[Federal Register: September 19, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 180)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 54833-54835]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19se05-1]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
[[Page 54833]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. FV05-922-1 FIR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Decreased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2005-2006 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $2.50 per ton to $1.00 per ton of fresh apricots handled. The
Committee locally administers the marketing order which regulates the
handling of apricots grown in designated counties in Washington.
Assessments upon apricot handlers are used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period
began April 1 and ends March 31. The assessment rate will remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 19, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Portland, Oregon; Telephone: (503) 326-
2724; Fax: (503) 326-7440; or George J. Kelhart, Technical Advisor,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence,
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491;
Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 922 (7 CFR 922) regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, handlers in
designated counties in Washington are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended
that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all
assessable Washington apricots beginning April 1, 2005, and continue
until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee for the 2005-2006 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $2.50 per ton to $1.00 per ton of fresh
Washington apricots handled under the order.
The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers of Washington apricots. They are
familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs for goods and
services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an
appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed at a public meeting. Thus, all directly
affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2004-2005 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $2.50 per ton of
apricots handled. This assessment rate would continue in effect from
fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 10, 2005, and unanimously recommended
2005-2006 expenditures of $10,594--the same as approved for the 2004-
2005 fiscal period--and a decreased assessment rate of $1.00 per ton of
apricots handled. The $1.00 assessment rate is $1.50 lower than the
rate approved for the 2004-2005 and subsequent fiscal periods. Based on
the Committee's 2005-2006 crop estimate of 3,800 tons, assessment
income should approximate $3,800. The Committee recommended the lower
assessment rate after taking into account the potential economic impact
the anticipated crop shortfall might have on the apricot industry, and
also to reduce the Committee's authorized monetary reserve to a level
commensurate with program requirements. The anticipated $3,800
assessment revenue, when combined with $6,794 from the monetary
reserve, is adequate to cover budgeted expenses for the 2005-2006
fiscal period. By drawing funds from the
[[Page 54834]]
reserve ($13,962 on April 1, 2005), the Committee estimates that by the
end of the current fiscal period the reserve will approximate $7,168.
This amount is within the maximum permitted by the order of
approximately one fiscal period's operational expenses (Sec. 922.42).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2005-
2006 fiscal period include staff salaries ($5,892), rent and
maintenance ($864), compliance ($100), and Committee travel and
compensation ($1,000). These budgeted expenses are the same as those
approved for the 2004-2005 fiscal period.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committees or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of the Committee's meetings are available from the Committee or
USDA. The Committee's meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate
the Committee's recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed.
Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's
2005-2006 budget has been reviewed and approved by USDA, which will
also review, and as appropriate, approve, budgets for subsequent fiscal
periods.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 272 apricot producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 28 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,000,000.
For the 2004 apricot season, Washington Agricultural Statistics
Service reported that the total 6,400 ton apricot utilization sold for
an average of $973 per ton. Based on the number of producers in the
production area (272), the average annual producer revenue from the
sale of apricots in 2004 can thus be estimated at approximately
$22,894. In addition, based on information from the Committee and
USDA's Market News Service, 2004 f.o.b. prices ranged from $14.50 to
$18.50 per 24-pound loose-pack container, and from $18.00 to $24.00 for
2-layer tray pack containers. With about half of the 2004 season fresh
apricot pack-out of 4,911 tons in loose-pack containers and about half
in tray-pack containers (weighing an average of about 20 pounds each),
each of the industry's 28 handlers would have averaged less than
$225,000 from the sale of fresh apricots. Thus, the majority of
producers and handlers of Washington apricots may be classified as
small entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from
handlers for the 2005-2006 and subsequent fiscal periods from $2.50 to
$1.00 per ton of fresh apricots handled. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2005-2006 expenditures of $10,594. With the 2005-2006 crop
estimate of 3,800 tons, the Committee anticipates assessment income of
$3,800, which, when combined with $6,794 from the monetary reserve,
will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses for the 2005-2006 fiscal
period. At this assessment rate and expense level, the Committee's
reserve fund will approximate $7,168 by March 30, 2006. This amount is
within the maximum permitted by the order of approximately one fiscal
period's operational expenses (Sec. 922.42).
The Committee discussed alternatives to this rule, including
alternative expenditure levels. Lower assessment rates were considered,
but not recommended because they would not generate the income
necessary to administer the programs.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price
for the 2005-2006 season could range from about $973 per ton to about
$1,100 per ton for Washington apricots. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2005-2006 fiscal period as a percentage of
total producer revenue could range between 0.09 and 0.10 percent.
This action continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. In addition, the
Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the Washington
apricot industry and all interested persons were invited to attend and
participate in the Committee's deliberations on all issues. Like all
marketing order committee meetings, the May 10, 2005, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to
express views on the issues. Finally, interested persons were invited
to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Washington apricot handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on June 27, 2005, (70 FR 36812). Copies of that
publication were mailed or distributed via facsimile to all Committee
members and made available to handlers at the office of the Committee.
The interim final rule was also made available through the Internet by
the Office of the Federal Register and USDA. A 60-day comment period
was provided for interested persons to respond to the interim final
rule. No comments were received during the comment period that ended on
August 26, 2005.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ama.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
[[Page 54835]]
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 922 which was
published at 70 FR 36812 on June 27, 2005, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: September 14, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-18584 Filed 9-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P