[Federal Register: January 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 4)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1182-1184]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06ja05-8]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-18771; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-313-AD;
Amendment 39-13890; AD 2004-25-03]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes. That
AD currently requires repetitive inspections to detect fatigue cracking
in certain areas of the fuselage, and corrective action if necessary.
That AD also provides for an optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. This new AD revises the compliance threshold
and repetitive intervals for the inspections required by the existing
AD. This AD is prompted by a full-scale fatigue survey on the Model
A320 fleet. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the fuselage, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective February 10, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1034, Revision 02, dated December 4, 2001, as listed in the AD, is
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of February 10,
2005.
On February 12, 1999 (64 FR 1118, January 8, 1999), the Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated March 30, 1992.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. You
can examine this information at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html
.
Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at
http://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is FAA-2004-18771; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2002-NM-313-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical information: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Plain language information: Marcia Walters, marcia.walters@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 39) with an AD to supersede
AD 99-01-17, amendment 39-10985 (64 FR 1118, January 8, 1999). The
existing AD applies to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes. The
proposed AD was published in the Federal Register on August 5, 2004 (69
FR 47393), to require reducing the compliance threshold and repetitive
intervals for the inspections required by the existing AD. The proposed
AD also provides for an optional terminating action for the repetitive
inspections.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comment submitted on the
proposed AD. The commenter supports the proposed AD.
Clarification of Certain Wording in Preamble of Proposed AD
For clarification, we are explaining an inadvertent error in
certain wording in the preamble of the proposed AD, which differed from
the AD requirements for the optional terminating action specified in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. In the Summary, Relevant Service
Information, and FAA's Determination and Requirements of the proposed
AD sections, we specify that the proposed AD would add an allowable
time for the optional terminating action (provided by the existing AD).
However, in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD we did not include that
``allowable time'' for accomplishing the optional terminating action.
This decision was based on the fact that the French airworthiness
directive referenced in the proposed AD did not specify an allowable
time for the optional terminating action, so it was not necessary to
state that time in the proposed AD. In light of the above, we have
removed the wording ``* * * would add an allowable time for the
optional terminating action * * *'' from the new actions in the Summary
section. The Relevant Service Information and FAA's Determination and
Requirements of the proposed AD sections are not restated in the final
rule.
In addition, certain other wording in the preamble specifies that
the new AD reduces the compliance threshold, but it also extends the
compliance threshold for certain airplanes. Therefore, we have changed
the wording to specify that the new AD revises the compliance
threshold.
Clarification of Paragraph (f)(2) of Proposed AD
For clarification, we are explaining an inadvertent error in
paragraph (f)(2) of the proposed AD. Paragraph (f)(2) of the proposed
AD specified doing the inspection at the later of the times specified
in paragraph (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of the AD; the correct citation
is paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of the AD.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comment that has been submitted, and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase
the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
This AD will affect about 269 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The ultrasonic inspection that is required by AD 99-01-17 and
retained in this AD takes about 6 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the currently required ultrasonic inspection is $390
per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The optional terminating action specified in Airbus Service
Bulletin
[[Page 1183]]
A320-53-1033, if done, takes about 5 work hours to do, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour. The cost of required parts is about
$75 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
optional terminating action is $400 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, the FAA is charged with promoting
safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2004-25-03 Airbus: Amendment 39-13890. Docket No. FAA-2004-18771;
Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-313-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February
10, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 99-01-17, amendment 39-10985.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, and -
231 series airplanes on which Airbus Modification 21202 has not been
done, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a full-scale fatigue survey on the
Model A320 fleet. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the fuselage, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections
(f) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD: Do an ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking in
the bottom panels of the keel beam (both left and right), in the
area of the frame 46 and stringer 37 intersection at the pressure
bulkhead, using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, Revision 02,
dated December 4, 2001. Thereafter, repeat the ultrasonic inspection
at intervals not to exceed 5,200 flight cycles or 10,400 flight
hours, whichever is first. Accomplishment of the inspection required
by this paragraph ends the requirements of AD 99-01-17.
(1) For airplanes on which the inspection specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated March 30, 1992; or Revision 02,
dated December 4, 2001; has been done as of the effective date of
this AD: Do the next inspection within 5,200 flight cycles after
accomplishment of the last inspection, or within 800 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever is later.
(2) For airplanes on which no inspection specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated March 30, 1992; or Revision 02,
dated December 4, 2001; has been done as of the effective date of
this AD: Do the inspection at the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 24,200 total flight cycles or
48,400 total flight hours, whichever is first.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles, or
within 3,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever is first.
Corrective Action
(g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD, before further flight, repair using Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated March 30, 1992; or Revision 02,
dated December 4, 2001. Accomplishment of a repair using the service
bulletin ends the repetitive inspection requirements for the area
repaired. If any crack is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and the service bulletin specifies to contact Airbus for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate.
Optional Terminating Action
(h) Accomplishment of Airbus Modification 21202 using Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1033, Revision 03, dated July 4, 1994; or
Revision 04, dated December 4, 2001; constitutes terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.
(i) Accomplishment of the optional terminating action specified
in AD 99-01-17 before the effective date of this AD, using Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1033, Revision 03, dated July 4, 1994; or
Revision 04, dated December 4, 2001; is considered acceptable for
compliance with paragraph (h) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(k) French airworthiness directive 2002-260(B), dated May 15,
2002, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated
March 30, 1992; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, Revision
02, dated December 4, 2001; to perform the actions that are required
by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1034,
Revision 02, dated December 4, 2001, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) On February 12, 1999 (64 FR 1118, January 8, 1999), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1034, dated March 30,
1992.
(3) For copies of the service information, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. For
[[Page 1184]]
information on the availability of this material at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA), call (202) 741-6030, or
go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
You may view the AD docket at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 29, 2004.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-283 Filed 1-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P