[Federal Register: July 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 140)]
[Notices]
[Page 40135-40139]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23jy07-39]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Disposal of Greater-Than-Class-C Low-Level Radioactive Waste
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement (EIS) under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the disposal of Greater-Than-Class-
C low-level radioactive waste (GTCC LLW). GTCC LLW is defined by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 10 CFR 72.3 as ``low-level
radioactive waste that exceeds the concentration limits of
radionuclides established for Class C waste in [10 CFR 61.55].'' GTCC
LLW is generated by NRC or Agreement State-licensed activities
(hereafter referred to as NRC-licensed activities).
DOE proposes to evaluate alternatives for GTCC LLW disposal: in a
geologic repository; in intermediate depth boreholes; and in enhanced
near surface facilities. Candidate locations for these disposal
facilities would be: the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Idaho; the
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
(WIPP) in New Mexico; the Nevada Test Site (NTS) and the proposed Yucca
Mountain repository in Nevada; the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South
Carolina; the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) in Tennessee; and the Hanford
Site (Hanford) in Washington. DOE will also evaluate disposal at
generic commercial facilities in arid and humid locations.
In addition, DOE proposes to include DOE LLW and transuranic waste
having characteristics similar to GTCC LLW and which may not have an
identified path to disposal (hereafter referred to as GTCC-like waste)
in the scope of this EIS. DOE's GTCC-like waste is owned or generated
by DOE. The use of the term ``GTCC-like'' does not have the intent or
effect of creating a new classification of radioactive waste.
DOE invites public comment on the scope of this EIS during a 60-day
public scoping period. During this period, DOE will hold public scoping
meetings to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the
scope of the EIS and to learn more about the proposed action from DOE
officials.
DOE issued an Advance Notice of Intent (ANOI), 70 FR 24775 (May 11,
2005), inviting the public to provide preliminary comments on the
potential scope of the EIS. This Notice of Intent (NOI) includes a
summary of the public comments received on the ANOI.
DATES: The public scoping period starts with the date of publication of
this NOI in the Federal Register and will continue until September 21,
2007. DOE will consider all comments received or postmarked by
September 21, 2007 in defining the scope of this EIS. Comments received
or postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent
practicable.
Public scoping meetings will be held to provide the public with an
opportunity to present comments on the scope of the EIS and to learn
more about
[[Page 40136]]
the proposed action from DOE officials. The locations, dates, and times
for the public scoping meetings are listed in the ``Public Scoping''
section under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the GTCC LLW EIS or
requests to speak at one of the public scoping meetings should be sent
to: James L. Joyce, Document Manager, Office of Regulatory Compliance
(EM-10), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0119. Telephone: (301) 903-2151. Fax: 301-903-
4303. E-mail: gtcceis@anl.gov.
Written comments on the scope of the GTCC LLW EIS and requests to
speak at one of the public scoping meetings can also be submitted
through the Web site at http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request further information about
the EIS, the public scoping meetings, or to be placed on the EIS
distribution list, use any of the methods (fax, telephone, e-mail, or
Web site) listed under ADDRESSES above. For general information
concerning the DOE NEPA process, contact: Carol Borgstrom, Director,
Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-20), U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0119.
Telephone: 202-586-4600, or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756.
Fax: 202-586-7031.
This NOI will be available on the internet at http://www.eh.doe.gov/nepa
.
Additional information on the GTCC LLW EIS can be found at http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov
.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
GTCC LLW is defined by NRC in 10 CFR 72.3 as ``low-level
radioactive waste that exceeds the concentration limits of
radionuclides established for Class C waste in 10 CFR 61.55.'' In 10
CFR 61.55, the NRC defines classes of LLW as A, B and C by the
concentration of specific short- and long-lived radionuclides, with
Class C LLW having the highest radionuclide concentration limits.
Consistent with NRC's and DOE's authorities under the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954 (as amended), the NRC LLW radioactive waste classification
system does not apply to radioactive wastes generated or owned by DOE
and disposed of at DOE facilities. However, DOE owns and generates LLW
and transuranic radioactive waste with characteristics similar to GTCC
LLW and that may not have a path to disposal. For the purposes of this
EIS, DOE is referring to this DOE waste as GTCC-like waste (the use of
the term ``GTCC-like'' does not have the intent or effect of creating a
new classification of radioactive waste). DOE proposes to evaluate
alternatives for the disposal of both GTCC LLW and DOE GTCC-like waste
in this EIS.
