[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 122 (Monday, June 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36995-36997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3332]
[[Page 36995]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51885; File No. SR-PCX-2005--71]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Relating to
Complex Orders on the PCX Plus System
June 20, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 7, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the PCX. On June 14, 2005, the PCX
submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ In Amendment No. 1, the PCX revised Exhibit 5 to the
proposal to add underscoring that was inadvertently deleted from the
text of proposed PCX Rule 6.91(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The PCX proposes to adopt PCX Rule 6.91, ``Complex Orders on the
PCX Plus System,'' in order to create a mechanism to electronically
enter and execute complex orders on the PCX Plus system. The text of
the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed new language is
in italics; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
* * * * *
Complex Orders on the PCX Plus System
RULE 6.91 [Reserved] (a) Definition: A complex order is any order
for the same account as defined below:
(1) Spread Order: A spread order is as defined in Rule 6.62(d)
(2) Straddle Order: A straddle order is as defined in Rule 6.62(g).
(3) Strangle Order: A strangle order is an order to buy (sell) a
number of call option contracts and the same number of put option
contracts in the same underlying security, which contracts have the
same expiration date (e.g., an order to buy two XYZ June 35 calls and
to buy two XYZ June 40 puts).
(4) Combination Order: A combination order is as defined in Rule
6.62(h).
(5) Ratio Order: A ratio order is as defined in Rule 6.62(k)
(6) Butterfly Spread Order: A butterfly spread order is an order
involving three series of either put or call options all having the
same underlying security and time of expiration and, based on the same
current underlying value, where the interval between the exercise price
of each series is equal, which orders are structured as either (i) a
``long butterfly spread'' in which two short options in the same series
offset by one long option with a higher exercise price and one long
option with a lower exercise price or (ii) a ``short'' butterfly
spread'' in which two long options in the same series are offset by one
short option with a higher exercise price and one short option with a
lower exercise price.
(7) Box/Roll Spread Order: Box spread means an aggregation of
positions in a long call option and short put option with the same
exercise price (``buy side'') coupled with a long put option and short
call option with the same exercise price (``sell side'') all of which
have the same aggregate current underlying value, and are structured as
either: A) a ``long box spread'' in which the sell side exercise price
exceeds the buy side exercise price or B) a ``short box spread'' in
which the buy side exercise price exceeds the sell side exercise price.
(8) Collar Orders and Risk Reversals: A collar order (risk
reversal) is an order involving the sale (purchase) of a call (put)
option coupled with the purchase (sale) of a put (call) option in
equivalent units of the same underlying security having a lower
(higher) exercise price than, and same expiration date as, the sold
(purchased) call (put) option.
(9) Conversions and Reversals: A conversion (reversal) order is an
order involving the purchase (sale) of a put option and the sale
(purchase) of a call option in equivalent units with the same strike
price and expiration in the same underlying security, and the purchase
(sale) of the related instrument.
(b) Types of Complex Orders: Complex orders may be entered as fill-
or-kill, immediate or cancel, day orders and good-til-cancelled.
Complex orders may be entered as ``all or none orders''.
(c) Complex Trading Engine
(1) Routing of Complex Orders: Complex orders on PCX Plus will
route either to the Electronic Order Capture system (``EOC'') or the
Complex Trading Engine (``CTE''). Order types eligible for routing to
the CTE will be determined by the Exchange. All pronouncements
regarding routing procedures will be announced to OTP Holders and OTP
Firms via Regulatory Bulletin. Both public customers and registered
broker-dealer orders are eligible to be routed to the CTE.
(2) Priority of Complex Orders in the CTE: Orders from public
customers have priority over orders from non-public customers. Multiple
public customer complex orders at the same price are accorded priority
based on time.
(3) Execution of Complex Orders in the CTE: Complex orders resting
in the CTE may be executed without consideration to prices of the same
complex order that might be available on other exchanges. Complex
orders resting in the CTE may trade in the following way:
(i) Orders in the Consolidated Book: A complex order in the CTE
will automatically execute against individual orders or quotes residing
in the Consolidated Book provided the complex order can be executed in
full (or in a permissible ratio) by the orders in the Consolidated
Book.
(ii) Orders in CTE: Complex orders in the CTE that are marketable
against each other will automatically execute.
(iii) OTP Holders or OTP Firms will have the ability to view orders
in the CTE via an electronic interface and may submit orders to trade
against orders in the CTE. The allocation of complex trades among OTP
Holders and OTP Firms shall be done pursuant to PCX Rule 6.76.
(4) Only those complex orders with no more than four legs are
eligible for placement into the CTE. Only those orders having a ratio
of one-to-three or lower are eligible for placement in the CTE.
Commentary:
.01 Conversions and reversals are not eligible for routing to the
Complex Trading Engine. Changes to this policy will be submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission via a rule filing pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the PCX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange prepared summaries, set forth in
[[Page 36996]]
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Complex orders involve multiple option transactions that are
executed simultaneously as part of the same strategy. The PCX currently
routes incoming complex orders to the Electronic Order Capture System
(``EOC''), which is a function of the Floor Broker Hand Held System.
Orders on the trading floor are announced by a Floor Broker to the
trading crowd and the order trades in open outcry. As an enhancement to
the PCX Plus system, the Exchange intends to develop a Complex Trading
Engine (``CTE''), which will facilitate more automated handling of
complex orders. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to adopt a separate
complex order rule applicable solely to the PCX Plus system.
