[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29715-29720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10252]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Request for Applications (RFA): Research and Development Risk
Management Research Partnerships; Correction
Announcement Type: Notice of availability of funds and request for
application for risk management research partnerships; Correction.
CFDA Number: 10.456.
Dates: The closing date and time for receipt of an application is
5:00 p.m. C.D.T. on July 5, 2005. Applications received after the
deadline will not be evaluated by the technical review panel and will
not be considered for funding. All awards will be made and agreements
completed no later than September 30, 2005.
Summary: Due to technical errors, the following notice supersedes
the original Request for Applications, published on May 6, 2005, for
Research and Development Risk Management Research Partnerships at 70 FR
23969-23975.
Overview: The purpose of the Risk Management Research Partnerships
is to fund the development of non-insurance risk management tools that
will be utilized by agricultural producers to assist them in mitigating
the risks inherent in agricultural production. The proposals must
address at least one of the ten objectives listed in part I.D. In
addition, all proposals must clearly demonstrate the usefulness and
benefits of the tool to producers of priority commodities and provide a
plan for ongoing maintenance and support as
[[Page 29716]]
described in part III.C.2. Approximately $4 million is available to
fund an undetermined number of partnerships. Projects may be funded for
a period of up to three years. Applications are accepted from public
and private entities; individuals are not eligible to apply. No cost
sharing by the applicant is required. There are no limitations on the
number of applications each applicant may submit.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
A. Background
The Risk Management Agency (RMA), on behalf of the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation (FCIC), is committed to meeting the risk
management needs and improving or developing risk management tools for
the nation's farmers and ranchers. It does this by offering Federal
crop insurance and other risk management products and tools through a
network of private-sector entities and by overseeing the creation of
new products, seeking enhancements in existing products, and by
expanding the use of a variety of risk management tools. Risk
management tools include a variety of risk management options and
strategies developed to assist producers in mitigating the risks
inherent in agricultural production. Risk management tools may include:
Financial management tools to mitigate price and production risks;
tools to enhance measurement and prediction of risks in order to
facilitate risk diversification; tools to improve production
management, harvesting, record keeping or marketing. For the purposes
of this announcement, risk management tools do not include insurance
products, plans of insurance, policies, modifications thereof or any
related material.
B. Purpose
The purpose of this program is to fund partnership agreements that
assist producers, minimize their production risks, and/or develop risk
management tools. The agreements are for the development of risk
management tools for use directly by agricultural producers. To aid in
meeting these goals each partnership agreement awarded through this
program will provide the recipient with funds, guidance, and the
substantial involvement of RMA to carry out these risk management
initiatives. Applications requesting funding for the development of
insurance products, plans of insurance, policies, modifications thereof
or related materials are excluded from consideration under this
announcement.
C. Authorization
In accordance with section 522(d) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act
(Act), FCIC announces the availability of funding for risk management
research activities. Priority will be given to those activities
addressing the need for risk management tools for producers of the
following agricultural commodities (For purposes of this announcement,
these commodities are collectively referred to as ``Priority
Commodities.''):
Agricultural commodities covered by section 196 of the
Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7333) (Noninsured
Assistance Program (NAP)). Commodities in this group are commercial
crops that are not covered by catastrophic risk protection crop
insurance, are used for food or fiber (except livestock), and
specifically include, but are not limited to, floricultural, ornamental
nursery, Christmas trees, turf grass sod, aquaculture (including
ornamental fish), and industrial crops.
Specialty crops. Commodities in this group may or may not
be covered under a Federal crop insurance plan and include, but are not
limited to, fruits, vegetables, tree nuts, syrups, honey, roots, herbs,
and highly specialized varieties of traditional crops.
Underserved commodities. This group includes: (a)
Commodities, including livestock that are covered by a Federal crop
insurance plan but for which participation in an area is below the
national average; and (b) commodities, including livestock, with
inadequate crop insurance coverage.
D. Objectives
The project objectives listed below highlight the research
priorities of RMA. The objectives are listed in priority order, with
the most important objective designated as 1, the second most important
designated as 2, etc. The order of priority will be considered in
making awards. The suggested emphasis discussed within each objective
is not meant to be exhaustive. Applicants may propose other topics
within any project objective but justification for those topics must be
provided.
RMA encourages proposals that address multiple risks and will
result in the development of tools that provide an integrated or
holistic approach to risk mitigation. Preference will be given to such
proposals.
Proposals may address multiple objectives, but each proposal must
specify a single primary objective for funding purposes.