Section 3(b)(1)(D) of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy
Amendments Act of 1985 (LLRWPAA) assigns the responsibility for the
disposal of GTCC LLW to the Federal Government. The LLRWPAA specifies
that the GTCC LLW covered under Section 3(b)(1)(D) is to be disposed of
in a facility licensed and determined to be adequate by the NRC. DOE is
the federal agency responsible for the disposal of GTCC LLW. This
responsibility was described in a 1987 report to Congress,
Recommendations for Management of Greater-Than-Class-C Low-Level Waste
(DOE/NE-0077), U.S. Department of Energy, February 1987. The report can
be obtained by contacting the Document Manager listed under ADDRESSES
above or from the Web site at http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov.
The September 11, 2001, attacks and subsequent threats have
heightened concerns that terrorists could gain possession of
radiological sealed sources, including GTCC LLW sealed sources, and use
them for malevolent purposes. Since 2003, the Government Accountability
Office (GAO) has issued three reports on matters related to the
security of uncontrolled sealed sources, including the Department's
progress in developing a GTCC LLW disposal facility.\1\ In addition,
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 contains several provisions (e.g.,
sections 631, 651, and 957) directed at improving the control of sealed
sources, including disposal availability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These GAO reports are entitled Nuclear Security: Federal and
State Action Needed to Improve Security of Sealed Radiological
Sources, GAO-03804 (August 6, 2004); Nuclear Nonproliferation: DOE
Action Needed to Ensure Continued Recovery of Unwanted Radioactive
Sources, GAO-03-438 (April 15, 2003); and Nuclear Security: DOE
Needs Better Information to Guide Its Expanded Recovery of Sealed
Sources, GAO-05-967 (September 2005). These reports can be found at
http://www.gao.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of its technical expertise in radiation protection, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will participate as a
cooperating agency in the preparation of this EIS. NRC will be a
commenting agency.
Energy Policy Act of 2005 Reporting Requirements
Section 631 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires the Secretary
of Energy to: provide Congress with notification of the DOE office with
responsibility for completing activities needed to provide for safe
disposal of GTCC LLW; submit a report to Congress containing an
estimate of the cost and schedule to complete an EIS and record of
decision (ROD) for a permanent disposal facility for GTCC LLW; and
prior to making a final decision on the disposal alternative or
alternatives to be implemented, submit to Congress a report that
describes all alternatives considered in the EIS. In meeting these
requirements thus far, DOE has named the Office of Environmental
Management as the lead organization having responsibility to develop
GTCC LLW disposal capability and has submitted a report to Congress
dated July 2006 on the estimated cost and proposed schedule to complete
the EIS.
Types and Estimated Quantities of GTCC LLW and DOE GTCC-like Waste
GTCC LLW may generally be categorized into the following three
types: sealed sources, activated metals, and other miscellaneous waste
(e.g., contaminated equipment). Sealed sources are typically small,
high-activity radioactive materials encapsulated in closed metal
containers. They are used for a variety of purposes including
irradiating food and medical products for sterilization, detecting
flaws and failures in pipelines and metal welds, calculating moisture
content in soil and other materials, and assisting in the diagnosis and
treatment of illnesses.
Activated metal wastes are primarily generated in nuclear reactors
during facility modifications and decommissioning. There are 104
operating commercial reactors in the United States and an additional 18
that have been closed or decommissioned. The activated metals consist
of internal nuclear components that have become radioactive from
neutron absorption. These components include portions of the reactor
vessel and other stainless steel components near the fuel assemblies.
Other miscellaneous waste includes all GTCC LLW that is not
activated metals or sealed sources. This waste includes contaminated
equipment, debris, trash, scrap metal and decontamination and
decommissioning waste from miscellaneous industrial activities, such as
the manufacture of sealed sources and laboratory research.
DOE GTCC-like waste includes some sealed sources owned or generated
by DOE activities; activated metals including reflector materials from
research reactors as well as other miscellaneous waste owned by DOE or
generated by DOE activities that has characteristics similar to GTCC
LLW and may not have a path to disposal.