1. Definitional. Proposed paragraph (a) of PCX Rule 6.91 is a
definitional section. The first four order types in that section
(spread order, straddle order, strangle order, and combination order)
are defined in other PCX rules (most notably PCX Rule 6.62, ``Certain
Types of Orders Defined'') but for ease of reference, the Exchange
includes them in this new rule. The next four order type definitions
(ratio order, butterfly spread order, box/roll spread order, and collar
orders and risk reversals) are new but are substantially identical to
those contained in both the International Securities Exchange and the
Chicago Board of Options Exchange rules. The last order type
definitions are for conversions and reversals, which are a type of
stock-option order, as explained in PCX Rule 6.8, ``Position Limits.''
Conversions and reversals will not be eligible for trading in the CTE
but they are an existing type of complex order under the rules of the
PCX. These definitions are included here merely for ease of reference.
Changes to this policy will be made via rule filing to the Commission
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
2. Complex Trading Engine. A. Routing Complex Orders: Proposed
paragraph (c) governs the CTE. Proposed paragraph (1) governs routing
and provides that the Exchange will determine which order types that
are entered into the PCX Plus system are eligible to route to the CTE.
Paragraph (1) also deals with routing of customer and broker-dealer
orders. Anytime the Exchange changes or amends complex order routing
procedures, it will announce such changes via Regulatory Bulletin. This
will provide that all OTP Holders and OTP Firms will have access to all
current information regarding the routing of complex orders. OTP
Holders and OTP Firms will still have the ability to enter orders, via
telephone, directly to an OTP Broker for manual representation
utilizing the EOC system. As with the trading of complex orders today,
Market Makers or other OTP Brokers will have the ability to trade the
order at the limit price or offer price improvement for that order.
Alternatively, trading crowd members may choose not to trade the order,
in which case it will reside on EOC, or at the discretion of the Floor
Broker, be entered into the CTE. Any complex orders represented by an
OTP Broker will be subject to all provisions regarding due diligence
and order handling of PCX Rule 6.46(a). Proposed paragraph (c)(3)
governs execution of orders in the CTE and is described below.
As stated in the introductory paragraph of this rule filing,
complex orders currently route to, and continue to reside on, EOC until
they are traded in open outcry. Accordingly, manual intervention is
necessary before complex orders will execute. The proposal enhances the
treatment of complex orders by making them eligible for placement into
an electronic format (i.e., into the CTE). Once these orders rest in
the CTE, they may trade electronically (as described below), which
means that they may trade more quickly than they otherwise may have in
an open outcry environment. Moreover, complex orders residing on EOC
are not displayed. When orders are routed into the CTE, OTP Holders and
OTP Firms will use an electronic interface to the PCX to view complex
orders resting in the CTE, which will enhance transparency. For these
reasons, the Exchange believes that routing orders to the CTE will
enhance the treatment these orders currently receive and allow the
Exchange to compete more effectively for this type of order flow.
Proposed paragraph (c)(4) provides that only those complex orders with
no more than four legs are eligible for placement into the CTE.
B. Trading Complex Orders: When an order is routed directly into
the CTE, the order may trade in one of three ways. First, if individual
orders or quotes in the Exchange's consolidated book ``line-up''
against the legs of the complex order, an automatic execution occurs,
provided the complex order can be executed in full (or in a permissible
ratio) by the orders in the consolidated book. Second, if a subsequent
incoming complex order is marketable against a resting complex order in
the CTE, it will automatically execute against the resting complex
order in the CTE. Third, OTP Holders and OTP Firms will have the
ability to view orders in the CTE and submit orders to trade against
those orders. Under this option, the complex order in the CTE would be
allocated to market participants pursuant to PCX Rule 6.76(b). It is
also noted here that PCX Rule 6.76(c) that deals with crossing orders
on PCX Plus will also apply to orders in the CTE. Proposed paragraph
(c)(3) provides that complex orders resting in the CTE may be executed
without consideration to prices of the same complex orders that might
be available on other exchanges.
C. Priority and Complex Orders: This rule filing does not
negatively affect the existing priority rules. In this regard, proposed
paragraph (c)(2) explicitly provides that orders from public customers
have priority over orders from non-public customers. For example,
presently if members of the trading crowd wish to trade a complex order
resting on EOC that is marketable against individual public customer
orders in the consolidated book, public customers would have priority.
These same practices will apply in the CTE. Multiple public customer
complex orders at the same price are accorded priority based on time.
The current complex order priority exceptions contained in PCX Rule
6.75, Commentary .04, will continue to be applicable. The complex order
priority exception generally states that a member holding a qualifying
complex order may trade ahead of a customer order in the consolidated
book on one leg of the order provided the other leg of the order
betters the corresponding bid (offer) in the consolidated order book.
For example, assume a complex order rests in the CTE (priced at a net
debit or credit). If this resting complex order were marketable against
both legs in the consolidated book, the resting complex order would
have already traded automatically. This makes it impossible for a
marketable incoming complex order to trade ahead of resting orders in
the consolidated book that are marketable against all legs of the
resting complex order. Accordingly, when a marketable incoming complex
order trades against a resting complex order, it is only because the
resting complex order is at a better price than the orders in the
consolidated book.
Adoption of a complex order rule provides a framework for the
trading of complex orders on the PCX Plus system.
[[Page 36997]]
This, in turn, should provide investors with greater certainty in the
routing of their complex orders. The Exchange believes that the
development of a complex order trading engine will provide deeper and
more liquid markets for complex orders and will provide order entry
firms with a trading platform the Exchange believes is more conducive
to satisfying their best execution and due diligence obligations with
respect to these types of orders.
2. Statutory Basis
For the above reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change would enhance competition. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)\4\ of the Act, in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\5\ in
particular, in that it is designed to facilitate transactions in
securities, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the PCX consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-PCX-2005-71 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-71. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the PCX. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-PCX-2005-71 and should be submitted on or before July
18, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-3332 Filed 6-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P