[Federal Register: December 21, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 245)]
[Notices]
[Page 72682-72683]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21de07-51]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The Acting Leader, Information Management Case Services Team,
Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management
invites comments on the submission for OMB review as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
January 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222,
Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are encouraged to submit responses
electronically by e-mail to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax to
(202) 395-6974. Commenters should include the following subject line in
their response ``Comment: [insert OMB number], [insert abbreviated
collection name, e.g., ``Upward Bound Evaluation'']. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not submit paper copies.
[[Page 72683]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB
may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the
extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat
the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal
law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform
its statutory obligations. The Acting Leader, Information Management
Case Services Team, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office
of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g. new, revision, extension,
existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection;
(4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information;
(5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.
Dated: December 17, 2007.
Linda Darby,
Acting Leader, Information Management Case Services Team, Regulatory
Information Management Services, Office of Management.
Institute of Education Sciences
Type of Review: New.
Title: Understanding Science Professional Development and the
Science Achievement of English Learners.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public:
Individuals or household.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden:
Responses: 3,516.
Burden Hours: 673.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to investigate how to
prepare middle-school teachers to improve all students' physical
science content knowledge, including that of low-performing students
and English learners (ELs). Using a cluster-randomized experimental
design, the research will test the effectiveness of WestEd's
Understanding Science model of professional development, an approach
that incorporates science content, analysis of student work and
thinking, and critical analysis of issues related to teaching that
content to students. The professional development course sessions focus
on science concepts both in the context of structured investigations
and in narrative cases of teaching practice drawn from actual classroom
episodes involving those concepts. This model will be evaluated by
comparing it with a control condition that provides no additional
science professional development beyond that already received in each
school. The experiment will evaluate the value added for grade 8
teachers in California who take an Understanding Science course in
addition to whatever science professional development they ordinarily
receive. The ultimate outcome of interest is the impact of the
professional development on students' science achievement. To provide a
basis for explaining the results, impacts will also be studied on
teachers' science content knowledge, and a descriptive study will
examine selected aspects of their classroom science instructional
practices.
Requests for copies of the information collection submission for
OMB review may be accessed from http://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting
the ``Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number
3452. When you access the information collection, click on ``Download
Attachments `` to view. Written requests for information should be
addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20202-4700. Requests may also
be electronically mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-245-
6623. Please specify the complete title of the information collection
when making your request.
[FR Doc. E7-24798 Filed 12-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P