[[Page 40137]]
Most of the DOE GTCC-like waste consists of transuranic waste \2\ (a
DOE waste category) that may have originated from non-defense
activities and therefore may not be authorized for disposal at WIPP
under the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act of 1992 and
has no other currently identified path to disposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Transuranic waste is radioactive waste containing more than
100 nanocuries of alpha-emitting transuranic isotopes per gram of
waste, with half-lives greater than 20 years, except for: (1) High-
level waste; (2) waste that the Secretary of Energy has determined,
with the concurrence of the Administrator of EPA, does not need the
degree of isolation required by the 40 CFR Part 191 disposal
regulations; or (3) waste that the NRC has approved for disposal on
a case-by-case basis in accordance with 10 CFR Part 61. PAGE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE estimates a total inventory (existing and projected to be
generated) of approximately 2,600 cubic meters of GTCC LLW and
approximately 3,000 cubic meters of GTCC-like waste. A small percentage
of this waste is mixed waste (i.e., radioactive waste that contains a
hazardous component subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act). Table 1 shows estimated quantities of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like
waste that DOE proposes to analyze and is based on the report entitled
Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Estimates,
(DOE, July 2007). This report updates the 1993 inventory estimates
contained in the report entitled Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level
Radioactive Waste Characterization: Estimated Volumes, Radionuclides,
Activities, and Other Characteristics, DOE/LLW-114, Revision 1 (Sept.
1994), which served as the basis for inventories in the ANOI. Copies of
both reports are available by contacting the Document Manager listed
under ADDRESSES above or at http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov.
Table 1.--Inventory Summary of Estimated Quantities of GTCC LLW and DOE GTCC-like Waste a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total stored and projected
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume in
Waste type In storage Projected cubic Activity\b\ Activity Volume Activity
meters MCi Volume m\3\ \b\ MCi m \3\ \(b)\
(m\3\) MCi
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
GTCC LLW:
Activated metal......................................... 58 3.5 810 110 870 110
Sealed sources.......................................... (\c\) (\c\) 1,700 2.4 1,700 2.4
Other \d\............................................... 76 0.0076 1.0 0.00023 77 0.0078
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total GTCC LLW...................................... 130 3.5 2,500 110 2,600 110
DOE GTCC-like waste:
Activated metal......................................... 5.0 0.11 29 0.82 34 0.93
Sealed sources.......................................... 8.7 0.013 25 0.030 34 0.043
Other \d\............................................... 860 11 2,000 19 2,900 30
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total DOE GTCC-like waste........................... 870 11 2,100 20 3,000 31
===========================================================================================
Total GTCC and GTCC-like waste.................. 1,000 15 4,600 130 5,600 140
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Values have been rounded to two significant figures.
\b\ Radioactivity values are in millions of curies (MCi).
\c\ There are sealed sources currently possessed by NRC licensees that may become GTCC LLW when no longer needed by the licensee. The estimated volume
and activity of those sources are included in the projected inventory, notwithstanding the lack of information on the current status of the sources
(e.g., in use, waste, etc.).
\d\ Other GTCC LLW and DOE GTCC-like waste includes contaminated equipment, debris, trash, scrap metal and decontamination and decommissioning waste.
Purpose and Need for Action
As shown in Table 1, NRC and Agreement State licensees have
generated and continue to generate GTCC LLW for which there is no
permitted disposal facility. DOE is responsible for the safe and secure
disposal of GTCC LLW covered under Section 3(b)(1)(D) of the LLRWPAA,
including determining how and where to dispose of these wastes. In
addition, DOE owns or generates certain LLW and transuranic wastes with
characteristics similar to GTCC LLW that also may not have an
identified path to disposal.
Proposed Action
DOE proposes to construct and operate a new facility or facilities,
or use an existing facility, for the disposal of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like
waste. DOE would then close the facility or facilities at the end of
each facility's operational life. Based on the EIS analysis, DOE
expects to make a decision on the method(s) and location(s) for
disposing of GTCC LLW and DOE GTCC-like waste. A combination of
disposal methods and locations may be appropriate based on the
characteristics of the waste and other factors.
