FR Doc E7-17842

[Federal Register: September 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 176)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51975-51988]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12se07-1]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

[[Page 51975]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Parts 301 and 305

[Docket No. APHIS-2006-0143]
RIN 0579-AC54

Potato Cyst Nematode; Quarantine and Regulations

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are quarantining parts of Bingham and Bonneville Counties,
ID, due to the discovery of the potato cyst nematode there and
establishing restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated
articles from the quarantined area. This action is necessary on an
emergency basis to prevent the spread of the potato cyst nematode to
noninfested areas of the United States.

DATES: This interim rule is effective on November 1, 2007. We will
consider all comments that we receive on or before November 13, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
, select ``Animal and Plant Health Inspection

Service'' from the agency drop-down menu, then click ``Submit.'' In the
Docket ID column, select APHIS-2006-0143 to submit or view public
comments and to view supporting and related materials available
electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing
the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through
the site's ``User Tips'' link.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Please send four copies
of your comment (an original and three copies) to Docket No. APHIS-
2006-0143, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-
03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state
that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2006-0143.
Reading Room: You may read any comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading room is located in room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
Other Information: Additional information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at http://www.aphis.usda.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Osama El-Lissy, Director, Invasive
Species and Pest Management, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 134,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-8676.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

We are amending the ``Domestic Quarantine Notices'' in 7 CFR part
301 by adding a new subpart, ``Potato Cyst Nematode'' (Sec. Sec.
301.86 through 301.86-9, referred to below as the regulations). The
regulations quarantine parts of Bingham and Bonneville Counties, ID,
due to the discovery of the potato cyst nematode there and restrict the
interstate movement of regulated articles from the quarantined area.
The potato cyst nematode (PCN) (Globodera pallida) is a major pest
of potato crops in cool-temperature areas. Other solanaceous hosts
include tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, tomatillos, and some weeds. The
PCN is thought to have originated in Peru and is now widely distributed
in many potato-growing regions of the world. PCN infestations may be
expressed as patches of poor growth. Affected potato plants may exhibit
yellowing, wilting, or death of foliage. Even with only minor symptoms
on the foliage, potato tuber size can be affected. Unmanaged
infestations can cause potato yield loss ranging from 20 to 70 percent.
The spread of this pest in the United States could result in a loss of
domestic or foreign markets for U.S. potatoes and other commodities.
PCN is a soil-borne pest and is typically spread by the movement of
infested soil, either soil itself or soil adhering to plants, farm
equipment, or other articles. In some cases, PCN may be transported by
wind and flood water.
In the absence of host plants on which to feed, PCN survives in
soil as cysts. Mature brown cysts are the desiccated bodies of female
nematodes, which contain eggs bearing juvenile nematodes. Each cyst may
contain as many as 500 eggs. These durable cysts protect the eggs from
physical damage, making it possible for the eggs to survive periods
when host plants are not present. When host crops are present, PCN eggs
are stimulated to hatch in the spring by chemicals exuded from the
roots of the host crops. Once hatched, the juvenile nematode moves
between soil particles and locates and invades host plant roots. The
larvae will undergo three additional larval stages; the third and
fourth stages occur inside the plant root. Once the larvae have entered
the host plant root (usually at or near the growing point), they become
sedentary. The females eventually become ``sac-like,'' with their
posteriors protruding from the root, and can be seen as tiny white
embedded objects along the host plant's roots. When the females die,
their body walls gradually harden and darken to form the cysts.
When the nematode eggs are in the cysts, they are able to withstand
chemical treatment. Since the cysts can survive in the absence of host
plants for up to 30 years under ideal conditions, eradication of PCN
has typically required long-term efforts. However, fumigants have been
found to be effective at significantly reducing nematode cyst
population levels in the absence of host plants, and repeated
fumigations over a period of years can be used as an eradication tool.
On April 13, 2006, nematode cysts from a sample of soil from a
potato grading station in Idaho were confirmed to be PCN. Extensive
traceback activities have determined that at least seven fields located
in Bingham and Bonneville Counties, ID, are infested. Cysts recovered
from a field were officially confirmed to be PCN by the

[[Page 51976]]

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's (APHIS) Plant Protection
and Quarantine (PPQ) program on June 12, 2006. This is the first
detection of PCN in the United States.
APHIS and the Idaho State Department of Agriculture are conducting
ongoing detection and delimiting surveys of all fields adjacent to or
otherwise potentially infested with PCN. A robust survey of fields
where potatoes have been grown is currently taking place throughout the
State of Idaho. Idaho has restricted the intrastate movement of certain
articles from the infested area to prevent the spread of PCN within
Idaho. However, Federal regulations are necessary to restrict the
interstate movement of certain articles from the infested area to
prevent the spread of PCN to noninfested areas of the United States.
This interim rule establishes those Federal regulations, which are
described below.

Restrictions on Interstate Movement of Regulated Articles (Sec.
301.86)

Section 301.86 prohibits the interstate movement of regulated
articles from quarantined areas except in accordance with the
regulations.

Definitions (Sec. 301.86-1)

Section 301.86-1 contains definitions of the following terms:
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, associated
field, certificate, compliance agreement, departmental permit, field,
infestation (infested), infested field, inspector, interstate, limited
permit, moved (move, movement), nursery stock, person, Plant Protection
and Quarantine, potato cyst nematode, quarantined area, regulated
article, and State.

Regulated Articles (Sec. 301.86-2)

Certain articles present a risk of spreading PCN if they are moved
from quarantined areas without restrictions. We call these articles
regulated articles. Paragraphs (a) through (h) of Sec. 301.86-2 list
the following as regulated articles:
Potato cyst nematodes;
PCN host crops: Potato, eggplant, pepper, tomatillos, and
tomato;
Root crops;
Garden and dry beans and peas;
All nursery stock;
Soil, compost, humus, muck, peat, and manure, and products
on or in which soil is commonly found, including grass sod and plant
litter;
Hay, straw, and fodder;
Any equipment or conveyance used in an infested or
associated field that could carry soil if moved out of the field; and
Any other product, article, or means of conveyance that an
inspector determines presents a risk of spreading the potato cyst
nematode, after the inspector provides written notification to the
person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance
that it is subject to the restrictions of the regulations.
The last item listed above, which provides for the designation of
``any other product, article, or means of conveyance'' as a regulated
article, is intended to address the risks presented by, for example, a
truck with caked soil that could have come from an infested field;
under this provision, an inspector would be able to designate that
truck as a regulated article. This will allow an inspector to ensure
that any measures necessary to mitigate the risk of spreading PCN are
carried out.

Quarantined Areas (Sec. 301.86-3)

Paragraph (a) of Sec. 301.86-3 describes the process by which the
quarantined area for PCN is designated. Under this process, the
Administrator will designate as a quarantined area each field that has
been found to be infested with PCN, each field that has been found to
be associated with an infested field, and any area that the
Administrator considers necessary to quarantine because of its
inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from infested or
associated fields.
In the past, we have published the description of the quarantined
area for our domestic quarantines in the regulations for those
quarantines. For the potato cyst nematode, we will instead publish the
description of the quarantined area on the PPQ Web site at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/potato/pcn.shtml.

The description of the quarantined area will include the date the
description was last updated and a description of the changes that have
been made to the quarantined area. The description of the quarantined
area may also be obtained by request from any local office of PPQ;
local offices are listed in telephone directories. After a change is
made to the quarantined area, we will publish a notice in the Federal
Register informing the public that the change has occurred and
describing the change to the quarantined area.
Instead of including the description of the quarantined area in the
regulations, the regulations set out a description of the criteria
APHIS will use to designate a field as infested with PCN (an infested
field) or as a field associated with an infested field (an associated
field). These criteria are found in paragraph (c) of Sec. 301.86-3.
The regulations also state the conditions under which infested and
associated fields will be removed from quarantine in paragraph (d) of
Sec. 301.86-3. Because we will not be publishing the description of
the quarantined area in the regulations, we will be able to update it
more quickly if an infestation of PCN is detected, thus allowing us to
take prompt action to prevent the spread of PCN and providing necessary
information to affected parties in a more timely manner. We believe our
description of the criteria by which infested and associated fields
will be designated and how the quarantined area will be determined will
provide adequate notice regarding the criteria by which we will make
changes to the quarantined area. We invite public comment on this
approach to providing the public with a description of the quarantined
area.
Paragraph (b) describes the conditions for the designation of an
area less than an entire State as a quarantined area. Less than an
entire State will be designated as a quarantined area only if the
Administrator determines that:
The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the
intrastate movement of the regulated articles that are equivalent to
those imposed by the regulations on the interstate movement of
regulated articles; and
The designation of less than the entire State as a
quarantined area will prevent the interstate spread of PCN.
We have determined that it is not necessary to designate the entire
State of Idaho as a quarantined area. PCN has not been found in any
area of the State other than portions of Bingham and Bonneville
Counties, and Idaho has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the
intrastate movement of regulated articles from that area that are
equivalent to those we are imposing on the interstate movement of
regulated articles. Therefore, in accordance with the criteria
described in the paragraphs (a) through (c) of Sec. 301.86-3, we have
designated the following area as a quarantined area:
Idaho. That part of Township 1 North, Range 37 East of the Boise
Meridian that lies east and south of the Snake River, and sections 10
through 36 of Township 1 North, Range 37 East.
As mentioned earlier, paragraph (c) of Sec. 301.86-3 sets out the
criteria for designating a field as an infested or associated field.
Paragraph (c)(1) states that the Administrator will designate a field
as an infested field when PCN is found in the field. PCN is difficult
to detect with the naked eye. It is typically found through surveys,
soil sampling, and microscopic inspection.
Paragraph (c)(2) states that the Administrator will designate a
field as

