[Federal Register: October 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 204)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59969-59971]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23oc07-12]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0074; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-151-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
[[Page 59970]]
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30 airplanes. This proposed
AD would require replacement of the wire harness of the auxiliary
hydraulic pump with a new wire harness, and routing the new wire
harness outside of the tire burst area. This proposed AD results from
fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer, as well as reports
of shorted wires in the right wheel well and evidence of arcing on the
power cables of the auxiliary hydraulic pump. We are proposing this AD
to prevent shorted wires or electrical arcing at the auxiliary
hydraulic pump, which could result in a fire in the wheel well. We are
also proposing this AD to reduce the potential of an ignition source
adjacent to the fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 7,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management,
Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheyenne Del Carmen, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety/Mechanical and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM-150L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562)
627-5338; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0074;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-151-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
We have received three reports indicating that operators found
shorted wires in the right wheel well and evidence of arcing on the
power cables of the auxiliary hydraulic pump, on three McDonnell
Douglas Model DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes. One incident resulted in a
fire in the wheel well. Investigation revealed that damage to the power
cables was caused by structural chafing. In addition, SFAR 88 analysis
determined that extra protection is required on the wire harness of the
auxiliary hydraulic pump where it comes in close proximity to the
center fuel tank; Model MD-90-30 airplanes have a similar installation.
Boeing analysis also determined that the existing wire harness of the
auxiliary hydraulic pump for Model MD-90-30 airplanes is routed within
the ``tire burst'' area. Installing a new and longer wire harness for
the auxiliary hydraulic pump and routing it outside of the tire burst
area will minimize the possibility of chafing and wire arcing damage.
Shorted wires or electrical arcing at the auxiliary hydraulic pump, if
not corrected, could result in a fire in the wheel well. A potential
ignition source adjacent to the fuel tanks, if not corrected, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors could result in a
[[Page 59971]]
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
The installation of the auxiliary hydraulic pump wire harness on
Model DC-9-82 (MD-82) airplanes is similar to that on the affected
Model MD-90-30 airplanes. Therefore, all of these models are subject to
the same unsafe condition.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, dated
May 15, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for replacing
the wire harness of the auxiliary hydraulic pump with a new wire
harness, and routing the new wire harness outside of the tire burst
area. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 110 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 16 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 7 work hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts
would cost about $3,997 per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $72,912, or
$4,557 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2007-0074; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-151-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by December
7, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, dated May 15, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer, as well as reports of shorted wires in the right wheel
well and evidence of arcing on the power cables of the auxiliary
hydraulic pump. We are issuing this AD to prevent shorted wires or
electrical arcing at the auxiliary hydraulic pump, which could
result in a fire in the wheel well. We are also issuing this AD to
reduce the potential of an ignition source adjacent to the fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Replacement
(f) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the wire harness of the auxiliary hydraulic pump with a new
wire harness and route the new wire harness outside of the tire
burst area, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, dated May 15, 2007.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 12, 2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-20823 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P