[Federal Register: August 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 166)]
[
Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 50191-50194]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26au08-4]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE



Agricultural Marketing Service



7 CFR Part 993



[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0060; FV08-993-1 IFR]



 
Dried Prunes Produced in California; Decreased Assessment Rate



AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.



ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the 

Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) for the 2008-09 and subsequent 

crop years from $0.60 to $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes. The 

Committee locally administers the marketing order that regulates the 

handling of dried prunes in California. Assessments upon dried prune 

handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary 

expenses of the program. The crop year began August 1 and ends July 31. 

The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, 

suspended, or terminated.



DATES: Effective August 27, 2008. Comments received by October 27, 

2008, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.



ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 

concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, 

Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 

AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 

20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: http://

www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and 

the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will 

be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk 

during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://

www.regulations.gov.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen Pello, Assistant Regional 

Manager, or Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field 

Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 

Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or 

E-mail: Maureen.Pello@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.

    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 

regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration 

Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 

Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-

2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 

Agreement No. 110 and Marketing Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR 

part 993), regulating the handling of dried prunes grown in California, 

hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing agreement and 

order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 

1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 

``Act.''

    The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in 

conformance with Executive Order 12866.

    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 

Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 

dried prune handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer 

the order are derived from such assessments. It is



[[Page 50192]]



intended that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable 

to all assessable dried prunes beginning on August 1, 2008, and 

continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not 

preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they 

present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.

    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 

before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 

Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 

stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 

imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 

request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 

handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 

After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 

that the district court of the United States in any district in which 

the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 

business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 

provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 

the entry of the ruling.

    This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the 

Committee for the 2008-09 and subsequent crop years from $0.60 to $0.30 

per ton of salable dried prunes handled.

    The California dried prune marketing order provides authority for 

the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget 

of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 

program. The members of the Committee are producers of California dried 

prunes. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs 

for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position 

to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment 

rate is formulated and discussed at a public meeting. Thus, all 

directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and 

provide input.

    For the 2007-08 and subsequent crop years, the Committee 

recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate that would continue 

in effect from crop year to crop year unless modified, suspended, or 

terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the 

Committee or other information available to USDA.

    The Committee met on June 26, 2008, and unanimously recommended an 

assessment rate of $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes and 

expenditures totaling $51,587 for the 2008-09 crop year. In comparison, 

last year's approved expenses were $102,523. The assessment rate of 

$0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes is one-half of the rate currently 

in effect.

    The Committee recommended a lower assessment rate because the 2008-

09 crop is estimated at 120,000 tons, which is over 35,000 tons larger 

than the 2007-08 crop. Income generated from the lower assessment rate 

combined with excess assessment income carried into the new crop year 

should be adequate to cover the Committee's 2008-09 expenses.

    The Committee's budget of expenses of $51,587 includes a decrease 

in personnel expenses, and a slight decrease in operating expenses. 

Combined salaries and expenses are almost 50 percent lower than last 

year, or about $26,248. The Committee also included $12,446 for 

contingencies. Most of the Committee's expenses reflect its portion of 

the joint administrative costs of the Committee and the California 

Dried Plum Board (CDPB). Based on the Committee's reduced activities in 

recent years, it is funding only 5 percent of the shared expenses of 

the two programs. This level was reduced from last year's level of 10 

percent to reflect a more accurate figure. The Committee believes that 

extra assessment income carried in from the 2007 crop year, plus 

interest income and 2008 assessment income, is adequate to cover its 

estimated expenses of $51,587.

    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2008-09 

crop year include $26,248 for salaries and benefits, $12,893 for 

operating expenses, and $12,446 for contingencies. For the 2007-08 crop 

year, the Committee's budgeted expenses were $50,505 for salaries and 

benefits, $15,075 for operating expenses, and $36,943 for 

contingencies.

    The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 

considering the handler assessment revenue needed to meet anticipated 

expenses, the estimated salable tons of California dried prunes, excess 

funds carried forward into the 2008-09 crop year, and estimated income 

from other sources such as interest. Dried prune production for the 

year is estimated to be 120,000 salable tons, which should provide 

$36,000 in assessment income at $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes. 

Income derived from handler assessments, plus excess funds from the 

2007-08 crop year should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.

    The Committee is authorized under Sec.  993.81(c) of the order to 

use excess assessment funds from the 2007-08 crop year (currently 

estimated at $15,487) for up to 5 months beyond the end of the crop 

year to meet 2008-09 crop year expenses. At the end of the 5 months, 

the Committee either refunds or credits excess funds to handlers.

    The assessment rate established in this rule is effective 

indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon 

recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other 

available information.

    Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite 

period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 

crop year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 

recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 

times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. 

Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 

express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate the 

Committee's recommendations and other available information to 

determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 

Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committees' 

2008-09 budget and those for subsequent crop years will be reviewed 

and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.



Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis



    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 

economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 

prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.

    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 

business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 

not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 

pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 

that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 

entities acting on their own behalf.

    There are approximately 800 producers of dried prunes in the 

production area and approximately 22 handlers subject to regulation 

under the marketing order. The Small Business Administration (13 CFR 

121.201) defines small agricultural producers as those whose annual 

receipts are less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms 

are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $6,500,000.

    Committee data indicates that about 64 percent of the handlers ship 

under $6,500,000 worth of dried prunes.



