[Federal Register: August 31, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 168)]
[Notices]
[Page 53129-53130]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31au04-93]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FMCSA announces its denial of 51 applications from
individuals who requested an exemption from the Federal vision standard
applicable to interstate truck drivers and the reasons for the denials.
The FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision
standard if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The
agency has concluded that granting these exemptions does not provide a
level of safety that will equal or exceed the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Teresa Doggett, Office of Bus and
Truck Standards and Operations, (MC-PSD), (202) 366-4001, Department of
Transportation, FMCSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.s.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the Federal vision standard for a renewable two year period if it
finds such an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent
such an exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 51 individual exemption requests on
their merits and made a determination that these applicants do not
satisfy the criteria established to demonstrate that granting an
exemption is likely to achieve an equal or greater level of safety than
exists without the exemption. Each applicant has, prior to this notice,
received a letter of final disposition on his/her individual exemption
request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial
and constitute final agency action. The list published today summarizes
the agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by
periodically publishing names and reason for denials.
[[Page 53130]]
The following 28 applicants lacked sufficient recent driving
experience over three years:
Behrer, Ed
Boven, Scott H.
Bradford, Johnny W.
Briones, Joe C.
Cupples, Geoffrey
Dean, Joseph A.
Decker, Karl
Fix, James E.
Fogle, Stephen B.
Grey, Walter M.
Gysberg, Rocky D.
Holt, Jeffrey L.
Lovejoy, Michael J.
McDade, Matthew
Mena, Jaime E.
Miller, Odis G.
Perkins, Kenneth D.
Peters, Karl
Remsburg, III, Albert L.
Roy, Paul R.
Schmitt, James L.
Siano, Jr., Peter
Slinde, Jay A.
Smith, Wayne M.
Stanley, John W.
Thompson, Jr., Ned
Wheeler, Greg
Williams, Dennis J.
Three applicants, Mr. Cory W. C. Thaine, Mr. Edward Tripp, Jr., and
Mr. Danny R. Wood, do not have experience operating a commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) and therefore presented no evidence from which FMCSA can
conclude that granting the exemption is likely to achieve a level of
safety equal to that existing without the exemption.
The following five applicants do not have three years of experience
driving a CMV on public highways with the vision deficiency:
Fultz, Ronald K.
Hilliker, Jason D.
Jackman, Steven R.
Watkins, Sr., William A.
Worley, Billy
Three applicants, Mr. George H. Blakey, Mr. Curtis A. Boyster, and
Mr. Terry J. Edwards, do not have three years of recent experience
driving a CMV with the vision deficiency.
Two applicants, Mr. Thomas G. Carpenter and Mr. Donald L. Scoville,
meet the vision requirements of 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and do not need a
vision exemption.
One applicant, Mr. Bruce A. Homan, was charged with a moving
violation in conjunction with a CMV crash, which is a disqualifying
offense.
The following four applicants had their commercial driver's license
suspended during the three year period, in relation to a moving
violation. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension
during the three year review period.
Barnett, Jamenson L.
Bone, Stephen M.
Ross, James C.
Wise, Gregory
The following three applicants, Mr. William J. Cunningham, Mr.
Robert A. Miller, and Mr. Lasaro R. Salgado, contributed to a crash
while operating a CMV, which is a disqualifying offense.
One applicant, Mr. Ruben Duron, did not hold a license that allowed
operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for all or part of the three
year period.
One applicant, Mr. Gilbert L. Martinez, does not meet the vision
standard in the better eye.
Issued on: August 16, 2004.
Rose A. McMurray,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 04-19807 Filed 8-30-04; 8:45 am]