In the order of priority, the project objectives are:
1.To develop risk management tools to assist producers in finding
alternative products, techniques or strategies related to disease
management (e.g., soybean rust) and/or pest mitigation under various
farming practices.
2. To develop risk management tools to assist producers in reducing
the impact of multiple-year losses, such as the multiple-year losses
due to sustained or recurring drought and to increase the economic and
production stability of agricultural producers.
3. To develop risk management tools to assist forage and rangeland
producers in improving techniques for one or more of the following:
Managing production, e.g., optimization of grazing patterns;
establishing and maintaining forage production records; drought
mitigation; and harvesting or marketing production.
4. To develop risk management tools to assist limited resource and/
or traditionally underserved farmers and ranchers and/or producers with
limited English language proficiency that traditionally produce
agricultural commodities covered by NAP, specialty crops and
underserved agricultural commodities. The tools developed under this
objective should address risks that may be specific to the targeted
producers and/or will assist the targeted producers in gaining
meaningful access to existing risk management tools and information.
(Definitions: A limited resource farmer is a producer or operator of a
farm with an annual gross income of $20,000 or less derived from all
sources of revenue or a producer on a farm of less than 25 acres
(aggregated for all crops) where a majority of the producer's gross
income from farming operations does not exceed $20,000; and/or direct
or indirect gross farm sales not more than $100,000 in each of the
previous two years adjusted for inflation using Prices Paid by Farmer
Index as compiled by the National Agricultural Statistical Service
(NASS) and a total household income at or below the national poverty
level for a family of four, or less than 50 percent of county median
household income in each of the previous two years (to be determined
annually using Commerce Department Data). Underserved farmers and
ranchers include: Women, African Americans, Asians and Pacific
Islanders, American Indians, Alaskan Natives, and Hispanics.)
5. To develop risk management tools to assist livestock producers
in improving techniques for one or more of the following: planning and
managing the production of livestock, including disease management and
control; improving techniques for breeding of
[[Page 29717]]
livestock; and managing price, revenue, or production and market risks.
6. To develop risk management tools to assist agricultural
producers in developing a better understanding of the interaction of
financial markets, marketing, crop insurance, and production costs and
assist producers in the determination of the optimal combination of
risk management strategies.
7. To clarify labor requirements and assist producers in complying
with requirements to better meet the physically intense and time-
compressed planting, tending, and harvesting requirements associated
with the production of specialty crops and underserved agricultural
commodities.
8. To develop risk management tools encouraging self-protection for
production agricultural enterprises vulnerable to losses due to
terrorism.
9. To provide risk management tools to State foresters or
equivalent officials for the prescribed use of burning on private
forest land for the prevention, control and suppression of fire.
10. To develop risk management tools to further increase the
economic and production stability of wild salmon fishermen.
II. Award Information
A. Award Description
Approximately $4 million is available for partnership agreements
that will fund the development of risk management tools. Awards under
this program will be made on a competitive basis. Projects may be
funded for a period of up to three years for the activities described
in this announcement. Projects can also be in two parts with the first
part including the research and feasibility studies and the second part
including the development, implementation, delivery and maintenance of
the risk management tool. If the development of the tool is determined
not to be feasible, the partnership may be terminated by RMA after
completion of the first part with funding reduced accordingly.
There is no commitment by RMA to fund any particular project or to
make a specific number of awards. Applicants awarded a partnership
agreement for an amount that is less than the amount requested will be
required to modify their application to conform to the reduced amount
before execution of the partnership agreement. No maximum or minimum
funding levels have been established for individual projects. All
awards will be made and agreements completed no later than September
30, 2005.
Recipients of awards must demonstrate non-financial benefits from a
partnership agreement and must agree to substantial involvement of RMA
in the project. RMA encourages collaborative efforts and geographic
diversity of proposed projects.
In conducting activities to achieve the purpose of this proposed
research, the recipient will be responsible for the activities listed
under Section II. A. 1 of this part. RMA will be responsible for the
activities listed under Section II. A. 2 of this part.
