[Federal Register: August 9, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 153)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45400-45403]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09au06-17]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123; FRL-8077-6]
Inorganic Bromide; Tolerance Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is revoking twelve specific inorganic bromide tolerances
because they are no longer needed. These twelve tolerances are for
residues of inorganic bromide from pre-plant (non-food) use in or on
raw agricultural commodities grown in soil fumigated with combinations
of chloropicrin, methyl bromide, and propargyl bromide. Although methyl
bromide is used as an agricultural pesticide, the Agency considers its
application as a soil fumigant to be a non-food use because it is
quickly degraded or metabolized in the soil, and subsequently
incorporated into natural plant constituents. Methyl bromide is also
emitted to the atmosphere. Residues of the parent compound are not
likely to be found in foods as a result of prior treatment of fields.
While residues of inorganic bromide may be present, these residues are
indistinguishable from background because of inorganic bromide's
ubiquity in the environment. Consequently, EPA is revoking them because
no tolerances are needed for those non-food uses. Furthermore, since
methyl bromide, when applied as a pre-plant soil fumigant is a non-food
use, the Agency is adding it as an entry to 40 CFR 180.2020 noting the
non-food use determination.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 9, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 10, 2006,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Weiss, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8293; e-mail
address: weiss.steven@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, you may access this ``Federal Register'' document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr
.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 10, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123, by one of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
[[Page 45401]]
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the Federal Register of May 31, 2006 (71 FR 30845) (FRL-8061-7),
EPA issued a proposed rule to revoke twelve specific tolerances for
residues of inorganic bromide. The proposal provided a 60-day comment
period.
In response to the proposal published in the Federal Register of
May 31, 2006 (71 FR 30845), EPA received no comments during the 60-day
public comment period.
These twelve tolerances are for residues of inorganic bromide from
pre-plant use in or on raw agricultural commodities grown in soil
fumigated with combinations of chloropicrin, methyl bromide, and
propargyl bromide. There are no active registrations for the use of
propargyl bromide. Although methyl bromide is used as an agricultural
pesticide, the Agency considers its application as a soil fumigant to
be a non-food use because it is quickly degraded or metabolized in the
soil, and subsequently incorporated into natural plant constituents.
Residues of the parent compound are not likely to be found in foods as
a result of prior soil fumigation treatment of fields and are
indistinguishable from background because of inorganic bromide's
ubiquity in the environment. Accordingly, because the tolerances are no
longer needed, EPA is revoking the tolerances in 40 CFR 180.199(a) for
residues of inorganic bromides in or on broccoli, cauliflower,
eggplants, muskmelons, peppers, pineapples, strawberries, and tomatoes;
in 40 CFR 180.199(b) in or on asparagus, lettuce, and onions (dry
bulb); and in 40 CFR 180.199(c) in or on ginger, roots.
Furthermore, because methyl bromide application as a pre-plant soil
fumigant is a non-food use, EPA is adding methyl bromide as an entry to
40 CFR 180.2020 noting the non-food use determination for all pre-plant
soil uses.
Currently, there are CODEX Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for
bromide ion on broccoli, head lettuce, sweet peppers, strawberry, and
tomato. However, as noted above, residues of bromide ion may be
expected to occur in both domestic and imported foods as a result of
inorganic bromide's ubiquity in the environment and residue levels
resulting from use of methyl bromide are expected to be
indistinguishable from those background, or naturally occurring levels.
Thus, no international trade issues due to absence bromide ion
tolerances in the U.S. are expected as a result of this final action.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
As a general matter, EPA believes that retention of tolerances not
needed to cover any residues on food may result in unnecessary
restriction on trade of pesticides and foods. In an assessment of
aggregate exposure to a pesticide, EPA must consider potential
contributions to such exposure from all tolerances. If the aggregate
risk is such that the tolerances in aggregate are not safe, then every
one of these tolerances is potentially vulnerable to revocation.
Furthermore, if unneeded tolerances are included in the aggregate
assessment, the estimated exposure to the pesticide would be inflated.
Consequently, it may be more difficult for others to obtain needed
tolerances or to register needed new uses. To avoid potential trade
restrictions, the Agency believes it is appropriate to revoke
tolerances that are no longer needed.
C. When Do These Actions Become Effective?
These actions become effective on the date of publication of this
final rule in the Federal Register because application of pre-plant
uses in or on raw agricultural commodities grown in soil fumigated with
combinations of chloropicrin, methyl bromide, and propargyl bromide
have been determined by EPA to be a non-food use and no tolerances are
needed for those non-food uses.
D. What is the Contribution to Tolerance Reassessment?
By law, EPA is required by August 3, 2006 to reassess the
tolerances in existence on August 2, 1996. As of July 31, 2006, EPA has
reassessed over 9,700 tolerances. This document revokes a total of 12
tolerances which have been previously considered to be reassessed and
counted toward the August, 2006 review deadline of FFDCA section
408(q), as amended by FQPA in 1996.
III. Are There Any International Trade Issues Raised by this Final
Action?
No. As stated previously there are no international trade issues
raised by this final action. EPA is working to ensure that the U.S.
tolerance reassessment program under FQPA does not disrupt
international trade. EPA considers Codex Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs)
in setting U.S. tolerances and in reassessing them. MRLs are
established by the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues, a committee
within the Codex Alimentarius Commission, an international organization
formed to promote the coordination of international food standards.
When possible, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with Codex MRLs.
EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL;
however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain in a Federal
Register document the reasons for departing from the Codex level. EPA's
effort to harmonize with Codex MRLs is summarized in the tolerance
reassessment section of individual REDs. The U.S. EPA has developed
guidance concerning submissions for import tolerance support (65 FR
35069, June 1, 2000) (FRL-6559-3). This guidance will be made available
to interested persons. Electronic copies are available on the internet
at http://www.epa.gov. On the Home Page select ``Laws and
Regulations,'' then select ``Regulations and Proposed Rules'' and then
look up the entry for this document under ``Federal Register--
Environmental Documents.'' You can also go directly to the ``Federal
Register'' listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this final rule, EPA revokes specific tolerances established
under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this type of action (i.e., a tolerance revocation for which
extraordinary circumstances do not exist) from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
[[Page 45402]]
enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations as required by
Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any other
Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks(62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical standards
that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus
standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-13, section 12(d)
(15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether
revocations of tolerances might significantly impact a substantial
number of small entities and concluded that, as a general matter, these
actions do not impose a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This analysis was published on December 17,
1997 (62 FR 66020), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration. Taking into account this
analysis, and the fact that there is no reasonable expectation that
residues of the pesticides listed in this rule will be found on the
commodities discussed in this rule (so that the lack of the tolerance
could not prevent sale of the commodity), the Agency hereby certifies
that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. In a memorandum dated May 25,
2001, EPA determined that eight conditions must all be satisfied in
order for an import tolerance or tolerance exemption revocation to
adversely affect a significant number of small entity importers, and
that there is a negligible joint probability of all eight conditions
holding simultaneously with respect to any particular revocation. (This
Agency document is available in the docket of this final rule).
Furthermore, for the pesticides named in this final rule, the Agency
knows of no extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present
revocations that would change EPA's previous analysis. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial
direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
James Jones,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Sec. 180.199 [Removed]
0
2. Section 180.199 is removed.
0
3. Section 180.2020 is amended by adding alphabetically the following
entry to the table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.2020 Non-food determinations.
* * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pesticide Chemical CAS Reg.No. Limits Uses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methyl Bromide 74-83-9 When applied as a pre-plant soil All pre-plant soil uses
fumigant
* * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45403]]
[FR Doc. E6-12964 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S