[Federal Register: August 16, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 157)]
[Notices]               
[Page 48124-48125]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16au05-62]                         


[[Page 48124]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OECA-2005-0034; FRL-7953-4]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic 
Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants (Renewal), ICR Number 
1081.08, OMB Number 2060-0043

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this document 
announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been 
forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. 
This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2005. Under OMB 
regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the 
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This 
ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its 
estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before September 15, 
2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number OECA-
2005-0034, to (1) EPA online using EDOCKET (our preferred method), by 
e-mail to docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Enforcement and Compliance Docket and 
Information Center, Mail Code 2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 
for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Compliance Assessment 
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, (Mail Code 2223A), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-4113; fax number: 
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address: williams.learia@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB 
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 
1320.12. On May 6, 2005 (70 FR 24020), EPA sought comments on this ICR 
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID 
Number OECA-2005-0034, which is available for public viewing at the 
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open 
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, 
and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and 
Information Center is: (202) 566-1752. An electronic version of the 
public docket is available through EPA Dockets (EDOCKET) at http://www.epa.gov/edocket.
 Use EDOCKET to submit or view public comments, 

access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to 
access those documents in the public docket that are available 
electronically. When in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the 
docket ID number identified above.
    Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB 
within 30 days of this notice. EPA's policy is that public comments, 
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available 
for public viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives them and without change, 
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential Business 
Information (CBI), or other information whose public disclosure is 
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing 
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in 
the version of the comment that is placed in EDOCKET. The entire 
printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available 
in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official 
docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise 
restricted by statute, is not included in the official public docket, 
and will not be available for public viewing in EDOCKET. For further 
information about the electronic docket, see EPA's Federal Register 
notice describing the electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 (May 31, 2002), 
or go to http://www.epa.gov/edocket.

    Title: NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass 
Manufacturing Plants (Renewal).
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
Pollutants (NESHAP) for inorganic arsenic emissions from glass 
manufacturing plants were proposed on July 20, 1983, and promulgated on 
August 4, 1986, and were amended on May 31, 1990, to add an alternative 
test method. These standards apply to each glass melting furnace that 
uses commercial arsenic as a raw material.
    Owners or operators must submit initial notifications, performance 
tests, and periodic reports. Respondents are also required to maintain 
records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or 
malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period 
during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, 
reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are 
required of all sources subject to NESHAP.
    Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall 
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least 
two years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, 
and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local 
authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the 
reports are sent directly to the EPA regional office.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA's 
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are 
identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping 
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 49 
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial 
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or 
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This 
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, 
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of 
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and 
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; 
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable 
instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to 
a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review 
the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the 
information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of glass 
manufacturing plants that emit inorganic arsenic.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 16.

[[Page 48125]]

    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion, annually, and 
semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 3,098 hours.
    Estimated Total Capital and Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Annual 
Costs: $306,106, which includes $0 annualized capital/startup costs, 
$56,000 annual O&M costs, and $250,106 Respondent Labor Costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 1,426 hours in the 
total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of 
Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is due to a decrease in the number 
of sources. Our data indicates that there are approximately sixteen 
sources to the rule, as compared to the active ICR that shows twenty-
eight sources. There are no new facilities expected to be constructed 
in the next three years. The burden in the renewed ICR shows a higher 
cost for each respondent than in the active ICR, this is due to the 
fact that we are presently accounting for management and clerical 
person hours per year in the renewal ICR, which was omitted in the 
active ICR, and a revised salary table.

    Dated: August 8, 2005.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 05-16196 Filed 8-15-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P