[[Page 50193]]



Dividing the average prune crop value for 2007-08 reported by the 

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) of $111,650,000 by the 

number of producers (800) yields an average annual producer revenue 

estimate of about $139,562. Based on the foregoing, the majority of 

handlers and dried prune producers may be classified as small entities.

    This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the 

Committee and collected from handlers for the 2008-09 and subsequent 

crop years from $0.60 to $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes.

    The Committee met on June 26, 2008, and unanimously recommended 

estimated expenses for 2008-09 of $51,587 and a decreased assessment 

rate of $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes. The Committee's 

recommended budget was based on a decrease in personnel expenses and a 

decrease in operating expenses. Combined salaries and expenses are 

almost 50 percent lower than last year, or about $26,248. The Committee 

also included $12,446 for contingencies. Most of the Committee's 

expenses reflect its portion of the joint administrative costs of the 

Committee and the CDPB. Based on the Committee's reduced activities in 

recent years, it is funding only 5 percent of the shared expenses of 

the two programs. This level was reduced from last year's level of 10 

percent to reflect a more accurate figure. The Committee believes that 

extra assessment income carried in from the 2007 crop year, plus 

interest income and 2008 assessment income, is adequate to cover its 

estimated expenses of $51,587.

    The assessment rate of $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes is 

one-half of the rate currently in effect. The quantity of salable dried 

prunes for the 2008-09 crop year is currently estimated at 120,000 

tons, compared to 95,000 tons of salable dried prunes for the 2007-08 

crop year.

    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2008-09 

crop year include $26,248 for salaries and benefits, $12,893 for 

operating expenses, and $12,446 for contingencies. Budgeted expenses 

for these items in 2007-08 were $50,505 for salaries and benefits, 

$15,075 for operating expenses, and $36,943 for contingencies.

    The 2008-09 assessment rate was derived by considering the handler 

assessment revenue needed to meet anticipated expenses, the estimated 

salable tons of California dried prunes, excess funds carried forward 

into the 2008-09 crop year, and estimated income from other sources 

such as interest. Therefore, the Committee recommended an assessment 

rate of $0.30 per ton of salable dried prunes.

    Prior to arriving at its budget of $51,587, the Committee 

considered information from various sources, including the Committee's 

Executive Subcommittee. The Executive Subcommittee reviewed the 

administrative expenses shared between the Committee and the CDPB in 

recent years. Accordingly, the Executive Subcommittee recommended 

reducing the share of expenses allocated to the Committee from 10 to 5 

percent. The Executive Subcommittee then recommended the $51,587 budget 

and $0.30 per ton assessment rate to the Committee. The Committee 

recommended the same budget and assessment rate to USDA.

    Section 993.81(c) of the order provides the Committee the authority 

to use excess assessment funds from the 2007-08 crop year (estimated at 

$15,487) for up to 5 months beyond the end of the crop year to meet 

2008-09 crop year expenses. At the end of the 5 months, the Committee 

either refunds or credits excess funds to handlers.

    To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the 

assessment rate for 2007, the assessment rate of $0.60 per ton is 

divided by the estimated average grower price (according to the NASS). 

This results in estimated assessment revenue for the 2007-08 crop year 

as a percentage of grower revenue of.05 percent ($0.60 divided by 

$1,450 per ton). NASS data for 2008 is not yet available. However, 

applying the same calculations above using the average grower price for 

2005-07 would result in estimated assessment revenue as a percentage of 

total grower revenue of.02 percent for the 2008-09 crop year ($0.30 

divided by $1,437 per ton). Thus, the assessment revenue should be well 

below 1 percent of estimated grower revenue in 2008.

    This action decreases the assessment obligation imposed on 

handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some 

of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the 

assessment rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the 

burden on producers. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely 

publicized throughout the California dried prune industry and all 

interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate 

in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, 

the June 26, 2008, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both 

large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, 

interested persons are invited to submit comments on this interim final 

rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of this action 

on small businesses.

    This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements on either small or large California dried prune handlers. 

As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 

periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 

duplication by industry and public sector agencies.

    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 

the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 

and services, and for other purposes.

    USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 

overlap, or conflict with this rule.

    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 

specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/

/www.ams. usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams. fetchTemplate Data.do?template= 

TemplateN&page=Marketing OrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about 

the compliance guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously 

mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

    After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 

the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 

available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 

hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 

the Act.

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined upon good 

cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 

interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting the rule into 

effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date 

of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 

because: (1) The 2008-09 crop year began on August 1, 2008, and the 

marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each year 

apply to all assessable prunes handled during the year; (2) this action 

decreases the assessment rate for assessable prunes beginning with the 

2008-09 crop year; (3) handlers are aware of this action which was 

unanimously recommended at a public meeting and is similar to actions 

recommended by the Committee in past years, and (4) this interim final 

rule provides for a 60-day comment period, and all comments timely 

received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.



[[Page 50194]]



List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993



    Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements.



0

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is amended as 

follows:



PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA



0

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 993 continues to read as 

follows:



    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.





0

2. Section 993.347 is revised to read as follows:





Sec.  993.347   Assessment rate.



    On and after August 1, 2008, an assessment rate of $0.30 per ton of 

salable dried prunes is established for California dried prunes.



    Dated: August 20, 2008.

Lloyd C. Day,

Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.

[FR Doc. E8-19695 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-02-P