[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44235-44242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17408]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; Overview
Information:
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children With Disabilities--Center on Dispute Resolution;
Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2008.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.326D.
DATES:
Applications Available: July 30, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 29, 2008.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 8, 2008.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities program is to promote academic achievement and to improve
results for children with disabilities by providing technical
assistance (TA), supporting model demonstration projects, disseminating
useful information, and implementing activities that are supported by
scientifically based research.
Priority: In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this priority
is from allowable activities specified in the statute or otherwise
authorized in the statute (see sections 663 and 681(d) of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et
seq.).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2008 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards based on the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
[[Page 44236]]
This priority is:
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children With Disabilities--Center on Dispute Resolution.
Background
IDEA includes procedural safeguards that give parents an
opportunity to file complaints about any matter relating to the
provision of a free appropriate public education to an eligible child,
including procedures that are designed to ensure the timely resolution
of disputes so that a child's educational or early intervention program
is not adversely affected. Currently, the procedural safeguards provide
for the filing of State complaints, mediation, resolution sessions, and
due process hearings.
State Complaints. The State complaint procedures under IDEA provide
an easily and widely accessible method for parents and other interested
individuals or organizations to voice concerns regarding alleged
violations of IDEA to the State.
Mediation. In response to the growing number of due process hearing
requests involving matters under IDEA, Congress amended IDEA in 1997 to
require State educational agencies (SEAs) and Part C lead agencies to
make mediation available, at a minimum, whenever a request for a due
process hearing was made. The purpose of this requirement was to
provide the parties involved in a dispute with an opportunity to
resolve the dispute without a due process hearing. In 2004, Congress
amended section 615(e) of IDEA to expand the use of mediation to allow
parties to resolve disputes involving any matter under IDEA (not just
those matters that are the subject of a due process complaint).
Mediation provides a neutral third party to help facilitate the
resolution of matters in dispute. Mediation is more likely than due
process hearings to foster positive relationships between families and
educators (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2003).
Resolution Session. The 2004 amendments to IDEA added a new
requirement for a resolution session prior to a due process hearing.
Under section 615(f)(1)(B) of IDEA, the local educational agency (LEA)
must convene a meeting with the parents and relevant member or members
of the individualized education program (IEP) team who have specific
knowledge of the facts identified in the complaint so that the parents
and the LEA have an opportunity to resolve the complaint and avoid a
due process hearing.
Due Process Hearings. Due process hearings provide the parties with
an opportunity to have an impartial decision-maker resolve the issues
in dispute. While due process hearings are an important protection,
they can be costly if parties choose to involve attorneys in the
process, time consuming, and contentious, and can damage relationships
between families and educators. Therefore, the Department believes
every effort should be made by the parties to resolve disputes as early
as possible and without a due process hearing.
Data from State Performance Plans (SPPs) and Annual Performance
Reports (APRs) submitted by States to the Office of Special Education
Programs (OSEP) indicate that, although progress is being made, some
States have not yet met their compliance targets for the timely
resolution of State complaints and due process hearing requests. In
addition, some States have not yet met their performance targets for
the percentage of mediations and resolution meetings that result in
agreement between the parties. Therefore, technical assistance and
information on effective dispute resolution practices is needed in
order for States to reach these targets (Consortium for Appropriate
Dispute Resolution in Special Education, 2007). Additionally, States
need technical assistance and information on how to effectively
implement the requirements added by the 2004 amendments to IDEA for
resolution sessions.
In addition to the methods of dispute resolution specifically
required under IDEA (i.e., State complaint procedures, mediation,
resolution sessions, and due process hearings), there are a variety of
more informal or ``early resolution'' practices that can be used to
resolve disputes at the school or district level. In the preamble to
the final regulations implementing Part B of IDEA, the Department
encouraged States to explore the use of early resolution practices to
facilitate the timely resolution of disputes and to preserve the
relationships between families and educators (71 FR 46540, 46604).
Early resolution strategies offer parties additional opportunities to
resolve disputes collaboratively and avoid time-consuming and costly
litigation (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2003). For example,
training in conflict resolution, which is designed to equip individuals
with skills to enhance their ability to communicate and negotiate their
positions and interests, has been shown to result in early resolution
of disputes (Henderson, 2008).
Since 1998, OSEP has funded a TA center to support States'
implementation of dispute resolution processes. (For further
information on the work of the current center, go to
www.directionservice.org/cadre.) This center's grant is about to end.
