[Federal Register: October 20, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 202)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61107-61111]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20oc05-24]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 194
[FRL-7985-8]
Notification of Completeness of the Department of Energy's
Compliance Recertification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot
Plant
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of completeness of the Department of Energy's Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant Compliance Recertification Application and
announcement of end of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, ``we'' or ``the
Agency'') has determined that the Department of Energy's (DOE)
Compliance Recertification Application (CRA, or ``application'') for
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) is complete. EPA provided
written notice of the completeness decision to the Secretary of Energy
on September 29, 2005. The text of the letter is contained in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. The Agency has determined that the
Compliance Recertification Application is complete, in accordance with
40 CFR Part 194, ``Criteria for the Certification and Recertification
of the WIPP's Compliance with the 40 CFR part 191 Disposal
Regulations'' (Compliance Certification Criteria). The completeness
determination is an administrative step that is required by regulation,
and it does not imply in any way that the Compliance Recertification
Application demonstrates compliance with the Compliance Criteria and/or
the disposal regulations. EPA is now engaged in the full technical
review that will determine if WIPP remains in compliance with the
disposal regulations. As required by the 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act
and our implementing regulations, EPA will make a final recertification
decision within six months of issuing the completeness letter to the
Secretary of Energy.
DATES: EPA opened the public comment period upon receipt of the
Compliance Recertification Application (69 FR 29646-49, May 24, 2004).
Comments must be received by EPA's official Air Docket on or before
December 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail to: EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), Air and Radiation Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA West, Mail Code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2004-0025. Comments may also be
submitted electronically, by facsimile, or through hand delivery/
courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I.B of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Sharp, telephone number: 202-343-
9265 or Ray Lee, telephone number: (202) 343-9601, address: Radiation
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Mail Code 6608J, Washington, DC 20460. You
can also call EPA's toll-free WIPP Information Line, 1-800-331-WIPP or
visit our Web site at http://www.epa/gov/radiation/wipp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under Docket ID No. OAR-2004-0025. The official public docket
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received, and other information related to this action.
Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not
include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket
is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at
the Air and Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA
West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566-1742. These documents are
also available for review in paper form at the official EPA Air Docket
in Washington, DC, Docket No. A-98-49, Category II-A2, and at the
following three EPA WIPP informational docket locations in New Mexico:
in Carlsbad at the Municipal Library, Hours: Monday-Thursday, 10 a.m.-9
p.m., Friday-Saturday, 10 a.m.-6 p.m., and Sunday, 1 p.m.-5 p.m.; in
Albuquerque at the Government Publications Department, Zimmerman
Library, University of New Mexico, Hours: vary by semester; and in
Santa Fe at the New Mexico State Library, Hours: Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-
5 p.m. As provided in EPA's regulations at 40 CFR Part 2, and in
accordance with normal EPA docket procedures, if copies of any docket
materials are requested, a reasonable fee may be charged for
photocopying.
2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the Federal Register
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment
[[Page 61108]]
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the official public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket
identification number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent
feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in
EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the
index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you
may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through
the docket facility identified in Unit I.B. EPA intends to work towards
providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket
materials through EPA's electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief
description written by the docket staff.
For additional information about EPA's electronic public docket
visit EPA Dockets online or see 67 FR 38102, May 31, 2002.
B. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, by facsimile, or
through hand delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
identify the appropriate docket identification number in the subject
line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your
comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments. However, late
comments may be considered if time permits.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing
address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body
of your comment. Also include this contact information on the outside
of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying
the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket
, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. To
access EPA's electronic public docket from the EPA Internet Home Page,
select ``Information Sources,'' ``Dockets,'' and ``EPA Dockets.'' Once
in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in Docket ID No. OAR-
2004-0025. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to
a-and-r-docket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2004-0025. In
contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not
an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly
to the Docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket,
EPA's e-mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
2. By Mail. Send your comments to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Air
and Radiation Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West, Mail
Code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2004-0025.
3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Air and
Radiation Docket, EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC, Attention Docket ID No. OAR-
2004-0025. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal
hours of operation as identified in Unit I.A.1.
4. By Facsimile. Fax your comments to: (202) 566-1741, Attention
Docket ID. No. OAR-2004-0025.
C. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide any technical information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at your estimate.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternatives.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket
identification number in the subject line on the first page of your
response. It would also be helpful if you provided the name, date, and
Federal Register citation related to your comments.