Alternatives Proposed for Evaluation
The GTCC EIS will evaluate the range of reasonable alternatives for
the disposal of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste, together with a no action
alternative. The NRC regulations at 10 CFR 61.55(a)(2)(iv) define GTCC
LLW as that waste which would require disposal in a geologic repository
as defined in 10 CFR Part 60 or 63, unless proposals for an alternative
method of disposal are approved by NRC under 10 CFR 61.55(a)(2)(iv).
Although NRC regulations state that GTCC LLW is generally not
acceptable for near surface-disposal, the NRC recognizes in 10 CFR
61.7(b)(5) that ``there may be some instances where waste with
concentrations greater than permitted for Class C waste would be
acceptable for near-surface disposal with special processing or
design.'' Therefore, the disposal methods DOE proposes to evaluate in
the EIS include deep geologic repository disposal, intermediate depth
borehole disposal, and enhanced near-surface disposal.
For deep geologic disposal, DOE intends to analyze disposal at
Yucca Mountain in Nevada, a proposed geologic repository to be licensed
under 10 CFR Part 63. DOE will also evaluate deep geologic repository
disposal at WIPP in New Mexico. Identification of
[[Page 40138]]
the proposed Yucca Mountain repository for analysis in the EIS is based
on the 10 CFR 61.55 regulations, which identify disposal in a geologic
repository licensed under 10 CFR Part 60 or 63 as an acceptable method
for the disposal of GTCC LLW. Identification of WIPP is based on its
characteristics as a geologic repository, although not subject to NRC
licensing as a geologic repository under 10 CFR Parts 60 or 63. DOE
does not plan to evaluate an additional deep geologic repository
facility because siting of another deep geologic repository facility
for GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste is impractical due to the cost, time,
and the relatively small volume of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste.
DOE also intends to evaluate disposal of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like
waste in a new intermediate depth borehole facility and enhanced-near
surface facility at existing DOE sites and generic commercial
locations. The DOE sites considered for analysis include INL in Idaho,
LANL in New Mexico, WIPP vicinity (either within the WIPP Land
Withdrawal perimeter that is under the jurisdiction of DOE, or on
government property in the vicinity of WIPP), NTS in Nevada, SRS in
South Carolina, ORR in Tennessee, and Hanford in Washington.
Identification of these sites for potential analysis is based on
mission compatibility (these DOE sites currently have waste disposal
operations as part of their mission) and physical characteristics of
the sites such as hydrogeology and topography.
In addition, DOE intends to evaluate a generic enhanced near
surface and intermediate depth borehole commercial disposal facility
under both arid and humid conditions in the EIS. In a Request for
Information in the FedBizOpps on July 1, 2005, DOE solicited technical
capability statements from commercial vendors that may be interested in
constructing and operating a GTCC waste disposal facility. Although
several commercial vendors expressed an interest, no vendors have
provided specific information on disposal locations and methods for
analysis in the EIS. Including a generic commercial facility in the EIS
would allow DOE to make a programmatic determination regarding disposal
of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste in such a facility. Should one or more
commercial facilities be identified at a later time, DOE would conduct
further NEPA review, as appropriate.
DOE intends to evaluate each of the GTCC waste types (i.e., sealed
sources, activated metals, and other waste) individually and in
combination for each of the disposal alternatives, taking into account
the characteristics of the waste types and other considerations (e.g.,
waste volumes, physical and radiological characteristics, and
generation rates). For example, GTCC LLW containing transuranic
radionuclides with longer half-lives may require greater isolation or
other special measures to protect against potential inadvertent human
intrusion, whereas GTCC LLW containing radionuclides with shorter half-
lives may require less extensive measures. DOE will also consider
volumes and time periods when wastes would be generated and require
disposal.
