[Federal Register: April 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 19885-19887]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ap07-37]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
[No. USA-2007-0014]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers--ERDC/CERL announces a
proposed new public information collection and seeks public comment on
the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by June 19,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any
[[Page 19886]]
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments, please write to: Larry Pater, PhD,
P.E., Program/Project Manager, Noise R&D, U.S. Army Engineer Research
and Development Center (ERDC), Construction Engineering Research
Laboratory (CERL), 2902 Farber Drive, Champaign, IL 61821.
Title and OMB Number: Assessing Human Response to Military Impulse
Noise; OMB Control Number 0710--TBD.
Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary
to obtain information on the relationship between community annoyance
and complaints, related to impulsive noise from military installations.
The information will provide the necessary tools and guidance for
military installations to effectively balance the need for training
operations at military installations with public safety and welfare.
Affected Public: Individuals and households.
Annual Burden Hours:
Year 1 (2007): 37.5 hours.
Year 2 (2008): 1,575 hours.
Year 3 (2009): 700 hours.
Year 4 (2010): 1,287.5 hours.
Year 5 (2011): 412.5 hours.
Total Number of Burden Hours for 5 Years: 4,012.5 hours.
Number of Respondents:
Year 1 (2007): 75.
Year 2 (2008): 1,575.
Year 3 (2009): 575.
Year 4 (2010): 725.
Year 5 (2011): 25.
Total Number of Respondents for 5 Years: 2,975.
Respondents Per Respondent:
Year 1.
1 response for 50 Qualitative Personal Interview
respondents in three locations (30 minutes per interview equaling 25
hours).
1 response for 25 baseline interviews for the respondents
participating in the In-situ study at Site 1 (30 minutes per
interview equaling 12.5 hours).
Total Responses for Year 1: 75.
Year 2.
16,750 (estimated) responses for 25 In-situ survey
participants (670 respondents per person) at Site 1 (3 minutes
per response equaling 837.5 hours).
1,225 responses for 1,050 General Community Survey
respondents (30 minutes per survey equaling 612.5 hours).
[cir] 2 responses for 175 panel survey respondents at Site
1.
[cir] 1 response for 525 cross-sectional survey respondents at Site
1.
[cir] 1 response for 175 panel survey respondents at Site
2.
[cir] 1 response for 175 cross-sectional survey respondents at Site
2.
1 response for 500 complaint survey respondents (15
minutes per survey equaling 125 hours).
Total Responses for Year 2: 18,475.
Year 3.
8,250 (estimated) responses for 25 In-situ survey
respondents (330 responses per person) at Site 1 (3 minutes
per response equaling 412.5 hours).
1 response for 25 post measurement interviews for In-situ
study participants at Site 1 (30 minutes per interview
equaling 12.5 hours).
1 response for 25 baseline interviews for the respondents
participating in the In-situ study at Site 2 (30 minutes per
interview equaling 12.5 hours).
1 response for 525 General Community Survey respondents at
Site 2 (30 minutes per survey equaling 262.5 hours).
[cir] 1 response for 175 panel survey respondents.
[cir] 1 response for 350 cross-sectional survey respondents.
Total Responses for Year 3: 8,825.
Year 4.
16,750 (estimated) responses for 25 In-situ survey
respondents (670 responses per person) at Site 2 (3 minutes
per response equaling 837.5 hours).
1 response for 25 post measurement interviews In-situ
participants at Site 2 (30 minutes per interview equaling 12.5
hours).
875 responses for 700 General Community Survey respondents
at Site 3 (30 minutes per survey equaling 437.5 hours).
[cir] 2 responses for 175 panel survey respondents at Site
3.
[cir] 1 response for 525 cross-sectional survey respondents at Site
3.
Total Responses for Year 4: 17,650.
Year 5.
8,250 (estimated) responses for 25 In-situ survey participants at
Location 2 (330 responses per person) at Site 2 (3
minutes per response equaling 412.5 hours).
Total Responses for Year 5: 8,250.
Total Number of Responses for 5 years: 53,275.
Average Burden per Resposne:
Qualitative Personal Interview: 30 minutes.
Baseline Interview: 30 minutes.
Post Measurement Interview: 30 minutes.
In-situ Survey: 3 minutes.
General Community Survey: 30 minutes.
Complaint Survey: 15 minutes.
Frequency of responses:
Qualitative Personal Interview: One time per installation.
Baseline Interview: One time per installation.
Post Measurement Interview: One time per installation.
In-situ Survey: On occasion for 12 months.
General Community Survey:
Panel Sample: Two times per installation.
Cross-sectional sample: One time per installation.
Complaint Survey: One time per installation.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Information Collection
Respondents are individuals living in the vicinity of selected
military installations who regularly experience impulsive noise from
explosions and heavy weapons blasts. Information collection includes
several different surveys:
1. A qualitative personal interview to explore respondents
experiences, understanding, and terminology to refine the survey
questions (to be conducted at 2 installations).
2. An In-situ study where respondents are asked to respond to a
brief set of 5-6 questions on a PDA whenever they experience an
impulsive noise event (to be conducted at 2 installations ).
3. A baseline interview for respondents participating in the In-
situ study (to be conducted at 2 installations).
4. A post measurement interview for respondents participating in
the In-situ study (to be conducted at 2 installations).
5. A general community survey to gather responses to questions
about the impact of impulsive noise events from a large representative
sample of community residents (to be conducted at 3 installations).
6. A complaint survey that gathers data on response to a specific
noise event for which one or more complaints are received by the
military installation. For each recorded noise complaint, a sample of
10 households in the immediate vicinity of the complainant, as well as
the complainant will be surveyed (to be conducted at 1 installation).
The study will involve communities surrounding 3 different military
[[Page 19887]]
installations to ensure the results and dose-response models can be
generalized and applied to other U.S. military installations.
Dated: April 10, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-1969 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M