[[Page 61109]]
II. Background
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) was authorized in 1980,
under section 213 of the DOE National Security and Military
Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
164, 93 Stat. 1259, 1265), ``for the express purpose of providing a
research and development facility to demonstrate the safe disposal of
radioactive wastes resulting from the defense activities and programs
of the United States.'' WIPP is a disposal system for transuranic (TRU)
radioactive waste. Developed by DOE, WIPP is located near Carlsbad in
southeastern New Mexico. TRU waste is emplaced 2,150 feet underground
in an ancient layer of salt that will eventually ``creep'' and
encapsulate the waste containers. WIPP has a total capacity of 6.2
million cubic feet of TRU waste.
The 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA; Pub. L. 102-579) \1\ limits
radioactive waste disposal in WIPP to TRU radioactive wastes generated
by defense-related activities. TRU waste is defined as waste containing
more than 100 nano-curies per gram of alpha-emitting radioactive
isotopes, with half-lives greater than twenty years and atomic numbers
greater than 92. The WIPP Land Withdrawal Act further stipulates that
radioactive waste shall not be TRU waste if such waste also meets the
definition of high-level radioactive waste, has been specifically
exempted from regulation with the concurrence of the Administrator, or
has been approved for an alternate method of disposal by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. The TRU radioactive waste proposed for disposal
in WIPP consists of materials such as rags, equipment, tools,
protective gear, and sludges that have become contaminated during
atomic energy defense activities. The radioactive component of TRU
waste consists of man-made elements created during the process of
nuclear fission, chiefly isotopes of plutonium. Some TRU waste is
contaminated with hazardous wastes regulated under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C. 6901-6992k). The waste
proposed for disposal at WIPP derives from Federal facilities across
the United States, including locations in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico,
Nevada, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act was amended by the ``Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act Amendments,'' which were
part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WIPP must meet EPA's generic disposal standards at 40 CFR part 191,
subparts B and C, for high-level and TRU radioactive waste. These
standards limit releases of radioactive materials from disposal systems
for radioactive waste, and require implementation of measures to
provide confidence for compliance with the radiation release limits.
Additionally, the regulations limit radiation doses to members of the
public, and protect ground water resources by establishing maximum
concentrations for radionuclides in ground water. To determine whether
WIPP performs well enough to meet these disposal standards, EPA issued
the WIPP Compliance Criteria (40 CFR Part 194) in 1996. The Compliance
Criteria interpret and implement the disposal standards specifically
for the WIPP site. They describe what information DOE must provide and
how EPA evaluates the WIPP's performance and provides ongoing
independent oversight. Thus, EPA implemented its environmental
radiation protection standards, 40 CFR Part 191, by applying the WIPP
Compliance Criteria, 40 CFR Part 194, to the disposal of TRU
radioactive waste at the WIPP. For more information about 40 CFR part
191, refer to Federal Register notices published in 1985 (50 FR 38066-
38089, Sep. 19, 1985) and 1993 (58 FR 66398-66416, Dec. 20, 1993). For
more information about 40 CFR part 194, refer to Federal Register
notices published in 1995 (60 FR 5766-5791, Jan. 30, 1995) and in 1996
(61 FR 5224-5245, Feb. 9, 1996).
Using the process outlined in the WIPP Compliance Criteria, EPA
determined on May 18, 1998 (63 FR 27354), that DOE had demonstrated
that the WIPP will comply with EPA's radioactive waste disposal
regulations at Subparts B and C of 40 CFR Part 191. EPA's certification
determination permitted the WIPP to begin accepting transuranic waste
for disposal, provided that other applicable conditions and
environmental regulations were met. Disposal of TRU waste at WIPP began
in March 1999.
Since the 1998 certification decision, EPA has conducted ongoing
independent technical review and inspections of all WIPP activities
related to compliance with the EPA's disposal regulations. The initial
certification decision identified the starting (baseline) conditions
for WIPP and established the waste and facility characteristics
necessary to ensure proper disposal in accordance with the regulations.
At that time, EPA and DOE understood that future information and
knowledge gained from the actual operation of WIPP would result in
changes to the best practices and procedures for the facility.
In recognition of this, section 8(f) of the amended WIPP Land
Withdrawal Act requires EPA to evaluate all changes in conditions or
activities at WIPP every five years to determine if WIPP continues to
comply with EPA's disposal regulations for the facility. This
determination is not subject to standard rulemaking procedures or
judicial review, as stated in the aforementioned section of the WIPP
Land Withdrawal Act. This first recertification process includes a
review of all of the changes made at the WIPP facility since the
original 1998 EPA certification decision.