In the GTCC LLW EIS, DOE will describe the statutory and regulatory
requirements for each disposal alternative and whether legislation or
regulatory modifications may be needed to implement the alternative
under consideration. In summary, DOE proposes to evaluate the
alternatives listed below:
Alternative 1: No Action--under this alternative, current and
future GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste would be stored at designated
locations consistent with ongoing practices, such as storage of GTCC
LLW activated metals at nuclear utilities;
Alternative 2: Disposal in a Geologic Repository at WIPP--under
this alternative, DOE would dispose of GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste at
WIPP;
Alternative 3: Disposal in a Geologic Repository at Yucca
Mountain--under this alternative, DOE would dispose of GTCC LLW and
GTCC-like waste at the proposed Yucca Mountain Repository;
Alternative 4: Disposal at a New Enhanced Near-Surface Facility--
under this alternative, DOE would dispose of GTCC LLW or GTCC-like
waste at a new enhanced near-surface facility at INL, LANL, WIPP
vicinity, NTS, SRS, ORR, and Hanford, or a commercial facility should
such a facility be identified in the future;
Alternative 5: Disposal at a New Intermediate Depth Borehole
Facility--under this alternative, DOE would dispose of GTCC LLW or
GTCC-like waste at a new intermediate depth borehole facility at INL,
LANL, WIPP vicinity, NTS, SRS, ORR and Hanford, or a commercial
facility should such a facility be identified in the future.
Identification of Environmental Issues
DOE proposes to evaluate disposal technologies at various DOE and
generic commercial locations for the construction, operation, and
closure of a facility or facilities for the disposal of GTCC LLW and
GTCC-like waste. DOE proposes to address the issues listed below in the
process of considering the potential impacts of the proposed disposal
alternatives.
Potential impacts on air, noise, surface water and
groundwater.
Potential impacts from the shipment of GTCC LLW and GTCC-
like waste to the disposal site(s).
Potential impacts from postulated accidents.
Potential impacts on human health, including impacts to
involved and non-involved site workers and members of the public.
Potential impacts to historical and cultural artifacts or
sites of historical and cultural significance.
Potential disproportionately high and adverse effects on
low income and minority populations (environmental justice).
Potential Native American concerns.
Short-term and long-term land use impacts.
Long-term site suitability, including erosion and
seismicity.
Potential impacts to endangered species.
Intentional destructive acts.
Compliance with applicable federal, state, and local
requirements.
Irretrievable and irreversible commitment of resources.
Cumulative impacts from past, present and reasonably
foreseeable actions.
This list is not intended to be inclusive, and we invite interested
parties to suggest other issues to be considered, including aspects of
the waste inventories presented in Table 1.
Summary of Public Comments on the Advance Notice of Intent
In 2005, DOE issued an ANOI, 70 Fed. Reg. 24775 (May 11, 2005),
inviting the public to provide preliminary comments on the potential
scope of the EIS. DOE received comments on the ANOI from: the states of
Nevada, Oregon and Washington; the Sacramento Municipal Utility
District; the New England Coalition; the Sierra Club; the Nuclear
Energy Institute; and the Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board.
The major scoping issues identified in the comments are summarized
below, along with DOE's response.
EIS General Scope: Commenters questioned the need for the
EIS, assuming that GTCC LLW would be disposed of in the proposed Yucca
Mountain repository for spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste. Some
commenters favored the inclusion of DOE's GTCC-like waste along with
GTCC LLW generated from NRC-licensed activities in the EIS, while
[[Page 40139]]
other commenters recommended restricting the scope of the EIS to GTCC
LLW analyzed in the Yucca Mountain EIS (DOE/EIS-0250, February 2002) or
to waste generated from NRC-licensed activities. Still other commenters
questioned the basis for projecting the GTCC LLW volume to 2035 and
2055.
Response: GTCC waste is LLW, not high-level waste or spent nuclear
fuel; nevertheless, DOE has identified the proposed Yucca Mountain
repository as one of the sites to be analyzed in the EIS for GTCC LLW
as a disposal alternative, as well as other appropriate sites, in
accordance with 10 CFR Part 61. Under the LLRWPAA, DOE is responsible
for disposing of this waste, and because such disposal would be a major
federal action, DOE is required by the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations that implement NEPA to complete an EIS analyzing the range
of reasonable alternatives for this action. The Energy Policy Act of
2005 also requires DOE to take actions related to the preparation of an
EIS for GTCC LLW. DOE plans to include its GTCC-like waste that may
have no path to disposal, as well as waste generated from NRC or
Agreement State licensed activities, and to identify where economies of
scale may be achieved in using the same disposal methods and locations.
