[Federal Register: November 19, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 222)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64981-64985]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19no07-25]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
RIN 1018-AV35
Migratory Bird Permits; Revisions to Migratory Bird Import and
Export Regulations
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose changes in the
regulations governing migratory bird permitting. We propose to amend 50
CFR part 21 to resolve problems related to export of species covered by
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (CITES) permits or certificates; to allow the importation and
possession without an import permit of legally acquired migratory game
birds in the families Anatidae, Columbidae, Gruidae, Rallidae, or
Scolopacidae that were lawfully hunted in a foreign country; to extend
the period of time for which an Import and Export permit is valid from
3 to 5 years; and to reorganize and reword the regulations to make them
easier to understand.
DATES: Send comments on this proposal by February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and viewing
others' comments, please see ``Public Participation'' below. You may
submit comments, identified by RIN 1018-AV35, by any one of the
following methods:
E-mail: Import/Export@fws.gov. Include RIN number 1018-
AV35 in the subject line of the message;
Fax: 703-358-2217;
Mail: Chief, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop MBSP-
4107, Arlington, VA 22203-1610;
Hand Delivery: Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 4501 North Fairfax Drive, Room 4091,
Arlington, VA 22203-1610; or
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. George T. Allen, Division of
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 703-358-
1825.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 64982]]
Background
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the Federal agency that has
been delegated the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (16 U.S.C. 703 et
seq.), which implements conventions with Great Britain (for Canada),
Mexico, Japan, and the Soviet Union (Russia). Raptors (birds of prey)
are afforded Federal protection by the 1972 amendment to the Convention
for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Game Animals, February 7,
1936, United States-Mexico, as amended; the Convention between the
United States and Japan for the Protection of Migratory Birds in Danger
of Extinction and Their Environment, September 19, 1974; and the
Convention Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics (Russia) Concerning the Conservation of Migratory
Birds and Their Environment, November 26, 1976.
Among other things, we manage the import and export of migratory
birds and their parts, eggs, and nests. The regulations at 50 CFR 21.21
set forth the requirements for import and export permits for migratory
birds and their parts, eggs, and nests. Currently at Sec. 21.21, we
set forth requirements for import and export permits, application
procedures for these permits, additional permit conditions, and the
term for which a permit is valid. These regulations are nearly 18 years
old and are, in part, outdated. In particular, these regulations do not
mention the requirements associated with CITES, addressed in part 23 of
our regulations. In addition, many of the requirements currently set
forth at Sec. 21.21 simply reference another part or section of our
regulations. They are therefore difficult to read and understand.
We propose to update and revise the regulations at Sec. 21.21 to,
among other things: Address the export of species covered by CITES;
allow the importation and possession of legally acquired migratory game
birds in the families Anatidae, Columbidae, Gruidae, Rallidae, and
Scolopacidae that were lawfully hunted in a foreign country; extend the
period of time for which an Import and Export permit is valid from 3 to
5 years; and reorganize and reword the regulations to make them easier
to understand. Specifically, we propose changes to Sec. 21.21 as
follows.
General requirements (proposed Sec. 21.21(a)): Current Sec.
21.21(a) provides the general requirements for import and export
permits, as well as the exceptions to these requirements. We would
reorganize current Sec. 21.21(a) to separate the general requirements
(proposed Sec. 21.21(a)) from the exceptions to the requirements
(proposed Sec. 21.21(b), (c) and (d)). In proposed Sec. 21.21(a), we
would also acknowledge all of the regulations, including the CITES
regulations at 50 CFR part 23, that apply to imports and exports of
migratory birds and their parts, eggs, and nests. These proposed
revisions would help ensure that importers and exporters of migratory
birds or their parts, eggs, or nests understand all of the requirements
applicable to their imports and exports.
Exceptions for import permits (proposed Sec. 21.21(b)): Current
Sec. 21.21(a)(1) provides the requirements for import permits; it does
not provide any exceptions to import permit requirements for migratory
birds or their parts, eggs, or nests. Current Sec. 21.21(a)(2) does
have one import permit exception for raptors for falconry that will be
discussed later in this document. We would add, in a new Sec.