1. Recipient Activities
The applicant will be required to perform the following activities:
a. Finalize, in cooperation with RMA, the partnership agreement.
b. Finalize, in cooperation with RMA, the plan to administer,
maintain and update the risk management tool in the future. The
applicant must develop a plan for the delivery of the risk management
tool to producers and the ongoing maintenance and support of the risk
management tool, including how the applicant will fund the delivery,
support, maintenance and updating of the tool to maintain its
applicability, benefits, usefulness, and value to producers. The
applicant must also deliver the risk management tool to producers and
support, maintain and update the tool as applicable.
c. Define non-financial benefits and the substantial involvement of
the RMA.
d. Coordinate, manage, document and implement the timely completion
of the approved research and development activities.
e. Abide by the plans and provisions contained in the partnership
agreement.
f. Report on program performance in accordance with the partnership
agreement.
g. The recipient may be required to make a presentation to the FCIC
Board of Directors.
h. Adhere to RMA guidelines for systems development and information
technology development.
2. RMA Activities
RMA will be substantially involved during the performance of the
funded activity. Potential types of substantial involvement may
include, but are not limited to the following activities:
a. Collaborate on the research plan;
b. Assist in the selection of subcontractors and project staff;
c. Review and approve critical stages of project development before
subsequent stages may be started;
d. Provide assistance in the management or technical performance of
the project;
e. Collaborate with the recipient in the development of materials
associated with the funded project, as it relates to publication or
presentation of the results and the distribution of the risk management
tools to the public, any producer groups, RMA, and the FCIC Board of
Directors;
f. Assist in the collection of data and information that may be
available in RMA databases;
g. Collaborate with the recipient in the development of a proposal
to administer, maintain and update the risk management tool in the
future; and
h. Similar type of activities.
B. Other Activities
In addition to the specific activities listed above, the applicant
may suggest other activities that would contribute directly to the
purpose of this program. For any additional activity suggested, the
applicant should identify the objective of the activity, the specific
tasks required to meet the objective, specific timelines for performing
the tasks, and specific responsibilities of the partners. For any
additional activity suggested, the applicant should identify specific
ways in which RMA could or should have substantial involvement in that
activity.
III. Eligibility Information
A. Eligible Applicants
Proposals are invited from qualified public and private entities.
Eligible applicants include colleges and universities, Federal, State,
and local agencies, Native American tribal organizations, non-profit
and for-profit private organizations or corporations, and other
entities. Individuals are not eligible applicants.
Although an applicant may be eligible to compete for an award based
on its status as an eligible entity, other factors may exclude an
applicant from receiving Federal assistance under this program (e.g.,
debarment and suspension; a determination of non-performance on a prior
contract, cooperative agreement, grant or partnership; a determination
of a violation of applicable ethical standards).
B. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing, matching, in-kind contributions, or cost
participation is not required.
C. Other
1. Applicants must demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed risk
management tool and the benefits of the tool to producers of priority
commodities. Applicants must include
[[Page 29718]]
information supporting the need for the tool, such as a market
analysis, or communications from producers or producer organizations
expressing a need for the proposed tool. The proposal must also clearly
define how the proposed tool will meet the needs of the producer groups
identified. The second objective is that the proposed risk management
tool meet specific identified needs of the producer and the proposed
risk management tool be supported by the applicant without the need of
resources from RMA. Refer to part V.B for the review and selection
process.
2. If the project proposed for development requires ongoing
maintenance, support and delivery to producers beyond the development
stage, the applicant must submit a plan to continue the maintenance,
support and delivery of the tool without relying on RMA's resources. If
the applicant does not plan to directly support, maintain and deliver
the tool using non-award funds after the development period funded by
this award is completed, then the proposal should identify a third
party sponsor who will do so. For example, if a proposed tool would
require constant updating of data and availability on a website in
order to be utilized by producers, then a sponsor should be identified
that would be able to provide the funds necessary to maintain and host
the tool. Third party sponsors may include government agencies, grower
organizations, industry organizations, private sector entities, etc. If
the tool proposed does not require support, maintenance, updating or
revisions to maintain applicability or value or does not require
continued delivery to producers, the proposal should so state and
provide the basis why such actions are not required. Refer to part V.B
for the review and selection process.
3. Applicants must be able to demonstrate they will receive non-
financial benefits as a result of the partnership agreement. Non-
financial benefits must accrue to the applicant and must include more
than the ability to provide employment income to the applicant or for
the applicant's employees or the community. The applicant must
demonstrate that performance under the partnership agreement will
further the specific mission of the applicant (such as providing
research or activities necessary for graduate or other students to
complete educational programs). Refer to part V.A.2 for evaluation
criteria.
IV. Application and Submission Information
A. Address To Request Application Package
Applicants may download an application package from the Risk
Management Agency Web site at: http://www.rma.usda.gov. Applicants may
also request an application package from: RMA/RED Partnership Agreement
Program, USDA, RMA/RED, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop 0813, Kansas City,
Missouri 64133-4676, phone: (816) 926-6343, fax: (816) 926-7343, e-
mail: [email protected].
