[Federal Register: November 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 212)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64439-64441]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02no06-1]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
[[Page 64439]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1210
[FV-05-704-FR]
Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan; Redistricting
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule that reapportioned the
producer and handler membership on the National Watermelon Promotion
Board (Board). The final rule continues in effect the realignment of
all seven districts under the Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan
(Plan) based on three-year United States production records for
watermelons and the assessments paid in each district. The change was
proposed by the Board, which administers the nationally coordinated
program, in accordance to the provisions of the Plan which require a
review of the districts' alignment at least every five years.
DATES: Effective December 4, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Research and Promotion Branch, FVP, AMS, USDA, Room 0635-S, Stop 0244,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0244; telephone
(202) 720-9915 or (888) 720-9917 (toll free); fax: (202) 205-2800; or
e-mail jeanette.palmer@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under the Watermelon
Research and Promotion Plan [7 CFR part 1210]. The Plan is authorized
under the Watermelon Research and Promotion Act (Act) 7 U.S.C. 4901-
4916].
Executive Orders 12886
The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
In addition, this rule has been reviewed under Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform. The rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect and will not affect or preempt any other State or
Federal law authorizing promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
The Act allows producers, handlers, and importers to file a written
petition with the Department of Agriculture (Department) if they
believe that the Plan, any provision of the Plan, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Plan, is not established in accordance
with the law. The Act provides that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has
his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review
USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.], the Agricultural Marketing Service has considered the
economic impact of this action on the small businesses and has
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to
fit regulatory action to scale on businesses subject to such action so
that small businesses will not be disproportionately burdened.
The Small Business Administration defines, in 13 CFR part 121,
small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of no more
than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms (handlers and
importers) as those having annual receipts of no more than $6.5
million. Under these definitions, the majority of the producers,
handlers, and importers that would be affected by this rule would be
considered small entities. Producers of less than 10 acres of
watermelons are exempt from this program. Importers of less than
150,000 pounds of watermelons per year are also exempt.
According to the Board, there are approximately 1,301 producers,
442 handlers, and 346 importers who are eligible to serve on the Board.
The Plan requires producers to be nominated by producers, handlers
to be nominated by handlers, and importers to be nominated by
importers. This will not change. Because some current members are in
states or counties which will be moved to other districts under this
rule, one handler vacancy in the new District 4, one producer member
vacancy in the new District 5, and one handler member vacancy in the
new District 2 is created with this rule change. Nomination meetings
will be held in the new districts to fill these vacancies.
The overall impact is favorable because the new district boundaries
provide more equitable representation for the producers and handlers
who pay assessments in the various districts. The current importer
membership will not change.
The Board considered several alignments of the districts in an
effort to provide balanced representation for each district. The Board
selected the alignment described in this rule as it provides
proportional representation on the Board of producers, handlers, and
importers.
This rule does not impose additional recordkeeping requirements on
first handlers, producers, or importers of watermelons because the
number of nominees would remain unchanged.
There are no Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulation [5 CFR part 1320] which implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. Chapter 35], the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements that are imposed by the Plan have been
approved previously under OMB control number 0581-0093. This rule does
not result in a change to the information collection and recordkeeping
requirements previously approved.
Background
Under the Plan, the Board administers a nationally coordinated
program of research, development, advertising, and
[[Page 64440]]
promotion designed to strengthen the position of watermelons in the
market place and to establish, maintain, and expand markets for
watermelons. This program is financed by assessments on producers
growing 10 acres or more of watermelons, handlers of watermelons, and
importers of 150,000 pounds of watermelons or more per year. The Plan
specifies that handlers are responsible for collecting and submitting
both the producer and handler assessments to the Board, reporting their
handling of watermelons, and maintaining records necessary to verify
their reporting(s). Importers are responsible for payment of
assessments to the Board on watermelons imported into the United States
through the U.S. Customs Service and Border Protection. This action
will not have any impact on the assessment rates paid by producers,
handlers, and importers.
Membership on the Board consists of two producers and two handlers
for each of the seven districts established by the Plan, at least one
importer, and one public member. The Board currently has 35 members: 14
producers, 14 handlers, 6 importers, and 1 public member.