[[Page 51977]]

an associated field when PCN host crops, as listed in Sec. 301.86-
2(b), have been grown in the field in the last 10 years and:
The field shares a border with an infested field; or
The field came into contact with a regulated article from
an infested field within the last 10 years; or
Within the last 10 years, the field shared ownership,
tenancy, seed, drainage or runoff, farm machinery, or other elements of
shared cultural practices with an infested field that could allow
spread of PCN, as determined by the Administrator.
Fields will only be designated as associated fields under the last
criterion above if the Administrator determines that one of the
circumstances listed means that PCN could have been spread from an
infested field to the associated field. If an infested field and a
noninfested field share cultural practices, but the Administrator
determines that the specific cultural practice that is shared does not
pose a risk of spreading PCN, the noninfested field would not be
designated as an associated field.
It should be noted that, because soil is a regulated article under
Sec. 301.86-2(f), the unauthorized movement of soil from an infested
field to another field will cause that field to be designated as an
associated field.
Paragraph (d) of Sec. 301.86-3 described the conditions under
which fields will be removed from quarantine. Under paragraph (d)(1),
an infested field will be removed from quarantine when a 3-year
biosurvey protocol approved by APHIS has been completed and the field
has been found to be free of PCN.
The biosurvey protocol involves planting PCN host crops in soil
from a field and sampling the soil for PCN. This process must be
repeated three times, over three crop cycles, with negative results in
order for APHIS to declare the field to be free of PCN and thus to
remove the quarantine from an infested field. We are confident that
such a process will be sufficient to establish freedom from PCN.
One means to ensure that a field is free of PCN is to avoid
planting host crops in it for at least 30 years; as noted earlier, PCN
can survive for up to 30 years in a dormant state without any host
crops to feed on. PPQ is also developing a plan for eradicating PCN in
infested fields. A draft of the eradication plan has guided our initial
eradication efforts. We will use the data we gather from these efforts
to further refine the eradication plan. When the plan is finalized, we
will make it available to the public. Regardless of the eradication
means used to ensure that a field is free from PCN, however, we would
require the 3-year bioassay protocol to confirm that freedom.
Under paragraph (d)(2), an associated field will be removed from
quarantine when the field has been found to be free of PCN according to
a survey protocol approved by the Administrator as sufficient to
support removal from quarantine. The survey protocol to designate an
associated field as free of PCN is more thorough than the sampling
process by which APHIS determines that PCN is not known to occur in a
field, although not as intensive as the biosurvey protocol for infested
fields. The additional steps required by the survey protocol to
determine freedom are appropriate prior to releasing a field from
quarantine entirely.
Paragraph (d)(3) states that if the Administrator has quarantined
any area other than infested, adjacent, or associated fields because of
its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from infested or
associated fields, as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, that
area will be removed from quarantine when the relevant infested or
associated fields are removed from quarantine.

Conditions Governing the Interstate Movement of Regulated Articles From
Quarantined Areas (Sec. 301.86-4)

This section requires most regulated articles moving interstate
from quarantined areas to be accompanied by a certificate or a limited
permit. The articles must be moved in accordance with Sec. Sec.
301.86-5 and 301.86-8 and under any additional conditions issued by the
Administrator to prevent the spread of PCN. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA or the Department) may move regulated articles
interstate without a certificate or limited permit if the articles are
moved for experimental or scientific purposes.
Except for articles moved by APHIS or the Department, only a
regulated article that is moved into the quarantined area from outside
the quarantined area and that is accompanied by a waybill that
indicates the point of origin may be moved interstate from the
quarantined area without a certificate or limited permit. The article
may not have been combined or commingled with other articles so as to
lose its individual identity. Additionally, the article must be moved
through the quarantined area without stopping (except for refueling and
for traffic conditions such as traffic lights and stop signs), and the
regulated article must not be unpacked or unloaded in the quarantined
area.

Issuance and Cancellation of Certificates and Limited Permits (Sec.
301.86-5)

Under Federal domestic plant quarantine programs, there is a
difference between the use of certificates and limited permits.
Certificates are issued for regulated articles when an inspector finds
that, because of certain conditions (e.g., the article is from a field
that has been surveyed for PCN by an inspector in the last 3 years and
in which PCN has not been found, and no more than one PCN host crop has
been grown in the field in the last 3 years), the regulated articles
can be moved safely from the quarantined area without spreading PCN.
Regulated articles accompanied by a certificate may be moved interstate
without further restrictions. Limited permits are issued for regulated
articles when an inspector finds that, because of a possible pest risk,
the articles may be safely moved interstate only subject to further
restrictions, such as movement to specified destinations and movement
for limited purposes. Section 301.86-5 explains the conditions for
issuing a certificate or limited permit.
Paragraph (a) of Sec. 301.86-5 sets out the conditions under which
an inspector or person operating under a compliance agreement will
issue a certificate for the interstate movement of a regulated article.
Paragraph (a)(1) provides that, to be eligible for a certificate, all
regulated articles must be moved in compliance with any additional
emergency conditions the Administrator may impose under section 414 of
the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714) to prevent the spread of PCN.
In addition, all regulated articles must be eligible for unrestricted
movement under all other Federal domestic plant quarantines and
regulations applicable to the regulated article. We have included a
footnote (number 3) that provides an address for securing the addresses
and telephone numbers of the local PPQ offices at which services of
inspectors may be requested. We have also included a footnote (number
4) that explains that the Secretary of Agriculture may, under the Plant
Protection Act, take emergency actions to seize, quarantine, treat,
destroy, or apply other remedial measures to articles that are, or that
he or she has reason to believe are plants pests or are infested,
infected by, or contain plant pests.
Specific requirements apply to the movement of certain other
regulated articles. These requirements are listed in paragraphs (a)(2)
through (a)(7) of Sec. 301.86-5.

[[Page 51978]]

