[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 105 (Friday, May 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31072-31073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12065]
[[Page 31072]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for Carolinas Cement Company LLC Castle Hayne Project in New
Hanover County, NC
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Wilmington District,
Wilmington Regulatory Division has received a request for Department of
the Army authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, from Carolinas Cement
Company LLC (a subsidiary of Titan America LLC) to construct the
Carolinas Cement Company LLC Castle Hayne Project. This project will
include quarrying to support cement manufacturing in northern New
Hanover County, NC.
The proposed project will require the excavation of an open pit
adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River in order to extract and
process the raw materials (calcium carbonate and limestone) in order to
produce Portland Cement.
Existing infrastructure including railroad, interstate highway, and
waterways allow for both the shipment of product from the plant and the
receipt of materials, such as coal. The Castle Hayne site is the
location of former cement manufacturing facility and an unrelated,
active aggregate quarry.
DATES: A public scoping meeting for the DEIS will be held at Emsley A.
Laney High School, 2700 North College Road, Wilmington, NC, June 12,
2008 at 6 p.m. EST. Written comments will be received until June 30,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and questions regarding scoping of the
Draft EIS may be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District, Regulatory Division, ATTN: File Number SAW-2007-00073, P. O.
Box 1890, Wilmington, NC 28402-1890.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and DEIS can be directed to Mr. Henry Wicker, Regulatory Division,
telephone: (910) 251-4930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed Castle Hayne quarry and cement
plant is located in Castle Hayne in New Hanover County, NC. The
proposed project would be located on an approximately 1,868-acre site
located at Ideal Cement Road approximately 2.6 miles east of Interstate
40 and north of Holly Shelter Road. The project site is bordered to the
north by the Northeast Cape Fear River, to the east by Island Creek,
and to the south by Holly Shelter Road. The proposed project site
includes undeveloped forested lands, an existing aggregate quarry pit
currently operated by Martin Marietta Materials, as well as an inactive
cement manufacturing plant, formerly operated by Ideal Cement. The
proposed project is located in an area zoned as I-2 Industrial District
and the quarrying and cement manufacturing would be compatible with the
existing zoning.
The Carolinas Cement Company has provided the following information
about the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to establish a quarry from
which it can extract marl and limestone that will support manufacturing
Portland cement to supply the eastern North Carolina market in an
economically viable fashion. To be economically viable the minable
resource must be within a 3 mile radius of the manufacturing facility
and must provide for a long-term, at least 30 years, marl and limestone
resource of sufficient quality that can be recovered in a systematic
and cost-effective manner. Based on the economies of scale and the
projected market demand, the proposed plant will have a capacity of 2.3
million short tons per year of finished Portland cement. Furthermore,
the manufacturing facility must be accessible to suitable modes of
transportation. The relative cost of transporting a ton of Portland
cement increases from barge to rail to trucks. Titan America's Roanoke
Cement Company facility currently moves 50% of the Portland cement it
produces by rail in the mid-Atlantic region. The cost of establishing
and operating a Portland cement quarrying/manufacturing operation is
substantial. The Portland cement market is cyclical depending upon the
growth and contraction of the construction industry. It is important to
locate a Portland cement operation where quarrying, manufacturing, and
transportation costs and logistics allow for long-term production in an
economical and efficient manner. The magnitude of the necessary
investment in property and personnel requires the Portland cement
industry to develop production plans based on long-term horizons. Since
1950, no manufacturing facility of the size proposed has commenced
operations without 40 to 50 years of reserves, and currently operating
Portland cement plants have been operating an average of 44 years.
Based on this, the applicant requires at least a 30-year resource
reserve to construct the proposed facility.
The primary considerations in economic Portland cement production
include raw materials to provide the necessary chemistry, availability
of other materials (often by-products from other industries), and
transportation and power infrastructure, near to the markets that the
plant is intended to serve. These primary considerations are
interrelated.
Proposed Impacts to Wetlands and Surface Waters: Surface waters and
wetlands have been delineated for the proposed project site. Field
reviews of the delineations with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) have been
conducted with final USACE verification of the wetlands delineation
pending. The North Carolina Division of Coastal Management's (NCDCM)
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) jurisdictional Areas of
Environmental Concern (AECs) have also been identified for the site.
Field reviews of the CAMA regulated AEC boundary have been conducted
and agreed to by the NCDCM. The proposed quarrying action will impact
approximately 493 acres of wetlands. This total includes approximately
214 acres of wetlands located within CAMA jurisdictional areas.
Scope of Investigations: Based upon the proposed impacts to
wetlands and surface waters, Carolinas Cement Company LLC has been
advised by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will be required for the proposed Project. The
scope of the EIS investigation will include the following: Alternatives
analyses, Affected environment, Environmental consequences, Secondary
and cumulative environmental impacts, and Mitigation.
Alternatives analyses: Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations (40 CFR 1502.14(a)) require an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to ``rigorously explore and objectively evaluate all
reasonable alternatives'' for a proposed action. The regulations (40
CFR 1502.14(b)) further require that substantial treatment be made of
each alternative considered in detail, including the proposed action.
