulation'' by reference
to section 658 of title 2 of the U.S. Code, which in turn defines
``regulation'' and ``rule'' by reference to section 601(2) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). That section of the RFA defines
``rule'' as ``any rule for which the agency publishes a notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to section 553(b) of [the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA)], or any other law. * * *''
NPDES general permits are not ``rules'' under the APA and thus not
subject to the APA requirement to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking. NPDES general permits are also not subject to such a
requirement under the CWA. While EPA publishes a notice to solicit
public comment on draft general permits, it does so pursuant to the CWA
section 402(a) requirement to provide ``an opportunity for a hearing.''
Thus, NPDES general permits are not ``rules'' for RFA or UMRA purposes.
EPA has determined that the proposed permit modification would not
contain a Federal requirement that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector in any one year.
The Agency also believes that the permit would not significantly
nor uniquely affect small governments. For UMRA purposes, ``small
governments'' is defined by reference to the definition of ``small
governmental jurisdiction'' under the RFA. (See UMRA section 102(1),
referencing 2 U.S.C. 658, which references section 601(5) of the RFA.)
``Small governmental jurisdiction'' means governments of cities,
counties, towns, etc., with a population of less than 50,000, unless
the agency establishes an alternative definition.
The permit, as proposed, also would not uniquely affect small
governments because compliance with the proposed permit conditions
affects small governments in the same manner as any other entities
seeking coverage under the permit. Additionally, EPA does not expect
small governments to operate facilities authorized to discharge by this
permit.
National Environmental Policy Act. Issuance of an NPDES general
permit for oil and gas extraction in the territorial seas of Texas is a
major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment. Thus, EPA has prepared a Draft EIS to evaluate the
potential environmental consequences of its Federal (general permit)
action, pursuant to its responsibilities under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
EPA issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) on February 12, 1993, to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on new source NPDES
General Permits for the Offshore Subcategory of the Oil & Gas
Extraction Category proposed for the territorial seas of both Texas and
Louisiana. Scoping issues were considered through the NOI and other
informal procedures, including interagency meetings conducted in July,
1993. The Draft EIS was issued in January 1994, for review and comment
from interested agencies, officials, groups and individuals. EPA's
public hearing to receive comments on the Draft EIS was held on March
16, 1994. The Final EIS issued in June 1996, however, covered only
EPA's proposed general permit action for Louisiana, recognizing that a
separate Final EIS would be prepared prior to its decision on the NPDES
general permit for the territorial seas of Texas.
EPA intends to rely on its original Draft EIS (which is available
for review at the EPA Region 6 Office) in this continued NEPA review
process for the current proposal to issue the oil and gas NPDES general
permit for the territorial seas of Texas. In addition EPA will
[[Page 64898]]
undertake consultations with the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation, National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the Texas General Land Office, and the Texas Railroad
Commission. EPA invites comment on the Draft EIS, particularly on
whether there are significant new circumstances or information relevant
to environmental concerns that bear on the proposed action or its
impacts. EPA will review all comments made on the Draft EIS and draft
NPDES general permit, and, unless EPA learns of significant new
circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and
bearing on the proposed action or its impacts, EPA will issue the Final
EIS for the territorial seas of Texas, followed by a Record of Decision
and final NPDES general permit.
Miguel I. Flores,
Director, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region 6.
[FR Doc. 03-28421 Filed 11-14-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P