[Federal Register: October 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 207)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60783-60786]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc07-11]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0631; FRL-8486-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan;
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements for Abnormal Conditions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving Michigan's June 29, 2007, request to
revise recordkeeping and reporting requirements for abnormal
conditions, start-up, shutdown, and malfunction of a source, process,
or process equipment. The revised rule contains more specific and
complete recordkeeping and reporting requirements than are currently
approved into the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP). In the
proposed rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is proposing
approval of and soliciting public comment on this requested SIP
revision. If adverse comments are received on this action, EPA will
withdraw this final rule and address the comments received in response
to this action in a final rule on the related proposed. A second public
comment period will not be held. Parties interested in commenting on
this action should do so at this time.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 26, 2007,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 26, 2007. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2007-0631, by one of the following methods:
1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 886-5824.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR 18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR 18J), U.S.
[[Page 60784]]
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2007-0631. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 886-1767 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the following, whenever ``we,'' ``us,''
or ``our'' are used, we mean the United States Environmental Protection
Agency.
Table of Contents
I. What Has Michigan Submitted?
II. What Action is EPA Taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. What Has Michigan Submitted?
On June 29, 2007, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted a revision to the Michigan SIP. The submittal revises
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for abnormal conditions,
start-up, shutdown, and malfunction of a source, process, or process
equipment contained in R 336.1912 of the Michigan Administrative Code.
The revised rule contains more specific and complete recordkeeping and
reporting requirements than are currently approved into the SIP.
The rule requires the owner or operator of a source to:
1. Operate in a manner consistent with good air pollution control
practices for minimizing emissions during periods of abnormal
conditions, start-up, shutdown, and malfunctions;
2. Provide notice of an abnormal condition, start-up, shutdown, or
malfunction that results in the emission of a hazardous air pollutant
or toxic air contaminant in excess of an emission standard which
continues for more than one hour;
3. Provide notice and a written report of an abnormal condition,
start-up, shutdown, or malfunction that results in emissions of any air
contaminant continuing for more than two hours in excess of a standard
or limitation;
4. Certify the truth, accuracy, and completeness of written
reports; and
5. Incorporate into a preventative maintenance and malfunction
abatement plan actions taken to correct and to prevent a reoccurrence
of an abnormal condition or malfunction.
Notices, which can be by any reasonable means, including
electronic, telephonic, or oral communication, are required to be
submitted to the MDEQ no later than two business days after the start-
up or shutdown or after discovery of the abnormal conditions or
malfunction. Written reports are required to be submitted to the MDEQ
within ten days after the start-up or shutdown occurred, within ten
days after the abnormal conditions or malfunction has been corrected,
or within thirty days of discovery of the abnormal conditions or
malfunction, whichever is first.
Written reports must include the time and date, probable causes and
duration of the abnormal conditions, start-up, shutdown, or
malfunction; identification of the source, process, or process
equipment involved; the type and, where possible, quantity or magnitude
of the excess emissions; and information describing the measures taken
and air pollution control practices followed to minimize emissions. For
abnormal conditions and malfunctions, the report must also include a
summary of the actions taken to correct and to prevent a reoccurrence
of the abnormal conditions or malfunction and the time taken to correct
the malfunction.
II. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is approving R 336.1912 as a revision to the Michigan SIP. We
are publishing this action without prior proposal because we view this
as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register
publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as
the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be effective December 26, 2007
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by November 26, 2007. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. If we do not receive any comments, this
action will be effective December 26, 2007.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
[[Page 60785]]
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (59
FR 22951, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act.
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a
Federal Standard.
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 26, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 10, 2007.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
0
Parts 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart X--Michigan
0
2. Section 52.1170(c) is amended by revising entry ``R 336.1912'' under
part 9 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1170 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Michigan Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Michigan citation Title date EPA approval date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Part 9. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60786]]
* * * * * * *
R 336.1912...................... Abnormal 7/26/95, as 10/26/07 [Insert
conditions, start- corrected 6/1/07. page number where
up, shutdown, and the document
malfunction of a begins].
source, process,
or process
equipment,
operating,
notification, and
reporting
requirements.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-20935 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P