[Federal Register: June 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 124)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36687-36690]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn06-9]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0395; FRL-8068-2]
Myclobutanil; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes time-limited tolerances for legume
vegetables (except soybeans) and foliage of legume vegetables (except
soybeans) of myclobutanil in or on vegetable, legume (except soybeans)
and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans). This action is in
response to EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under section 18
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
authorizing use of the pesticide on vegetable, legume (except soybeans)
and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans). This regulation
establishes a maximum permissible level for residues of myclobutanil in
this food commodity. These tolerances will expire and are revoked on
June 30, 2009.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 28, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 28, 2006,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0395. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Docket Facility is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Groce, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-2505; e-mail address: groce.stacey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS 111)
Animal production (NAICS 112)
Food manufacturing (NAICS 311)
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to
[[Page 36688]]
assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability
of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr
.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0395 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before August 28, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0395, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
telephone number for the Docket Facility is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, is establishing tolerances for combined residues of the
fungicide myclobutanil, alpha-butyl-alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-
triazole-1-propanenitrile and its alcohol metabolite (alpha-(3-
hydroxybutyl)-alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-propanenitrile
(free and bound), in or on vegetable, legume (except soybean), Crop
Group 6 and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybean), Crop Group 7
at 1.0 parts per million (ppm). These tolerances will expire and are
revoked on June 30, 2009. EPA will publish a document in the Federal
Register to remove the revoked tolerances from the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-
limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for
pesticide chemical residues in food that will result from the use of a
pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under section 18
of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without providing notice
or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its actions on
section 18 related tolerances to set binding precedents for the
application of section 408 of the FFDCA and the new safety standard to
other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the FFDCA allows EPA
to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any
petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or
State agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that
``emergency conditions exist which require such exemption.'' This
provision was not amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). EPA has established regulations governing such emergency
exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.
III. Emergency Exemption for Myclobutanil on Vegetable, Legume (Except
Soybeans) and Vegetable, Foliage of Legume (Except Soybeans and FFDCA
Tolerances
The States of Florida and Tennessee, as lead state agencies in what
is essentially a ``national'' emergency exemption request for vegetable
legume growing states, have petitioned the Agency requesting an
Emergency Exemption for myclobutanil to control soybean rust under
section 18 of FIFRA. On November 10, 2004, U.S. Department of
Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA/APHIS)
confirmed the presence of Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the pathogen that
causes soybean rust, on soybean leaf samples taken from two plots
associated with a Louisiana State University research farm. Soybean
rust has been designated as a biosecurity threat and therefore it is
important that control measures be available for this disease. Legume
crops, in general are considered a suitable host for the pathogen that
causes soybean rust. So, for this reason, legume crops are vulnerable
to this plant disease. EPA has authorized under FIFRA section 18 the
use of myclobutanil on vegetable, legume (except soybeans) and
vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans) for control of soybean
rust in Florida and Tennessee, and all other states that have requested
an exemption for this use. After having reviewed the submission, EPA
concurs that emergency conditions exist for these States.
As part of its assessment of this emergency exemption, EPA assessed
the potential risks presented by residues of myclobutanil in or on
vegetable, legume (except soybeans) and vegetable, foliage of legume
(except soybeans). In doing
[[Page 36689]]
so, EPA considered the safety standard in section 408(b)(2) of the
FFDCA, and EPA decided that the necessary tolerance under section
408(l)(6) of the FFDCA would be consistent with the safety standard and
with FIFRA section 18. Consistent with the need to move quickly on the
emergency exemption in order to address an urgent non-routine situation
and to ensure that the resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is
issuing these tolerances without notice and opportunity for public
comment as provided in section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA. Although these
tolerances will expire and are revoked on June 30, 2009, under section
408(l)(5) of the FFDCA, residues of the pesticide not in excess of the
amounts specified in the tolerances remaining in or on vegetable,
legume (except soybeans) and vegetable, foliage of legume (except
soybeans) after that date will not be unlawful, provided the pesticide
is applied in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA, and the residues do
not exceed a level that was authorized by this tolerance at the time of
that application. EPA will take action to revoke these tolerances
earlier if any experience with, scientific data on, or other relevant
information on this pesticide indicate that the residues are not safe.
Because these tolerances are being approved under emergency
conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether myclobutanil
meets EPA's registration requirements for use on vegetable, legume
(except soybeans) and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans) or
whether permanent tolerances for this use would be appropriate. Under
these circumstances, EPA does not believe that these tolerances serve
as a basis for registration of myclobutanil by a State for special
local needs under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor do these tolerances serve as
the basis for any State other than those which have been granted
exemptions as part of the vegetable, legume (except soybeans) and
vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans) section 18 to use this
pesticide on this crop under section 18 of FIFRA without following all
provisions of EPA's regulations implementing FIFRA section 18 as
identified in 40 CFR part 166. For additional information regarding the
emergency exemption for myclobutanil, contact the Agency's Registration
Division at the address provided under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see the final rule on
Bifenthrin Pesticide Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-
5754-7).
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
myclobutanil and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for time-limited
tolerances for residues of myclobutanil in or on vegetable, legume
(except soybeans) and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans) at
1.0 ppm. EPA recently assessed the potential risks presented by
residues of myclobutanil in or on vegetable, legume (except soybeans)
and vegetable, foliage of legume (except soybeans) as part of the
dietary exposure estimates in the human health risk assessment for
another proposed section 18 use of myclobutanil. EPA was still
evaluating the emergency application on the specialty legume crops at
that time and did not include a regulatory expression for these time-
limited tolerances in the earlier notice. However, the human health
risk assessment of the dietary exposures and risks associated with
establishing these tolerances is discussed fully in the final rule
published in the Federal Register of August 24, 2005 (70 FR 49499)
(FRL-7731-2).
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (example--gas chromatography) is
available to enforce the tolerance expression. The method may be
requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental
Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone
number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address: residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no CODEX, Canadian, or Mexican Maximum Residue Limits
(MRLs) for myclobutanil on legumes (excluding soybeans). Therefore,
there are no international harmonization issues associated with this
action.
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerances are established for combined residues of
myclobutanil, alpha-butyl-alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-
propanenitrile and its alcohol metabolite (alpha-(3-hydroxybutyl)-
alpha-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-propanenitrile (free and
bound), in or on vegetable, legume (except soybeans) and vegetable,
foliage of legume (except soybeans) at 1.0 ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes time-limited tolerances under section
408 of the FFDCA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408 of the FFDCA, such as the
tolerances in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in
[[Page 36690]]
Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of the FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency
has determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications''
as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 16, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.443 is amended by alphabetically adding commodities to
the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.443 Myclobutanil; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration/
Commodity Parts per million revocation date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Vegetable, foliage of legume, 1.0 6/30/09
group 07.........................
Vegetable, legume, group 06....... 1.0 6/30/09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-10093 Filed 6-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S