21.21(b), a provision to allow the importation and possession without
an import permit of legally hunted migratory game birds in the families
Anatidae, Columbidae, Gruidae, Rallidae, and Scolopacidae that were
lawfully hunted in a foreign country. The imported specimens could be
carcasses, skins, or mounts and would have to be accompanied by
evidence of lawful export from the country of origin. These families
may be legally hunted under the provisions of the migratory bird
treaties with Canada and Mexico, though hunting seasons have not been
established for all of them. We wish to allow hunters to import birds
in these families that they legally hunted outside the United States
without requiring an import permit to do so.
Exceptions for export permits (proposed Sec. 21.21(c)): As stated
above, current Sec. 21.21(a) provides the requirements for import and
export permits, and exceptions to these requirements. Current Sec.
21.21(a) does provide exceptions to the export permit requirements for
certain captive-bred migratory game birds exported to Canada or Mexico
and for raptors used for falconry exported to or imported from Canada
or Mexico. Our proposed Sec. 21.21(c) would retain these exceptions,
with certain changes.
Instead of simply directing readers to 50 CFR 21.13(b) of the
regulations for the marking requirements for captive-bred migratory
game birds exported to Canada or Mexico, we would detail those
requirements in this new paragraph. This proposed revision would help
ensure that exporters of migratory game birds understand the exceptions
to our export permit requirements.
We would also move the provisions concerning the exception to the
import and export permit requirements for raptors for falconry to their
own paragraph in this section of the regulations. We believe that this
change would help readers find this information in the regulations.
In addition, we would add a provision to allow export of lawfully
acquired captive-bred raptors, provided that the exporter holds both a
valid raptor propagation permit and a CITES export permit, and has full
documentation of the lawful origin of the raptor(s). The raptor(s)
would also have to be properly identified by a captive-bred raptor band
(see 21.30 of this Part). This change would eliminate redundant
permitting reviews for export of captive-bred raptors and would help
ensure that border inspectors can easily and accurately identify birds
for export.
Exception for transport of falconry birds (proposed Sec.
21.21(d)): The exception to the import and export permit requirements
for falconry birds currently resides in Sec. 21.21(a)(2), with the
general export permit requirements for migratory birds. We propose to
put the exception to the requirements for falconry birds into its own
paragraph (proposed new Sec. 21.21(d)) so that it is easier to find in
the regulations. For clarity, we would revise the language concerning
the exception, and we would acknowledge the CITES regulations at 50 CFR
part 23 that apply to exports of these birds. This proposed revision
would help ensure that importers and exporters of falconry birds
understand this exception to the transport requirements for falconry
birds.
We believe it is reasonable to allow temporary transport of birds
held for falconry out of the United States. Therefore, a proposed
provision in the regulation makes it clear that we allow this action.
The provision states that unless you have the necessary CITES permit or
certificate to permanently export a raptor from the United States, you
must bring any raptor you transport out of the country for use in
falconry back to the United States when you return. However, if the
raptor dies or is lost, the permittee must document the loss of the
bird as required by his or her State falconry regulations and any
conditions on the CITES document.
Inspection procedures (proposed Sec. 21.21(e)): The current Sec.
21.21 is silent on inspection procedures for imported and exported
migratory birds and their parts, eggs, and nests, even though these
inspections occur regularly. We propose to add a paragraph explaining
that migratory birds imported into, or
[[Page 64983]]
exported from, the United States, and any associated documentation, may
be inspected by the Service or Customs and Border Protection.
Application procedures (proposed Sec. 21.21(f)): Current Sec.
21.21(b) provides the application procedures for permits to import or
export migratory birds or their parts, eggs, or nests. The current
regulations set forth the information required on the application
forms. The ``additional information,'' specified in current Sec.
