[Federal Register: April 20, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 75)]
[Notices]
[Page 20545-20549]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap05-57]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-2005-0076; FRL-7703-9]
Aluminum-magnesium Hydroxy Carbonate; Notice of Filing a
Pesticide Petition for Exemption from Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide
petition
[[Page 20546]]
proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of a certain
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPP-
2005-0076, must be received on or before May 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as
provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Martin, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-2857; e-mail address: martin.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS 111)
Animal production (NAICS 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under docket ID number OPP-2005-0076. The official public docket
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any
public comments received, and other information related to this action.
Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not
include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket
is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at
the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305-
5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may be
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly
available docket materials through the docket facility identified in
Unit I.B.1. Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the
appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public
docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will not be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent
feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in
EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the
index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the
document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you
may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through
the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA intends to work
towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available
docket materials through EPA's electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief
description written by the docket staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of
your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider
these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is
otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit
I.D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or information
protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name,
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. Also include this contact information on the
outside of any disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter
accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact
you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA's
policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your
[[Page 20547]]
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/
, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number
OPP-2005-0076. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2005-0076. In contrast to EPA's
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in Unit I.C.2. These
electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
2. By mail. Send your comments to: Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID Number OPP-2005-0076.
3. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
Number OPP-2005-0076. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
D. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
electronically through EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. You
may claim information that you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part
or all of that information as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that
is CBI). Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the public docket and EPA's electronic public docket. If you submit
the copy that does not contain CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside
of the disk or CD ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information
not marked as CBI will be included in the public docket and EPA's
electronic public docket without prior notice. If you have any
questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1.Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2.Describe any assumptions that you used.
3.Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4.If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5.Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6.Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this notice.
7.To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
II. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received a pesticide petition as follows proposing the
establishment and/or amendment of regulations for residues of a certain
pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities under section 408
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a.
EPA has determined that this petition contains data or information
regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA section 408(d)(2); however,
EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at
this time or whether the data support granting of the petition.
Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 30, 2005
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Summary of Petition
The petitioner summary of the pesticide petition is printed below
as required by FFDCA section 408(d)(3). The summary of the petition was
prepared by the petitioner and represents the view of the petitioner.
The petition summary announces the availability of a description of the
analytical methods available to EPA for the detection and measurement
of the pesticide chemical residues or an explanation of why no such
method is needed. EPA has not fully evaluated the merits of this
pesticide petition. The summary may have been edited by EPA if the
terminology used was unclear, the summary contained extraneous
material, or the summary unintentionally made the reader conclude that
the findings reflected EPA's position and not the position of the
petitioner.
Keller & Heckman LLP
PP 5E6907
EPA has received a pesticide petition (5E6907) from Keller &
Heckman LLP, 1001 G St., NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20001,
proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate (CAS No. 85585-93-9) when used in
the formulation process for antimicrobial pesticides used on food-
contact surfaces and in water that contacts raw agricultural
commodities postharvest. EPA has determined that the petition contains
data or information regarding the elements set forth in section
408(d)(2) of FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the
sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data
support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before
EPA rules on the petition.
[[Page 20548]]
A. Residue Chemistry
An analytical method for residues is not applicable, as this
petition proposes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
B. Toxicological Profile
Hydrated aluminum oxide and magnesium oxide (MgO) are the principal
components of aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate. Both of these
materials have been reviewed by EPA, and are exempt from the
requirement of a tolerance without limitation at 40 CFR 180.910 when
used in pesticide formulations that are applied to growing crops, or to
postharvest raw agricultural commodities. Additionally, EPA has
exempted a similar substance, magnesium carbonate, from the requirement
of a tolerance at 40 CFR 180.910. The stability of aluminum-magnesium
hydroxy carbonate (insoluble except in strong acids) indicates that it
does not present a greater potential for exposure to the components
used in its preparation, and the uses proposed for it are identical to
uses that are currently cleared by EPA for the starting materials (flow
agent and solid diluent).
1. Acute toxicity. To assess the acute toxicity, the composition of
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate was compared to aluminum oxides
and hydroxides, to magnesium oxides and hydroxides, and to other
components used to produce the finished product. When manufactured,
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate forms a layered lattice, similar
to that of clay minerals. It may be further formed into shapes, or used
as a loose powder to absorb moisture in dry formulations. Magnesium
oxide and aluminum hydroxide are used in antacids sold over the counter
in the United States. No acute toxicity data were identified for oxides
or hydroxides of magnesium or aluminum. However, the salts of these
metals have been assessed in acute toxicity studies.
