[Federal Register: November 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 66784-66785]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16no06-79]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-07-0222]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call
the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639-5960 or send an e-mail
to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395-6974.
Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory (QDRL) 2007-2009, (OMB No.
0920-0222)--Extension--National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory (QDRL) conducts
questionnaire pre-testing and evaluation activities for CDC surveys
(such as the NCHS National Health Interview Survey, OMB No. 0920-0214)
and other federally sponsored surveys. The QDRL conducts cognitive
interviews, focus groups, mini field-pretests, and experimental
research in laboratory and field settings, both for applied
questionnaire evaluation and more basic research on response errors in
surveys.
In a cognitive interview, a questionnaire design specialist
interviews a volunteer participant. QDRL participants are usually
recruited by expressing their personal willingness to participate. They
read or hear about the study through media advertisements, flyers, and
word-of-mouth, and either call the laboratory answering machine number
or contact a person coordinating the recruitment. Thus, participation
is strictly voluntary and participants are not chosen randomly.
The most common questionnaire evaluation method is the cognitive
interview. The interviewer administers the draft survey questions as
written, but also probes the participant in depth about interpretations
of questions, recall processes used to answer them, and adequacy of
response categories to express answers, while noting points of
confusion and errors in responding. Interviews are generally conducted
in small rounds of 10-15 interviews; ideally, the questionnaire is re-
worked between rounds and revisions are tested interactively until
interviews yield relatively few new insights. When possible, cognitive
interviews are conducted in the survey's intended mode of
administration. For example, when testing telephone survey
questionnaires, participants often respond to the questions via a
telephone in a laboratory room. Under this condition, the participant
answers without face-to-face interaction. QDRL staff watch for response
difficulties from an observation room, and then conduct a face-to-face
debriefing with in-depth probes. Cognitive interviewing provides useful
data on questionnaire performance at minimal cost and respondent
burden. Similar methodology has been adopted by other Federal agencies,
as well as by academic and commercial survey organizations. NCHS is
requesting 3 years of OMB Clearance for the project. There are no costs
to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized
burden hours are 600.
[[Page 66785]]
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Projects Number of responses/ Average hours
participants participant per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QDRL Interviews:
(1) NCHS Surveys............................................ 120 1 1.25
(2) Other questionnaire testing............................. 120 1 1.25
(3) Research on the effects of alternative questionnaire 500 1 18/60
design.....................................................
(4) General Methodological Research......................... 60 1 1.25
Focus Groups (5 groups of 10)................................... 50 1 1.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: November 9, 2006.
Joan F. Karr,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6-19373 Filed 11-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P