[Federal Register: August 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 151)]
[Notices]
[Page 44676-44679]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07au06-53]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Request for Expressions of Interest in a Consolidated
Fuel Treatment Center To Support the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership
AGENCY: Office of Nuclear Energy, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of request for expressions of interest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Based upon feedback since the President of the United States
announced the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) in February
2006, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is seeking Expressions of
Interest (EOI) from domestic and international industry in building
spent nuclear fuel recycling and transmutation fuel fabrication
capabilities. DOE contemplates locating these capabilities together in
a Consolidated Fuel Treatment Center (CFTC) and seeks expressions of
interest from potential domestic host sites. DOE is also seeking to
define the interest of industry to build upon their proven capabilities
and participate in demonstrating spent nuclear fuel (SNF) recycling
technologies that meet GNEP goals. This EOI will help inform DOE's GNEP
Program as to those issues that industry and potential host sites
consider important to the ultimate construction of sustainable,
commercial-scale SNF recycling technologies that meet GNEP objectives.
The information gained from this EOI will be used to create Requests
for Proposals (RFP) for the proposed CFTC.
DATES: Interested parties wishing to submit an EOI should do so in
writing by September 8, 2006, to ensure their input is considered. A
briefing for respondents to learn about DOE's baseline plan and answer
EOI-related questions will be held on August 14, 2006, 8 a.m.-12 p.m.,
in the Washington, DC metropolitan area. The specific meeting location
will be announced on the GNEP Web site, http://www.gnep.energy.gov.
Please indicate your interest in attending the briefing by sending an
e-mail indicating your intent to attend to
GNEP_EOI_RSVP@nuclear.energy.gov. It is recognized that GNEP is moving forward
on an aggressive schedule that will task all of the responders'
abilities to provide quality information in a short period of time. DOE
believes that GNEP can help to revitalize the U.S. nuclear industry and
improve its global competitive position. Early participation by
industry in this effort will greatly maximize GNEP's success.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By postal mail, Mr. John F. Gross,
Mail Stop: NE-2.4/Germantown, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0119; by phone on 301-903-3918; by e-mail at
GNEP_EOI_RSVP@nuclear.energy.gov.
ADDRESSES: Please send all hardcopy Expressions of Interest to Mr. John
F. Gross, Mail Stop: NE-2.4/Germantown, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0119. Electronic
versions of the Expressions of Interest may be submitted in pdf
(portable document format) format by e-mail to
GNEP_EOI_RSVP@nuclear.energy.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As part of President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, DOE has
launched the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP). The broad goals
of GNEP are described in the Report to Congress--Spent Nuclear Fuel
Recycling Program Plan issued May 2006, http://www.gnep.energy.gov/pdfs/snfRecyclingProgframPanMay2006.pdf
.
A major element of GNEP is the development and deployment of
advanced nuclear fuel recycling technologies. In general, advanced
recycling technologies focus on three operations:
(1) Separate commercial LWR SNF into its usable and waste
components.
Spent nuclear fuel contains uranium, transuranics (plutonium and
other long-lived radioactive elements), and fission products. The
fission products are waste and make up less than five percent of the
used fuel. Buildup of fission products within the fuel inhibits nuclear
fission reactions so the spent fuel must be replaced with fresh fuel
for continued operation of a nuclear reactor. The transuranics and
uranium in SNF would be separated from the fission products and then
fabricated into new fuel for a fast reactor to consume the transuranics
and uranium while simultaneously recovering their energy content. The
SNF recycling program would use advanced separation processes (e.g.,
Uranium Extraction Plus or other comparable processes).
(2) Fabricate and recycle fast reactor fuel containing transuranic
elements.
Fabricating, testing, and qualifying fast reactor fuel containing
transuranic and actinide elements (i.e., transmutation fuel), obtained
from recycled spent fast reactor fuel, is required to provide fresh
fuel for the reactor. After the qualification of transmutation fuel,
the GNEP facilities would demonstrate recycle of fast
[[Page 44677]]
reactor transmutation fuel and eventually could include the
construction of a separate transmutation fuel separations and
fabrication facility.
(3) Convert transuranics into shorter-lived radioisotopes while
producing electricity.
Fast reactors produce high-energy neutrons that can fission long-
lived transuranics, thus converting the transuranics into shorter-lived
radioisotopes. As the transuranics are consumed, significant energy is
released that can be used to produce electricity from material that
would otherwise be considered waste and potentially require disposal in
a geologic repository.
The Department initially announced an approach that would
demonstrate technologies from the laboratory at engineering scale,
prior to a second phase of commercialization. This initial approach is
described in the Report to Congress--Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycling
Program Plan issued May 2006, http://www.gnep.energy.gov/pdfs/snfRecyclingProgframPanMay2006.pdf
.
Following the announcement of the GNEP Program by the President, a
number of foreign governments and private companies expressed interest
in cooperating in the near-term with the Department in the development
and deployment of advanced recycling technologies. Some of these
entities indicated they are pursuing similar technologies and, in some
cases, these technologies may be ready for deployment prior to those
currently under development by the Department. In light of this
information, DOE seeks to determine the feasibility of accelerating the
development and deployment of advanced recycling technologies that
would enable commercial scale demonstrations that meet GNEP objectives.