21.21(b)(1) through (b)(6), has been incorporated into the relevant
application forms, so we are proposing to remove that information from
the regulations. Instead, we propose to list the specific forms
required to apply for an import or export permit (FWS form 3-200-6) or
a permit for scientific collecting (FWS form 3-200-7). We also propose
to add language reminding applicants of the application fee that must
accompany their application to import or export migratory birds or
their parts, eggs, or nests. This change would help ensure that persons
interested in importing or exporting know which form to complete and
its associated application fee.
Service criteria for issuing a permit (proposed Sec. 21.21(g)):
The current Sec. 21.21 is silent on the criteria we consider when
deciding whether or not to issue a permit to import or export migratory
birds or their parts, eggs, or nests. We propose to include the
issuance criteria in this section to ensure that the public understands
how we make our decisions.
Standard conditions for a permit (proposed Sec. 21.21(h)): The
current Sec. 21.21(c) provides information on additional permit
conditions. We would retain this information, but rewrite it for
clarity. We would also add a reference to 50 CFR part 14 to ensure that
importers and exporters of migratory birds or their parts, eggs, or
nests understand that they must also comply with the general
regulations concerning the importation, exportation, and transportation
of wildlife.
Term of permit (proposed Sec. 21.21(i)): The current Sec.
21.21(d) provides information on the length of time that a permit is
valid. We also propose to extend the period of time for which an import
or export permit is valid from 3 to 5 years. In recent years, as we
have completed regulations revisions we have extended the duration of
some permit types that we believe have a limited potential effect on
bird populations, to ease the burden on both permittees and our permits
examiners. We believe that is also true of the import and export
regulations, so we propose to extend the term of an Import and Export
permit from 3 to 5 years.
Plain Language: Throughout our proposed revisions to Sec. 21.21,
we have used short sentences and active voice to make the regulations
easy to understand.
Public Participation
If you submit electronic comments, please include your name and
return address in your message, and identify it as comments on RIN
1018-AV35 in the subject line of your message.
If you submit hard copy comments, please include your name and
return address in your letter and identify it as comments on RIN 1018-
AV35. To facilitate compilation of the Administrative Record for this
action, you must submit hard copy comments on 8\1/2\ -inch by 11-inch
paper.
All comments on the proposed rule, including any personal
information received, will be available for public inspection during
normal business hours at Room 4091 at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 4501 North Fairfax
Drive, Arlington, VA 22203-1610. The supporting file for this proposed
rule is available, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
same address. You may call 703-358-1825 to make an appointment to view
the file.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will not consider anonymous comments.
Following review and consideration of comments, we will issue a
final rule on the proposed regulation changes.
Required Determinations
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 requires each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand. We invite your comments on how
to make this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions
such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly
stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that
interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it
were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' appears
in bold type and is preceded by the symbol Sec. and a numbered
heading; for example: ``Sec. 21.21 Import and export permits.'') (5)
Does the description of the rule in the ``Supplementary Information''
section of the preamble help you to understand the proposed rule? What
else could we do to make the rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that concern how we could make this
rule easier to understand to: Office of Regulatory Affairs, Department
of the Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240.
You also may e-mail comments to Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
Regulatory Planning and Review
In accordance with the criteria in E.O. 12866, this proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action. The Office of Management and
Budget makes the final determination of significance under E.O. 12866.
a. This proposed rule would not raise novel legal or policy issues.
The proposed provision is in compliance with other laws, policies, and
regulations.
b. This proposed rule would not have an annual economic effect of
$100 million or more, or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of government. A
cost-benefit and economic analysis thus is not required. There are no
costs associated with this proposed rule.
c. This proposed rule would not create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions. The proposed rule deals solely with governance of
migratory bird permitting in the United States. No other Federal agency
has any role in regulating activities with migratory birds.
d. This proposed rule would not materially affect entitlements,
grants, user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
their recipients. There are no entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs associated with the regulation of migratory birds.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121)), whenever an agency is required to
publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must
prepare and make available
[[Page 64984]]
for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency
certifies the rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the factual basis for certifying
that a rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We have examined this proposed
rule's potential effects on small entities as required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and have determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, because the changes we are proposing are intended primarily
to simplify export for a limited number of raptor propagators.