Recertification is not a reconsideration of the decision to open
WIPP, but a process to reaffirm that WIPP meets all requirements of the
disposal regulations. The recertification process will not be used to
approve any new significant changes proposed by DOE; any such proposals
will be addressed separately by EPA. Recertification will ensure that
WIPP is operated using the most accurate and up-to-date information
available and provides documentation requiring DOE to operate to these
standards.
EPA received DOE's first Compliance Recertification Application on
March 26, 2004. On May 24, 2004, EPA announced the availability of the
Compliance Recertification Application and EPA's intent to evaluate
compliance with the disposal regulations and compliance criteria in the
Federal Register (69 FR 29646). At that time, EPA also began accepting
public comments on the application.
In a letter dated September 29, 2005, from EPA's Director of the
Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, the Agency notified DOE that it had
determined that the Compliance Recertification Application for WIPP is
complete. This determination is solely an administrative measure and
does not reflect any conclusion regarding WIPP's continued compliance
with the disposal regulations.
This determination was made using a number of the Agency's WIPP-
specific guidances; most notably, the ``Compliance Application
Guidance'' (CAG; EPA Pub. 402-R-95-014) and ``Guidance to the U.S.
Department of Energy on Preparation for Recertification of the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant with 40 CFR Parts 191 and 194'' (Docket A-98-49,
Item II-B3-14; December 12, 2000). Both guidance documents include
guidelines regarding: (1) Content of certification/recertification
applications; (2) documentation and format requirements; (3) time frame
and evaluation process; and (4) change reporting and modification. The
Agency
[[Page 61110]]
developed these guidance documents to assist DOE with the preparation
of any compliance application for the WIPP. They are also intended to
assist in EPA's review of any application for completeness and to
enhance the readability and accessibility of the application for EPA
and public scrutiny.
EPA has been reviewing the Compliance Recertification Application
for ``completeness'' since its receipt. EPA's review identified several
areas of the application where additional information was necessary to
perform a technical evaluation. EPA sent six letters to DOE requesting
additional information, which are detailed below:
May 20, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-72)--EPA requested
additional information on the performance assessment and monitoring.
July 12, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-73)--EPA
requested additional information on waste chemistry.
September 2, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-74)--EPA
requested additional references, clarification of issues related to
chemistry and actinide solubilities, waste inventory, hydrology, and
documentation on computer codes and parameters.
December 17, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-78)--EPA
requested additional information on the Hanford tank wastes that are
included in the WIPP waste inventory.
February 3, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-79)--EPA
requested additional information on DOE's proposed MgO emplacement
plan.
March 4, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B3-80)--EPA
requested additional information on performance assessment (PA) issues.
DOE submitted the requested information with a series of 11
letters, which were sent on the following dates:
July 15, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-34).
August 16, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-34).
September 7, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-36).
September 29, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-37).
October 20, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-38).
November 1, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-39).
December 17, 2004 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-40).
January 19, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-41).
March 21, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-47).
May 11, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-50).
September 20, 2005 (EPA Docket A-98-49, II-B2-51).
All completeness related correspondence was placed in our dockets
(A-98-49, EDOCKET No. OAR-2004-0025) and on our WIPP Web site (http://www.epa.gov/radiation/wipp
).
Since receipt of the Compliance Recertification Application, EPA
received two rounds of public comments from stakeholder groups
regarding both the completeness and technical adequacy of the
recertification application. In addition to soliciting written public
comments, EPA held a series of public meetings in New Mexico during
July 2004, and June 2005, to hear public comments and to discuss WIPP
recertification. These comments were instrumental in developing EPA's
requests for additional information from DOE, particularly regarding
the Hanford tank waste and its inclusion in the WIPP waste inventory.
EPA will now evaluate the complete application in determining
whether the WIPP continues to comply with the radiation protection
standards for disposal. EPA will also consider any additional public
comments and other information relevant to WIPP's compliance. The
Agency is most interested in whether new or changed information has
been appropriately incorporated into performance assessment
calculations for WIPP, and whether the potential effects of changes are
properly characterized.