The Department believes it is important to continue to fund a TA center
that provides SEAs and Part C lead agencies with resources that can
help them in effectively implementing a range of dispute resolution
options, including strategies that other SEAs and Part C lead agencies
are using to address the SPP and APR indicators related to dispute
resolution. SEAs and Part C lead agencies also need information on how
to collect and use dispute resolution data to improve services and
results for children with disabilities and their families. In addition,
continued funding of a TA center on dispute resolution will help ensure
that parents and families get the information they need about various
methods for resolving disputes.
Priority
The purpose of this priority is to fund a cooperative agreement to
support the establishment and operation of a Center on Dispute
Resolution (Center) that will (1) provide TA to SEAs and Part C lead
agencies on dispute resolution methods that can be used to resolve
disputes in connection with the programs they implement under Part B
and Part C of IDEA, and (2) collaborate with the National and Regional
Technical Assistance Centers for Parent Centers funded by OSEP (Parent
TACs) to provide information and resources to parents and families
regarding strategies for resolving disagreements with SEAs and Part C
lead agencies, utilizing a range of dispute resolution options.
The TA provided to SEAs and Part C lead agencies by the Center must
address how to (1) implement a range of dispute resolution procedures,
including those specifically required under IDEA (i.e., State
complaints, mediation, resolution sessions, and due process hearings)
and techniques that facilitate early resolution of disputes; (2)
collect, analyze, and report dispute resolution data to improve the
State's system of general supervision and APR reporting; and (3) use
dispute resolution data to improve services and results for children
with disabilities and their families. The TA provided by the Center
also must include targeted TA for SEAs and Part C lead agencies
identified by OSEP that have not met the dispute resolution targets for
the SPP indicators under IDEA and have been referred to the Center for
assistance.
To be considered for funding under this absolute priority,
applicants must
[[Page 44237]]
meet the application requirements contained in this priority. The
project funded under this absolute priority also must meet the
programmatic and administrative requirements specified in the priority.
Application Requirements. An applicant must include in its
application--
(a) A logic model that depicts, at a minimum, the goals,
activities, outputs, and outcomes of the proposed project. A logic
model communicates how a project will achieve its outcomes and provides
a framework for both the formative and summative evaluations of the
project;
Note: For more information on logic models, the following Web
site lists multiple on-line resources: http://www.cdc.gov/eval/resources.htm.
(b) A plan to implement the activities described in the Project
Activities section of this priority;
(c) A plan, linked to the proposed project's logic model, for a
formative evaluation of the proposed project's activities. The plan
must describe how the formative evaluation will use clear performance
objectives to ensure continuous improvement in the operation of the
proposed project, including objective measures of progress in
implementing the project and ensuring the quality of products and
services;
(d) A budget for a summative evaluation to be conducted by an
independent third party;
(e) A budget for attendance at the following:
(1) A one and one-half day kick-off meeting to be held in
Washington, DC within four weeks after receipt of the award, and a two
day annual planning meeting held in Washington, DC with the OSEP
Project Officer during each subsequent year of the project period.
(2) A three-day Project Directors' Conference in Washington, DC
during each year of the project period.
(3) A four-day Technical Assistance and Dissemination Conference in
Washington, DC during each year of the project period.
(4) A three-day OSEP Leadership Meeting during each year of the
project period; and
(f) A line item in the proposed budget for an annual set-aside of
five percent of the grant amount to support emerging needs that are
consistent with the proposed project's activities, as those needs are
identified in consultation with OSEP.
Note: With approval from the OSEP Project Officer, the Center
must reallocate any remaining funds from this annual set-aside no
later than the end of the third quarter of each budget period.
Project Activities. To meet the requirements of this priority, the
Center, at a minimum, must conduct the following activities:
Knowledge Development Activities.
(a) Develop or update, as appropriate, research syntheses on the
elements of effective approaches to dispute resolution and techniques
to facilitate early resolution of disputes.
(b) Identify and document effective approaches to dispute
resolution, including those dispute resolution methods required under
IDEA (i.e., State complaints, mediation, resolution sessions, and due
process hearings) as well as other methods that have been shown to
facilitate early resolution of disputes.
(c) In the first six months of the project period, identify a
minimum of three States to partner with that have implemented effective
dispute resolution systems for their Part B or Part C programs. The
purpose of establishing a partnership with States is for the Center to
acquire knowledge about how dispute resolution is working in the States
and to use the information to inform the technical assistance and
dissemination work of the Center. In partnering with States, the Center
must work with both the Part C and Part B programs in each State.