Paragraph (a)(2) contains specific requirements that must be
fulfilled for an inspector to issue a certificate for the movement of
nursery stock. This paragraph addresses three classes of nursery stock:
Potatoes intended for use as nursery stock (i.e., seed
potatoes) are prohibited from moving interstate from the quarantined
area. Because potatoes are the primary host of PCN, the interstate
movement of living potatoes for planting would pose an extremely high
risk of spreading PCN if we allowed it to occur.
Nursery stock of PCN host crops other than potatoes, as
listed in Sec. 301.86-2(b), must have been grown in a field that meets
the following requirements:
[cir] The field has been surveyed by an inspector for PCN at least
once in the last 3 years;
[cir] PCN has not been found in the field; and
[cir] No more than one PCN host crop has been grown in the field in
the last 3 years.
While these crops are not primary hosts, they could still serve as
pathways for the spread of PCN; allowing their movement only from
fields that have been surveyed and found to be free of PCN will
effectively mitigate this risk.
Nursery stock of non-host crops that is moved with soil
(for example, nursery stock grown and moved in potting soil) must have
been grown in a field that meets the requirements for nursery stock of
PCN host crops listed above. The regulations include this requirement
because the interstate movement of soil poses a high risk of spreading
PCN, since PCN dwells in soil before infesting a host. Nursery stock of
non-host crops that is moved without soil must have been found by an
inspector to be free of soil on its roots and on all other parts of the
plant, in order to ensure that the movement of nursery stock of these
non-host crops poses no risk.
Paragraph (a)(3) addresses the movement of potatoes and root crops
for consumption. Uses of potatoes and root crops produced for
consumption include both table consumption and processing into products
such as frozen french fries. Both potatoes and root crops moved for
consumption are likely to carry soil, which poses a risk of spreading
PCN. (Potatoes grown for use as nursery stock [seed potatoes] cannot be
easily converted into potatoes grown for consumption.) Under paragraph
(a)(3), an inspector may issue a certificate for the movement of
potatoes or root crops intended for consumption from the quarantined
area only if the field in which the potatoes or root crops have been
grown meets the following requirements:
The field has been surveyed by an inspector for PCN at
least once in the last 3 years and prior to the planting of the
potatoes or root crops;
PCN has not been found in the field; and
No more than one PCN host crop has been grown in the field
the last 3 years.
Paragraph (a)(4) addresses soil and associated products. An
inspector may issue a certificate for the interstate movement of a
regulated article listed in Sec. 301.86-2(e), which includes soil,
compost, humus, muck, peat, and decomposed manure, and products on or
in which soil is commonly found, including grass sod and plant litter,
only if the article originated in a field that meets the following
requirements:
The field has been surveyed by an inspector for PCN at
least once in the last 3 years;
PCN has not been found in the field; and
No more than one PCN host crop has been grown in the field
the last 3 years.
Paragraph (a)(5) addresses hay, straw, and fodder. These
commodities also pose a risk because they may have soil attached.
Accordingly, an inspector may issue a certificate for the movement of
hay, straw, or fodder from the quarantined area only if the field where
the hay, straw, or fodder was produced meets the following
requirements:
The field has been surveyed by an inspector for PCN at
least once in the last 3 years;
PCN has not been found in the field; and
No more than one PCN host crop has been grown in the field
the last 3 years.
Alternatively, an inspector may issue a certificate for the
interstate movement of hay, straw, or fodder if it is produced
according to procedures judged by an inspector to be sufficient to
isolate it from soil throughout its production and handling. Isolation
of stored hay, straw, or fodder from soil is commonly accomplished by
using asphalt, gravel, concrete, tarpaulins or pallets.
Paragraph (a)(6) addresses equipment used in infested or associated
fields. An inspector may issue a certificate for the interstate
movement of equipment that has been used in an infested or associated
field and that could carry soil if moved out of the field only after
the equipment has been pressure-washed under the supervision of an
inspector to remove all soil or steam-treated in accordance with 7 CFR
part 305. If properly performed, the pressure-washing will remove all
soil from the farm equipment, and the soil adhering to the farm
equipment is what poses a risk of spreading PCN from the quarantined
area. Properly performed steam treatment kills PCN.
Paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 301.86-5 sets out general conditions for
the issuance of a limited permit. An inspector may issue a limited
permit for the interstate movement of a regulated article if the
inspector determines that the article is to be moved to a specified
destination for specified handling, utilization, or processing, and
that the movement will not result in the spread of PCN because life
stages of PCN will be destroyed by the specified handling, processing,
or utilization. A limited permit will only be issued if the regulated
article will be moved in compliance with any additional emergency
conditions imposed by the Administrator under section 414 of the Plant
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714) to prevent the spread of PCN, and if the
regulated article is eligible for interstate movement under all other
Federal domestic plant quarantines and regulations applicable to the
regulated article.
Paragraph (b)(2) sets out specific conditions for the issuance of a
limited permit for the interstate movement from the quarantined area of
potatoes intended for consumption. We anticipate that potatoes intended
for consumption that are not eligible to move from the quarantined area
with a certificate under paragraph (a)(3) may nonetheless need to be
moved from the quarantined area for packing or processing. This
paragraph sets out specific conditions under which they may be moved.
An inspector may issue a limited permit to allow the interstate
movement of potatoes from the quarantined area for packing or
processing only if:
The potatoes are transported in a manner that prevents the
potatoes and soil attached to the potatoes from coming into contact
with agricultural premises outside the quarantined area; and
The potatoes are processed and packed at facilities that
handle potatoes, waste, and waste water in a manner approved by APHIS
to prevent the spread of PCN.
As a matter of policy, we will not issue limited permits for
potatoes grown in an infested field if they are grown in any year
following the year in which PCN is initially detected in the field.
Paragraph (c) of Sec. 301.86-5 allows any person who has entered
into and is operating under a compliance agreement to issue a
certificate or

[[Page 51979]]

limited permit for the interstate movement of a regulated article after
an inspector has determined that the article is eligible for a
certificate or limited permit under Sec. 301.86-5(a) or (b).
Also, Sec. 301.86-5(d) contains provisions for the withdrawal of a
certificate or limited permit by an inspector if the inspector
determines that the holder of the certificate or limited permit has not
complied with all of the provisions for the use of the document or with
all the conditions contained in the document. This section also
contains provisions for notifying the holder of the reasons for the
withdrawal and for holding a hearing if there is any conflict
concerning any material fact in the event that the person wishes to
appeal the cancellation.

Compliance Agreements and Cancellation (Sec. 301.86-6)

Section 301.86-6 provides for the use of and cancellation of
compliance agreements. Compliance agreements are provided for the
convenience of persons who are involved in the growing, handling, or
moving of regulated articles from quarantined areas. A person may enter
into a compliance agreement when an inspector has determined that the
person requesting the compliance agreement has been made aware of the
requirements of the regulations and the person has agreed to comply
with the requirements of the regulations and the provisions of the
compliance agreement. This section contains a footnote (number 7) that
explains where compliance agreement forms may be obtained.
Section 301.86-6 also provides that an inspector may cancel the
compliance agreement upon finding that a person who has entered into
the agreement has failed to comply with any of the provisions of the
regulations. The inspector will notify the holder of the compliance
agreement of the reasons for cancellation and offer an opportunity for
a hearing to resolve any conflicts of material fact in the event that
the person wishes to appeal the cancellation.

Assembly and Inspection of Regulated Articles (Sec. 301.86-7)

Section 301.86-7 provides that any person (other than a person
authorized to issue certificates or limited permits under Sec. 301.86-
5(c)) who desires a certificate or limited permit to move regulated
articles must request, at least 48 hours before the desired interstate
movement, that an inspector issue a certificate or limited permit. The
regulated articles must be assembled in a place and manner directed by
the inspector.

Attachment and Disposition of Certificates and Limited Permits (Sec.
301.86-8)

Section 301.86-8 requires the certificate or limited permit issued
for movement of the regulated article to be attached, during the
interstate movement, to the regulated article, or to a container
carrying the regulated article, or to the consignee's copy of the
accompanying waybill. Further, the section requires that the carrier or
the carrier's representative must furnish the certificate or limited
permit to the consignee listed on the certificate or limited permit
upon arrival at the location provided on the certificate or limited
permit.

Costs and Charges (Sec. 301.86-9)

Section 301.86-9 explains the APHIS policy that the services of an
inspector that are needed to comply with the regulations are provided
without cost between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except holidays, to persons requiring those services, but that APHIS
will not be responsible for any costs or charges incident to
inspections or compliance with the provisions of the quarantine and
regulations in this subpart, other than for the services of the
inspector.

Treatments in 7 CFR Part 305

The phytosanitary treatments regulations contained in 7 CFR part
305 set out standards and schedules for treatments required in 7 CFR
parts 301, 318, and 319 for fruits, vegetables, and articles to prevent
the introduction or dissemination of plant pests or noxious weeds into
or through the United States. Within 7 CFR part 305, Sec. 305.2 lists
approved treatments for pests associated with certain articles
regulated in 7 CFR parts 301, 318, and 319.
Certain treatments listed in Sec. 305.2 are approved for treating
the golden nematode (G. rostochiensis) but not PCN. Due to the similar
biology of these two pests, we believe that treatments approved to
treat the golden nematode will be effective at treating PCN.
Accordingly, we are amending Sec. 305.2 to amend certain treatments
for the golden nematode to approve their use on PCN as well. These
treatments are:
Steam sterilization treatment T-406d, used for
construction equipment without cabs, used farm equipment without cabs,
and used containers; and
Steam cleaning treatment T-406c, used for automobiles and
used farm equipment with cabs.
Section 305.2 also contains treatments for soil products that are
approved to treat G. rostochiensis. However, the risk associated with
moving soil from the PCN quarantined area is such that we are only
allowing soil and soil products to move from the quarantined area with
a certificate if they are from a field that has been surveyed by an
inspector and found to be free of PCN. Therefore, we are not approving
any of the treatments for soil products in Sec. 305.2 to be used to
treat PCN.

Emergency Action

This rulemaking is necessary on an emergency basis to prevent the
spread of PCN to noninfested areas of the United States.
This rule is being made effective on November 1, 2007, because the
potato harvesting season in Idaho ends on that date, and regulated
parties will need time to prepare for the changes in operations that
will become necessary when this rule becomes effective. Under these
circumstances, the Administrator has determined that prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are contrary to the public interest and
that there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above). After the comment period closes,
we will publish another document in the Federal Register. The document
will include a discussion of any comments we receive and any amendments
we are making to the rule.

Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule
has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
We are quarantining part of Bingham and Bonneville Counties, ID,
because of the presence there of PCN and restricting the interstate
movement of regulated articles from the quarantined area. This action
is necessary on an emergency basis to prevent the spread of PCN to
noninfested areas of the United States.
Tests conducted by PPQ on June 12 and July 13, 2006, confirmed the
presence of PCN in soil samples taken from two fields in Bingham
County. Subsequently, four additional fields in Bingham County and one
field in Bonneville County were found to be infested. This is the first
detection of PCN from fields in the United States.
In addition to potatoes, tomatoes, eggplant, peppers, tomatillos,
and some

[[Page 51980]]

weeds also serve as host to the potato cyst nematode. The interim rule
regulates the movement of potatoes and other host crops, as well as
plants with roots, root crops, soil, any equipment used on farms that
can carry soil, and any other products, articles, or means of
conveyance when determined by an inspector to present a hazard of
spread of PCN.
Three different classes of nursery stock are regulated under the
rule:
Seed potatoes;
Other host nursery stock (i.e. tomatoes, eggplant,
peppers, and tomatillos); and
Non-host nursery stock that is moved with soil.
Seed potatoes are prohibited from moving interstate from the
quarantined area since this would pose a high risk of spreading PCN.
Other host nursery stock and non-host nursery stock in soil may be
moved out of the quarantined area if either originates from a field
that has been inspected at least once in the last three years, the
field has been found to be free of PCN, and no more than one PCN host
crop has been grown in the field in the last three years. Non-host
nursery stock that is bare-rooted may be moved from the quarantined
area after inspection to ensure the roots and all other plant parts are
free of soil.
Potatoes and root crops for consumption are allowed to move
interstate from the quarantined area if the articles originate from a
field found to be free of PCN, potatoes were grown in a field in which
no more than one potato crop was grown in the previous 3 years, and
articles are accompanied by a certificate. Soil, compost, humus, muck,
peat, and manure, and products on or in which soil is commonly found,
as well as hay, straw, or fodder may also move interstate from the
quarantined area following the same criteria as that for potatoes and
root crops for consumption. Interstate movement of equipment that has
been used in an infested or associated field is allowed after the
equipment has been pressure-washed under the supervision of an
inspector to remove all soil or after it has been steam-treated.
Potatoes for consumption that are not eligible to move from the
quarantined area with a certificate are allowed to move from the
quarantined area under limited permit if they are moved and processed
under conditions designed to prevent the spread of PCN. APHIS will not
issue limited permits for potatoes grown in an infested field if they
are grown in any year following the year in which PCN is initially
detected in the field. There are no domestic restrictions against the
movement of processed products.
APHIS is adding provisions for compliance agreements for entities
operating inside the quarantined area to issue certificates and limited
permits. An infested field will only be removed from quarantine after
the completion of a 3-year biosurvey protocol approved by APHIS to
determine whether the field is free of PCN. One means to ensure freedom
of a field from PCN is not planting host crops in the area for at least
30 years; another is following the APHIS eradication plan. The list of
quarantined areas will be maintained on the PPQ Web site.
U.S. production and exports.\1\ Potatoes, excluding sweet potatoes,
are a staple crop grown in a majority of U.S. States. They are also the
lead vegetable crop in the United States. The Russet variety, which is
planted in the spring and harvested in the fall, accounts for
approximately 75 percent of the total U.S. acreage planted to potatoes.
Ninety percent of all potatoes are harvested in the fall, with the
remaining 10 percent harvested in the other three seasons. This 10
percent of production accounts for specialty varieties that typically
command higher prices, such as round white, red, yellow, and purple
potatoes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Most information in this section is derived from the
Economic Research Service's Potato Briefing Room, available online
at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Potatoes/.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

From 2000 to 2005, acreage planted to fall potatoes and production
of this variety decreased by 9 percent throughout the United States.
The decline in Idaho's acreage and production was sharper, falling by
22 percent and 23 percent, respectively. Yields over the same period
remained relatively stable in the United States as a whole and Idaho in
particular. Fall potatoes are marketed year-round from July (early
harvest areas) through June. Potatoes can be stored for long periods of
time. This storage capability allows flexibility in marketing; sellers
can hold their crop until more favorable prices prevail on the market.
Fresh potatoes are mainly sold on the open market, not contracted.
Processing potatoes, on the other hand, are typically contracted.

Table 1.--Production and Farm Prices of Fall Potatoes in the United States, Idaho, Bingham County, Idaho, and Bonneville County, Idaho, 2000-2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Idaho Bingham County, ID Bonneville County, ID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Farm price Farm price
----------------------- ---------------------------------- Farm Farm
Production Table Production Table Production price Production price
stock processing stock Processing All uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,000 Cwt. $ per Cwt. 1,000 Cwt. $ per Cwt. ......... 1,000 Cwt. $ per 1,000 Cwt. $ per
Cwt. Cwt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000......................................................... 467,529 $5.27 $4.70 152,320 (\a\) (\a\) $4.00 25,104 (\b\) 9,000 (\b\)
2001......................................................... 393,631 10.79 5.05 120,200 (\a\) (\a\) 6.15 18,330 (\b\) 8,136 (\b\)
2002......................................................... 413,581 9.59 5.16 133,385 (\a\) (\a\) 5.00 20,000 (\b\) 9,204 (\b\)
2003......................................................... 410,588 7.32 5.10 123,180 $3.85 $4.30 4.40 19,598 (\b\) 8,537 (\b\)
2004......................................................... 410,253 6.76 5.06 131,970 3.40 4.50 4.25 20,740 (\b\) 9,070 (\b\)
2005......................................................... 423,926 10.04 5.21 118,288 6.90 4.90 5.70 18,080 (\b\) 8,250 (\b\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Prices by use not available for these years.
\b\ No data available for prices at the county level.
Source: USDA, NASS, Potatoes: 2005 Summary, September 2006 and USDA, NASS, Idaho Office, County Estimates: Potatoes 2005, September 2006.

The United States ranks fourth in the world in potato production,
trailing China, Russia, and India. Historically, the United States has
been a net exporter of potatoes in value terms, with exports of
processed potatoes accounting for a large portion of this surplus. In
2003 and 2004, an increase in imports of processed products from Canada
tipped this balance so that the United States ran a trade deficit in
those years. However, the imports of Canadian goods returned to
historical levels in 2005, and the United States regained its status as
a net exporter. Exports of

[[Page 51981]]

potatoes are on the rise and now account for approximately one-third of
the value of farm sales. Over half of these exports are processed
products, primarily frozen french fries. Japan is the United States'
largest importer of frozen fries, followed by Mexico and Canada. Canada
is the largest supplier of U.S. potato imports.
Although historically Japan has been the largest importer of U.S.
frozen potato products, that country banned imports of fresh potatoes
from the United States starting in the 1950s. However, in February of
2006, Japan opened its market to the importation of fresh potatoes from
approved facilities in 14 States: Arizona, California, Colorado,
Florida, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota,
Texas, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin. The outbreak of PCN in Idaho
led to Japan's reimplementation of its ban on fresh potatoes from the
United States.
Idaho production and exports. Idaho specializes in production of
fall potatoes. According to National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS) data, there were no spring, summer, or winter potatoes produced
in Idaho from 2000 to 2005. Over 65 percent of U.S. fall potatoes are
grown in the Western States. Idaho and Washington account for 50
percent of the U.S. total, where planted acreage in Idaho is more than
double that in Washington. Idaho's importance to the domestic potato
industry also makes this State influential in the world market for
potatoes. Idaho exports a substantial amount of potatoes on a yearly
basis. However, the majority of these exports is in a processed form
rather than fresh. This analysis only focuses on the fresh market since
this is the portion that will be affected by the interim rule.
From 2001 to 2006, Idaho exported on average $6.2 million worth of
table potatoes to countries around the world. On average, a large
portion, 67 percent, of Idaho's fresh exports was destined for Canada.
Mexico also imported potatoes from Idaho, accounting for 23 percent of
Idaho exports. Japan, as mentioned previously, historically has
prohibited imports of fresh potatoes from the United States. Thus,
although Japan is a substantial importer of processed products, its
imports of fresh potatoes are negligible or nonexistent. Together,
Canada and Mexico accounted for approximately 90 percent of Idaho
exports between 2001 and 2006, although Idaho's fresh potato sales
worldwide and the combined share exported to Canada and Mexico have
fluctuated substantially (table 2). Mexico has been an expanding
market, with sales increasing 90-fold over this 6-year period, while
exports to Canada have declined by more than half. In 2005, Idaho's
potato exports to Mexico exceeded its potato exports to Canada for the
first time.

