[Federal Register: January 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 3)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 830-833]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr04ja08-10]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0414; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-340-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional
Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aircraft fuel system against fuel tank safety standards * * *.
[A]ssessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks [for the
fuel tank wiring harness installation, and the hydraulic system No.
3 temperature transducer, among other items] are required to prevent
potential ignition sources inside the fuel system, which could
result in a fuel tank explosion. * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 4,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the
[[Page 831]]
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rocco Viselli, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7331; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0414;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-340-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2007-28, dated November 22, 2007 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aircraft fuel system against fuel tank standards introduced in
Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of Proposed
Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified non-compliances were then
assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to
determine if mandatory corrective action is required.
The assessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks [for
the fuel tank wiring harness installation, and the hydraulic system
No. 3 temperature transducer, among other items] are required to
prevent potential ignition sources inside the fuel system, which
could result in a fuel tank explosion. Revision has been made to
Canadair Regional Jet Models CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-
2D24 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2, Section 3
``Fuel System Limitations'' to introduce the required maintenance
tasks.
The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section
of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate new
limitations for fuel tank systems. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,''
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
We have determined that the actions identified in this AD are
necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued a revision to Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-
600-2C10, -2D15, and -2D24 Airworthiness Limitations (ALIs) in the
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2, Section 3, ``Fuel
System Limitations,'' Revision 9, dated July 20, 2007. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD would also allow accomplishing the AWL revision in
accordance with later revisions of the MPD as an acceptable method of
compliance if the limit or interval is part of a later approved
Maintenance Requirements Manual revision or the limit or interval is
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
In most ADs, we adopt a compliance time allowing a specified amount
of time after the AD's effective date. In this case, however, the FAA
has already issued regulations that require operators to revise their
maintenance/inspection programs to address fuel tank safety issues. The
compliance date for these regulations is December 16, 2008. To provide
for coordinated implementation of these regulations and this proposed
AD, we are using this same compliance date in this proposed AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S.
[[Page 832]]
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend
to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and
related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 289 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $23,120, or $80 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2008-0414;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-340-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February 4, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional
Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial numbers.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (g) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane. The FAA has
provided guidance for this determination in Advisory Circular (AC)
25-1529-1.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the
aircraft fuel system against fuel tank standards introduced in
Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual through Notice of Proposed
Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified non-compliances were then
assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No. 525-001, to
determine if mandatory corrective action is required.
The assessment showed that supplemental maintenance tasks [for
the fuel tank wiring harness installation, and the hydraulic system
No. 3 temperature transducer, among other items] are required to
prevent potential ignition sources inside the fuel system, which
could result in a fuel tank explosion. Revision has been made to
Canadair Regional Jet Models CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-
2D24 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2, Section 3
``Fuel System Limitations'' to introduce the required maintenance
tasks.
The corrective action is revising the Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate new limitations for fuel tank systems.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, or on or
before December 16, 2008, whichever occurs first, revise the ALS of
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the
inspection requirements of Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-2C10,
-2D15, and -2D24 Airworthiness Limitations (ALIs) in the Maintenance
Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2, Section 3, ``Fuel System
Limitations,'' Revision 9, dated July 20, 2007 (``the MRM''). For
task numbers 24-90-00-601, 24-90-00-602, 28-00-00-601, 28-11-23-601,
28-11-23-602, 28-12-13-601, 29-30-00-601, and 29-30-00-602, the
initial compliance times start from the later of the times specified
in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, and the
repetitive inspections must be accomplished thereafter at the
interval specified in the MRM, except as provided by paragraph (g)
of this AD. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a later
revision of the MRM is an acceptable method of compliance if the
revision is approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA.
(i) The effective date of this AD.
(ii) The date of issuance of the original Canadian standard
airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the original
Canadian export certificate of airworthiness.
(2) Except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: After
accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1) of this AD,
no alternative inspections or inspection intervals may be used,
unless the limit or interval is part of a later approved revision of
the Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-2C10, -2D15, and -2D24
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2,
[[Page 833]]
Section 3, ``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 9, dated July 20,
2007, or the limit or interval is approved as an alternative method
of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Rocco Viselli, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7331; fax (516) 794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2007-28,
dated November 22, 2007; and Canadair Regional Jet Model CL-600-
2C10, -2D15, and -2D24 Airworthiness Limitations (ALIs) in the
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP B-053, Part 2, Section 3,
``Fuel System Limitations,'' Revision 9, dated July 20, 2007; for
related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 21, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-25619 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P