Completed and signed application packages must be sent to: RMA/RED
Partnership Agreement Program, USDA, RMA/RED, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop
0813, Kansas City, Missouri 64133-4676. Applicants are encouraged to
submit completed and signed application packages using overnight mail
or delivery service to ensure timely receipt by the USDA. Applicants
using the U.S. Postal Service should allow for extra security-
processing time for mail delivered to government offices.
B. Content and Form of Application Submission
A complete and valid application package must include an original,
twelve complete paper copies are requested, three copies are required,
and one copy (Microsoft Word format preferred) of the application
package on diskette or compact disc, and:
1. A completed and signed OMB Standard Form 424, ``Application for
Federal Assistance.''
2. A completed and signed OMB Standard Form 424-A, ``Budget
Information--Non-construction Programs.'' Reviewers will need
sufficient information to effectively evaluate the budget. Indirect
cost for projects submitted in response to this solicitation are
limited to 10 percent of the total direct cost of the agreement. A
sample budget narrative, including suggestions for format and content,
is available on the RMA Web site (http://www.rma.usda.gov) or upon
request.
3. A completed and signed OMB Standard Form 424-B, ``Assurances,
Non-construction Programs.''
4. A completed and signed OMB Standard Form LLL, ``Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities.''
5. A completed and signed AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters (Primary Covered
Transactions.'')
6. A completed and signed AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding Drug-
Free Workplace.''
7. A statement of the non-financial benefits of any partnership
agreement to the recipient. (Refer to part II.B ``Non-financial
Benefits.'')
8. A completed Form R&D-1, ``Title Page and Proposal Summary.''
Each proposal must specify the single primary objective for evaluation
and funding purposes. The same or similar proposals cannot be submitted
multiple times with different primary objectives specified. If the same
or similar proposals are submitted, the first received will be the only
one evaluated.
9. A proposal narrative submitted with the application package
should be limited to 10 single-sided pages. Reviewers will need
sufficient information to effectively evaluate the application under
the criteria contained in part V. A sample narrative, including
suggestions for format and content, is available on the RMA website
(http://www.rma.usda.gov) or upon request.
10. An appendix containing any attachments that may support
information in the narrative (Optional).
11. A completed Form R&D-2, ``Statement of Work.''
Applicants are responsible for ensuring the application materials
are received by the closing date. Incomplete application packages will
not receive further consideration.
C. Submission Dates and Times
The closing date and time for receipt of an application is 5 p.m.
CDT on July 5, 2005. Applications received after the deadline will not
be evaluated by the technical review panel and will not be considered
for funding.
D. Funding Restrictions
No maximum or minimum funding levels have been established for
individual projects or for categories of objectives. The funding level
by category of objective will be determined by FCIC. Indirect cost for
projects submitted in response to this solicitation are limited to 10
percent of total direct cost of the agreement. Each project may be
funded for a period of up to three years for the activities described
in this announcement.
Partnership agreement funds may not be used to:
1. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or
facility including a processing facility;
2. To purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment;
3. Repair or maintain privately owned vehicles;
4. Pay for the preparation of the partnership application;
5. Fund political activities;
6. Pay costs incurred prior to receiving this partnership
agreement;
[[Page 29719]]
7. Fund any activities prohibited in 7 CFR Parts 3015 and 3019, as
applicable.
E. Other Submission Requirements
1. An original and twelve (12) paper copies are requested, three
copies are required, of the complete and signed application, and one
copy (Microsoft Word format preferred) on diskette or compact disc must
be submitted in one package at the time of initial submission.
2. All applications must be submitted and received by the deadline.
Applications that do not meet all of the requirements in this
announcement are considered incomplete applications. Late or incomplete
applications will not be considered in this competition and will be
returned to the applicant.
3. Applications will be considered as meeting the announced
deadline if they are received in the mailroom at the address stated
above service on or before the deadline. Applicants are cautioned that
express, overnight mail or other delivery services do not always
deliver as agreed. Applicants are responsible for mailing applications
well in advance, to ensure that applications are received on or before
the deadline time and date. Applicants should be aware that there may
be significant delays in delivery if applications are mailed using the
U.S. Postal Service due to the additional security measures that mail
delivered to government offices now require. Applicants should take
this into account because failure of such delivery services will not
extend the deadline.