Table 2.--Idaho Exports of Fresh Potatoes by Country, 2001-2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Canada Mexico Japan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exports Exports Percentage Exports Percentage Exports Percentage
($1,000) ($1,000) of total ($1,000) of total ($1,000) of total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001......................................................... $3,622 $3,209 88.6 $34 0.9 $43 1.2
2002......................................................... 3,472 3,200 92.2 12 0.3 0 0.0
2003......................................................... 1,988 1,988 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
2004......................................................... 1,485 1,096 73.8 338 22.8 0 0.0
2005......................................................... 6,643 1,485 22.4 2,967 44.7 0 0.0
2006......................................................... 4,518 1,190 26.3 3,086 68.3 0 0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Global Trade Information Services, World Trade Atlas: U.S. State Export Edition, April 2007.

Alternatives available to producers. Under the interim rule,
producers have two options for dealing with an infestation of PCN. The
first of these is a quarantine program. Under this program, producers
are prohibited from planting potatoes or any other host crop in the
quarantined area for a minimum of 30 years. APHIS has determined that
not planting host material for this amount of time will ensure that the
PCN infestation has died out before the quarantine is lifted. This is
based on the fact that PCN can survive for up to 30 years in a dormant
state without any host crops on which to feed.
Eradication is the second option available to affected potato
producers. APHIS is currently working on a PCN eradication protocol.
However, an approved protocol is not yet available. The eradication
protocol will prevent producers from planting any crops on PCN affected
and associated fields for a specified amount of time. However, APHIS
will assume the costs of eradication for those producers wishing to
participate in this program, to the extent that funds are available.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that agencies consider the
economic impact of rule changes on small businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions. Section 603 of the Act requires agencies to
prepare and make available for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) describing the expected impact of rules on
small entities. Sections 603(b) and 603(c) of the Act specify the
content of an IRFA. In this section, we address these IRFA
requirements.

Reasons for Action

APHIS is taking these actions based on the finding of PCN in Idaho.
The quarantine measures are intended to curtail the spread of PCN to
other areas of Idaho and the United States. The rule is likely to
benefit a majority of potato producers in that it safeguards their
fields from infestation. Additionally, declines in production resulting
from the quarantine are not expected to be significant since the number
of acres on which potatoes would not be grown accounts for only 0.3
percent of Idaho's potato acreage.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ Currently, 916 acres are considered to be infested and
would, therefore, be ineligible for planting host crops.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Objectives and Legal Basis for Rule

The objective of the interim rule is to prevent the spread of PCN
by quarantining infested or associated fields or implementing APHIS
approved eradication protocols for these fields. A widespread outbreak
of PCN in Idaho could have devastating consequences for the U.S. potato
industry. APHIS believes the implementation of the quarantine or
eradication program and related movement restrictions will prevent the
pest from spreading to other areas in Idaho and the rest of the United
States.
This rule amends 7 CFR part 301 by adding a new subpart regulating
PCN. The legal basis for the implementation

[[Page 51982]]

of a quarantine to prevent the spread of PCN may be found in the Plant
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), which authorizes the Secretary
of Agriculture to implement programs and policies designed to prevent
the introduction and spread of plant pests and diseases.

Description and Estimated Number of Small Entities Regulated

The PCN regulations being imposed by APHIS are intended to prevent
the spread of the pest to additional areas. Approximately 2,500 of the
330,000 acres planted to potatoes in Idaho are regulated under the
current quarantine as imposed by the Federal Order. The potential
economic impacts of regulating this area are presented in the following
paragraphs.
Given a quarantined area of approximately 2,500 acres, 800,100
pounds of production are estimated to be affected by the rule.\3\ A
reduction in production of this magnitude is not likely to have a
significant economic impact on the potato industry. Despite the minimal
impacts on domestic production, export markets have been closed due to
the PCN outbreak. While Canada and Mexico have banned imports of fresh
potatoes from Idaho, Japan has banned imports of fresh potatoes
produced anywhere in the United States. However, export statistics
indicate that the vast majority of U.S. potatoes are consumed
domestically. From 2000 to 2005, exports of fresh and processed
potatoes amounted to approximately 7 percent of domestic production.
Based on current restrictions on U.S. imports resulting from the PCN
outbreak, we expect exports to decline by approximately 19 percent,
accounting for less than 2 percent of domestic production. The
reduction in the value of exports is expected to be larger, since the
United States exports more processed products than table potatoes.
However, given that domestic demand and supply can fluctuate by as much
as 4 percent from one year to the next coupled with the potato's
storage capability, it is likely that the domestic market will be able
to absorb the excess supply created by import bans placed on U.S.
potatoes because of the discovery of PCN in certain parts of Idaho.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ Estimates are based on historical yields from Bingham and
Bonneville Counties and the estimated number of acres quarantined
under the rule. An average of the yields from 2000 to 2005 excluding
the high and low yields from the period is multiplied by the number
of acres quarantined to estimate the level of production for the
quarantined area. The production numbers for the two counties are
then averaged to obtain the estimate reported above.
\4\ Only reductions of U.S. potato imports by other countries
attributable to the presence of PCN in certain areas of Idaho are
considered here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Producers subject to the quarantine may be negatively impacted by
this regulatory action. Those with infested fields will not be able to
plant any host crop, including potatoes, tomatoes, or eggplant, for at
least 30 years if they are seeking to remove their fields from
quarantine, unless a PCN eradication protocol approved by the
Administrator is developed. However, producers may plant non-host crops
on the quarantined acreage. In Bingham County, ID, the area planted to
potatoes is second only to that planted to wheat. Producers in this
county also grow corn, oats, barley, sugarbeets, and alfalfa hay. Based
on historical production (table 3) and farmers' desire to make a
profit, it is likely that farmers in the quarantined area would choose
to plant one of these crops rather than forgo 30 years of revenue which
could be generated from the land under quarantine. The planting
decision would be a function of market prices, input costs, and
expected government payments for those commodities classified as a
program crop. Farmers may choose to plant one commodity or multiple
commodities depending on these factors. Given alternative production
opportunities, it is not clear how producers in the quarantined area
would be affected. If the crops mentioned above are viable substitutes
in production for the ineligible crops, producers will likely not face
substantial impacts due to the quarantine regulations. APHIS welcomes
public comment on this issue.

Table 3.--Harvested Acreage and Production of Various Crops in Bingham County, ID, 2000-2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wheat Barley Hay Potatoes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harvested acres
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000........................................................ 132,200 22,500 52,300 67,000
2001........................................................ 117,500 21,300 54,300 55,200
2002........................................................ 116,500 22,500 67,000 59,700
2003........................................................ 109,000 28,700 66,900 60,300
2004........................................................ 117,500 26,900 64,500 56,000
2005........................................................ 122,200 24,300 61,600 52,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Production (1,000 Pounds)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000........................................................ 858,600 104,016 517,600 2,510,400
2001........................................................ 660,000 95,184 472,800 1,833,000
2002........................................................ 682,200 100,224 568,400 2,000,000
2003........................................................ 680,400 123,360 512,000 1,959,800
2004........................................................ 795,600 133,440 514,000 2,074,000
2005........................................................ 807,960 121,152 583,800 1,808,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USDA, NASS, Quick Stats Database, U.S. and All States County Data--Crops, October 2006.

?>
[[Page 51983]]

Table 4.--Harvested Acreage and Production of Various Crops in Bonneville County, ID, 2000-2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corn Corn
Wheat (grain) (silage) Oats Barley Hay Potatoes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harvested acres
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000......................................................... 4,185,000 0 40,000 42,000 4,746,000 128,500 9,000,000
2001......................................................... 3,200,000 20,000 39,100 77,000 4,910,000 121,000 8,136,000
2002......................................................... 2,980,000 0 59,000 58,000 5,840,000 128,400 9,204,000
2003......................................................... 2,420,000 ........... ........... 33,000 4,380,000 124,000 8,537,000
2004......................................................... 3,580,000 12,000 97,000 33,000 6,572,000 127,400 9,070,000
2005......................................................... 3,065,000 170,000 114,000 15,000 6,904,000 131,600 8,250,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Production (1,000 Pounds)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000......................................................... 251,100 0 80,000 1,344 227,808 257,000 900,000
2001......................................................... 192,000 1,120 78,200 2,464 235,680 242,000 813,600
2002......................................................... 178,800 0 118,000 1,856 280,320 256,800 920,400
2003......................................................... 145,200 ........... ........... 1,056 210,240 248,000 853,700
2004......................................................... 214,800 672 194,000 1,056 315,456 254,800 907,000
2005......................................................... 183,900 9,520 228,000 480 331,392 263,200 825,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USDA, NASS, Quick Stats Database, U.S. and All States County Data--Crops, October 2006.

