[Federal Register: November 23, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 225)]
[Notices]
[Page 70885-70886]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23no05-135]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,831]
Mueller Copper Tube Products, Inc., Subsidiary of Mueller
Industries, Inc., Wynne, AR; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand
The United States Court of International Trade (USCIT) granted the
Secretary of Labor's motion for a voluntary remand in Former Employees
of Mueller Copper Tube Products, Inc. v. Elaine Chao, U.S. Secretary of
Labor, Court No. 05-00442.
The Department's initial negative determination for the former
workers of Mueller Copper Tube Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Mueller
Industries, Inc., Wynne, Arkansas (hereafter ``Mueller Copper Tube
Products'') for Trade Adjustment Assistance (``TAA'') was issued on May
17, 2005. The Notice of determination was published in the Federal
Register on June 13, 2005 (70 FR 34154).
The petition for the workers of Mueller Copper Tube Products
engaged in the production of copper tube products was denied because
the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility requirement of
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was not met, nor was
there a shift in production from that firm to a foreign country. The
``contributed importantly'' test is generally demonstrated through a
[[Page 70886]]
survey of the workers' firm's customers. The survey revealed that
customers of the subject firm did not increase reliance on imports of
copper tube products in 2003, 2004 and during the period of January
through March of 2005 over the corresponding 2003 period. The subject
firm did not import copper tube products nor did it shift production to
a foreign country during the relevant period.
By letter of July 14, 2005 to the USCIT, the Petitioners appealed
the denial alleging that the subject firm lost its business due to
other businesses selling copper tubing manufactured in Mexico.
A careful review of the documents revealed that the Department
surveyed major declining customers of the subject firm regarding their
purchases of ``copper tubing''. In order to establish import impact,
the Department must consider imports that are ``like or directly
competitive'' with those produced at the subject firm. Because the
customer survey which specifies copper tubing as a product might have
omitted information on other ``like or directly competitive'' products,
the Department requested, and was granted, a voluntary remand to
conduct a further investigation. The Order was issued on September 13,
2005.
Hence, during the remand investigation, the Department conducted
another survey of the subject firm's major declining customers
regarding their purchases of products ``like or directly competitive''
to copper tubing manufactured by the subject firm during the relevant
time period. The remand investigation revealed that the major declining
customers did not increase their reliance on imports of products ``like
or directly competitive'' to copper tubing during the relevant time
period.
Conclusion
After reconsideration on remand, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for adjustment
assistance for workers and former workers of Mueller Copper Tube
Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Mueller Industries, Inc., Wynne,
Arkansas.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of November, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-6465 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P