[Federal Register: April 29, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 82)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22283-22287]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29ap05-17]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Notice No. 40; Ref: T.D. ATF-454]
RIN 1513-AA50
Santa Rita Hills Viticultural Area Proposed Name Abbreviation to
Sta. Rita Hills (2003R-091P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to a petition, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau proposes to modify the name of the existing ``Santa Rita
Hills'' American viticultural area by abbreviating its name to ``Sta.
Rita Hills.'' We propose this change to prevent possible confusion
between wines bearing the Santa Rita Hills appellation and wines
bearing the Santa Rita brand name used by a Chilean winery. The size
and boundaries of the existing viticultural area will remain unchanged.
We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe
the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify
wines they may purchase. We invite comments on this proposed amendment
to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before June 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any one of the following addresses:
Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 40, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
202-927-8525 (facsimile).
nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm (an online
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site).
http://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow instructions for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, and any comments
we receive on this proposal by appointment at the TTB Library, 1310 G
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call 202-
927-2400. You may also access copies of the notice and comments online
at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments and for
information on how to request a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Butler, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau, Regulations and Procedures Division, 1310 G. St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20220; telephone 202-927-8210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA
Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels
provide the consumer with adequate information regarding a product's
identity and prohibits the use of misleading information on those
labels. The FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive American viticultural areas and the use of
their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographic origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an
[[Page 22284]]
endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Petitioners may use the same procedure to
request changes involving existing viticultural areas. Section 9.3(b)
of the TTB regulations requires the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, elevation, physical features, and soils, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Sta. Rita Hills Petition
General Background
TTB received a petition from a group of 11 viticulturists and
vintners in the established Santa Rita Hills viticultural area (27 CFR
9.162) in Santa Barbara County, California, proposing to abbreviate the
name of the viticultural area as ``Sta. Rita Hills.'' The 11 people who
signed this petition are: Richard R. Longoria, owner of Richard
Longoria Wines; Mary Melville, Retail Marketing Manager for Melville
Vineyards and Winery; Norman Huber, owner of Huber Vineyard; Wesley D.
Hagen, Vineyard Manager at Close Pepe Estate; J. Richard Sanford,
Managing Partner for Sanford Winery; David Lafond, General Manager of
Santa Barbara Winery and Lafond Winery; John M. Sundheim, Vice
President of Arita Hills, Inc. (vineyard); Peter Work, owner of the
Ashley Parker Snider, Executive Vice President of Fess Parker Winery
and Vineyard; and M. Perry Osborne, owner/trustee for Hill Top Ranch.
The petitioners are requesting abbreviation of the name of the
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area as ``Sta. Rita Hills'' in order to
prevent confusion between wine bearing the ``Santa Rita Hills''
appellation and wines bearing the ``Santa Rita'' brand name. The
petitioners do not believe such confusion is likely, but recognize the
legitimate concerns of Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, the Chilean producer of
Santa Rita brand wines. The petitioners believe it would be in the best
interests of all parties, including consumers in the United States and
abroad, to abbreviate the name of the viticultural area to ``Sta. Rita
Hills.'' Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita endorses this proposal. TTB has given
recognition to viticultural areas under names different from those
originally proposed in similar circumstances.
According to the petitioners, abbreviating the viticultural area
name as suggested above would accommodate Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita's
brand and trademark rights without compromising the accuracy of the
viticultural area's name. As discussed more fully below:
The term ``Sta.'' is a recognized abbreviation for the
word ``Santa,'' as evidenced by standard dictionaries of abbreviations.
Of particular significance is the use of the abbreviation
``Sta.'' in the United States to refer to wines made from grapes grown
in such well-known appellations as Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County,
the Santa Cruz Mountains, and the Santa Maria Valley.
Historic evidence demonstrates that ``Sta. Rita'' has been
used as an abbreviation for the ``Santa Rita Hills'' region. Such
evidence also shows the term ``Sta.'' was frequently used with other
California place names, such as Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, and Santa
Rosa.
The use of abbreviations in viticultural area names is not
uncommon; approved viticultural areas include names like ``Mt. Veeder''
(27 CFR 9.123), ``Mt. Harlan'' (27 CFR 9.131), ``St. Helena'' (27 CFR
9.149), and ``Isle St. George'' (27 CFR 9.51). The petitioners believe
the name ``Sta. Rita Hills'' fits comfortably within these precedents.
Background for Petition
The current petition notes that on March 31, 1998, a group of
viticulturists and vintners in Santa Barbara County, California,
petitioned the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF, TTB's
predecessor agency) to establish the ``Santa Rita Hills'' viticultural
area in the western portion of the Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area.
ATF published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register
on September 11, 1998 (see Notice No. 866, 63 FR 48658).
