[Federal Register: May 20, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 98)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29091-29093]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20my08-16]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0557; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-364-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During approach, a Falcon 2000EX operator experienced a
temporary loss of the 4 Electronic Flight Instrumentation System
(EFIS) display units followed by a consecutive restart of the
avionics. During initial investigation, a loose connection on the DC
load distribution system was discovered and determined to be the
root cause of this event. However, further analysis pointed out that
large electrical transients on the essential bus bar may possibly
cause simultaneous and temporary power shortage on both sides of the
electrical system.
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) * * * action is necessary to
prevent a momentary loss of data on the EFIS screens, which could
lead to the pilot's loss of situational awareness during initial
climb or approach/landing, and possibly result in reduced control of
the airplane. * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0557;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-364-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2007-0290, dated November 26, 2007 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During approach, a Falcon 2000EX operator experienced a
temporary loss of the 4 Electronic Flight Instrumentation System
(EFIS) display units followed by a consecutive restart of the
avionics. During initial investigation, a loose connection on the DC
load distribution system was discovered and determined to be the
root cause of this event. However, further analysis pointed out that
large electrical transients on the essential bus bar may possibly
cause simultaneous and temporary power shortage on both sides of the
electrical system.
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires a wiring modification
of the GCUs (Generator Control Units) to increase the electrical
system robustness. This action is necessary to prevent a momentary
loss of data on the EFIS screens, which could lead to the pilot's
loss of situational awareness during initial climb or approach/
landing, and possibly result in reduced control of the airplane.
This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dassault has issued Service Bulletin F2000EX-141, Revision 1, dated
November 26, 2007. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use
[[Page 29092]]
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for
U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not
intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the
MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 57 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
would take 8 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $36,480, or $640 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2008-0557; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-364-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by June 19, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes
from serial number 1 to 107 inclusive, certificated in any category;
which have not been modified by Dassault Service Bulletin (SB)
F2000EX-141.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical Power
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states: During approach, a Falcon 2000EX operator experienced a
temporary loss of the 4 Electronic Flight Instrumentation System
(EFIS) display units followed by a consecutive restart of the
avionics. During initial investigation, a loose connection on the DC
load distribution system was discovered and determined to be the
root cause of this event. However, further analysis pointed out that
large electrical transients on the essential bus bar may possibly
cause simultaneous and temporary power shortage on both sides of the
electrical system.
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires a wiring modification
of the GCUs (Generator Control Units) to increase the electrical
system robustness. This action is necessary to prevent a momentary
loss of data on the EFIS screens, which could lead to the pilot's
loss of situational awareness during initial climb or approach/
landing, and possibly result in reduced control of the airplane.
This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 13 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the GCU electrical wiring as instructed in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX-141, Revision 1,
dated November 26, 2007.
(2) Actions done prior to the effective date of this AD
according to Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX-141, dated February
16, 2007, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
requirements of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2007-
[[Page 29093]]
0290, dated November 26, 2007, and Dassault Service Bulletin
F2000EX-141, Revision 1, dated November 26, 2007, for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 8, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-11282 Filed 5-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P