[Federal Register: May 21, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 99)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29238-29240]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21my04-20]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[PA213-4026; FRL-7663-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; The 2005 ROP Plan for the Pennsylvania Portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton Severe Area Severe 1-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These revisions amend
Pennsylvania's rate-of-progress (ROP) plan for 2005 for its portion of
the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment
area (the Philadelphia area). These revisions update the plan's
emission inventories and motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) to
reflect the use of MOBILE6 while continuing to satisfy the ROP
requirement for 2005. The revisions also amend the contingency measures
associated with the 2005 ROP plan. These SIP revisions are being
approved in accordance with the Clean Air Act (the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on June 21, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents relevant to this action are
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 and the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control,
P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Kotsch, (215) 814-3335, or by
e-mail at Kotsch.Martin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 16, 2004 (69 FR 12293), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) proposing approval of revisions to Pennsylvania's 2005
ROP plan for its portion of the Philadelphia area. The revisions update
the plan's mobile emissions inventories and 2005 MVEBs to reflect the
use of MOBILE6, an updated model for calculating mobile emissions of
ozone precursors. These SIP revisions were proposed under a procedure
called parallel processing, whereby EPA proposes its rulemaking action
on a SIP revision concurrently with a state's procedures for amending
its SIP. The Pennsylvania Department of the Environmental Protection
(PADEP) submitted the proposed SIP revisions to EPA on January 9, 2004
for parallel processing. On March 16, 2004 (69 FR 12293), EPA proposed
approval of Pennsylvania's January 9, 2004 submittal. No comments were
submitted to EPA on its March 16, 2004 proposal. The PADEP formally
submitted the final SIP revisions to EPA on February 23, 2004. That
final submittal had no substantive changes from the proposed version
submitted on January 9, 2004. A detailed description of Pennsylvania's
submittal and EPA's rationale for its proposed approval were presented
in NPR published on March 16, 2004, and
[[Page 29239]]
will not be restated in their entirety here.
II. Summary of the SIP Revisions
These SIP revisions amend the 1990 and 2005 motor vehicle emissions
inventories and 2005 MVEBs of Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP plan for its
portion of the Philadelphia area to reflect the use of the MOBILE6
motor vehicle emissions model. The PADEP has demonstrated that the
revised plan's levels of motor vehicle emissions, calculated using
MOBILE6, continue to demonstrate the required ROP for 2005. These
revised MOBILE6-based MVEBs in the 2005 ROP plan are identical to the
MOBILE6-based MVEBs of the 2005 attainment demonstration plan for the
Philadelphia area found adequate by EPA on May 28, 2003 (68 FR 31700).
The revised mobile inventories and MVEBs being approved for
Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP Plan are shown in tons per day (tpd) in Tables
1 and 2.
Table 1.--Motor Vehicle Emissions Inventories of Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 2005
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe 1-hour ozone -------------------------------------------------------
nonattainment VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd) VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania Portion.................................... 239.95 252.93 79.69 144.73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2.--Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP
Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 ROP plan
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe 1- ---------------------------
hour ozone nonattainment area VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pennsylvania Portion........................ 79.69 144.73
------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Final Action
EPA is taking final action to approve the SIP revisions submitted
by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on February 23, 2004. These
revisions amend the 1990 and 2005 motor vehicle emissions inventories
and 2005 MVEBs of Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP plan for the Philadelphia
area severe 1-hour ozone nonattainment area to reflect the use of
MOBILE6.
These SIP revisions were proposed under a procedure called parallel
processing, whereby EPA proposes a rulemaking action concurrently with
a state's procedures for amending its SIP. On January 9, 2004, the
PADEP submitted its proposed SIP revisions to EPA. On March 16, 2004
(69 FR 12293), EPA proposed approval of Pennsylvania's January 9, 2004
submittal. No comments were submitted to EPA on its EPA's March 16,
2004 proposal. The PADEP formally submitted the final SIP revisions to
EPA on February 23, 2004. EPA has evaluated Pennsylvania's final SIP
revisions submitted on February 23, 2004 and finds that no substantive
changes were made from the proposed SIP revisions submitted on January
9, 2004.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they
meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary
consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP
submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in
place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
[[Page 29240]]
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 20, 2004. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.
This action to approve revisions to Pennsylvania's 2005 ROP plan
for its portion of the Philadelphia area to reflect the use of MOBILE6
may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce their
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: May 10, 2004.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. Section 52.2037 is amended by revising the section heading,
redesignating the existing paragraph (i) as (i)(1) and adding paragraph
(i)(2), and revising paragraph (k) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2037 Control strategy plans for attainment and rate-of-
progress: Ozone.
* * * * *
(i)(1) * * *
(2) EPA approves revisions to the Pennsylvania State Implementation
Plan, submitted by the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of the
Environmental Protection on February 23, 2004. These revisions amend
Pennsylvania's rate-of-progress (ROP) plan for year 2005 for its
Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton 1-hour
ozone nonattainment area. These revisions update the 2005 ROP plan's
1990 and 2005 motor vehicle emissions inventories and motor vehicle
emissions budgets to reflect the use of the MOBILE6 emissions model,
and establish revised motor vehicle emissions budgets of 79.69 tons per
day (tpd) of volatile organic compounds and 144.73 tpd of nitrogen
oxides.
* * * * *
(k) EPA approves the following mobile budgets of the post-1996 rate
of progress plans and the 2005 attainment plan:
Transportation Conformity Budgets for the Philadelphia Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of adequacy determination
Type of control strategy SIP Year VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd) or SIP approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-1996 ROP Plan..................... 1999 88.6 109.6 June 23, 2000 (65 FR 36438,
June 8, 2000).
Post-1996 ROP Plan..................... 2002 69.52 93.13 June 23, 2000 (65 FR 36438,
June 8, 2000).
Post-1996 ROP Plan..................... 2005 79.69 144.73 June 21, 2004 (May 21, 2004,
Insert Federal Register page
citation).
Attainment Demonstration............... 2005 79.69 144.73 June 12, 2003 (68 FR 31700,
May 28, 2003).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) [Reserved]
(2) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 04-11339 Filed 5-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P