4. Although the application package may be downloaded
electronically, RMA cannot accommodate transmissions of application
submissions by facsimile or through other electronic media. Therefore,
applications transmitted electronically will not be accepted regardless
of the date or time of submission or the time of receipt.
V. Application Review Information
A. Criteria
1. Research Objectives--Maximum 40 points
The application must receive a minimum score of 28 points under
this criterion in order to be considered for further evaluation and
funding. Applications receiving less than 28 points will be eliminated
and will not be evaluated under criteria 2 through 4.
The proposal must clearly define the development, management and
implementation of a risk management tool designed to meet the needs of
the producers outlined for at least one of the objectives listed in
part I.D. Proposals that best meet the objective and are innovative,
clear, concise, useful, easy to understand, and address multiple risks
that result in the development of tools that provide an integrated or
holistic approach to risk mitigation will be given the highest score.
The proposal will be reviewed to determine if it is similar to a
project that has been funded, has been recommended for funding, or is
currently under development through other means.
2. Indication of RMA Involvement and Non-Financial Benefits--Maximum 10
Points
The proposal clearly indicates areas of substantial involvement by
RMA and clearly indicates benefits derived from the partnership that
extend beyond the financial benefits or funding of the research
proposal. Those proposals that clearly outline the involvement of RMA
in all aspects of the project and demonstrate non-financial benefit
will receive the highest score. Examples of non-financial benefits
would be the benefits derived by an educational institution by
providing research opportunities to students or benefits derived
through the furtherance of an organization's mission.
3. Research Approach, Methodology, Development and Implementation--
Maximum 40 Points
The proposal clearly demonstrates a sound research approach and
defines the methodology to be used as well as describes the development
and implementation of the risk management tool. Proposals that
demonstrate a clear, concise and generally accepted research
methodology and innovative approach will receive the highest number of
points.
4. Management--Maximum 10 Points
The proposal clearly demonstrates the applicant's ability and
resources to coordinate and manage all aspects of the proposed research
project. The applicant whose approach is the most cost effective and
optimizes the use and effective application of the funding will receive
the highest score.
B. Review and Selection Process
Each application will be evaluated using a five-part process.
First, each application will be screened by RMA to ensure that each
proposal specifies a single primary objective for evaluation and
funding purposes and the proposal meets the objectives stated in part
I.D. The same or similar proposals cannot be submitted multiple times
with different primary objectives specified. If the same or similar
proposals are submitted, the first received will be the only one
evaluated. Applications that do not meet the objectives stated in part
I.D and all other requirements in this announcement or are incomplete
will not receive further consideration.
Second, the proposal must clearly demonstrate the usefulness of the
tool and the benefits of the tool to producers of priority commodities
and demonstrate that there is a reasonable expectation that the tool
will actually be used by a substantial number of such producers. Any
proposal that does not do this will not receive further consideration.
Third, the plan will be evaluated to ensure that the risk
management tool can be delivered to producers and will be supported,
maintained, updated or revised as necessary. Any proposal where the
plan does not adequately address each of these issues will not receive
further consideration. If the plan states that such actions are not
necessary, the basis for such a determination will be evaluated and the
proposal reviewed to determine if such determination is reasonable. If
it is determined that any such actions are required and they are not
contained in the plan, the proposal will not receive further
consideration.
Fourth, all eligible applications will be evaluated using the
criterion in part V.A.1. Applications must score at least 28 points
under this criteria in order to be to be evaluated further.
Fifth, all applications scoring the required 28 points will be
evaluated further under part V.A.2 through 4.
For the second and third steps, a review panel will consider all
applications that are complete and meet the objectives in part I.D. and
all other requirements in this announcement. If the panel determines
that an application is eligible to be reviewed under steps four and
five, the review panel will review the merits of the applications. The
evaluation of each application will be conducted by a panel of not less
than three independent reviewers. The panel will be comprised of
representatives from USDA, other federal agencies, and others
representing public and private organizations, as needed. The narrative
and any appendixes provided by each applicant will be used by the
review panel to evaluate the merits of the project that is being
proposed for funding. The panel will examine and score applications
based on the evaluation criteria and weights contained in part V.A.
In order to be considered for funding, a proposal must score at
least 75 points.
[[Page 29720]]
For the last step, those applications meeting the minimum number of
points will be listed in initial rank order by objective. The highest-
ranking proposal for each objective will be funded in the order of
priority (the highest ranking proposal meeting objective 1 will be
funded first and the highest ranking proposal meeting objective 2 will
be funded second, etc.). It is possible that funds could be exhausted
before funding projects for every objective. If there are funds
remaining, the process will be repeated until the funds are obligated.