Factors for consideration in selecting the partner States could include
whether (1) the State met its targets for the dispute resolution
indicators in its SPP; (2) the State has a demonstrated history of
using effective dispute resolution processes, including early
resolution practices; and (3) the State offers professional development
activities to local program staff that focus on timely and effective
dispute resolution practices. Final State selection must be approved by
OSEP.
Note: Applicants must describe in their application the proposed
methods and criteria for recruiting and selecting partner States for
the activities described in paragraph (c) of this section.
(d) In the first and second years of the project period, partner
with the States identified in paragraph (c) of this section to (1)
develop guidelines for implementing effective dispute resolution
approaches and for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of
these approaches and (2) identify, describe, and document the elements
of the dispute resolution approaches that make them effective. The
Center must build on the information learned from their work with
partner States to develop exemplars and guidelines that all States can
use to improve their dispute resolution processes, as appropriate.
(e) Collaborate with the Parent TACs to identify and document
dispute resolution information needs of parents of children with
disabilities and their families. The Center must collect data about the
information parents and families need to fully participate in resolving
disputes, including data that will inform the type of TA that the
Center will offer in paragraph (e) of the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination Activities section of this priority.
Technical Assistance and Dissemination Activities.
(a) Work directly with SEAs and Part C lead agencies using the
exemplars and guidelines developed in the first and second years of the
project to increase their capacity to effectively implement the range
of dispute resolution options available, including early resolution
practices. The Center must facilitate the development of State
consortia, such as State-to-State information sharing systems, or
regional TA networks to disseminate information on effective dispute
resolution approaches in order to maximize the number of States the
Center reaches. These activities must occur by at least the third year
of the project period.
(b) In each year of the project period, utilize the current
knowledge-base on dispute resolution to provide TA to SEAs and Part C
lead agencies who are not successfully meeting their targets for the
dispute resolution indicators in their SPPs by working collaboratively
with States to--
(1) Evaluate the SEA or Part C lead agency's current dispute
resolution system;
(2) Identify elements of the dispute resolution system that need
improvement; and
(3) Develop an improvement plan and provide TA to implement the
plan, as requested by OSEP.
(c) Develop materials and guidance for States to assist them in
meeting the dispute resolution indicators on SPPs and APRs.
(d) Provide TA on collecting, analyzing, reporting, and using
dispute resolution data to improve services and results for children
with disabilities and their families (i.e., analyzing and modifying, as
appropriate, existing data management systems; providing guidance on
how to collect timely and accurate data; offering strategies for
reporting dispute resolution data to a variety of audiences; and
utilizing the data to identify and address areas in need of
improvement).
[[Page 44238]]
(e) Collaborate with the Parent TACs to provide TA and products to
parents and families that will help them avoid and resolve disputes
using the range of dispute resolution options available. Specific TA
activities and products must address the needs identified in paragraph
(e) of the Knowledge Development Activities section of this priority.
(f) Provide a continuum of general TA and disseminate widely
information about effective dispute resolution practices to SEA
personnel, Part C lead agency personnel, and Parent TACs using a
variety of dissemination methods (e.g., managing listservs and
communities of practice);
(g) Maintain a Web site that meets a government or industry-
recognized standard for accessibility and that links to the Web site
operated by the Technical Assistance Coordination Center (TACC), which
OSEP intends to fund in FY 2008; and
(h) Prepare and disseminate reports, documents, and other materials
on dispute resolution procedures, as requested by OSEP for specific
audiences, including policy makers, service providers, local-level
administrators, and parents and families. In consultation with the OSEP
Project Officer and the advisory committee established in accordance
with paragraph (c) in the Leadership and Coordination Activities
section of this priority, make selected reports, documents, and other
materials available for parents and families in both English and
Spanish.
Leadership and Coordination Activities.
(a) Compile and share data related to dispute resolution from
States' APRs and, as appropriate, SPPs, and specifically data from Part
B indicators 16 (complaint timelines), 17 (due process hearing
timelines), 18 (hearing requests resolved by resolution sessions), and
19 (mediation agreements) and Part C indicators 10 (complaint
timelines), 11 (due process hearing timelines), 12 (hearing requests
resolved by resolution sessions), and 13 (mediation agreements) by--
(1) Reviewing relevant sections of each State's APR and, as
appropriate, SPP, and summarizing the data on these indicators;
(2) Developing a summary report for each indicator that includes
information about States' progress in meeting targets for the
indicator, as well as any revisions made to States' dispute resolution
systems, or improvement strategies; and
(3) Providing a summary report for each indicator to OSEP in a
timely manner and participating in OSEP-requested teleconferences to
discuss the findings of the summary reports. (For further information
on Part B performance and compliance indicators, go to http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/bapr/index.html. For further
information on Part C performance and compliance indicators, go to
http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/capr/index.html.)