ATF received comments from 35 parties. Eleven parties, mostly Santa
Barbara County winemakers, grape growers, and public officials,
supported the proposed viticultural area. The remaining 24 parties were
opposed, not to the establishment of the viticultural area, but to its
proposed name.
Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, a publicly traded Chilean company that has
produced and sold wines under the brand name ``Santa Rita'' for more
than 120 years, led this opposition. Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita commented
that recognition of the ``Santa Rita Hills'' viticultural area would
cause widespread consumer confusion and would damage Vi[ntilde]a Santa
Rita's vested trademark rights.
On May 31, 2001, ATF published a final rule in the Federal Register
approving Santa Rita Hills as an American viticultural area (see T.D.
ATF-454, 66 FR 29476). ATF concluded that the region was locally known
as the Santa Rita Hills and that it was geographically, viticulturally,
and climatically distinct from the surrounding Santa Ynez Valley
viticultural area.
ATF recognized the similarities between the Santa Rita trademark
and brand name and the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area, but
concluded that consumers would not be confused by wines bearing the
Santa Rita brand name and wines labeled with the Santa Rita Hills
viticultural area.
The current petition states that Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita and the
petitioners have since negotiated in good faith about the use of the
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area name. The petitioners, with the
agreement of Vi[ntilde]a Santa Rita, believe that abbreviating the name
``Santa Rita Hills'' to ``Sta. Rita Hills'' would be in the best
interest of everyone, including consumers in the United States and
abroad. Moreover, the requested modification will, by agreement,
obviate the need for further legal proceedings.
Avoiding Conflict With the Existing Santa Rita Brand Name
TTB regulations recognize that consumers can be confused when an
American viticultural area and a brand name contain the same or similar
terms but are used for different wines (see 27 CFR 4.39(i)). When
confronted with a proposed viticultural area name that is similar to an
existing brand or trademark, TTB solicits public comment for other
potential names that might avoid such a dilemma. Upon occasion, TTB has
modified the proposed viticultural area name to avoid conflict.
For example, in 1981, ATF considered recognizing a new AVA called
``The Pinnacles'' (46 FR 49601; Oct. 7, 1981).
[[Page 22285]]
That brand name, however, was already in use by a California winery.
ATF thus determined the proposed name was ``inappropriate'' due to
``trademark claims by another winery and the possibility of consumer
confusion that would result if the proposed name were approved'' (see
47 FR 25517; June 14, 1982). After soliciting alternative proposals,
ATF recognized the viticultural area under the name ``Chalone'' (27 CFR
9.24).
Similarly, in 1992, ATF proposed establishing the Spring Mountain
viticultural area (58 FR 8726; February 17, 1993). Spring Mountain
Vineyards protested, claiming that its brand name, ``Spring Mountain,''
would be ``rendered worthless'' by establishment of a viticultural area
of the same name. At Spring Mountain Vineyards' suggestion, the
petitioners amended their petition to request the name ``Spring
Mountain District'', which was approved (27 CFR 9.143).
More recently, ATF considered recognizing the Diamond Mountain
viticultural area (66 FR 29695; June 1, 2001). Diamond Mountain
Vineyards objected, claiming the name would cause consumer confusion
and conflict with its trademark right in the ``Diamond Mountain
Vineyards'' brand. ATF agreed, noting consumers might confuse wines
labeled with the Diamond Mountain viticultural area name with wines
bearing the brand name ``Diamond Mountain Vineyards.'' Sufficient name
evidence was provided for recognition of the ``Diamond Mountain
District'' name and, therefore, ATF approved the viticultural area
under this alternative name (see 27 CFR 9.166).
The current petition states that the requested modification to the
viticultural area's name is intended to reconcile competing and
legitimate claims to the ``Santa Rita'' name. The petition contends
that modifying the viticultural area's name to feature the abbreviation
``Sta.'' would reduce the potential for consumer confusion. The
petitioners feel that abbreviating the viticultural area's name would
be consistent with TTB's policy of minimizing, when possible, the
potential for consumer confusion between existing brand names and newly
created viticultural areas.
Name Evidence for Sta. Rita Hills
Below, we discuss the evidence provided in the petition showing
that ``Sta. Rita Hills'' is an appropriate name for the Santa Rita
Hills viticultural area. According to the petition, ``Sta. Rita Hills''
is equally accurate and appropriate name for the area, since the term
``Sta.'' is a well-recognized abbreviation for ``Santa.'' This
abbreviation is confirmed by authoritative sources such as the ``Gale
Press Abbreviations Dictionary'' and ``The Oxford Dictionary of
Abbreviations.'' The petition included copies of these sources. Based
on this, the petitioners state that the terms ``Santa Rita Hills'' and
``Sta. Rita Hills'' are functionally identical.
