[Federal Register: May 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 88)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24899-24901]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my08-26]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0326]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Rochester Harborfest, Lake Ontario at the Genesee
River, Rochester, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishment of a safety zone for a
fireworks event in the Captain of the Port Buffalo zone. This proposed
rule is intended to restrict vessels from portions of water and shore
areas during events that pose a hazard to public safety. The safety
zone established by this proposed rule is necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: Comments and related materials must reach the Coast Guard on or
before June 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Boulevard, Buffalo, NY
14203. Sector Buffalo Prevention Department maintains the public docket
for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as
well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the
docket, will become part of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector Buffalo between 8 a.m. and
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have further questions on this
rule, contact Lieutenant Tracy Wirth, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo,
at (716) 843-9573.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 24900]]
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking [USCG-2008-
0326], indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a fireworks
display. Based on accidents that have occurred in other Captain of the
Port zones, and the explosive hazards of fireworks, the Captain of the
Port Buffalo has determined fireworks launches in close proximity to
watercraft pose significant risk to public safety and property. The
likely combination of large numbers of recreation vessels, congested
waterways, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, alcohol use,
and debris falling into the water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a safety zone to control vessel
movement around the location of the launch platform will help ensure
the safety of persons and property at these events and help minimize
the associated risks.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels and
people during the Rochester Harborfest Fireworks. The proposed safety
zone is described in subparagraphs (1) of this regulation. The proposed
safety zone will be enforced only immediately before and during the
event which poses hazard to the public and only upon notice by the
Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port Buffalo will cause notice
of enforcement of the safety zone established by this section to be
made by all appropriate means to the affected segments of the public
including publication in the Federal Register in accordance with 33 CFR
165.7(a). Such means of notification may also include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
notifying the public when enforcement of the safety zone established by
this section is suspended.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
The Coast Guard's use of this safety zone will be of short duration
and designed to minimize the impact on navigable waters. This safety
zone will only be enforced immediately before and during the time the
event occurs. Furthermore, this safety zone has been designed to allow
vessels to transit unrestricted to portions of the waterway not
affected by the safety zone. The Coast Guard expects insignificant
adverse impact to mariners from the activation of this safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners of operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the area designated as the safety
zone in subparagraph (1) during the date and time the safety zone is
being enforced. This safety zone would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons. The safety zone in this proposed rule will be in effect only
for a short period of time. The safety zone has been designed to allow
traffic to pass safely around the zone whenever possible and vessels
will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the
Captain of the Port.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact LT Tracy Wirth,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Buffalo, Buffalo, NY at (716)
843-9573. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year.
[[Page 24901]]
Though this proposed rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule will not effect the taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
may disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate tribal
concerns. We have determined that these special local regulations and
fishing rights protection need not be incompatible. We have also
determined that this Proposed Rule does not have tribal implications
under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have questions concerning the
provisions of this Proposed Rule or options for compliance are
encouraged to contact the point of contact listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to
have a significant impact on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-005 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-005 Safety Zone; Rochester Harborfest, Lake Ontario at
the Genesee River, Rochester, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters of Lake Ontario at Genesee River, Rochester, NY within a five
hundred foot radius of position 43[deg]15[min]21[sec] N,
077[deg]36[min]19[sec] W. [DATUM: NAD 83]. Located on the Ontario Beach
West pier.
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 9:30 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on June 21, 2008.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23 apply.
(2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol
personnel. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or other means,
the operator shall proceed as directed.
(3) Commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of
the Port Buffalo to transit the safety zone. Approval will be made on a
case-by-case basis. Requests must be made in advance and approved by
the Captain of the Port before transits will be authorized. The Captain
of the Port may be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo on
Channel 16, VHF-FM.
Dated: April 14, 2008.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E8-10001 Filed 5-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P