[Federal Register: November 8, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 215)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64695-64697]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08no04-19]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-19442; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-31-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model
GA8 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model GA8 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require you to inspect the pilot and co-pilot control
column wheels and aileron cable operating arm shafts for damage and, if
damage is found, to repair the shafts or to replace the steel shafts
with bronze shafts. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority
for Australia. We are issuing this proposed AD to detect and correct
damage of the pilot and co-pilot control wheels and aileron cable
operating arm shafts. This damage could result in the aileron controls
becoming stiff or locking, which could lead to loss of control of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by December 15,
2004.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to submit comments on this proposed
AD:
DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-001.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
To get the service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd., Latrobe Regional Airport, P.O.
Box 881, Morwell, Victoria 3840, Australia; telephone: 61 (0) 3 5172
1200; facsimile: 61 (0) 3 5172 1201.
To view the comments to this proposed AD, go to http://dms.dot.gov.
This is docket number FAA-2004-19442.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
Small Airplane Directorate, ACE-112, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: 816-329-4059; facsimile: 816-329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
How do I comment on this proposed AD? We invite you to submit any
written relevant data, views, or arguments regarding this proposal.
Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include the
docket number, ``FAA-2004-19442; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-31-AD''
at the beginning of your comments. We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function of our docket web site, anyone
can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
This is docket number FAA-2004-19442. You may review the DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov.
Are there any specific portions of this proposed AD I should pay
attention to? We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
proposed AD. If you contact us through a nonwritten communication and
that contact relates to a substantive part of this proposed AD, we will
summarize the contact and place the summary in the docket. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD in light of those comments and contacts.
Docket Information
Where can I go to view the docket information? You may view the AD
docket that contains the proposal, any comments received, and any final
disposition in person at the DMS Docket Offices between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. (eastern standard time), Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at
the street address stated in ADDRESSES. You may also view the AD docket
on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. The comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
Discussion
What events have caused this proposed AD? The Civil Aviation Safety
Authority (CASA), which is the airworthiness authority for Australia,
recently notified FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on certain
Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model GA8 airplanes. CASA reports three
occurrences of aileron control stiffness and one occurrence of aileron
control locking during taxi. Rubbing between the control wheel shaft
and the bush in the control column may cause wear or damage to the
control wheel shaft where the shaft connects to the control column.
This damage may lead to the
[[Page 64696]]
aileron control becoming stiff or locking.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Damage of the
pilot and co-pilot control wheels and aileron cable operating arm
shafts could result in the aileron controls becoming stiff or locking,
which could lead to loss of control of the airplane.
Is there service information that applies to this subject?
Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. has issued Service Bulletin SB-GA8-
2004-11, dated August 25, 2004.
What are the provisions of this service information? The service
bulletin includes procedures for:
--Inspecting control wheel and aileron cable operating arm shafts for
damage;
--Repairing damage; and
--Replacing damaged shafts with the bronze shafts.
What action did the CASA take? The CASA classified this service
bulletin as mandatory and issued Australian AD Number AD/GA8/2, dated
September 17, 2004, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in Australia.
Did the CASA inform the United States under the bilateral
airworthiness agreement? These Gippsland GA8 airplanes are manufactured
in Australia and are type-certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement.
Under this bilateral airworthiness agreement, Australia has kept us
informed of the situation described above.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
What has FAA decided? We have examined the CASA's findings,
reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is
necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other Gippsland Aeronautics GA8 airplanes of the same
type design that are registered in the United States, we are proposing
AD action to detect and correct damage of the pilot and co-pilot
control wheels and aileron cable operating arm shafts that could result
in the aileron controls becoming stiff or locking, which could lead to
loss of control of the airplane.
What would this proposed AD require? This proposed AD would require
you to inspect the pilot and co-pilot control wheels and aileron cable
operating arm shafts for damage and, if damage is found, to repair the
shafts or to replace the steel shafts with bronze shafts.
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this proposed AD? On
July 10, 2002, we published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR
47997, July 22, 2002), which governs FAA's AD system. This regulation
now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight
permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material
previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is
included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD
actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many airplanes would this proposed AD impact? We estimate that
this proposed AD affects 5 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What would be the cost impact of this proposed AD on owners/
operators of the affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to
accomplish this proposed inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost on
Labor cost Parts cost Total cost U.S.
per airplane operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work hours x $65 per hour = $130.............................. N/A $130 $650
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of this
proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that may need this repair/replacement:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per airplane
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost per side (either pilot or co- Warranty................... Per side = $520.
pilot) - 8 work hours x $65 per hour = For both sides = $1,040.
