[Federal Register: December 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 231)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69484-69486]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01de06-12]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Honolulu 06-008]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Waters Surrounding U.S. Forces Vessel SBX-1, HI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 500-yard moving
security zone around the U.S. Forces vessel SBX-1 during transit within
the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone. This security zone is necessary
to protect the SBX-1 from hazards associated with vessels and persons
approaching too close during transit. Entry of persons or vessels into
this temporary security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
DATES: This rule is effective from 12 a.m. (noon) (HST) on November 13,
2006, until 11:59 p.m. (HST) on December 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket COTP Honolulu 06-008 and are available
for inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector Honolulu between 7 a.m.
and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant (Junior Grade) Quincey
Adams, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu at (808) 842-2600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast Guard was not given
the final voyage plan in time to complete full notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedures, rulemaking, and the need for this temporary
security zone was not determined until less than 30 days before the
SBX-1 will require the protection provided by this rule. Publishing an
NPRM and delaying the effective date would be contrary to the public
interest since the transit would occur before completion of the notice-
and-comment rulemaking process, thereby jeopardizing the security of
the people and property associated with the operation. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. The COTP finds this good cause to be the immediate need for a
security zone to allay the waterborne security threats surrounding the
SBX-1's transit.
Background and Purpose
On October 6, 2006, the SBX-1 entered the Honolulu Captain of the
Port Zone and transited to Pearl Harbor, HI for repairs. On October 5,
2006, the Coast Guard issued a temporary final rule (COTP Honolulu 06-
006; Sec. 165.T14-148 Security zone; waters surrounding U.S. Forces
vessel SBX-1, HI) to protect the vessel during transit. That rule
expired at 6 p.m. on October 11, 2006, and is scheduled to be published
with other temporary rules that expired before they could be published
full-text in the Federal Register. Due to the unknown duration of
repairs, the SBX-1's actual departure date and time will not be known
in advance. The Coast Guard is establishing this security zone to
ensure that the vessel is protected during its upcoming departure from
Pearl Harbor with as much public notice as possible.
Discussion of Rule
This temporary security zone is effective from 12 a.m. (noon) (HST)
on November 13, 2006, until 11:59 p.m. (HST) on December 3, 2006. It is
located within the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-
10) and covers all U.S. navigable waters extending 500 yards in all
directions from the U.S. Forces vessel SBX-1, from the surface of the
water to the ocean floor. The security zone moves with the SBX-1 while
in transit. The security zone becomes fixed when the SBX-1 is anchored,
position-keeping, or moored. The security zone will be activated and
enforced for just a few days during its three-week effective period. A
broadcast notice to mariners will be issued to notify the public of
this activation and enforcement period as soon as possible. If the
Coast Guard has at least 48 hours notice of the movement of the SBX-1,
the broadcast notice to mariners will be published giving the public 48
hours notice of the enforcement period commencement. From the 1 and 2
buoy for Pearl Harbor until it departs the COTP zone, SBX-1 is expected
to have a Coast Guard escort.
The general regulations governing security zones contained in 33
CFR 165.33 apply. Entering into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or a designated representative thereof. The Captain of the Port
will cause notice of the enforcement of the security zone described in
this section to be made by broadcast notice to mariners. Any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, and any other Captain of
the Port representative permitted by law, may enforce the zone. The
Captain of the Port may waive any of the requirements of this rule for
any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that application of
the security zone is unnecessary or impractical for the purpose of
maritime security. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Sec.
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under Sec.
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is based on the
limited duration of the zone, the limited geographic area affected by
it, and its ability to move with the protected vessel.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We
[[Page 69485]]
expect that there will be little or no impact to small entities due to
the narrowly tailored scope of this security zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and either preempts State law or imposes a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards is inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards
(e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation;
test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems
practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that limit the
use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of the Commandant
Instruction M16475.1D, this rule is categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation.
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T14-150 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T14-150 Security zone; waters surrounding U.S. Forces vessel
SBX-1, HI.
(a) Location. The following area, in U.S. navigable waters within
the Honolulu Captain of the Port Zone (see 33 CFR 3.70-10), from the
surface of the water to the ocean floor, is a security zone: All waters
extending 500 yards in all directions from U.S. Forces vessel SBX-1.
The security zone moves with the SBX-1 while it is in transit and
becomes fixed when the SBX-1 is anchored, position-keeping, or moored.
(b) Effective period. This security zone is effective from 12 a.m.
(noon) (HST) on November 13, 2006, until 11:59 p.m. (HST) on December
3, 2006.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing security zones
contained in 33 CFR 165.33 apply. Entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or a designated representative thereof.
[[Page 69486]]
(d) Enforcement. The Coast Guard will begin enforcement of the
security zone described in this section upon the SBX-1's departure from
Pearl Harbor, HI.
(e) Informational notice. The Captain of the Port of Honolulu will
cause notice of the enforcement of the security zone described in this
section to be made by broadcast notice to mariners.
(f) Authority to enforce. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer, and any other Captain of the Port representative
permitted by law, may enforce this temporary security zone.
(g) Waiver. The Captain of the Port may waive any of the
requirements of this rule for any person, vessel, or class of vessel
upon finding that application of the security zone is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of maritime security.
(h) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: November 3, 2006.
V. B. Atkins,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. E6-20355 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P