The seven current districts were established in 2001. They are:
District 1--The Florida counties of Brevard, Broward, Collier,
Dade, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Indian River, Lee, Martin,
Monroe, Okeechobee, Osceola, Palm Beach, Polk, and St. Lucie.
District 2--The Florida counties of Alachula, Baker, Bay, Bradford,
Calhoun, Charlotte, Citrus, Clay, Columbia, Desoto, Dixie, Duval,
Escambia, Flagler, Franklin, Gadsden, Gilchrist, Gulf, Hamilton,
Hernando, Hillsborough, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Lake,
Leon, Levy, Liberty, Madison, Manatee, Marion, Nassau, Okaloosa,
Orange, Pasco, Pinnellas, Putnam, Santa Rosa, Sarasota, Seminole, St.
Johns, Sumter, Suwannee, Taylor, Union, Volusia, Wakulla, Walton, and
Washington.
District 3--Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi,
South Carolina, and Tennessee.
District 4--Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, D.C., West Virginia, and
Wisconsin.
District 5--Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming and the California counties of
Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Contra Costa, Del
Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake,
Lassen, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Mendocino, Merced, Modoc, Mono,
Monterey, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Benito, San
Francisco, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara,
Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma,
Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Toulumne, Venture, Yolo,
and Yuba.
District 6--Texas.
District 7--Arizona, New Mexico, and the California counties of
Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San
Diego.
The six importer membership positions on the Board are
proportionate to the percentage of assessments paid by the importers.
Pursuant to section 1210.320(c) of the Plan, the Board shall review the
seven districts to determine whether realignment of the districts is
necessary, every five years. When making a review, the Plan specifies
that the Board should consider factors such as the most recent three
years of USDA production reports or Board assessment reports if USDA
production reports are unavailable, shifts and trends in quantities of
watermelons produced, and any other relevant factors. Any realignment
should be recommended by the Board at least six months prior to the
date of the call for nominations and should become effective at least
30 days prior to this date.
Pursuant to section 1210.320 (e), the Secretary shall review
importer representation every five years. According to the Plan, the
Secretary shall review a three-year average of watermelon import
assessments and adjust, to the extent practicable, the number of
importers on the Board.
The Board appointed a subcommittee to begin reviewing the U.S.
districts and to determine whether realignment was necessary based on
production and assessment collections in the current districts. During
the review, as prescribed by the Plan, the subcommittee reviewed USDA's
Annual Crop Summary reports for 2002 through 2004, which provide
figures for the top 17 watermelon producing states, and the Board's
assessment collection records for 2002 through 2004. Both sets of data
showed similar trends in production among the various states. However,
the Board used the assessment reports because USDA's Annual Crop
Summary reports were available for only 17 of the 34 states in which
watermelons are produced.
The subcommittee recommended to the Board that the boundaries of
all seven districts be changed in order for there to be an equal amount
of assessments paid by producers and handlers in the districts.
The subcommittee also provided information that the average annual
percentage of assessments paid by importers continued to represent 20
percent of the Board's assessment income during 2002 through 2004.
Because there was no change in the assessments on imports, it is not
necessary to change the number of importer representatives on the
Board. Therefore, the number of importer Board members remains at six.
Subsequently, the realignment was approved by the Board at its
February 22, 2005, meeting. Under the realignment, each district will
represent, on average, 14 percent of total U.S. production. The
composition of the Board will remain at a total of 35 members: 14
producers, 14 handlers, 6 importers, and 1 public member.
Therefore, this rule realigns the districts as follows:
District 1--The Florida counties of Brevard, Broward, Charlotte,
Citrus, Collier, Dade, DeSoto, Flagler, Glades, Hardee, Hendry,
Hernando, Highlands, Hillsborough, Indian River, Lake, Lee, Manatee,
Martin, Marion, Monroe, Okeechobee, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Pasco,
Pinellas, Polk, Putnam, Sarasota, Seminole, St. Johns, St. Lucie,
Sumter, and Volusia.