The Proposed Project and a reasonable number of alternatives, including
the no action alternative and quarrying for marl in other areas within
and outside of New Hanover County and/or eastern North Carolina, will
be evaluated and compared in the EIS. The factors used
[[Page 31073]]
to compare the alternatives will be the same for each of the
alternatives.
Affected environment: CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1502.15) require the
EIS to describe the environment of the areas to be affected or created
by the alternatives under consideration. The data and analysis shall be
commensurate with the importance of the impact. Based upon preliminary
evaluation of the proposed Project, it appears the primary areas of
environmental concern will focus on the loss of wetland and other
aquatic resource functions and values including impacts to wetlands
within designated AEC's, mitigation of such losses, and the effect of
the proposed quarry on groundwater and surface water quality.
In preparation for the EIS, the following studies have been
completed or are ongoing for the proposed Project:
Comprehensive geological investigations to identify high
calcium marl and limestone reserves that meet cement chemistry criteria
quality and quantity. A technical report detailing the methodologies
and results of the geological investigation will be included as an
appendix to the EIS.
Jurisdictional wetland/stream/open waters delineations
(Section 404 Jurisdictional Areas) (field reviews have been conducted
with USACE and DWQ with final verification pending). A technical report
detailing the methodologies and results of the jurisdictional areas
delineation will be included as an appendix to the EIS.
Identification of NCDCM jurisdictional areas including
public trust areas and AECs (field reviews have been conducted with
NCDCM staff).
Federally protected species habitat evaluations and field
surveys. A technical report detailing the methodologies and results of
the protected species study will be included as an appendix to the EIS.
Hydrogeologic investigations to assess the amount of water
discharged from proposed quarry pits and the potential effects of
dewatering on adjacent wetlands and ground water resources in area. A
technical report detailing the methodologies and results of the
hydrogeological study will be included as an appendix to the EIS.
Archaeological investigations and field survey. A
technical report detailing the methodologies and results of the
archaeological investigation and survey will be included as an appendix
to the EIS.
Aquatic resources evaluations and field surveys. A
technical report detailing the methodologies and results of the aquatic
resources investigation and survey will be included as an appendix to
the EIS.
Environmental consequences: CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1502.16) state
the EIS will include the environmental impacts of the alternatives
including the proposed action, any adverse environmental effects which
cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, the relationship
between short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and
enhancement of long-term productivity, and any irreversible or
irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the
proposal should it be implemented. The EIS will identify and disclose
the direct impacts of the proposed project and study a reasonable
number of alternatives on the following: Topography, geology, soils,
climate, biotic communities, wetlands, fish and wildlife resources,
endangered and threatened species, hydrology, water resources and water
quality, floodplains, CAMA jurisdictional areas, hazardous materials,
air quality, noise, aesthetics, recreational resources, historical and
cultural resources, socioeconomics, land use, public health and safety,
energy requirements and conservation, natural or depletable resources,
drinking waters, and environmental justice.
Secondary and cumulative environmental impacts: Cumulative impacts
result from the incremental impact of the proposed action when added to
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of
what agency or person undertakes the action. GIS data and mapping will
be used to evaluate and quantify secondary and cumulative impacts of
the proposed Project with particular emphasis given to wetlands and
surface/groundwater resources.
Mitigation: CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1502.14, 1502.16, and 1508.20)
require the EIS to include appropriate mitigation measures. The USACE
has adopted, through the CEQ), a mitigation policy which embraces the
concepts of ``no net loss of wetlands'' and project sequencing. The
purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical,
biological, and physical integrity of ``Waters of the United States,''
specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined
by the CEQ to include: avoidance of impacts (to wetlands), minimizing
impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and
compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these aspects
(avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered in sequential order. As part of the EIS, the applicant will
develop a compensatory mitigation plan detailing the methodology and
approach to compensate for unavoidable impacts to waters of the U.S.
including wetlands.
NEPA/SEPA Preparation and Permitting: Because the proposed Castle
Hayne quarry project requires approvals from federal and state agencies
under both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), a joint Federal and State
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers will serve as the lead agency for the process. The
EIS will be the NEPA document for the Corps of Engineers (404 permit)
and the SEPA document for the State of North Carolina (CAMA permit).
Based on the size, complexity, and potential impacts of the
proposed project, the Applicant has been advised by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers to identify and disclose the environmental impacts of the
proposed project in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Within the
EIS, the Applicant will conduct a thorough environmental review,
including an evaluation of a reasonable number of alternatives. After
distribution and review of the Draft EIS and Final EIS, the Applicant
understands that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will issue a Record
of Decision (ROD) for the project. The ROD will document the completion
of the EIS process and will serve as a basis for permitting decisions
by federal and state agencies.
Christine M. Brayman,
Deputy District Engineer, Programs and Project Management.
[FR Doc. E8-12065 Filed 5-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-GN-P