These demonstrations would utilize industry expertise to build the
well-understood stages of advanced technology for the separation of LWR
SNF, and the construction and operation of a fast reactor, while
designing in the modules for incorporating group separation of
actinides, transmutation fuel production, burning, and recycling
operations.
This approach would involve two simultaneous tracks: (1) Deployment
of commercial scale facilities for which advanced technologies are
available now or in the near future and (2) further research and
development on transmutation fuels technologies. This two-track
approach could result in two commercial scale facilities, one of which
is the subject of this EOI. These facilities are:
Consolidated Fuel Treatment Center (CFTC; subject of this
EOI)--a facility to separate the usable uranium and transuranics from
spent light-water reactor fuel for use in fabricating fast reactor
fuel. During the second track the CFTC would be augmented or a separate
transmutation fuel separations and fabrication facility would be
constructed to separate and fabricate fast reactor transmutation fuel.
Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR)--fast reactor to use
transmutation fuel and consume transuranic elements within the fuel and
generate electricity. The ABR is expected to be qualified with
conventional fast reactor fuel. Subsequently, the ABR would be used to
demonstrate the feasibility of recycling fast reactor transmutation
fuel.
A third facility, the Advanced Fuel Cycle Facility (AFCF), will be
designed and directed through DOE's national laboratories and will
support development of the technologies required to separate and
fabricate fast reactor transmutation fuel. The AFCF is not currently a
subject of a Request for Expressions of Interest.
CFTC Characteristics
DOE prefers to constrain as little as possible this EOI on the fuel
cycle pathway to meet GNEP goals. Industry's input is valuable in
considering the ultimate technical and pragmatic configuration of
GNEP's closed fuel cycle. Some rough parameters for considering the
ultimate characteristics of a CFTC facility for the GNEP Technology
Demonstration Program are set out below. They simply illustrate the
type of information DOE is requesting in this EOI and respondents
should not interpret the following information as a final decision from
DOE on the CFTC's characteristics or the overall demonstration program.
The responses to this EOI may significantly influence subsequent RFPs.
Desired CFTC General Characteristics
The complete CFTC would be designed to perform several key
functions in support of GNEP technology development objectives,
including:
Separating reusable uranium and transuranics from spent
light water reactor (LWR) fuel for use in fabricating fast reactor
driver fuel. (An additional facility designed and directed through a
DOE national laboratory will support development of the technologies
required to separate and fabricate fast reactor transmutation fuel,
i.e., fuel that is fabricated from uranium, plutonium, and other
transuranics found in LWR spent fuel.)
Demonstrating the separation of LWR and fast reactor SNF
into their usable components and the fabrication of transmutation fuel
from those components.
Consuming transuranic elements in a fast reactor. See the
Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR) EOI for a discussion of that element.
Ensuring that facility designs meet U.S. standards for
safeguards and security.
Developing this complete system to support GNEP remains the central
objective, drawing upon the expertise and capabilities of industry and
international partners to achieve it. Further,
The CFTC shall safely and reliably perform its LWR spent
fuel process storage and separations functions as well as providing
safe and reliable ABR driver fuel fabrication capabilities. The CFTC
shall be capable of being licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) and operated in accordance with NRC regulations. The
CFTC shall incorporate design features and technologies to promote
reliable system performance during normal operations and in response to
postulated accident scenarios.
The CFTC shall demonstrate improved spent fuel separations
technologies. This shall be accomplished in a process whose end
products are not pure plutonium or other weapons-grade fissile
material. The spent fuel separations technology will be further
enhanced by advanced safeguards and security monitoring technology.
The CFTC will produce, through spent fuel separations,
high-purity uranium for reuse as reactor fuel or disposal as low-level
waste, transuranic fuel feed material for transmutation in a fast
reactor, and fission products with reduced heat generation and
radiotoxicity for long-term geologic disposal.
The CFTC shall be designed such that the future cost of
spent fuel receipt, separations process, product management, and fuel
fabrication capabilities can be shown as an efficient component of an
economical fuel cycle. It is desirable that the material remain
throughout in as low a category as possible for attractiveness for use
in a nuclear weapon and for safeguarding purposes.
The CFTC shall fabricate the driver fuel (i.e., fuel for
the initial startup core and subsequent refueling of the core in
advance of the availability of transmutation fuel) for the ABR to
initially generate power.
[[Page 44678]]
CFTC technologies shall be capable of commercial
deployment.
Example of Technical Characteristics of the CFTC
Process storage capacity: Sufficient storage capacity
should be included to support full-scale plant operation, including
storage of spent fuel prior to separations as well as storage of the
resulting separated material.
Spent fuel separations throughput: Able to be increased to
approximately 2,000 to 3,000 metric tons per year to support commercial
operation.