An acute toxicity study of magnesium chloride (MgCl2)
administered intravenously in ICR (ICR refers to a strain of mice) mice
identified an LD50 (lethal dose that causes death to half
the test animals) of 14.4 mg/kg bw. However, MgCl2
administered via the oral route resulted in an LD50 of
>2,500 mg/kg bw. In reports of human exposure to magnesium compounds,
large doses (unspecified) can cause metabolic alkalosis, diarrhea,
dehydration, and cardiac arrest. Exposure to MgO fumes has been
associated with leukocytosis and fever.
Male mice were administered aluminum sulfate
(Al(SO4)3) or aluminum chloride
(AlCl3) via oral gavage. The LD50 was reported as
980 milligrams aluminum/kilograms body weight (mg aluminum/kg bw,) and
the LD50 of AlCl3 as 770 mg aluminum/kg bw.
An acute inhalation study of aluminum dust was completed in male
Fischer rats. Rats were exposed to nominal chamber concentrations of
10, 50, 100, 200 and 1,000 mg/m\3\ for four hours (mean geometric
particle diameter of 2.82 [mu]m). The acute inhalation LC50
(lethal concentration of the test substance to half the animals) of
aluminum metal is reported as greater than 1,000 mg aluminum/m\3\, as
no animal fatalities occurred during the study.
2. Genotoxicity. The mutagenic potential of AlCl3 in
Salmonella typhimurium strain TA102 was studied at doses of 10, 30,
100, 300 and 1,000 nM per plate. No base-pair substitutions or frame
shift mutations were observed at up to 1,000 nM/plate.
A mouse lymphoma mutagenicity assay was completed with several
metal salts, including MgCl2 and AlCl3. Exposure
of cells to MgCl2 from 22,000 to 32,000 [mu]g/mL resulted in
no increase in mutations over the negative control. Exposure to
AlCl3 from 570 to 625 [mu]g/mL resulted in a two-fold
increase in mutations over the negative control, but was not considered
to be related to exposure to AlCl3, since survival was not
related to dose.
Male albino rats, 8 weeks old, were administered (by gavage)
Al2(SO4)3 [middot]18 H2O
suspended in deionized water; 15 animals/dose received 212, 265, 353,
530, 1,060 or 2,120 mg/kg bw for 21 days. Prolonged treatment of rats
with aluminum sulfate caused a dose-dependent inhibition of dividing
cells (bone marrow) and an increase in chromosomal aberrations.
3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. Magnesium is an
essential mineral in animals, and its deficiency has been linked to
reduced viability, increased resorptions, skeletal malformations, and
heart and lung anomalies in rats. No adverse developmental effects of
excessive intake of magnesium were identified.
The reproductive and developmental toxicity of aluminum is unclear,
based on two separate studies reported by a particular investigator.
Pregnant Wistar rats were administered 0, 192, 384, or 768 mg
Al(OH)3/kg bw/day through gestation day 20, sacrificed, and
maternal and fetal effects recorded. There were no maternal or
developmental effects in any of the treatment groups that differed from
those of the control group of rats. A no-observed-effects-level (NOEL)
of 768 mg/kg/day was reported. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were
administered Al(OH)3 (384 mg/kg), Al(OH)3 plus
citric acid (384 mg/kg and 62 mg/kg, respectively), or aluminum citrate
(1,064 mg/kg) by gavage on gestation days 6 to 15. All animals were
sacrificed on gestation day 20, and maternal and fetal effects
recorded. Maternal body weights were significantly reduced in the
aluminum hydroxide/citric acid treatment group. Fetal body weights were
significantly lower in the aluminum hydroxide/citric acid treatment
group, and the incidence of fetal skeletal development defects was
significantly increased.
4. Subchronic toxicity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were administered
aluminum hydroxide (302 mg aluminum/kg), sodium aluminum phosphate (141
mg aluminum/kg), or dibasic sodium aluminum phosphate (67 or 288 mg
aluminum/kg) in the diet for 28 days. No treatment-related effects were
reported at any dose in any of the treatment groups, when compared to
the control. Male and female beagle dogs were administered sodium
aluminum phosphate for six months; mean dietary concentrations were 0,
118, 317, and 1,034 mg/kg/day in male dogs, and 112, 361, and 1,087 mg/
kg/day in female dogs. No treatment-related effects were reported,
except for a sporadic decrease in food intake in females of all
treatment groups, without a corresponding decrease in body weight. A
NOEL of 1,034 mg/kg bw/day was reported.