$520.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Findings
Would this proposed AD impact various entities? We have determined
that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Would this proposed AD involve a significant rule or regulatory
action? For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this proposed AD
and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket FAA-2004-19442; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-31-AD'' in
your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14
CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 64697]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2004-19442;
Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-31-AD.
When Is the Last Date I Can Submit Comments on This Proposed AD?
(a) We must receive comments on this proposed airworthiness
directive (AD) by December 15, 2004.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects model GA8 airplanes, serial numbers GA8-00-
004 through GA8-04-056, that are certificated in any category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of rubbing between the control wheel
shaft and the bush in the control column, which may cause wear or
damage to the control wheel shaft where the shaft connects to the
control column. This damage may lead to the aileron control becoming
stiff or locking. The actions specified in this AD are intended to
detect and correct damage of the pilot and co-pilot control wheels
and aileron cable operating arm shafts that could result in the
aileron controls becoming stiff or locking, which could lead to loss
of control of the airplane.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the pilot and co- Perform the Follow Gippsland
pilot control column wheel and initial Aeronautics Pty.
aileron cable operating arm inspection within Ltd. Service
shafts for damage. 50 hours time-in- Bulletin SB-GA8-
service (TIS) 2004-11, Issue 2,
after the dated August 25,
effective date of 2004.
this AD.
(2) If no damage is found, Perform repetitive Follow Gippsland
continue repetitive inspections. inspections every Aeronautics Pty.
300 hours TIS Ltd. Service
until steel Bulletin SB-GA8-
operating arm 2004-11, Issue 2,
shafts are dated August 25,
replaced with 2004.
bronze operating
arm shafts.
Replacement of
steel operating
arm shafts with
bronze operating
arm shafts is
terminating
action for this
AD on the side
that was
replaced. If one
steel shaft
requires
replacement, all
of the shafts on
that side (pilot
or co-pilot) must
be replaced with
bronze shafts. If
only one side
(pilot or co-
pilot) is
replaced,
repetitive
inspections are
still required
for the side that
was not replaced.
(3) For airplanes where damage If damage is Follow Gippsland
is found: found, repair or Aeronautics Pty.
(i) If damage can be repaired by replace operating Ltd. Service
polishing out marks or arm shafts prior Bulletin SB-GA8-
scratches so that material to further 2004-11, Issue 2,
removed does not exceed 0.005 flight. If dated August 25,
inches, repair the shaft. You airplane is 2004.
can not repair by polishing out repaired,
marks or scratches more than repetitively
one time.. inspect every 300
(ii) If damage can not be hours TIS after
repaired by polishing out marks repair until
or scratches so that material replacement of
removed does not exceed 0.005 the operating arm
inches or you have already shafts.
repaired the damage by Replacement of
polishing out the marks or the steel
scratches previously, the operating arm
damaged steel operating arm shafts with
shaft must be replaced with a bronze operating
bronze operating arm shaft. arm shafts is
When a shaft (pilot or co- terminating
pilot) requires replacement, action for this
you must install new bronze AD. If only one
shafts in all areas of the side (pilot or co-
affected side.. pilot) is
replaced with
bronze shafts,
you must still
repetitively
inspect the other
side that was not
replaced.
(4) As of the effective date of As of the Follow Gippsland
this AD, do not install shafts effective date of Aeronautics Pty.
that are not bronze on any this AD. Ltd. Service
affected Model GA8 airplane. Bulletin SB-GA8-
2004-11, Issue 2,
dated August 25,
2004.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, Small
Airplane Directorate, FAA. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Doug Rudolph, Aerospace
Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, ACE-112, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: 816-329-4059; facsimile:
816-329-4090.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(g) Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority Airworthiness
Directive AD/GA8/2, dated September 17, 2004, and Gippsland
Aeronautics Pty., Ltd., Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2004-11, dated
August 25, 2004, also address the subject of this AD.
May I Get Copies of the Documents Referenced in This AD?
(h) To get copies of the documents referenced in this AD,
contact Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd., Latrobe Regional Airport,
P.O. Box 881, Morwell, Victoria 3840, Australia; telephone: 61 (0) 3
5172 1200; facsimile: 61 (0) 3 5172 1201. To view the AD docket, go
to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-
401, Washington, DC, or on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. This
is docket number FAA-2004-19442.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 2, 2004.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-24819 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P