(b) Collaborate with the OSEP-funded Data Accountability Center
throughout the project period to acquire the data referenced in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Establish and maintain an advisory committee to review the
activities and outcomes of the Center and provide programmatic support
and advice throughout the project period. At a minimum, the advisory
committee must meet through electronic means on an annual basis and
consist of a family member or an individual with a disability who has
received IDEA services; an individual with knowledge of cultural and
linguistic diversity; a representative from an SEA; a representative
from a Part C lead agency, or other appropriate public agency (e.g.,
social services, public health, mental health); and persons with
expertise in dispute resolution processes.
(d) Participate in, organize, or facilitate, as appropriate, OSEP
communities of practice (http://www.tacommunities.org/) that are
aligned with the Center's objectives as a way to support discussions
and collaboration among key stakeholders.
(f) Prior to developing any new product, whether paper or
electronic, submit to the OSEP Project Officer and the Proposed Product
Advisory Board at OSEP's TACC for approval, a proposal describing the
content and purpose of the product.
(g) Coordinate with the National Dissemination Center for
Individuals with Disabilities, which OSEP intends to fund in FY 2008,
to develop an efficient and high-quality dissemination strategy that
reaches broad audiences. The Center must report to the OSEP Project
Officer the outcomes of these coordination efforts.
(h) Contribute, on an ongoing basis, updated information on the
Center's services to OSEP's Technical Assistance and Dissemination
Matrix (http://matrix.rrfcnetwork.org/), which provides current
information on Department-funded TA services to a range of
stakeholders.
(i) Maintain ongoing communication with the OSEP Project Officer
through monthly phone conversations, quarterly progress reports, and e-
mail communication.
Fourth and Fifth Years of the Project
In deciding whether to continue funding the Center for the fourth
and fifth years, the Secretary will consider the requirements of 34 CFR
75.253(a), and in addition--
(a) The recommendation of a review team consisting of experts
selected by the Secretary. This review will be conducted during a one-
day intensive meeting in Washington, DC that will be held during the
last half of the second year of the project period. The Center must
budget for travel expenses associated with this one-day intensive
review;
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness with which all requirements of
the negotiated cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the
Center; and
(c) The quality, relevance, and usefulness of the Center's
activities and products and the degree to which the Center's activities
and products have contributed to changed practice and improved
processes for resolving disputes in special education and early
intervention services.
References
Consortium for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education.
(2007). APR/SPP dispute resolution data summaries part B and part C:
2003-2006. Eugene, OR: National Center on Dispute Resolution in
Special Education.
Henderson, K. (2008, May). Optional IDEA alternative dispute
resolution. Project Forum at the National Association of State
Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) and Consortium for
Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE).
Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.projectforum.org/docs/OptionalIDEAAlternativeDisputeResolution.pdf.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2003, September). Special
Education: Numbers of formal disputes are generally low and States
are using mediation and other strategies to resolve conflicts.
(Publication No. GAO-03-897). Retrieved June 21, 2007, from GAO
Reports: Main Page via GPO Access: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/gaoreports/index.html.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested
parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities and
requirements. Section 681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment
requirements of the APA inapplicable to the priority in this notice.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481.
Applicable Regulations: The Education Department General
[[Page 44239]]
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement.
Estimated Available Funds: $500,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000.
Maximum Awards: We will reject any application that proposes a
budget exceeding $500,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. The
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
may change the maximum amount through a notice published in the Federal
Register.
Number of Awards: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs; LEAs, including public charter
schools that are considered LEAs under State law; IHEs; other public
agencies; private nonprofit organizations; outlying areas; freely
associated States; Indian tribes or tribal organizations; and for-
profit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This competition does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: General Requirements--(a) The projects funded under this
competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in
employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of
IDEA).
(b) Applicants and grant recipients funded under this competition
must involve individuals with disabilities or parents of individuals
with disabilities ages birth through 26 in planning, implementing, and
evaluating the projects (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package: Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Telephone, toll
free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (301) 470-1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call, toll free: 1-877-
576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html or at its e-mail address: [email protected].
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA Number 84.326D.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the person or team
listed under Alternative Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this competition.
Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application)
is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your application. You must limit the
application narrative to the equivalent of no more than 70 pages, using
the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the
resumes, the bibliography, the references, or the letters of support.
The page limit, however, does apply to the application narrative in
Part III.