The eradication program will involve planting cover crops rather
than commercial crops for a predetermined amount of time. However, for
those producers wishing to participate in the eradication program,
APHIS will assume the costs of implementing eradication protocols it
determines to be effective, to the extent that funds are available.
Impacts of the rule on the domestic market are likely to be small,
and the benefits of the quarantine are expected to outweigh the costs.
Widespread dissemination of the pest would likely translate into
significant economic losses for producers and processors. Left
unchecked, PCN attacks the roots of the potato plant, leaching
nutrients from the plant itself, which in turn reduces yields, leading
to significant declines in production. Additionally, import bans
implemented by U.S. trading partners would likely be more widespread
and may take longer to remove.
The rule may affect domestic producers of potatoes, as well as
potato processing firms. It is likely that the entities affected would
be small according to Small Business Administration (SBA) guidelines. A
discussion of these impacts follows.
Affected U.S. potato producers are expected to be small, based on
2002 Census of Agriculture data and SBA guidelines for entities in the
farm category Potato Farming, Field, and Seed Potato Production (North
American Industry Classification System [NAICS] code 111211). The SBA
classifies producers in this farm category with total annual sales of
not more than $750,000 as small entities. APHIS does not have
information on the size distribution of the affected producers, but
according to 2002 Agriculture Census data, there were a total of 25,017
farms in Idaho in 2002.\5\ Of this number, approximately 95 percent had
annual sales in 2002 of less than $500,000, which is well below the
SBA's small entity threshold of $750,000 for commodity farms.\6\ This
indicates that the majority of farms are considered small by SBA
standards, and it is reasonable to assume that most of the 121 potato
farms located in Bingham County, ID, and the 47 potato farms located in
Bonneville County, ID, that may be affected by this rule also qualify
as small. Potato packing firms classified as NAICS 115114 (Postharvest
Crop Activities (except Cotton Ginning)) are considered small if they
have not more than $6.5 million in total annual sales. According to the
County Business Patterns report for Idaho published by the Census
Bureau, there were 30 post-harvest establishments in Idaho in 2002, the
latest date for which numbers were published. Of these, two were
located in Bingham County, and six were located in Bonneville County.
That report does not report the value of total annual sales or the
distribution of annual sales for firms in this category. Thus, it is
not known what percentage of potato packing firms would be considered
small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ This number represents the total number of farms in Idaho,
including farms producing potatoes.
\6\ Source: SBA and 2002 Census of Agriculture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the case of potato processors, establishments classified within
NAICS 311411 (Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing), NAICS
311423 (Dried and Dehydrated Food Manufacturing), NAICS 311919 (Other
Snack Food Manufacturing), and NAICS 311991 (Perishable Prepared Food
Manufacturing) with not more than 500 employees are considered small by
SBA standards. Data from the Economic Census shows that in 2002, there
were a total of 235 frozen fruit, juice, and vegetable manufacturing
establishments, including firms manufacturing frozen french fries, in
the United States. Of these firms, 215 or 92 percent employed fewer
than 500 employees and were, therefore, considered small by SBA
standards. There were 181 dried and dehydrated food manufacturing
establishments in 2002. Included in this category are manufacturers of
dehydrated potato products. There were 176 firms with fewer than 500
employees in this category, accounting for 97 percent of all firms. For
other snack food manufacturing establishments, which includes firms
manufacturing potato chips, there were 338 establishments in the United
States in 2002. Of these establishments, 322 (over 95 percent) had
fewer than 500 employees. Firms manufacturing peeled or cut potatoes,
included in the perishable prepared food manufacturing category,
numbered 610 in 2002. Of these, 603 (99 percent) had no more than 500
employees.\7\ Based on this information, it is reasonable to conclude
that domestic producers and potato processors that may be affected by
the rule are predominantly small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ Source: SBA and 2002 Economic Census.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Based on the data available to APHIS, benefits to producers outside
the regulated area of curtailing the spread of the pest will likely
outweigh the costs borne by producers in the affected area. Major
importers of fresh potatoes from Idaho, including Canada and Mexico,
have lifted their original import

[[Page 51984]]

prohibitions and now allow imports of fresh potatoes from Idaho subject
to certain restrictions, including that the potatoes did not originate
from the regulated area. Since the United States exports many more
potatoes in the processed form, either as frozen french fries or potato
chips, the loss of the fresh markets is not likely to have significant
economic impacts on the U.S. potato industry. Additionally, the
domestic market would likely be able to absorb any excess supply of
fresh potatoes resulting from the import bans imposed by other
countries. APHIS welcomes public comment on these potential effects.

Description and Estimate of Compliance Requirements

Inspection services required to comply with regulations are
provided to producers at no cost during regular business hours.
Certificates and limited permits required to move regulated articles
out of a quarantine area may be obtained without cost from an inspector
or person operating under a compliance agreement.

Significant Alternatives to Rule Which Accomplish the Stated Objectives
and Minimize Any Significant Economic Impacts on Small Entities

It is the position of APHIS that there are no alternatives to the
interim rule that would satisfactorily accomplish the stated objectives
and minimize any significant impacts on small entities. The rule will
protect potato producers outside the regulated area from the crop
damage and losses that would be incurred if the potato cyst nematode
were allowed to spread.

Executive Order 12372

This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)

Executive Order 12988

This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

In accordance with section 3507(j) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements included in this interim rule have been
submitted for emergency approval to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). OMB has assigned control number 0579-0322 to the information
collection and recordkeeping requirements.
We plan to request continuation of that approval for 3 years.
Please send written comments on the 3-year approval request to the
following addresses: (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC 20503; and (2)
Docket No. APHIS-2006-0143, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-2006-
0143 and send your comments within 60 days of publication of this rule.
This interim rule establishes regulations to quarantine part of the
State of Idaho because of the PCN and restrict the interstate movement
of regulated articles from the quarantined area. In order to move
regulated articles interstate from the quarantined area, regulated
parties must obtain certificates or limited permits, and they may enter
into compliance agreements with APHIS. We are soliciting comments from
the public (as well as affected agencies) concerning our information
collection and recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency's functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 0.2686 hours per response.
Respondents: Potato producers, packers, processors and handlers.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 400.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 7.65.
Estimated annual number of responses: 3,060.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 822 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Mrs.
Celeste Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
734-7477.

E-Government Act Compliance

The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this interim rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 734-7477.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301

Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.

0
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR parts 301 and 305 as follows:

PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80,
and 371.3.
Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law
106-113, 113 Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and 301.75-16
issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400
(7 U.S.C. 1421 note).

0
2. Part 301 is amended by adding a new ``Subpart--Potato Cyst
Nematode,'' Sec. Sec. 301.86 through 301.86-9, to read as follows:
Subpart--Potato Cyst Nematode
Sec.
301.86 Restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.
301.86-1 Definitions.
301.86-2 Regulated articles.
301.86-3 Quarantined areas.
301.86-4 Conditions governing the interstate movement of regulated
articles from quarantined areas.
301.86-5 Issuance and cancellation of certificates and limited
permits.
301.86-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation.

[[Page 51985]]

301.86-7 Assembly and inspection of regulated articles.
301.86-8 Attachment and disposition of certificates and limited
permits.
301.86-9 Costs and charges.

Subpart--Potato Cyst Nematode

Sec. 301.86 Restrictions on interstate movement of regulated
articles.

No person may move interstate from any quarantined area any
regulated article except in accordance with this subpart.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Any properly identified inspector is authorized to stop and
inspect persons and means of conveyance and to seize, quarantine,
treat, apply other remedial measures to, destroy, or otherwise
dispose of regulated articles as provided in section 414 of the
Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec. 301.86-1 Definitions.