DOE has identified the estimated GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste
volumes based on the best available data. DOE has changed the
projections to 2035 and 2062 to include the 20-year license renewal
that commercial reactors may receive plus an additional 6-year
``cooling period'' before commencing reactor decommissioning
activities. Thus GTCC LLW and GTCC-like waste estimates are projected
through 2035, except for GTCC LLW activated metals estimates, which are
projected through 2062, based on anticipated nuclear reactor
decommissioning schedules.
Waste Disposal Alternatives: Commenters stated that DOE
should identify its criteria for including sites considered in the EIS
as potential disposal locations and criteria for selecting the
technologies and disposal methods to be evaluated.
Response: DOE has identified its basis for the disposal locations
and disposal methods proposed for analysis in the EIS under
``Alternatives Proposed for Evaluation'' in this Notice.
Waste Inventories: Commenters stated that the inventory
data provided in the ANOI should be updated.
Response: DOE has updated the inventory data as shown in Table 1.
DOE will incorporate other appropriate inventory data that may become
available during preparation of the EIS.
Resource Areas Proposed for Analysis: Commenters suggested
a number of subjects that DOE should include in the EIS impact
analyses.
Response: DOE's list of subjects proposed for evaluation in the EIS
under ``Identification of Environmental Issues'' in this NOI responds
to those comments.
Concentration Averaging: Commenters raised questions about
DOE's potential use of ``concentration averaging'' in which, for
example, the activity of one component is averaged over the volume or
mass of waste to identify applicable waste classification standards.
Response: For the purposes of analysis in the EIS, DOE would use
guidance in the Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging
and Encapsulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC,
January 1995, to determine when LLW is greater than Class C as defined
at according to 10 CFR Part 61.
Regulatory Requirements: A number of commenters discussed
the need to address compliance with regulatory and other legal
requirements in the EIS.
Response: The EIS would describe applicable regulatory and other
legal requirements and consider the extent to which the alternatives
analyzed meet those requirements.
Public Scoping
Interested parties are invited to participate in the public scoping
process to provide their comments on the proposed disposal alternatives
for analysis in the EIS and the environmental issues to be analyzed.
The scoping process is intended to involve all interested agencies
(federal, state, county, and local), public interest groups, Native
American tribes, businesses, and members of the public. Public scoping
meetings will be held at the following locations and times:
Carlsbad, New Mexico: Pecos River Village Conference
Center, Carousel House, 711 Muscatel Avenue, Carlsbad, New Mexico,
Monday, August 13, 2007, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Los Alamos, New Mexico: Hilltop House Best Western, La
Vista Room, 400 Trinity Drive, Los Alamos, New Mexico, Tuesday, August
14, 2007, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee: DOE Oak Ridge Information Center,
475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Wednesday, August 22, 6
p.m.--9 p.m.
North Augusta, South Carolina: North Augusta Community
Center, 495 Brookside Avenue, North Augusta, South Carolina, Thursday,
August 23, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Troutdale, Oregon: Comfort Inn & Suites-Columbia Gorge
West, 477 NW Phoenix Drive, Troutdale, Oregon, Monday, August 27, 2007,
6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Pasco, Washington: Red Lion Hotel, Gold Room, 2525 N 20th
Avenue, Pasco, Washington, Tuesday, August 28, 2007, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Idaho Falls, Idaho: Red Lion Hotel On The Falls,
Yellowstone/Teton Rooms, 475 River Parkway, Idaho Falls, Idaho,
Thursday, August 30, 2007, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Las Vegas, Nevada: Atomic Testing Museum, 755 E. Flamingo
Road (Just East of Paradise Road), Las Vegas, Nevada, Tuesday,
September 4, 2007, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Washington DC: Hotel Washington, Washington Room, 15th and
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, Monday, September 10, 1 p.m.-
5 p.m.
During the first hour of each scoping meeting, DOE officials will
be available for informal discussions with attendees. During the formal
part of the meeting, the public will have the opportunity to provide
comments orally or in writing. The presiding officer will establish
procedures to ensure that everyone who wishes to speak has a chance to
do so. Both oral and written comments will be considered and given
equal weight.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 17, 2007.
James A. Rispoli,
Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management.
[FR Doc. E7-14139 Filed 7-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P