The projects selected for funding will be presented, along with funding
level recommendations, to the Manager of FCIC, who will make the final
decision on awarding of a partnership agreement.
If the Manager of FCIC determines that any application is
sufficiently similar to a project that has been funded or has been
recommended to be funded under this announcement or any other research
and development program, then the Manager may elect to not fund that
application in whole or in part.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. Award Notices
Receipt of applications will be acknowledged by e-mail, whenever
possible. Therefore, each applicant is encouraged to provide an e-mail
address in the application. If an e-mail address is not indicated on an
application, receipt will be acknowledged by letter. There will be no
notification of incomplete, unqualified or unfunded applications until
the awards have been made.
When received by RMA, applications will be assigned an
identification number. This number will be communicated to applicants
in the acknowledgement of receipt of applications. An application
identification number should be referenced in all correspondence
regarding the application. If the applicant does not receive an
acknowledgement within 15 days of the submission deadline, the
applicant should contact the Research and Development Division at (816)
926-6343.
B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
1. Access to Panel Review Information
Upon written request, scores from the evaluation panel, not
including the identity of reviewers, will be sent to the applicant
after the review and awards process has been completed.
2. Notification of Partnership Agreement Awards and Notification of
Non-Selection
Following approval of the applications selected for funding, notice
of project approval and authority to draw down funds will be made to
the selected applicants in writing. Within the limit of funds available
for such purpose, the awarding official of RMA shall enter into
partnership agreements with those applicants whose applications are
judged to be most meritorious under the procedures set forth in this
announcement. The partnership agreement provides the amount of Federal
funds for use in the project period, the terms and conditions of the
award, and the time period for the project.
The effective date of the partnership agreement shall be the date
the agreement is executed by both parties. All funds provided to the
applicant by FCIC must be expended solely for the purpose for which
funds are obligated in accordance with the approved application and
budget, the regulations, the terms and conditions of the award, and the
applicability of Federal cost principles. No commitment of Federal
assistance beyond the project period is made or implied, as a result of
any award made pursuant to this announcement.
Notification of denial of funding will be sent to applicants after
final funding decisions have been made. Reasons for denial of funding
can include incomplete proposals, proposals that did not meet the
objectives, scored low or were duplicative.
3. Confidential Aspects of Proposals and Awards
When an application results in a partnership agreement, it becomes
a part of the official record of RMA transactions, available to the
public upon specific request. Information that the Secretary of
Agriculture determines to be of a confidential, privileged, or
proprietary nature will be held in confidence to the extent permitted
by law. Therefore, any information that the applicant wishes to be
considered confidential, privileged, or proprietary should be clearly
marked within the application, including the basis for such
designation. The original copy of a proposal that does not result in an
award will be retained by RMA for a period of one year. Other copies
will be destroyed. Such a proposal will be released only with the
express written consent of the applicant or to the extent required by
law. A proposal may be withdrawn at any time prior to award.
4. Administration
All partnership agreements are subject to 7 CFR part 3015.
5. Prohibitions and Requirements With Regard to Lobbying
All partnership agreements are subject to 7 CFR part 3018. A copy
of the certification and disclosure forms must be submitted with the
application.
6. Applicable OMB Circulars
All partnership agreements funded as a result of this notice will
be subject to the requirements contained in all applicable OMB
circulars.
C. Reporting
Applicants awarded a partnership agreement will be required to
submit quarterly progress and financial reports (SF-269) throughout the
project period, as well as a final program and financial report not
later than 90 days after the end of the project period.
VII. Agency Contact
If applicants have any questions they may contact: USDA, RMA/RED,
6501 Beacon Drive, Stop 0813, Kansas City, Missouri 64133-4676, or
phone: (816) 926-6343,or fax: (816) 926-7343,or e-mail:
[email protected].
VIII. Other Information
The names of applicants, the names of individuals identified in the
applications, the content of applications, and the panel evaluations of
applications will all be kept confidential, except to those involved in
the review process, to the extent permitted by law. In addition, the
identities of review panel members will remain confidential throughout
the entire review process and will not be released to applicants. At
the end of the fiscal year, names of panel members will be made
available. However, panelists will not be identified with the review of
any particular application.
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 18, 2005.
Ross J. Davidson, Jr.,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-10252 Filed 5-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P