Administrator. The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, or any person authorized to act for the
Administrator.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of
Agriculture.
Associated field. A field that has been found to be at risk for
infestation with potato cyst nematode in accordance with Sec. 301.86-
3(c)(2).
Certificate. A document in which an inspector or person operating
under a compliance agreement affirms that a specified regulated article
is free of potato cyst nematode and may be moved interstate to any
destination.
Compliance agreement. A written agreement between APHIS and a
person engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated articles,
wherein the person agrees to comply with this subpart.
Departmental permit. A document issued by the Administrator in
which he or she affirms that interstate movement of the regulated
article identified on the document is for scientific or experimental
purposes and that the regulated article is eligible for interstate
movement in accordance with Sec. 301.86-4.
Field. A defined production site that is managed separately from
surrounding areas for phytosanitary purposes.
Infestation (infested). The presence of the potato cyst nematode or
the existence of circumstances that makes it reasonable to believe that
the potato cyst nematode is present.
Infested field. A field that has been found to be infested with
potato cyst nematode in accordance with Sec. 301.86-3(c)(1).
Inspector. Any employee of APHIS or other person authorized by the
Administrator to perform the duties required under this subpart.
Interstate. From any State into or through any other State.
Limited permit. A document in which an inspector or person
operating under a compliance agreement affirms that the regulated
article identified on the document is eligible for interstate movement
in accordance with Sec. 301.86-5(b) only to a specified destination
and only in accordance with specified conditions.
Moved (move, movement). Shipped, offered for shipment, received for
transportation, transported, carried, or allowed to be moved, shipped,
transported, or carried.
Nursery stock. Living plants and plant parts intended to be
planted, to remain planted, or to be replanted.
Person. Any association, company, corporation, firm, individual,
joint stock company, partnership, society, or other entity.
Plant Protection and Quarantine. The Plant Protection and
Quarantine program of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,
United States Department of Agriculture.
Potato cyst nematode. The potato cyst nematode (Globodera pallida),
in any stage of development.
Quarantined area. Any State or portion of a State designated as a
quarantined area in accordance with the provisions in Sec. 301.86-3.
Regulated article. Any article listed in Sec. 301.86-2 or
otherwise designated as a regulated article in accordance with Sec.
301.86-2(i).
State. The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana
Islands, or any State, territory, or possession of the United States.

Sec. 301.86-2 Regulated articles.

The following are regulated articles:
(a) Potato cyst nematodes.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ Permit and other requirements for the interstate movement of
potato cyst nematodes are contained in part 330 of this chapter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) The following potato cyst nematode host crops:

Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)
Pepper (Capsicum spp.)
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Tomatillo (Physalis philadelphica)
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)

(c) Root crops.
(d) Garden and dry beans (Phaseolus spp.) and peas (Pisum spp.).
(e) All nursery stock.
(f) Soil, compost, humus, muck, peat, and manure, and products on
or in which soil is commonly found, including grass sod and plant
litter.
(g) Hay, straw, and fodder.
(h) Any equipment or conveyance used in an infested or associated
field that can carry soil if moved out of the field.
(i) Any other product, article, or means of conveyance not listed
in paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section that an inspector
determines presents a risk of spreading the potato cyst nematode, after
the inspector provides written notification to the person in possession
of the product, article, or means of conveyance that it is subject to
the restrictions of this subpart.

Sec. 301.86-3 Quarantined areas.

(a) Designation of quarantined areas. In accordance with the
criteria listed in paragraph (c) of this section, the Administrator
will designate as a quarantined area each field that has been found to
be infested with potato cyst nematode, each field that has been found
to be associated with an infested field, and any area that the
Administrator considers necessary to quarantine because of its
inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from infested or
associated fields. The Administrator will publish the description of
the quarantined area on the Plant Protection and Quarantine Web site,
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/potato/pcn.shtml.
The description of the quarantined area will include the

date the description was last updated and a description of the changes
that have been made to the quarantined area. The description of the
quarantined area may also be obtained by request from any local office
of PPQ; local offices are listed in telephone directories. After a
change is made to the quarantined area, we will publish a notice in the
Federal Register informing the public that the change has occurred and
describing the change to the quarantined area.
(b) Designation of an area less than an entire State as a
quarantined area. Less than an entire State will be designated as a
quarantined area only if the Administrator determines that:
(1) The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the
intrastate movement of the regulated articles that are equivalent to
those imposed by this subpart on the interstate movement of regulated
articles; and
(2) The designation of less than the entire State as a quarantined
area will prevent the interstate spread of the potato cyst nematode.
(c) Criteria for designation of fields as infested fields and
associated fields. (1) Infested fields. The Administrator will
designate a field as an infested field when a potato cyst nematode is
found in the field.

[[Page 51986]]

(2) Associated fields. The Administrator will designate a field as
an associated field when potato cyst nematode host crops, as listed in
Sec. 301.86-2(b), have been grown in the field in the last 10 years
and
(i) The field shares a border with an infested field; or
(ii) The field came into contact with a regulated article listed in
Sec. 301.86-2 from an infested field within the last 10 years; or
(iii) Within the last 10 years, the field shared ownership,
tenancy, seed, drainage or runoff, farm machinery, or other elements of
shared cultural practices with an infested field that could allow
spread of the potato cyst nematode, as determined by the Administrator.
(d) Removal of fields from quarantine--(1) Infested fields. An
infested field will be removed from quarantine when a 3-year biosurvey
protocol approved by APHIS has been completed and the field has been
found to be free of PCN.
(2) Associated fields. An associated field will be removed from
quarantine when the field has been found to be free of potato cyst
nematode according to a survey protocol approved by the Administrator
as sufficient to support removal from quarantine.
(3) Removal of other areas from quarantine. If the Administrator
has quarantined any area other than infested or associated fields
because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from
infested or associated fields, as provided in paragraph (a) of this
section, that area will be removed from quarantine when the relevant
infested or associated fields are removed from quarantine.

Sec. 301.86-4 Conditions governing the interstate movement of
regulated articles from quarantined areas.

(a) Any regulated article may be moved interstate from a
quarantined area only if moved under the following conditions:
(1) With a certificate or limited permit issued and attached in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 301.86-5 and 301.86-8;
(2) Without a certificate or limited permit if:
(i) The regulated article is moved by the United States Department
of Agriculture for experimental or scientific purposes; or
(ii) The regulated article originates outside the quarantined area
and is moved interstate through the quarantined area under the
following conditions:
(A) The points of origin and destination are indicated on a waybill
accompanying the regulated article; and
(B) The regulated article is moved through the quarantined area
without stopping (except for refueling and for traffic conditions such
as traffic lights and stop signs); and
(C) The regulated article is not unpacked or unloaded in the
quarantined area; and
(D) The article has not been combined or commingled with other
articles so as to lose its individual identity.
(b) When an inspector has probable cause to believe a person or
means of conveyance is moving a regulated article interstate, the
inspector is authorized to stop the person or means of conveyance to
determine whether a regulated article is present and to inspect the
regulated article. Articles found to be infested by an inspector, and
articles not in compliance with the regulations in this subpart, may be
seized, quarantined, treated, subjected to other remedial measures,
destroyed, or otherwise disposed of.

Sec. 301.86-5 Issuance and cancellation of certificates and limited
permits.

(a) Certificates. An inspector \3\ or person operating under a
compliance agreement may issue a certificate for the interstate
movement of a regulated article if the inspector determines that the
regulated article satisfies the general requirements for a certificate
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and any requirements that may apply
to the regulated article under paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(7) of this
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ Inspectors are assigned to local offices of APHIS, which are
listed in local telephone directories. Information concerning such
local offices may also be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and
Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, Maryland
20737-1236.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Certification requirements for all regulated articles. The
regulated article must be moved in compliance with any additional
emergency conditions the Administrator may impose under section 414 of
the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714) \4\ to prevent the spread of
the potato cyst nematode. In addition, the regulated article must be
eligible for unrestricted movement under all other Federal domestic
plant quarantines and regulations applicable to the regulated article.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ Section 414 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714)
provides that the Secretary of Agriculture may, under certain
conditions, hold, seize, quarantine, treat, apply other remedial
measures to destroy or otherwise dispose of any plant, plant pest,
plant product, article, or means of conveyance that is moving, or
has moved into or through the United States or interstate if the
Secretary has reason to believe the article is a plant pest or is
infested with a plant pest at the time of movement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) Certification requirements for nursery stock.--(i) Potatoes.
Potatoes intended for use as nursery stock (i.e., seed potatoes) are
prohibited from being moved interstate from the quarantined area.
(ii) Nursery stock of other host crops. An inspector may issue a
certificate for the interstate movement of nursery stock of potato cyst
nematode host crops other than potatoes, as listed in Sec. 301.86-
2(b), if the nursery stock was grown in a field that meets the
following requirements:
(A) The field has been surveyed by an inspector for potato cyst
nematode at least once in the last 3 years;
(B) The potato cyst nematode has not been found in the field; and
(C) No more than one potato cyst nematode host crop, as listed in
Sec. 301.86-2(b), has been grown in the last 3 years.
(iii) Nursery stock of non-host crops--(A) With soil. An inspector
may issue a certificate for the interstate movement of nursery stock of
non-host crops moved with soil if the nursery stock was grown in a
field that meets the following requirements:
(1) The field has been surveyed by an inspector for potato cyst
nematode at least once in the last 3 years;
(2) The potato cyst nematode has not been found in the field; and
(3) No more than one potato cyst nematode host crop, as listed in
Sec. 301.86-2(b), has been grown in the field in the last 3 years.
(B) Without soil (bare-rooted). An inspector may issue a
certificate for the interstate movement of nursery stock of non-host
crops moved without soil if the inspector finds the nursery stock to be
free of soil on its roots and on all other parts of the plant.
(3) Certification requirements for potatoes and root crops for
consumption. An inspector may issue a certificate for the movement of
potatoes or root crops intended for consumption from the quarantined
area only if the field in which the potatoes or root crops were grown
meets the following requirements:
(i) The field has been surveyed by an inspector for PCN at least
once in the last 3 years and prior to the planting of the potatoes or
root crops;
(ii) PCN has not been found in the field; and
(iii) No more than one PCN host crop has been grown in the field in
the last 3 years.
(4) Certification requirements for soil and associated products. An
inspector may issue a certificate for the interstate movement of a
regulated article listed in Sec. 301.86-2(e) only if the article
originated in a field that meets the following requirements:

[[Page 51987]]

(i) The field has been surveyed by an inspector for potato cyst
nematode at least once in the last 3 years;
(ii) The potato cyst nematode has not been found in the field; and
(iii) No more than one potato cyst nematode host crop, as listed in
Sec. 301.86-2(b), has been grown in the last 3 years.
(5) Certification requirements for hay, straw, and fodder. An
inspector may issue a certificate for the movement of hay, straw, or
fodder from the quarantined area only if:
(i) The field where the hay, straw, or fodder was produced meets
the following requirements:
(A) The field has been surveyed by an inspector for potato cyst
nematode at least once in the last 3 years;
(B) The potato cyst nematode has not been found in the field; and
(C) No more than one potato cyst nematode host crop, as listed in
Sec. 301.86-2(b), has been grown in the field in the last 3 years; or
(ii) The hay, straw, or fodder is produced according to procedures
judged by an inspector to be sufficient to isolate it from soil
throughout its production.
(6) Certification requirements for equipment used in infested or
associated fields. An inspector may issue a certificate for the
interstate movement of equipment that has been used in an infested or
associated field and that can carry soil if moved out of the field only
after the equipment has been pressure-washed under the supervision of
an inspector to remove all soil or steam-treated in accordance with
part 305 of this chapter.
(b) Limited permits--(1) General conditions. An inspector \5\ may
issue a limited permit for the interstate movement of a regulated
article if the inspector determines that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See footnote 3 to Sec. 301.86-5(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) The regulated article is to be moved interstate to a specified
destination for specified handling, processing, or utilization (the
destination and other conditions to be listed in the limited permit),
and this interstate movement will not result in the spread of the
potato cyst nematode because life stages of the potato cyst nematode
will be destroyed by the specified handling, processing, or
utilization;
(ii) The regulated article is to be moved in compliance with any
additional emergency conditions the Administrator may impose under
section 414 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714) to prevent the
spread of the potato cyst nematode; and
(iii) The regulated article is eligible for interstate movement
under all other Federal domestic plant quarantines and regulations
applicable to the regulated article.
(2) Specific conditions for potatoes for consumption. An inspector
may issue a limited permit to allow the interstate movement of potatoes
from the quarantined area for processing or packing only if:
(i) The potatoes are transported in a manner that prevents the
potatoes and soil attached to the potatoes from coming into contact
with agricultural premises outside the quarantined area; and
(ii) The potatoes are processed or packed at facilities that handle
potatoes, waste, and waste water in a manner approved by APHIS to
prevent the spread of potato cyst nematode.
(c) Certificates and limited permits for the interstate movement of
regulated articles may be issued by an inspector or person operating
under a compliance agreement. A person operating under a compliance
agreement may issue a certificate for the interstate movement of a
regulated article after an inspector has determined that the regulated
article is eligible for a certificate in accordance with paragraph (a)
of this section. A person operating under a compliance agreement may
issue a limited permit for interstate movement of a regulated article
after an inspector has determined that the regulated article is
eligible for a limited permit in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section.
(d) Any certificate or limited permit that has been issued may be
withdrawn, either orally or in writing, by an inspector if he or she
determines that the holder of the certificate or limited permit has not
complied with all provisions in this subpart for the use of the
certificate or limited permit or has not complied with all the
conditions contained in the certificate or limited permit. If the
withdrawal is oral, the withdrawal and the reasons for the withdrawal
will be confirmed in writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any
person whose certificate or limited permit has been withdrawn may
appeal the decision in writing to the Administrator within 10 days
after receiving the written notification of the withdrawal. The appeal
must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to
show that the certificate or limited permit was wrongfully withdrawn.
As promptly as circumstances allow, the Administrator will grant or
deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for the decision. A
hearing will be held to resolve any conflict as to any material fact.
Rules of practice concerning a hearing will be adopted by the
Administrator.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0322)

Sec. 301.86-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation.

(a) Any person engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated
articles may enter into a compliance agreement when an inspector
determines that the person is aware of this subpart, agrees to comply
with its provisions, and agrees to comply with all the provisions
contained in the compliance agreement.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\6\ Compliance agreement forms are available without charge from
local Plant Protection and Quarantine offices, which are listed in
telephone directories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Any compliance agreement may be canceled, either orally or in
writing, by an inspector whenever the inspector finds that the person
who has entered into the compliance agreement has failed to comply with
any of the provisions of this subpart. If the cancellation is oral, the
cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed in
writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any person whose compliance
agreement has been canceled may appeal the decision, in writing, to the
Administrator, within 10 days after receiving written notification of
the cancellation. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons
upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was
wrongfully canceled. As promptly as circumstances allow, the
Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the
reasons for the decision. A hearing will be held to resolve any
conflict as to any material fact. Rules of practice concerning a
hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.

Sec. 301.86-7 Assembly and inspection of regulated articles.

(a) Any person (other than a person authorized to issue
certificates or limited permits under Sec. 301.86-5(c)) who desires a
certificate or limited permit to move a regulated article interstate
must notify an inspector \7\ as far in advance of the desired
interstate movement as possible, but no less than 48 hours before the
desired interstate movement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See footnote 3 to Sec. 301.86-5(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) The regulated article must be assembled at the place and in the
manner the inspector designates as necessary to comply with this
subpart.

[[Page 51988]]

Sec. 301.86-8 Attachment and disposition of certificates and limited
permits.

(a) A certificate or limited permit required for the interstate
movement of a regulated article must, at all times during the
interstate movement, be:
(1) Attached to the outside of the container containing the
regulated article; or
(2) Attached to the regulated article itself if not in a container;
or
(3) Attached to the consignee's copy of the accompanying waybill.
If the certificate or limited permit is attached to the consignee's
copy of the waybill, the regulated article must be sufficiently
described on the certificate or limited permit and on the waybill to
identify the regulated article.
(b) The certificate or limited permit for the interstate movement
of a regulated article must be furnished by the carrier or the
carrier's representative to the consignee listed on the certificate or
limited permit upon arrival at the location provided on the certificate
or limited permit.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 0579-0322)

Sec. 301.86-9 Costs and charges.

The services of the inspector during normal business hours (8 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays) will be furnished
without cost. APHIS will not be responsible for any costs or charges
incident to inspections or compliance with the provisions of the
quarantine and regulations in this subpart, other than for the services
of the inspector.

PART 305--PHYTOSANITARY TREATMENTS

0
3. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 305 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and
136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

0
4. In Sec. 305.2, in the table in paragraph (g), the entries for
``Automobiles'' and ``Construction equipment without cabs''; the first
entry for ``Used farm equipment with cabs''; and the entries for ``Used
farm equipment without cabs'' and ``Used containers'' are revised to
read as follows:

Sec. 305.2 Approved treatments.

* * * * *
(g) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article Pest Treatment
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
Automobiles................... Globodera T406-c, steam
rostochiensis cleaning: Steam at
and G. pallida. high pressure until
all soil is removed.
Treated surfaces
must be thoroughly
wet and heated.
Construction equipment without G. rostochiensis SS T-406d.
cabs. and G. pallida.

* * * * * * *
Used farm equipment with cabs. G. rostochiensis T406-c, steam
and G. pallida. cleaning: Steam at
high pressure until
all soil is removed.
Treated surfaces
must be thoroughly
wet and heated.

* * * * * * *
Used farm equipment without G. rostochiensis SS T-406d.
cabs. and G. pallida.
Used containers............... G. rostochiensis SS T-406d.
and G. pallida.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of September 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7-17842 Filed 9-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P