The Agency will review DOE's recertification application to ensure
that WIPP will continue to safely contain TRU radioactive waste. If EPA
approves the Compliance Recertification Application, it will set the
parameters for how WIPP will be operated by DOE over the following five
years. The approved Compliance Recertification Application will then
serve as the baseline for the next recertification. As required by the
WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, EPA will make a final recertification
decision within six months of issuing its completeness determination.
September 29, 2005.
Honorable Samuel W. Bodman,
Secretary,
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington,
DC 20585.
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Pursuant to section 8(f) of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
(WIPP) Land Withdrawal Act, as amended, and in accordance with the
WIPP Compliance Criteria at 40 CFR 194.11, I hereby notify you that
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or ``the Agency'') has
determined that the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Compliance
Recertification Application for WIPP is complete. This completeness
determination is an administrative determination required under the
WIPP Compliance Criteria, which implement the Agency's Final
Radioactive Waste Disposal Regulations at subparts B and C of 40 CFR
part 191. While the completeness determination initiates the six-
month evaluation period provided for in section 8(f)(2) of the Land
Withdrawal Act, it does not have any generally applicable legal
effect. Further, this determination does not imply or indicate that
DOE's Compliance Recertification Application demonstrates compliance
with the Compliance Criteria and/or the Disposal Regulations.
Section 8(f) of the amended Land Withdrawal Act requires EPA to
evaluate all changes in conditions or activities at WIPP every five
years to determine if the facility continues to comply with EPA's
disposal regulations. This first recertification process includes a
review of all of the changes made at the WIPP facility since the
original 1998 EPA certification decision.
Under the applicable regulations, EPA may recertify the WIPP
only after DOE has submitted a ``full'' (or complete) application
(see 40 CFR 194.11). Upon receipt of the Compliance Recertification
Application on March 26, 2004, EPA immediately began its review to
determine whether the application was complete. Shortly thereafter,
the Agency began to identify areas of the Compliance Recertification
Application that required supplementary information and analyses. In
addition, EPA received public comments and held public meetings on
the application that identified areas where additional information
was needed for EPA's review.
May 20, 2004--EPA requested additional information on
the performance assessment and monitoring.
July 12, 2004--EPA requested additional information on
waste chemistry.
September 2, 2004--EPA requested additional references,
clarification of issues related to chemistry and actinide
solubilities, waste inventory, hydrology, and documentation on
computer codes and parameters.
December 17, 2004--EPA requested additional information
on the Hanford tank wastes that are included in the WIPP waste
inventory.
February 3, 2005--EPA requested additional information
on DOE's proposed MgO emplacement plan.
March 4, 2005--EPA requested additional information on
performance assessment (PA) issues.
DOE submitted the requested information with a series of 11
letters, which were sent on the following dates:
July 15, 2004.
August 16, 2004.
September 7, 2004.
September 29, 2004.
October 20, 2004.
November 1, 2004.
December 17, 2004.
January 19, 2005.
March 21, 2005.
May 11, 2005.
September 20, 2005.
All completeness-related correspondence was placed in our
dockets (A-98-49, EDOCKET OAR-2004-0025) and on our Web site (http://www.epa.gov/radiation/wipp
).
[[Page 61111]]
Based on the information provided by DOE, we conclude that the
Compliance Recertification Application is now complete. Again, this
is the initial, administrative step that indicates DOE has provided
information relevant to each applicable provision of the WIPP
Compliance Criteria and in sufficient detail for us to proceed with
a full technical evaluation of the adequacy of the application. In
accordance with section 8(f)(2) of the amended Land Withdrawal Act,
EPA will make its recertification decision within six months of this
letter.
To the extent possible, the Agency began conducting a
preliminary technical review of the application upon its submittal
by DOE, and has provided the Department with relevant technical
comments on an ongoing basis. EPA will continue to conduct its
technical review of the Compliance Recertification Application as
needed, and will convey further requests for additional information
and analyses. The Agency will issue its compliance recertification
decision, in accordance with 40 CFR part 194 and part 191, subparts
B and C, after it has thoroughly evaluated the complete CRA and
considered relevant public comments. The public comment period on
our completeness determination will remain open for 45 days
following the publication of this letter in the Federal Register.
Thank you for your cooperation during our review process. Should
your staff have any questions regarding this request, they may
contact Bonnie Gitlin at (202) 343-9290 or by e-mail at
gitlin.bonnie@epa.gov.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth A. Cotsworth.
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
Dated: October 13, 2005.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 05-20987 Filed 10-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P