The abbreviation ``Sta.'' has been used in reference to the Santa
Rita Hills region, as well as other California regions, for over a
century, according to the petition. The petition included copies of
historic dise[ntilde]os, or sketches, that were presented, along with
land grant petitions, to the governors of Mexican California. There
were no official surveyors in the region at that time; therefore, each
dise[ntilde]o graphically defined the tract of land solicited. On these
dise[ntilde]os, the term ``Sta. Rita'' was used to describe ``Santa
Rita.'' Likewise, ``Sta. Clara'' denotes ``Santa Clara,'' ``Sta. Rosa''
denotes ``Santa Rosa,'' and ``Sta. Izabel'' denotes ``Santa Izabel.''
According to the petition, the ``Sta.'' abbreviation continues to
be used throughout the United States today, especially in connection
with California wines. The Wine Enthusiast's Web site advertises a
``wine boot camp'' in ``Sta. Barbara Cty,'' and the term ``Sta.
Barbara'' is used in wine reviews (see http://www.dooyou.co.uk/product/141787.html_visited
on 8/19/02). Top restaurants and retailers from
around the United States use the terms ``Sta. Barbara,'' ``Sta. Cruz
Mountains,'' and ``Sta. Maria Valley'' as appellations for fine wines
(references: http://www.renaissancehollywood.com/docs/twistwine.pdf;
http://www.ambrosiaonhuntington.com/html/wines.html; http://www.circa1886.com/cabernet_
sauvignon--circa--restaurant--
charleston.asp?subject=circa1886; http://www.northsidewine.com/level3/us_west.htm; http://www.hotelastor.com/wine.htm; http://
www.capitalraleigh.com/dining/wine--list.htm; and http://www.villacreek.com/pages/winelist.html_all
visited on 10/11/2002).
Babcock Winery & Vineyards uses the abbreviation ``Sta. Barbara'' on
its distributors list (http://www.babcockwinery.com/distributionlist.html_visited
on 10/11/2002).
Internet searches reveal many additional uses of the abbreviation
``Sta.'' with California place names. A tourism page promoting Santa
Barbara County uses the abbreviation ``Sta. Barbara'' for addresses
within the city (http://www.maintour.com/socal/stabarb.html_visited on 10/11/2002). Ship schedules refer to ``Sta. Barbara'' (http://www.gso.uri.edu/unols/schedules/Sproul/Sproul99.html_visited
on 8/19/
02), as do high school athletic calendars (http://www.ouhsd.k12.ca.us/sites/cihs/handbook/december.htm_visited
on 10/11/2002).
The term ``Sta. Rita'' is used as an abbreviation for ``Santa
Rita'' throughout the United States and in Spanish-speaking countries.
For example, a simple Internet search performed by a petitioner found a
University of Arizona faculty Web site that uses the term ``N. Sta.
Rita St.'' to refer to ``North Santa Rita Street,'' located in Tucson,
Arizona (http://www.bened.arizona.edu/ransdell/english_102_108.htm_visited
on 8/19/2002). Another Web site concerning husbandry and
breeding of reptiles and amphibians abbreviates the ``Santa Rita
Mountains,'' a range in Arizona, as ``Sta. Rita Mts.'' (http://www.herper.com/MantidNA3.html, and http://www.
herper.com?PhasmidNA2.html--both visited on 8/19/2002).
The petition states that use of the ``Sta.'' abbreviation is
consistent with practices of the United States Board on Geographic
Names, the body responsible for standardizing geographic names used by
the Federal Government and printed on Federal maps. The Board's
guidelines specify that the term ``Saint'' may be abbreviated ``St.''.
Particularly in regions where place names are derived from the Spanish
language, as in Southern California, abbreviating the term ``Santa,''
the Spanish feminine form of the English word ``Saint,'' as ``Sta.'' is
consistent with the Board's general approach to abbreviations.
TTB Finding
Based on the information provided in the current petition, we
believe that it is appropriate to modify the name of the Santa Rita
Hills viticultural area by using the abbreviation ``Sta.'' in place of
``Santa.'' If this proposal is adopted, the name of the viticultural
area would be modified to read Sta. Rita Hills. Vina Santa Rita will be
able to obtain future label approvals of its use of its Santa Rita
brand name on wines imported into the United States because it is
distinguishable from Sta. Rita Hills. Please note that even if this
proposed rule is not adopted, Vina Santa Rita will be able to continue
to use its Santa Rita brand name on labels approved before July 7, 1986
(see 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)). Accordingly, we set forth below proposed
amendments to the TTB regulation concerning the Santa Rita
[[Page 22286]]
Hills viticultural area, found at 27 CFR 9.162.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
General
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. If we adopt the proposed modification of the name for
the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area, the abbreviated ``Sta. Rita
Hills'' name will be recognized as a name of viticultural significance.
