[Federal Register: September 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 177)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52314-52316]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13se07-13]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-29174; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-125-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections
to detect cracking of the body station 303.9 frame, and corrective
action if necessary. This proposed AD also provides for optional
terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This proposed AD
results from reports of cracks found at the cutout in the web of body
station frame 303.9 inboard of stringer 16L. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct such cracking, which could prevent the left
forward entry door from sealing correctly, and could cause in-flight
decompression of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 29,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6430; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
29174; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-125-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit http://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received reports of cracks found at the cutout in the web
of the body station 303.9 frame inboard of stringer 16L on seven Boeing
Model 737 ``classic'' airplanes. The cracks were found on airplanes
that had accumulated between 37,562 and 64,000 total flight cycles.
Such cracking, if not corrected, could prevent the left forward entry
door from sealing correctly, and could cause in-flight decompression of
the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed two service bulletins related to this action. The
service bulletins are similar but affect different groups of airplanes.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1188, Revision 2, dated May 9,
2007, for certain Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes,
describes the following actions:
Repetitive high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) and detailed
inspections to detect cracking in the station 303.9 web and doubler
around the cutouts for door stop straps at stringers 15L and 16L.
A repair/preventive change, which includes installing a
new web, doubler, and stop fitting assemblies; changing the shape of
the web cutout; and doing an eddy current inspection.
Service Bulletin 737-53A1188 specifies a threshold for the initial
inspection of 10,000 total flight cycles and a grace period of 2,250
flight cycles.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1197, dated August 25, 2006,
for certain Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes, describes the following actions:
Repetitive ultrasound inspections of the slot-shaped
cutout in the web for the door stop strap at stringer 16L.
Repetitive HFEC inspections of the web along the upper
edge and lower edge of the doubler around the doorstop strap at
stringer 16L.
Repetitive detailed inspections of the web around the
doubler for the cutout at stringer 16.
A repair/preventive change, which involves installing a
new web and doubler.
Service Bulletin 737-53A1197 specifies a threshold for the initial
inspection of 30,000 total flight cycles and a grace period of 2,250
flight cycles.
For both service bulletins, a repair/preventive change eliminates
the need
[[Page 52315]]
for the repetitive inspections. For airplanes on which the repair/
preventive change was previously done according to the original version
or Revision 1 of Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1188, replacing the
existing kit with a new kit (in accordance with Revision 2) is
necessary to eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service bulletins is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed below.
Difference Between Proposed AD and Service Information
The service bulletins specify to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
Using a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization whom we have authorized to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 2,765 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs,
depending on airplane configuration, for U.S. operators to comply with
this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Action Work hours labor rate Parts Cost per airplane Number of U.S.- Fleet cost
per hour registered airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.................... 1 to 4................ $80 None.................. $80 to $320, per 1,154................. $92,320 to
inspection cycle. $369,280, per
inspection
cycle.
Repair/preventive change, if 12 to 30.............. 80 $564 to $2,236........ $1,524 to $4,636. Up to 1,154........... Up to
done. $5,349,944.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-29174; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
125-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
29, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1.--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As identified in Boeing Alert
Boeing model-- Service Bulletin--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
737-100, -200, and -200C series 737-53A1197, dated August 25,
airplanes. 2006.
737-300, -400, and -500 series 737-53A1188, Revision 2, dated
airplanes. May 9, 2007, or 737-53A1197,
dated August 25, 2006.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52316]]
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of cracks found at the cutout
in the web of body station frame 303.9 inboard of stringer 16L. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct such cracking, which could
prevent the left forward entry door from sealing correctly, and
could cause in-flight decompression of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections: Service Bulletin 737-53A1188
(f) For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1188, Revision 2, dated May 9, 2007, including airplanes
modified by the repair/preventive change specified in the original
version, dated April 9, 1998, or Revision 1, dated March 18, 1999,
of the service bulletin: Do detailed and high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspections in the web and doubler around the slotted holes
in the frame web at stringers 15L and 16L, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Do the
inspections at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E. of
the service bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (h) of this
AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight in
accordance with the service bulletin, except as provided by
paragraph (i) of this AD. Repeat the inspections at intervals not to
exceed 4,500 flight cycles until accomplishment of the repair/
preventive change in accordance with the service bulletin, which
terminates the repetitive inspection requirements. A repair/
preventive change done in accordance with the original version or
Revision 1 of the service bulletin does not terminate the repetitive
inspections, but the repetitive inspections may be terminated after
the existing kit is replaced with a new kit in accordance with
Revision 2 of the service bulletin, paragraph 3.B., Part II, step 3,
or Part III, step 3.
Repetitive Inspections: Service Bulletin 737-53A1197
(g) For airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737-53A1197, dated August 25, 2006: Do an ultrasound inspection of
the slot-shaped cutout in the web for the door stop strap at
stringer 16L, an HFEC inspection of the web along the upper and
lower edges of the doubler around the doorstop strap at stringer
16L, and a detailed inspection of the web around the doubler for the
cutout at stringer 16L, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the service bulletin. Do the inspections at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin,
except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight in accordance with the
service bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (i) of this AD.
Repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 4,500 flight
cycles, until accomplishment of the repair/preventive change in
accordance with the service bulletin, which terminates the
repetitive inspections.
Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(h) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1188, Revision 2,
dated May 9, 2007; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1197,
dated August 25, 2006, specify a compliance time after release of
the service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the
specified time after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1188, Revision 2,
dated May 9, 2007; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1197,
dated August 25, 2006, specify to contact Boeing for appropriate
action, including repair of damage outside the scope of the service
bulletin, repair using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 31, 2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-18049 Filed 9-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P