[Federal Register: October 8, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 195)]
[Notices]
[Page 60432]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08oc04-126]
[[Page 60432]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-55,340]
Ripplewood Phosporous U.S., LLC, Formerly Akzo Nobel Functional
Chemical LLC, Gallipolis Ferry, WV; Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated September 2, 2004, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The negative
determination applicable to workers of Ripplewood Phosphorous U.S.,
LLC, Formerly Akzo Nobel Functional Chemical LLC, Gallipolis Ferry,
West Virginia was issued on August 6, 2004. The Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register on August 20, 2004 (69 FR 51715).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The subject company produces flame-retardant chemicals, including
Fyrol PCF, Fyrol FR-2, Fyroflex RDP, Fyroflex BDP, Phosphorus
Trichloride, Phosphorous Oxychloride, Phosflex 4, Phosflex TBEP and
Fyrol CEF. The workers are not separately identifiable by product line.
The TAA/ATAA petition was denied because during the relevant time
period, subject company sales and production increased and the subject
company did not shift production abroad.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner agrees that
subject company sales and production increased during the relevant time
period but contends that the increased sales were due to increased
imports and infers that the increased imports were the cause of worker
separations. Further, the petitioner contends that the Department
should investigate imports of phosphorous, a raw material for
phosphorus trichloride.
According to the petitioner, phosphorus trichloride ``was the base
product for the facility; which was used in 80% of all the
manufacturing products.'' The company confirmed that phosphorous was
imported to make phosphorus trichloride and that phosphorus trichloride
was, in turn, used to make the other flame-retardant chemicals. The
company also stated that although some phosphorus trichloride was sold
to customers, the company did not sell any phosphorus.
Increased company imports of article(s) produced at the subject
facility could be a basis for TAA certification when there are
decreased company sales and/or production and worker separations during
the relevant period. However, increased imports of raw material used in
production of articles produced at the subject facility cannot be the
basis for TAA certification, since the workers do not produce that
article. Thus, alleged import increases of a raw material (phosphorous)
cannot be a basis for TAA certification for the subject worker group.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of September, 2004.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E4-2548 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P