We will reject your application if you exceed the page limit or if
you use other standards and exceed the equivalent of the page limit.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: July 30, 2008.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 29, 2008.
Applications for grants under this competition may be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov), or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery. For information (including dates
and times) about how to submit your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery, please refer to section IV. 6.
Other Submission Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
in this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 8, 2008.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this program may be submitted electronically or in paper format by mail
or hand delivery.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
To comply with the President's Management Agenda, we are
participating as a partner in the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site.
The Center on Dispute Resolution competition, CFDA Number 84.326D, is
included in this project. We request your participation in Grants.gov.
If you choose to submit your application electronically, you must
use the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at http://www.Grants.gov.
Through this site, you will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Center on
Dispute Resolution competition at http://www.Grants.gov. You must
search for the downloadable application package for this competition by
the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your
search (e.g., search for 84.326, not 84.326D).
Please note the following:
Your participation in Grants.gov is voluntary.
[[Page 44240]]
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov;
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov at http://e-Grants.ed.gov/help/GrantsgovSubmissionProcedures.pdf.
To submit your application via Grants.gov, you must
complete all steps in the Grants.gov registration process (see http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp). These steps include (1)
registering your organization, a multi-part process that includes
registration with the Central Contractor Registry (CCR); (2)
registering yourself as an Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (3) getting authorized as an AOR by your organization.
Details on these steps are outlined in the Grants.gov 3-Step
Registration Guide (see http://www.grants.gov/section910/Grants.govRegistrationBrochure.pdf). You also must provide on your
application the same D-U-N-S Number used with this registration. Please
note that the registration process may take five or more business days
to complete, and you must have completed all registration steps to
allow you to submit successfully an application via Grants.gov. In
addition you will need to update your CCR registration on an annual
basis. This may take three or more business days to complete.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you submit your application in paper format.
If you submit your application electronically, you must
submit all documents electronically, including all information you
typically provide on the following forms: Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of Education Supplemental
Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs
(ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. Please note
that two of these forms--the SF 424 and the Department of Education
Supplemental Information for SF 424--have replaced the ED 424
(Application for Federal Education Assistance).
If you submit your application electronically, you must
attach any narrative sections of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable Document) format. If
you upload a file type other than the three file types specified in
this paragraph or submit a password-protected file, we will not review
that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by e-mail. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII in this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you submit your application in paper format by mail (through the
U.S. Postal Service or a commercial carrier), you must mail the
original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the applicable
following address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.326D) 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260.
or
By mail through a commercial carrier: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Stop 4260, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.326D)
7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD 20785-1506.
[[Page 44241]]
Regardless of which address you use, you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you submit your application in paper format by hand delivery,
you (or a courier service) must deliver the original and two copies of
your application by hand, on or before the application deadline date,
to the Department at the following address: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.326D)
550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under which you are submitting your
application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a notification
of receipt of your grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the application deadline
date, you should call the U.S. Department of Education Application
Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are listed in the application package.
2. Peer Review: In the past, the Department has had difficulty
finding peer reviewers for certain competitions because so many
individuals who are eligible to serve as peer reviewers have conflicts
of interest. The Standing Panel requirements under IDEA also have
placed additional constraints on the availability of reviewers.
Therefore, the Department has determined that, for some discretionary
grant competitions, applications may be separated into two or more
groups and ranked and selected for funding within the specific groups.
This procedure will make it easier for the Department to find peer
reviewers by ensuring that greater numbers of individuals who are
eligible to serve as reviewers for any particular group of applicants
will not have conflicts of interest. It also will increase the quality,
independence, and fairness of the review process while permitting panel
members to review applications under discretionary grant competitions
for which they also have submitted applications. However, if the
Department decides to select an equal number of applications in each
group for funding, this may result in different cut-off points for
fundable applications in each group.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notice
(GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section in this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements
on reporting, please go to http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the Department has established a set of
performance measures, including long-term measures, that are designed
to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness and
quality of the Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve
Services and Results for Children With Disabilities program. These
measures focus on the extent to which projects provide high quality
products and services, the relevance of project products and services
to educational and early intervention policy and practice, and the use
of products and services to improve educational and early intervention
policy and practice.
Grantees will be required to provide information related to these
measures.
Grantees also will be required to report information on their
project's performance in annual reports to the Department (34 CFR
75.590).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina Diamond, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4094, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-6674.
If you use a TDD, call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free,
at 1-800-877-8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an alternative format
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) by
contacting the Grants and Contracts Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS,
toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-
[[Page 44242]]
888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html.
Dated: July 24, 2008.
Tracy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E8-17408 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P