Consequently, wine bottlers using ``Sta. Rita Hills'' in a brand name,
including a trademark, or in another label reference as to the origin
of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is eligible to use
the viticultural area's name as an appellation of origin. Accordingly,
the proposed regulatory text set forth below in Sec. 9.162(a)
specifies that ``Sta. Rita Hills'' is a term of viticultural
significance for purposes of part 4 of the TTB regulations.
For a wine to be eligible to use as an appellation of origin the
name of a viticultural area specified in part 9 of the TTB regulations,
at least 85 percent of the grapes used to make the wine must have been
grown within the area represented by that name. If the wine is not
eligible to use the viticultural area name as an appellation of origin
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area name
appears in another reference on the label in a misleading manner, the
bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label. Accordingly, if a
new label or a previously approved label uses the name ``Sta. Rita
Hills'' for a wine that does not meet the 85 percent standard, the new
label will not be approved, and the previously approved label will be
subject to revocation.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name that was used as a brand name on a label
approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Use of the Name ``Santa Rita Hills'
Since July 30, 2001, the name of this viticultural area has been
expressed as ``Santa Rita Hills.'' If a final rule abbreviating this
viticultural area's name takes effect, we will approve wine labels
showing ``Sta. Rita Hills,'' and not ``Santa Rita Hills,'' as the
viticultural area appellation.
If a final rule is adopted, under our authority pursuant to 27 CFR
13.72(a)(2), we propose a transition period during which vintners may
continue to use approved labels that carry ``Santa Rita Hills'' as the
name of the viticultural area. However, one year after the effective
date of that final rule, certificates of label approval showing ``Santa
Rita Hills'' as an appellation of origin will be revoked by operation
of that final rule (see 27 CFR 13.51). We have added a statement to
this effect as a new paragraph (d) in Sec. 9.162.
Public Participation
Comments Sought
We invite comments from interested members of the public on whether
we should modify the name of the Santa Rita Hills viticultural area to
``Sta. Rita Hills.'' We are especially interested in the use of the
Sta. Rita Hills name as it applies to the region within the established
Santa Rita Hills viticultural area's boundaries. We are also interested
in comments on the impact, if any, that the abbreviation of the
viticultural area's name may have on current wine labels. Please
support your comments with specific information about the proposed
modification or impact on current wine labels.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
notice. Your comments must include this notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do not acknowledge receipt of
comments, and we consider all comments as originals. You may submit
comments in one of five ways:
Mail: You may send written comments to TTB at the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to 202-927-8525. Faxed comments must--
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long. This limitation assures
electronic access to our equipment. We will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
E-mail: You may e-mail comments to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments
transmitted by electronic mail must--
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by 11-inch paper.
Online form: We provide a comment form with the online
copy of this notice on our Web site at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ``Send comments via e-mail'' link under
this notice number.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To submit comments to us via
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit http://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether to hold a public
hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the public record and subject to
disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you
consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, and any comments
we receive by appointment at the TTB Library at 1310 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. You may also obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x
11-inch page. Contact our librarian at the above address or telephone
202-927-2400 to schedule an appointment or to request copies of
comments.
For your convenience, we will post this notice and any comments we
receive on this proposal on the TTB Web site. We may omit voluminous
attachments or material that we consider unsuitable for posting. In all
cases, the full comment will be available in the TTB Library. To access
the online copy of this notice and submitted comments, visit http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ``View Comments'' link
under this notice number to view the posted comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived
from the use of a viticultural area name would be the result of a
proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Therefore, it requires
no regulatory assessment.
[[Page 22287]]
Drafting Information
The principal author of this document is Rita Butler, Regulations
and Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we propose to amend
title 27, chapter 1, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
2. In subpart C, amend Sec. 9.162 by revising the section heading,
revising paragraph (a) and the introductory text of paragraphs (b) and
(c), and adding a new paragraph (d), to read as follows:
Sec. 9.162 Sta. Rita Hills.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Sta. Rita Hills''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Sta. Rita Hills'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved Maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundary of the Sta. Rita Hills viticultural area are five United
States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Series maps titled:
* * * * *
(c) Boundary. The Sta. Rita Hills viticultural area is located in
Santa Barbara County, California. The boundary is as follows:
* * * * *
(d) From July 30, 2001, until [1 day prior to effective date of the
final rule], this viticultural area was named ``Santa Rita Hills''.
Effective [effective date of final rule], this viticultural area is
abbreviated to ``Sta. Rita Hills.'' Existing certificates of label
approval showing ``Santa Rita Hills'' as the appellation of origin are
revoked by operation of this regulation on [date one year after the
effective date of final rule].
Signed: April 13, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-8575 Filed 4-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P