[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29767-29768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Title: Head Start National Training and Technical Assistance
Quality Assurance Study.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: The Head Start National Training and Technical
Assistance Quality Assurance study is being undertaken to document and
provide feedback on the work of the newly designed Head Start Training
and Technical Assistance (T/TA) system. The Head Start Bureau awarded
this contract to Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., and its
subcontractor, Xtria LLC, in October 2004.
Providing training and technical assistance has long been a crucial
component of the national-regional Head Start system. Through the new
T/TA system, however, the Head Start Bureau has placed greater emphasis
on quality and consistency of T/TA service delivery. Under the new T/TA
system, the Head Start Bureau's T/TA Branch annually sets national
priorities. Regional Office T/TA liaisons oversee the system's 12
contracts, awarded in December 2003, which include locally-based
content experts in the area of disabilities, early literacy, child
development, fiscal administration and management, health, and family
and community partnerships. These content experts support locally-based
TA specialists (TAS), who work with a caseload of 10 to 12 programs to
develop T/TA training plans based on each grantee's self-assessment and
the results from the Program Review Instrument for Systems Monitoring
(PRISM) process. National contractors provide training and other
resources according to priorities determined by the Head Start Bureau
and in line with Administration initiatives. Programs can also use
their special T/TA grant funds and, when necessary, additional funds
from their basic Head Start grant funds to hire consultants or attend
training events.
In addition, through Higher Education Grants, universities provide
coursework to meet Head Start staff's credentialing needs in
partnership with Head Start programs. The Higher Education grantees
(HEGs) are organized into three consortia, representing Historically
Black Colleges and Universities, Tribal Colleges and Universities, and
Hispanic/Latino-serving institutions.
For the regional Head Start system, the Quality Assurance Study
will assess (1) Each Head Start region's implementation and structure
of the new system, (2) regional T/TA strategies and services provided
to grantees, (3) grantees' progress in assessing T/TA needs and
identifying appropriate ways to meet these needs, (4) grantees' annual
T/TA plans, and (5) grantees' perceptions about the systems' impact on
program quality and child outcomes. The study also will analyze whether
the HEGs meet their goal of increasing the early childhood credentials
of Head Start staff and teachers. In 2005, the study will collect
information about the delivery of T/TA services to Head Start and Early
Head Start programs through site visits to 48 representative programs
(about 4 per region) and site visits to 15 HEGs (5 of each of the 3
types of HEGs). In 2006, the study will visit 36 of the 48
representative Head Start and Early Head Start programs to learn about
changes in the T/TA system. All data collection activities have been
designed to minimize the burden on respondents by minimizing the time
required to respond. Participation in the study is voluntary.
The research will provide the Head Start Bureau and the
Administration for Children and Families with information about
exemplary practices as well as areas in the T/TA system which could be
improved.
Respondents: Early Head Start and Head Start directors,
coordinators, specialists, center administrators, teachers, and home
visitors; locally-based TA specialists; university-based HEG project
directors, university faculty, Head Start program administrators, and
Head Start program staff and teachers.
Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Instrument Number of responses per hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Site Visit Protocols (2005)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director........................................ 48 1 1.5 72
Coordinator/Specialist.......................... 144 1 1.25 180
Center Administrator............................ 288 1 1.25 360
Teacher/Home Visitor............................ 480 1 1.25 600
Locally-Based TA Specialists.................... 48 1 1.5 72
Program Reviews \a\............................. 48 1 0.5 24
-------------------------------------------------
HEG Site Visit Protocols (2005)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEG Project Director/Coordinator................ 15 1 1.5 22.5
HEG Staff/Faculty............................... 45 1 1 45
HS Director..................................... 30 1 1 30
HS Staff........................................ 60 1 1 60
-----------------
Total for 2005.............................. .............. .............. .............. 1465.5
-------------------------------------------------
Grantee Site Visit Protocols (2005)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director........................................ 36 1 1.5 54
Coordinator/Specialist.......................... 108 1 1.25 135
Center Administrator............................ 216 1 1.25 270
Teacher/Home Visitor............................ 360 1 1.25 450
Locally-Based TA Specialist..................... 36 1 1.5 54
[[Page 29768]]
Program Reviews\a\.............................. 36 1 0.5 18
-----------------
Total for 2005.............................. .............. .............. .............. 981
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Reviews will be conducted with the locally based TA specialists.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2446.5.
Estimated Annualized Burden for both the grantee and HEG site
visits is 1223.25 hours. This annual burden was calculated by dividing
total burden hours by two years.
Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families,
Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW.,
Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk
Officer for ACF, e-mail address: [email protected].
Dated: May 19, 2005.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-10339 Filed 5-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M