[Federal Register: June 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 115)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33718-33721]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13jn08-19]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008, Notice 3; FRL-8578-7]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct Final Notice of deletion of the Double Eagle Refinery
Co. Superfund site from the National Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 is
publishing a direct final Notice of Deletion of the Double Eagle
Refinery Co. Site (Site), located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma County,
Oklahoma from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended is
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final deletion
is being published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of
Oklahoma, through the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ), because EPA has determined that all appropriate response
actions under CERCLA, other than operation and maintenance and five-
year reviews, have been completed However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective August 12, 2008
unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 14, 2008. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final deletion in the Federal Register informing the public that
the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1989-0008, Notice 3, by one of the following methods:
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments.
E-mail: walters.donn@epa.gov.
Fax: 214-665-6660.
Mail: Donn Walters, Community Involvement, U.S. EPA Region
6 (6SF-TS), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202-2733, (214) 665-6483 or
1-800-533-3508.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1989-0008, Notice 3. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
following information repositories:
U.S. EPA Online Library System at http://www.epa.gov/natlibra/ols.htm;
U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733, (214) 665-6617, by appointment only Monday through Friday 9 a.m.
to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
Ralph Ellison Library, 2000 Northeast 23, Oklahoma City, OK 73111,
(409) 643-5979, Monday through
[[Page 33719]]
Wednesday 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., Thursday and Friday 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.,
Saturday 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 707 North
Robinson, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101, (512) 239-2920, Monday through
Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bartolome Canellas (6SF-RL), Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, U.S.
EPA, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202, (214) 665-6662 or 1-800-
533-3508 or canellas.bart@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
The EPA Region 6 office is publishing this direct final notice of
deletion of the Double Eagle Refinery Co. Site, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
County, Oklahoma from the NPL. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR
part 300, which is the Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105
of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as a list of
sites that appear to present a significant risk to public health,
welfare, or the environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of
remedial actions financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund).
As described in. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for remedial actions if conditions at the deleted sites
warrant such actions.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication of a notice of
intent to delete. This action will be effective August 12, 2008 unless
EPA receives adverse comments by July 14, 2008. Along with the direct
final Notice of Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of Intent to
Delete in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the Federal Register. If
adverse comments are received within the 30-day public comment period
on this document, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this direct
final deletion before the effective date of the deletion and the
deletion will not take effect. EPA will, as appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the notice of intent to delete and the comments already
received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
Section II of this notice explains the criteria for deleting sites
from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using for
this action. Section IV discusses the Double Eagle Refinery Co.
Superfund Site and demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA actions to delete the Site from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate to protect public
health and the environment. In making a determination pursuant to 40
CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in consultation with the state,
whether any of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed (Hazardous Substance Superfund
Response Trust Fund) response under CERCLA has been implemented, and no
further response action by responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA section
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c) requires that a subsequent review of the site
be conducted at least every five years after the initiation of the
remedial action at the deleted site to ensure that the action remains
protective of public health and the environment. If new information
becomes available which indicates a need for further action, EPA may
initiate remedial actions. Whenever there is a significant release from
a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the state of Oklahoma prior to developing
this direct final Notice of Deletion and the Notice of Intent to Delete
copublished today in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the Federal
Register.
(2) EPA has provided the state 30 working days for review of this
notice and the parallel Notice of Intent to Delete prior to their
publication today, and the state, through the Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality, has concurred on the deletion of the Site from
the NPL.
(3) Concurrent with the publication of this direct final Notice of
Deletion, a notice of availability is being published in The Oklahoman
and is being distributed to appropriate federal, state and local
government officials and other interested parties. The newspaper notice
announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the Notice of
Intent to Delete the Site from the NPL.
(4) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in
the Site information repositories identified above.
(5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this document, EPA will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this direct final notice of deletion before its effective
date and will prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist EPA management of Superfund sites.
As mentioned in section II of this document, Sec. 300.425 (e)(3) of the
NCP states that the deletion of a site from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions should future conditions
warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting
this Site from the NPL.
Site Background and History
The Site occupies the Southeast Quarter (SE \1/4\) of section 35,
Township 12 North, Range 3 West, Indian Meridian, Oklahoma County,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Located at 301 N Rhode Island (generally South
of NE 4th Street and West of Martin Luther King Boulevard), the Site
extends over approximately 12 acres. The Double Eagle Refinery
collected, stored, and re-refined used oils and distributed the
[[Page 33720]]
recycled product. The refinery was active as early as 1929.
In 1986 through 1988, EPA conducted investigations of the Site. The
sampling results revealed elevated levels of volatile organic
compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, and metals found in surface
water, soil, sediment, and ground water. The Site also was found to
contain acidic sludges in on-site lagoons or pits.
The data from these sampling efforts resulted in the Site being
proposed for the Superfund NPL on June 24, 1988, 53 FR 23978, and the
Site was included on the NPL on March 31, 1989, 54 FR 10512.
Response Actions
The May 1992 Remedial Investigation (RI) reported potential
additional lifetime cancer risks to on-site workers that may have
access to the Site of 1.2 x 10E-04, which is two orders of magnitude
higher than the criterion of acceptability. Due to the unsecured nature
of the site, other unacceptable risks were possible to trespassers and
the resident of one nearby house. The shallow ground water was not
considered a potential source of drinking water and was reported of
limited potential beneficial use due to the high value of Total
Dissolved Solids (TDD), however concerns of potential contamination to
the deeper Garber-Wellington aquifer, triggered further investigations
into the ground water to ensure protection of this source. Regionally,
Oklahoma City receives its public water supply from reservoirs
surrounding the city.