Separations technology: UREX+1a where major products
include high-purity uranium, cesium and strontium, transuranics, spent
fuel cladding hulls, and fission products. Alternative separation
technologies with different product streams (e.g., different actinide
separation efficiencies or distributions) may be proposed.
Waste disposition strategies: Waste minimization is a
priority and should focus on reducing radiotoxicity, half-life, heat
generation, and minimize criticality concerns.
Fast reactor driver fuel type: Oxide or metal based
(depends on fuel type selected in related GNEP ABR EOI).
Geographic
The SNF processing and fuel fabrication operations may be
collocated with ABR.
Existing DOE or commercial facilities or new facilities
may be addressed in the response.
Regulatory
Must comply with all environmental protection laws and
regulations.
Must be capable of being licensed under NRC regulations
applicable to demonstration operations on privately owned land
regardless of where the demonstration is sited.
Content of EOI
The following items identify the information that DOE is requesting
in this EOI. All respondents are encouraged to provide information
beyond that requested if it is believed to be beneficial to their
responses.
1. Level of Interest and Proposed Scope of Interest
Please describe how you believe DOE could accelerate successful
demonstration of SNF integrated recycling technologies to advance the
goals of GNEP. Describe the approach that you believe should be taken
to accomplish this goal, including its benefits and risks, and describe
your level of interest or potential participation. Also, provide a
description of what you believe your approach does to advance the broad
goals of GNEP (as described, for example, in the Background section).
In particular, for the CFTC, DOE is interested in:
a. What LWR spent fuel process storage capabilities, separations
technology and throughput (initial and final), and fast sodium reactor
driver fuel fabrication system characteristics would be proposed to
achieve the CFTC mission?
b. What set of separations process technologies are sufficiently
mature to implement immediately and what proposed technologies or
components require additional developmental work (e.g., advanced
centrifugal contactors, advanced monitoring instrumentation) to achieve
the CFTC mission?
c. What are the key elements of the proposal's product and waste
management strategies? Are there near-term strategies using existing
technology as well as long-term strategies for improved waste
minimization and product form as well as storage and disposition
technologies envisioned? If so, specify the key elements of future
improvements, their relative costs and their benefits.
d. In addition to advanced separation processes, what technology
development could be pursued to support spent fuel recycling consistent
with the goals of GNEP?
2. Proposed Roles of Parties Involved
Please identify who you believe the parties to such a venture
should include and the role of each party. Parties could include U.S.
Government and foreign government agencies, state and local government
agencies, nongovernmental organizations, domestic and foreign
commercial firms (e.g., Architect & Engineering (A&E) firms, component
manufacturers, electric utility companies, etc.) or any other entity
you may identify that fits into your proposed solution. Your statement
should clearly identify the role each party would play in ensuring the
success of your proposition, whether direct or indirect. Examples of
roles include, but are not limited to, providing financing,
guaranteeing financing, A&E services, construction, facility
operations, program or project management, regulatory compliance
support, and hardware vendor. Provide an assessment of the benefit to
the U.S. Government and GNEP of your proposed parties and their roles.
Also, provide a description of the benefits that would accrue to each
of the parties in this venture. Benefits could include, but are not
limited to, financial gain, intellectual property, market position,
facilities, education, and advancing policy goals.
3. Resources
For each entity you have identified in Item 2 above, provide
specifics describing the resources each party could provide to ensure
the program's success. These resources may include, but are not limited
to, financial, existing or new facilities, personnel (include a
description of the type of personnel, e.g., technical, management,
regulatory, financial, etc.), intellectual property, and leased
equipment.
4. Proposed Contractual Vehicle
Please provide a description of the contractual vehicle(s) you feel
should be employed in furtherance of your approach. Examples may
include, but are not limited to, contracts, financial assistance,
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements, loan guarantees, other
transactional arrangements. Please limit your suggestions to those
contractual authorities already granted to DOE or other government
agencies you identify.
5. Areas of Technology Development Required for Potential
Commercialization
Please identify what technical areas associated with your approach
would benefit from additional research, development or demonstration
activities, how and to what extent this research and development (R&D)
would mitigate technical or technology risk, estimated timeframes to
accomplish this R&D, parties performing the activities, and other
technical issues that need to be addressed.
6. Government Furnished Data/Technology/Equipment
Describe what, if any, government furnished data, technology, or
equipment you would require to accomplish your defined approach. State
whether you have any existing rights or license for the use of the data
or technology, and if not, how you would pursue acquiring such rights.
Confidentiality
Confidential or business sensitive information contained in the
submission must be identified and marked accordingly. DOE will protect
this information from public disclosure to the extent permitted by law.
This EOI is not a formal solicitation requesting proposals and does
not represent a commitment by the
[[Page 44679]]
Government to award a contract. The Government does not intend to
formally respond to information submitted in response to this EOI. The
Government is not responsible for costs incurred to submit a response
to this EOI, conducting other activities associated with pre-
solicitation planning, or submitting a proposal in response to a
solicitation, if issued.
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2006.
Dennis R. Spurgeon,
Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.
[FR Doc. E6-12646 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P