There would be no costs associated with this regulatory change.
Consequently, we certify that because this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
This proposed rule is not a major rule under SBREFA (5 U.S.C.
804(2)). It would not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
a. This proposed rule would not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more.
b. This proposed rule would not cause a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local
government agencies; or geographic regions.
c. This proposed rule would not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501
et seq.), we have determined the following:
a. This proposed rule would not ``significantly or uniquely''
affect small governments. A small government agency plan is not
required. Actions under the proposed regulation would not affect small
government activities in any significant way.
b. This proposed rule would not produce a Federal mandate of $100
million or greater in any year; i.e., it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications because it would not contain a
provision for taking of private property. Therefore, a takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism
This proposed rule would not have sufficient Federalism effects to
warrant preparation of a Federalism assessment under E.O. 13132. It
would not interfere with the States' ability to manage themselves or
their funds. No significant economic impacts are expected to result
from changing exemptions in migratory bird permit requirements.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that the rule would not unduly burden the judicial system
and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We examined these proposed regulations under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). We may not collect or sponsor,
nor is a person required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
control number. The Office of Management and Budget approved the
information collection requirements for this part, and assigned OMB
Control Number 1018-0022. There are no new information collection
requirements associated with this regulations change.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have analyzed this rule in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 432-437(f), and Part 516 of
the U.S. Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM). We have no date on
the number of legally hunted birds that individuals might wish to
import, though we doubt that the number will be large. Because these
species are legally hunted elsewhere, we doubt that this proposed
regulations change would appreciably change the impact of hunting on
these species. Therefore, we do believe that there would be a
significant environmental impact due to the proposed regulations
change.
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), E.O. 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have
evaluated potential effects on Federally recognized Indian Tribes and
have determined that there are no potential effects. This proposed rule
would not interfere with the Tribes' ability to manage themselves or
their funds or to regulate migratory bird activities on tribal lands.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 addressing
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and
use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy
Effects when undertaking certain actions. Because this rule would
affect only import and export of birds in limited circumstances, it is
not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and would not
significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy action and no Statement of
Energy Effects is required.
Environmental Consequences of the Proposed Action
The primary change we propose is to allow export of lawfully
acquired captive-bred raptors provided that the exporter holds a valid
raptor propagation permit and has been issued a Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) export permit. This
change should eliminate redundant permitting required for this
activity. Another important change we propose is to allow the import of
legally acquired migratory game birds without a permit. A permit is
currently required to import such species. We believe that there are no
significant environmental impacts of this action.
Socioeconomic. This proposed rule would not have discernible
socioeconomic impacts.
Migratory bird populations. This proposed rule would not affect
migratory bird populations.
Endangered and threatened species. The proposed regulation is for
migratory bird species that are not threatened or endangered. It would
not affect threatened or endangered species or critical habitats.
[[Page 64985]]
Compliance With Endangered Species Act Requirements
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that ``The Secretary [of the
Interior] shall review other programs administered by him and utilize
such programs in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter'' (16
U.S.C. 1536(a)(1)). It further states that the Secretary must ``insure
that any action authorized, funded, or carried out * * * is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat'' (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2)). The proposed
regulations change will not affect listed species.
Author
The author of this rulemaking is Dr. George T. Allen, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop 4107, Arlington, VA 22203-1610.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 21
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons stated in the preamble, we propose to amend part 21
of subchapter B, chapter I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 21--MIGRATORY BIRD PERMITS
1. The authority citation for part 21 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 40 Stat. 755 (16 U.S.C.
703); Public Law 95-616, 92 Stat. 3112 (16 U.S.C. 712(2)); Public
Law 106-108, 113 Stat. 1491, Note following 16 U.S.C. 703.
2. Revise Sec. 21.21 to read as follows:
Sec. 21.21 Import and export permits.
(a) What is the permit requirement? Except as provided in
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, you must have a permit to
import or export migratory birds, their parts, nests, or eggs. You must
meet the applicable permit requirements of parts 14, 15, 17, 21, 22, or
23 of this subchapter B, even if the activity is exempt from a
migratory bird import or export permit.