The Site was divided into two operable units, a source control
operable unit and a ground water operable unit. EPA issued a Record of
Decision on September 28, 1992 for the source control operable unit.
The remedial action activities for the source control operable unit,
initiated in August 1997, consisted of asbestos abatement and
demolition of existing structures, on-site neutralization and
stabilization of wastes, and off-site disposal at a permitted landfill.
The remedial action was completed in March 2000.
EPA issued a ground water Record of Decision on April 19, 1994. The
remedial action activities for the ground water operable unit,
initiated in December 1996, consisted of quarterly ground water
monitoring for three years followed by semi-annual monitoring for three
years. EPA issued an Explanation of Significant Difference in January
2006, and documented a final decision to discontinue further semi-
annual monitoring.
EPA issued a Final Close Out Report on March 7, 2006, which
affirmed that the remedial action activities for the source control
operable unit and ground water operable unit had been completed and
were consistent with CERCLA, as amended, and to the extent practicable,
the NCP.
EPA issued a second Explanation of Significant in May 2008 to
clarify the final decision for clean up levels and document the need
for Institutional Controls and Five-Year Reviews.
Institutional Controls
An element of the selected remedy is to place notices to the
property deed warning of the site hazards. These notices were filed
pursuant to Oklahoma Statutes, Title 27A (2000 Supp.), Section 2-7-
123(B), by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality in 2001.
These notices declare the sites considered appropriate for activities
associated with industrial/commercial uses, the anticipated future land
use according to the ROD. Furthermore, the Oklahoma City Zoning maps
indicate the land use for the sites as classified for industrial.
A component of the ground water ROD is to ensure future potential
users of the lower Garber-Wellington aquifer are not exposed to
contaminants from the site. As part of Operation and Maintenance
activities, the State maintains the institutional controls and reviews
records of wells drilled in the area to ensure shallow ground water is
not used, and additional wells are not installed in the area.
Cleanup Goals
The remedial action cleanup activities at the Double Eagle Refinery
Site are consistent with the objectives of the NCP and will provide
protection to human health and the environment. The source control
operable unit cleanup goals were to provide for commercial/industrial
reuse of the Site. During the remedial action confirmation samples were
collected to ensure that all materials left at the Site were below the
cleanup goals. The remedial action objectives for the ground water
operable unit, to ensure that future potential users of the lower
Garber-Wellington aquifer are not exposed to contaminants from the Site
and to ensure that the North Canadian River is not impacted by
contaminants from the Site, have also been met by the remedial actions
at the Site.
The Remedial Investigation identified the shallow aquifer as a
Class III aquifer (the water is not suitable for human consumption). As
indicated through the ground water monitoring events, and the
additional investigations conducted, it was confirmed that the shallow
ground water in the alluvium is not usable as a drinking water source.
During a 1996 investigation, additional wells were drilled below 200
feet in depth to document the presence of a shale aquitard, which is
approximately 160+ feet deep. This shale within the Garber Sandstone
acts as an ``aquitard'' to separate the upper and lower ground water
aquifers, and provides protection to the lower aquifer from the
migration of contaminants in the shallow ground water. The deeper
ground water of the Garber-Wellington aquifer below the shale aquitard
is below cleanup goals.
The remedial action objective ``to ensure future potential users of
the deeper Garber-Wellington aquifer are not exposed to contaminants
from the site'' is achieved through the State monitoring of the
installation of any additional wells in the area.
Operation and Maintenance
The ODEQ has committed to performing Operation and Maintenance
(O&M) activities at the Site. In March 2006, the ODEQ submitted the
Site O&M Plan to EPA, which defines the long-term O&M activities for
the Site. O&M activities consist of maintaining the institutional
controls on the Site and semi-annual search of well drilling records to
ensure that no drinking water wells are installed on or near the Site.
Five-Year Review
Hazardous substances remain at the Site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted exposure. Therefore, the EPA must
conduct a statutory five-year review of the remedy no less than every
five years after the initiation of the remedial action pursuant to
CERCLA section 121(c), and as provided in the current guidance on Five-
Year Reviews (OSWER Directive 9355.7-03B-P, Comprehensive Five-Year
Review Guidance, June 2001). Based on the five-year reviews, EPA will
determine whether human health and the environment continue to be
adequately protected by the implemented remedy. Five-year reviews for
this Site were completed in July 29, 2002 and May 15, 2007. The reviews
found that the remedy remains protective of human health and the
environment, and that the Site appears to have been properly maintained
during the period between reports. The next five-year review will occur
no later than May 15, 2012.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA
[[Page 33721]]
section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C.
9617. Documents in the deletion docket which EPA relied on for
recommendation of the deletion from the NPL are available to the public
in the information repositories.
A Public Comment period was established when the site was proposed
to the National Priorities List, and Public Meetings were conducted on
July 1992 and August 1993 to discuss the proposed remedies for the soil
and the groundwater operable units. With this Notice of Deletion, a 30-
day public comment period is established before making this deletion
final.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Oklahoma, has determined
that all appropriate responses under CERCLA have been completed, and
that no further response actions under CERCLA, other than O&M and five-
year reviews, are necessary. Therefore, EPA is deleting the Site from
the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective August 12, 2008 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
July 14, 2008. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and it will not take effect and, EPA will prepare a response
to comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
notice of intent to delete and the comments already received. There
will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: May 23, 2008.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 is amended under Oklahoma (``OK'')
by removing the site name ``Double Eagle Refinery Co.'' and the city
``Oklahoma City.''
[FR Doc. E8-13338 Filed 6-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P