5. Chronic toxicity. Several studies suggest that aluminum is not
carcinogenic, and that it may induce a protective immune response to
implanted tumors. Both reviews suggest that results of epidemiological
studies linking aluminum compounds to cancers are questionable.
Male Syrian golden hamsters received 2 mg MgO, aluminum oxide
(Al2O3), or carbon in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)
solution by intratracheal instillation once per week for 30 weeks.
Negative and positive controls were 0.9% NaCl solution and
diethylnitrosamine, respectively. No tumors were identified in hamsters
in the Al2O3 treatment group, although lung
fibrosis, macrophages, and multinucleated giant cells were observed.
The MgO treatment group had a significantly higher incidence of
histiocytic lymphomas than the negative control. Interestingly,
hamsters treated simultaneously with diethylnitrosamine (subcutaneous
injection) and MgO did not develop similar lymphomas.
[[Page 20549]]
6. Animal metabolism. Magnesium is an essential mineral in animals.
It is used therapeutically to treat hypertension, myocardial
infarction, and cardiac arrhythmia. Large doses of magnesium salts are
administered orally to cleanse the colon prior to endoscopic
procedures. Normal human serum contains 2 to 5 mg magnesium/dL.
Magnesium salts are poorly absorbed from the intestines, and cause
osmotic withdrawal of water into the intestinal lumen; it is ultimately
excreted in the feces.
Aluminum metabolism is compound-dependent, but is generally very
low. Approximately 0.01% of aluminum hydroxide is absorbed when
administered via the oral route. Consequently, the majority is excreted
in the feces, and the remainder is excreted in the urine. Distribution
of aluminum compounds is not well understood, due to the levels that
occur naturally in and outside the body. Aluminum that is absorbed is
generally sequestered in bone tissue, and gradually accumulates over
time.
7. Endocrine disruption. No evidence of endocrine disruption from
magnesium compounds or aluminum compounds was identified.
C. Aggregate Exposure
1. Dietary exposure -- i.Food. Exposure to aluminum-magnesium
hydroxy carbonate from food is not anticipated, due to its insolubility
(except in strong acids) and the lack of potential for contact with
food or food-contact surfaces under the proposed conditions of use.
Additionally, the components in aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate
(Al2O3, magnesium carbonate, and MgO) are all
exempt from the requirement of a tolerance at 40 CFR 180.910 without
limitation. EPA has already assessed the dietary risks of these
substances, and determined that limitations on their use in pesticides
are not warranted when they are used individually or in combination in
pesticide formulations that are applied to growing crops or to
postharvest raw agricultural commodities.
ii. Drinking water. Both aluminum and magnesium compounds are
present in natural water that may be used for drinking. EPA has not
established a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for magnesium. The EPA
National Secondary Drinking Water Standard for aluminum in drinking
water is 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L. The use of aluminum-magnesium hydroxy
carbonate as an inert ingredient is not expected to result in
additional exposure to aluminum compounds in drinking water, as it is
insoluble when used as intended, as described above.
2. Nondietary exposure. There is no anticipated worker exposure to
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate from application of the pesticides
in which it will be used. Nondietary exposures to aluminum-magnesium
hydroxy carbonate may result from its use as a stabilizer in polyvinyl
chloride, and its use as a catalyst to polymerize propylene oxide.
These reactions occur in contained vessels, and no exposure to
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate would occur except during loading
of the reactants. Similarly, during manufacture of pesticides to which
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate is added, the components are mixed
in closed vessels, and limited exposure to workers is anticipated.
D. Cumulative Effects
No cumulative effects from a common mechanism of toxicity is
expected to result from the use of aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate
in pesticide formulations.
E. Safety Determination
Based on the information available, the petitioner believes that
there is no expectation that the U.S. population, including infants and
children, will be at increased risk from potential exposure to residues
of aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate. It is insoluble except in
strong acids, and the components used to manufacture the finished inert
ingredient have been individually evaluated and granted exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance at 40 CFR 180.910.
F. International Tolerances
No international tolerances are known to exist for residues of
aluminum-magnesium hydroxy carbonate.
[FR Doc. 05-7330 Filed 4-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S