(b) What is the exception to the import permit requirements? You do
not need a migratory bird permit to import or possess migratory game
birds in the families Anatidae, Columbidae, Gruidae, Rallidae, and
Scolopacidae for personal use that were lawfully hunted by you in a
foreign country if you comply with the requirements of part 20 of this
subchapter B (Migratory Bird Hunting). The game birds may be carcasses,
skins, or mounts. You must provide evidence that you lawfully took the
bird or birds in, and exported them from, the country of origin. This
evidence must include a hunting license and any export documentation
required by the country of origin. You must keep these documents with
the imported bird or birds permanently.
(c) What are the exceptions to the export permit requirements? You
do not need a migratory bird export permit to:
(1) Export live captive-bred migratory game birds to Canada or
Mexico if they are marked by one of the following methods:
(i) Removal of the hind toe from the right foot;
(ii) Pinioning of a wing by removal of all or some of the
metacarpal bones of one wing, which renders the bird permanently
incapable of flight;
(iii) Banding of one metatarsus with a seamless metal band; or
(iv) Tattooing of readily discernible numbers and/or letters on the
web of one foot.
(2) Export live lawfully acquired captive-bred raptors provided you
hold a valid raptor propagation permit issued under Sec. 21.30 and you
obtain a CITES permit or certificate issued under part 23 to do so. You
must have full documentation of the lawful origin of each raptor, and
each must be identifiable with a seamless band issued by the Service,
including those with an implanted microchip for identification.
(d) What is the exception for the transport of falconry birds? You
are not required to obtain a migratory bird import or export permit for
the temporary transport of a raptor or raptors you lawfully possess for
falconry to and from another country for use in falconry. Each raptor
must be covered by a CITES certificate of ownership issued under part
23 of this chapter. You must have full documentation of the lawful
origin of each raptor, and each must be identifiable with a seamless
band issued by the Service, including those with an implanted microchip
for identification. Unless you have the necessary CITES permit or
certificate to permanently export a raptor from the United States, you
must bring any raptor you transport out of the country for falconry
back to the United States when you return. If the raptor dies or is
lost, you are not required to bring it back but must report the loss
immediately upon your return to the United States in the manner
required by the falconry regulations of your State, and any conditions
on your CITES certificate.
(e) Will my imported or exported migratory birds be inspected? All
migratory birds imported into, or exported from, the United States, and
any associated documentation, may be inspected by the Service or
Customs and Border Protection. You must comply with the import and
export regulations in Part 14 of this chapter.
(f) What must I do to apply for a migratory bird import or export
permit? You must apply to the appropriate Regional Director--Attention
Migratory Bird Permit Office. You can find the address for your
Regional Director in Sec. 2.2 of subchapter A of this chapter. Your
application package must include a completed application (form 3-200-6,
or 3-200-7 if the import or export is associated with an application
for a scientific collecting permit), and a check or money order made
payable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of the
application fee for permits issued under this section, as listed in
Sec. 13.11 of this chapter.
(g) What criteria will the Service consider before issuing a
permit? After we receive a completed import or export application, the
Regional Director will decide whether to issue you a permit based on
the general criteria of Sec. 13.21 of this chapter and whether you
meet the following requirements:
(1) You are at least 18 years of age;
(2) The bird was lawfully acquired;
(3) The purpose of the import or export is consistent with the
conservation of the species;
(4) For an import permit, you are authorized to lawfully possess
the migratory bird after it is imported.
(h) Are there standard conditions for the permit? Yes, standard
conditions for your permit are set forth in part 13 of this subchapter
B. You also must comply with the regulations in part 14 (importation,
exportation, and transportation of wildlife). We may place additional
requirements or restrictions on your permit as appropriate.
(i) How long is a migratory bird Import and Export permit valid?
Your migratory bird import or export permit expires on the date
designated on its face unless it is amended or revoked, but it will not
be valid for more than 5 years.
Dated: November 2, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-22182 Filed 11-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P