[Federal Register: November 1, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 210)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63336-63338]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01no04-15]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
[[Page 63336]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA 2004-19221; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-28-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-12 and
PC-12/45 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Models PC-12 and PC-12/45
airplanes. This proposed AD would require you to check the airplane
logbook to determine whether any main landing gear (MLG) actuator (part
number (P/N) 960.30.01.103) with serial numbers (SNs) 830E through 881E
is installed. If any MLG actuator with one of these SNs is installed,
you are required to replace the MLG actuator with a P/N 960.30.01.103
actuator that has a SN other than 830E through 881E. The pilot is
allowed to do the logbook check. If the pilot can positively determine
that no MLG actuator with one of these SNs is installed, no further
action is required. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority
for Switzerland. We are issuing this proposed AD to prevent failure of
the MLG actuator, which could result in loss of hydraulic extension/
retraction of the MLG. This failure could lead to loss of control
during ground operations.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by December 3,
2004.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to submit comments on this proposed
AD:
DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-001.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
To get the service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 6208; facsimile: +41 41 619 7311; e-
mail: SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com or from Pilatus Business
Aircraft Ltd., Product Support Department, 11755 Airport Way,
Broomfield, Colorado 80021; telephone: (303) 465-9099; facsimile: (303)
465-6040.
To view the comments to this proposed AD, go to http://dms.dot.gov.
This is docket number FAA 2004-19221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
How do I comment on this proposed AD? We invite you to submit any
written relevant data, views, or arguments regarding this proposal.
Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include the
docket number, ``FAA 2004-19221; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-28-AD''
at the beginning of your comments. We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function of our docket web site, anyone
can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
This is docket number FAA 2004-19221. You may review the DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov.
Are there any specific portions of this proposed AD I should pay
attention to? We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
proposed AD. If you contact us through a nonwritten communication and
that contact relates to a substantive part of this proposed AD, we will
summarize the contact and place the summary in the docket. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD in light of those comments and contacts.
Docket Information
Where can I go to view the docket information? You may view the AD
docket that contains the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person at the DMS Docket Offices between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. (eastern standard time), Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at
the street address stated in ADDRESSES. You may also view the AD docket
on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. The comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
Discussion
What events have caused this proposed AD? The Federal Office for
Civil Aviation FOCA, which is the airworthiness authority for
Switzerland, recently notified FAA that an unsafe condition may exist
on all Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Models PC-12 and PC-12/45
airplanes. The FOCA reports that some components of MLG actuators (part
number (P/N) 960.30.01.103 with serial numbers (SNs) 830E through 881E)
were incorrectly heat treated during manufacture. Components in this
condition can decrease the specified fatigue life of the actuators.
It is possible that these components could have been removed and
then
[[Page 63337]]
installed in other Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Failure of the
MLG actuator could result in loss of hydraulic extension/retraction of
the MLG. This failure could lead to loss of control during ground
operations.
Is there service information that applies to this subject? Pilatus
has issued Pilatus PC-12 Service Bulletin No. 32-017, dated August 3,
2004.
What are the provisions of this service information? The service
bulletin includes procedures for:
--Checking the airplane logbook to ensure that no MLG actuator (P/N
960.30.01.103) with SNs 830E through 881E is installed;
--Inspecting for any MLG actuator (P/N 960.30.01.103) with SN 830E
through 881E; and
--Replacing any MLG actuator with a P/N 960.30.01.103 actuator that has
a SN other than 830E through 881E.
What action did the FOCA take? The FOCA classified this service
bulletin as mandatory and issued Swiss AD Number HB 2004-330, dated
August 18, 2004, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in Switzerland.
Did the FOCA inform the United States under the bilateral
airworthiness agreement? These Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45
airplanes are manufactured in Switzerland and are type-certificated for
operation in the United States under the provisions of section 21.29 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable
bilateral airworthiness agreement.
Under this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the FOCA has kept us
informed of the situation described above.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
What has FAA decided? We have examined the FOCA's findings,
reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is
necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes of the
same type design that are registered in the United States, we are
proposing AD action to prevent failure of the MLG actuator, which could
result in loss of hydraulic extension/retraction of the MLG. This
failure could lead to damage upon landing.
What would this proposed AD require? This proposed AD would require
you to incorporate the actions in the previously-referenced service
bulletin.
