[Federal Register: January 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 12)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3001-3003]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19ja06-8]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[CGD11-04-007]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations; San Pedro Bay, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is enlarging the current anchorage area
outside the Federal breakwater of the Ports of Los Angeles--Long Beach,
CA. This rule is necessary in order to accommodate the ever-increasing
number of larger vessels necessitating anchorage and will provide
vessels an appropriate area to anchor.
DATES: This rule is effective February 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD11-04-007 and are available for inspection or
copying at Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach, 1001 South Seaside Avenue,
Building 20, San Pedro, California, 90731, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Peter Gooding, USCG, Chief
of the Waterways Management Division, at (310) 732-2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On November 5, 2004, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Anchorage Regulations: San Pedro Bay, CA in the Federal
Register (69 FR 64549). We received no letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
Ships of increasing size are calling on the Ports of Los Angeles--
Long Beach. While in an anchorage area, these larger ships require
watch circles of 1500 yards in diameter. Currently, the anchorage area
outside the federal breakwater is made up of watch circles 1000 yards
in diameter. An increase in the anchorage boundary will allow three
additional anchorages for vessels with watch circles of 1500 yards in
diameter.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments on this rule and has not
changed the regulations from the published NPRM.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This proposal will impose no cost
on vessel operators, and have minimal impact to vessel traffic.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will possibly affect the following entities, some
of which may be small entities: The owners and operators of private and
commercial vessels intending to transit or anchor in the affected area.
The impact to these entities would not, however, be significant since
this zone will encompass only a small portion of the waterway and
vessels can safely navigate around the anchored vessels. Additionally,
large passenger vessels already routinely anchor within the anchorage
areas.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. However, we
received no requests for assistance from any small entities.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of
[[Page 3002]]
$100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(f), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation because it changes the size of an existing anchorage.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035, and
2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g). Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 110.214 by revising paragraph (b)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.214 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(6) Commercial Anchorage F (outside of Long Beach Breakwater). The
waters southeast of the Long Beach Breakwater bounded by a line
connecting the following coordinates:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning point....................... 33 deg.-43[min]-05.1[sec] N........ 118 deg.-07[min]-59.0[sec] W.
Thence west to........................ 33 deg.-43[min]-05.1[sec] N........ 118 deg.-10[min]-36.5[sec] W.
Thence south/southeast to............. 33 deg.-38[min]-17.5[sec] N........ 118 deg.-07[min]-00.0[sec] W.
Thence north/northeast to............. 33 deg.-40[min]-23.0[sec] N........ 118 deg.-06[min]-03.0[sec] W.
And thence north/northwest to the
beginning point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3003]]
* * * * *
Dated: January 9, 2006.
K.J. Eldridge,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 06-497 Filed 1-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P