District 2--The Florida counties of Alachua, Baker, Bay, Bradford,
Calhoun, Clay, Columbia, Dixie, Duval, Escambia, Franklin, Gadsden,
Gilchrist, Gulf, Hamilton, Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Leon,
Levy, Liberty, Madison, Nassau, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Suwannee, Taylor,
Union, Wakulla, Walton, Washington, and the Georgia counties Early,
Baker, Miller, Mitchell, Colquitt, Thomas, Grady, Decatur, Seminole,
and the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Virginia.
District 3--The Georgia counties not included in District two and
the state of South Carolina.
District 4--The States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska,
Kansas, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio,
Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, New Hampshire, Maine, New Jersey,
New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Delaware, Vermont,
Wisconsin, Connecticut, and Washington, DC.
District 5--The States of Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and
[[Page 64441]]
Washington and all of the counties in the state of California except
for those California counties included in District Seven.
District 6--The counties in the state of Texas, except for those
counties in Texas included in District Seven.
District 7--The counties in the state of Texas; Dallam, Sherman,
Hanaford, Ochiltree, Lipscomb, Hartely, Moore, Hutchinson, Roberts,
Hemphill, Oldham, Potter, Carson, Gray, Wheeler, Deaf Smith, Randall,
Armstrong, Donley, Collingsworth, Parmer, Castro, Swisher, Briscoe,
Hall, Childness, Bailey, Lamb, Hale, Floyd, Motley, Cottle, Cochran,
Hockely, Lubbock, Crosby, Dickens, King, Yoakum, Terry, Lynn, Garza,
Kent, Stonewall, the states of New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Colorado,
Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, and the following counties in California;
San Bernardino, Riverside, San Diego, and Imperial.
Under this realignment: (1) Eighteen Florida counties are moved
from District 2 to District 1; (2) Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Tennessee are moved from District 3 to District 2; (3)
North Carolina, Virginia and Oklahoma are moved from District 4 to
District 2; (4) Georgia counties Early, Baker, Miller, Colquitt,
Thomas, Grady, Decatur, and Seminole are moved from District 3 to
District 2; (5) Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado are moved
from District 5 to District 7; (6) Texas counties Dallam, Sherman,
Hanaford, Ochiltree, Lipscomb, Hartely, Moore, Hutchinson, Roberts,
Hemphill, Oldham, Potter, Carlson, Gray, Wheeler, Deaf Smith, Randall,
Armstrong, Donley, Collingsworth, Parmer, Castro, Swisher, Briscoe,
Hall, Childness, Bailey, Lamb, Hale, Floyd, Motley, Cottle, Cochran,
Hockely, Lubbock, Crosby, Dickens, King, Yoakum, Terry, Lynn, Garza,
Kent, and Stonewall, are moved from District 6 to District 7; and (7)
California counties Los Angeles and Orange are moved from District 7 to
District 5.
Due to the re-alignment of the districts the following vacancies
are created: one handler vacancy in District 4, one handler vacancy in
District 2, and one producer vacancy in District 5. Current Board
members would be affected because their states or counties would be
moved to other districts. Nomination meetings will be held as soon as
possible in the new districts to fill the vacancies.
An interim final rule that re-aligned the districts under the Plan
was published in the Federal Register on June 14, 2006. Copies of the
rule were made available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of
the Federal Register. That rule provided a 30-day comment period which
ended July 15, 2006. Two comments were received by the deadline.
Two unfavorable comments were received. The commenters' state that
USDA should not be marketing the agribusiness products at the expense
of the taxpayers; however, the Board is industry-funded and, as such,
taxpayers' dollars are not expended on this program.
After consideration of all relevant material presented including
comments, the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is
found that finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as
published in the Federal Register (71 FR 34232) on June 14, 2006, will
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1210
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Watermelon promotion.
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1210 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 4901-4916.
PART 1210--WATERMELON RESEARCH AND PROMOTION PLAN
0
The interim final rule amending of 7 CFR part 1210, which was published
in the June 14, 2006, Federal Register at 71 FR 34232 is adopted
without change.
Dated: October 27, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E6-18517 Filed 11-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P