[Federal Register: August 12, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 155)]
[Notices]
[Page 47180]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12au05-50]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS
Denial of Commercial Availability Request under United States-
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA)
August 9, 2005.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA)
ACTION: Denial of the request alleging that certain 100 percent cotton,
yarn dyed in the warp direction, seersucker fabrics cannot be supplied
by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner
under the CBTPA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 7, 2005, the Chairman of CITA received a petition from
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of their client B*W*A of
New York City, alleging that certain 100 percent cotton, yarn dyed in
the warp direction, plain weave double warp beam seersucker fabrics, of
detailed specifications, classified in subheadings 5208.42.30,
5208.42.40, 5208.42.50, and 5209.41.60 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), cannot be supplied by the
domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. The
petition requests that woven shirts, blouses, and sleepwear of such
fabrics be eligible for preferential treatment under the CBTPA. CITA
has determined that the subject fabrics can be supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities and in a timely manner and,
therefore, denies the request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Stetson, International Trade
Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of
Commerce, (202) 482-3400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: Section 211(a) of the CBTPA amending Section
213(b)(2)(A)(v)(II) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act
(CBERA); Section 6 of Executive Order No. 13191 of January 17, 2001;
Presidential Proclamation7351 of October 2, 2000.
Background:
The CBTPA provides for quota- and duty-free treatment for
qualifying textile and apparel products. Such treatment is generally
limited to products manufactured from yarns and fabrics formed in the
United States or a beneficiary country. The CBTPA also provides for
quota- and duty-free treatment for apparel articles that are both cut
(or knit-to-shape) and sewn or otherwise assembled in one or more
beneficiary countries from fabric or yarn that is not formed in the
United States, if it has been determined that such fabric or yarn
cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in
a timely manner. In Executive Order No. 13191 (66 FR 7271), CITA has
been delegated the authority to determine whether yarns or fabrics
cannot be supplied by the domestic industry in commercial quantities in
a timely manner under the CBTPA. On March 6, 2001, CITA published
procedures that it will follow in considering requests (66 FR 13502).
On June 7, 2005, the Chairman of CITA received a petition from
Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg, P.A., on behalf of their client B*W*A of
New York City, alleging that certain 100 percent cotton, yarn dyed in
the warp direction, plain weave double warp beam seersucker fabrics, of
detailed specifications, classified in HTSUS subheadings 5208.42.30,
5208.42.40, 5208.42.50, and 5209.41.60, cannot be supplied by the
domestic industry in commercial quantities in a timely manner. The
petition requests that woven shirts, blouses, and sleepwear of such
fabrics be eligible for referential treatment under the CBTPA.
On June 13, 2005, CITA published a notice in the Federal Register
requesting public comments on the petition particularly with respect to
whether these fabrics can be supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely manner. See Request for Public
Comments on Commercial Availability Petition under the United States -
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA), 70 FR 34091 (June 13,
2005). On June 29, 2005, CITA and USTR offered to hold consultations
with the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance
Committee, but no consultations were requested. We also requested
advice from the U.S. International Trade Commission and the relevant
Industry Trade Advisory Committees.
Based on the information and advice received by CITA, public
comments, and the report from the International Trade Commission, CITA
found that there is domestic production, capacity, and ability to
supply the subject fabrics in commercial quantities in a timely manner.
On the basis of currently available information and our review of
this request, CITA has determined that the domestic industry can supply
the subject fabrics in commercial quantities in a timely manner. The
request from B*W*A is denied.
James C. Leonard III,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. E5-4387 Filed 8-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S