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this proposed AD? On
July 10, 2002, we published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR
47997, July 22, 2002), which governs FAA's AD system. This regulation
now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight
permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material
previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is
included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD
actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many airplanes would this proposed AD impact? We estimate that
this proposed AD affects 260 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What would be the cost impact of this proposed AD on owners/
operators of the affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to
do this proposed inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane Total cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work hour x $65 per hour = Not Applicable............. $65 260 x $65 = $16,900.
$65.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement
that would be required based on the results of this proposed
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that
may need this replacement:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per
Labor cost Parts cost airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work hours x $65 per hour = $195 per MLG Not Applicable.............................. $195
actuator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilatus will provide replacement parts free of charge if any MLG
actuator with a SN 830E through 881E is returned to Pilatus. If
purchased, the cost of a new actuator is $14,000. The cost of an
overhauled actuator is $5,000.
Regulatory Findings
Would this proposed AD impact various entities? We have determined
that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Would this proposed AD involve a significant rule or regulatory
action? For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this proposed AD
and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket FAA 2004-19221; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-28-AD'' in
your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 63338]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA 2004-19221; Directorate
Identifier 2004-CE-28-AD
When Is the Last Date I Can Submit Comments on This Proposed AD?
(a) We must receive comments on this proposed airworthiness
directive (AD) by December 3, 2004.
What Other ADs Are Affected By This Action?
(b) None.
What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Models PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes, all
serial numbers, that are certificated in any category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for
Switzerland. The actions specified in this AD are intended to
prevent failure of the main landing gear (MLG) actuator, which could
result in loss of hydraulic extension/retraction of the MLG. This
failure could lead to loss of control during ground operations.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Check the airplane Within 90 days after The owner/operator
logbook to ensure that no the effective date holding at least a
main landing gear (MLG) of this AD, unless private pilot
actuator (part number (P/N) already done. certificate as
960.30.01.103) with serial authorized by
numbers (SN) 830E through section 43.7 of the
881E is installed. Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR
43.7) may do this
check.
(2) If you can positively Not Applicable...... Make an entry in the
determine that no MLG aircraft records
actuator (P/N showing compliance
960.30.01.103) with SN 830E with paragraphs
through 881E is installed, (e)(1) and (e)(2)
then no further action is of this AD per
required. section 43.9 of the
Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR
43.9).
(3) If you cannot positively Within 90 days after Follow the
determine that no MLG the effective date Accomplishment
actuator (P/N of this AD, unless Instructions--Aircr
960.30.01.103) with SN 830E already done. aft section in
through 881E is installed, Pilatus PC-12
then inspect any MLG Service Bulletin
actuator (P/N No. 32-017, dated
960.30.01.103) for SN 830E August 3, 2004.
through 881E.
(4) If any MLG actuator (P/N Before further Follow the
960.30.01.103) with SN 830E flight after the Accomplishment
through 881E is found inspection required Instructions--
during the inspection by paragraph (e)(3) Aircraft section in
required by paragraph of this AD in which Pilatus PC-12
(e)(3) of this AD, replace any actuator with Service Bulletin
the MLG actuator with a P/N SN 830E through No. 32-017, dated
960.30.01.103 actuator that 881E is found. August 3, 2004.
has a SN other than 830E
through 881E.
(5) Do not install any MLG As of the effective Not Applicable.
actuator (P/N date of this AD.
960.30.01.103) with SN 830E
through 881E.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: The FAA recommends that you send any MLG actuator (P/N
960.30.01.103) with SN 830E through 881E to Pilatus.
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, Small
Airplane Directorate, FAA. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Doug Rudolph, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(g) Swiss AD Number HB 2004-330, dated August 18, 2004, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
May I Get Copies of the Documents Referenced in This AD?
(h) To get copies of the documents referenced in this AD,
contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371
Stans, Switzerland; telephone: +41 41 619 6208; facsimile: +41 41
619 7311; e-mail: SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com or from Pilatus
Business Aircraft Ltd., Product Support Department, 11755 Airport
Way, Broomfield, Colorado 80021; telephone: (303) 465-9099;
facsimile: (303) 465-6040. To view the AD docket, go to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, Washington, DC, or on the
Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. This is docket number FAA 2004-
19221.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 25, 2004.
Scott L. Sedgwick,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-24323 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P