[Federal Register: October 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 207)]
[Notices]
[Page 63469-63470]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24oc08-68]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-8586-9]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070453, ERP No. D-BLM-J65497-UT, Monticello Field Office
Resource Management Plan, To Guide the Management of Public Land,
Southern two-third of San Juan County and small portion on the Northern
boundary within Grand County, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about the air quality
analysis and proposed changes in visual resource management. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20080290, ERP No. D-STB-F53019-00, Elgin, Joliet & Eastern
Railroad (Finance Docket No. 35087) Proposed Acquisition by Canadian
National (CN) Railway and Grand Trunk Corporation to connect all Five
of CN's Rail Lines, Chicago, Illinois and Gary, Indiana.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about hazardous
materials transport/rail safety, air quality, surface water, wetlands,
floodplains, environmental justice, noise, and habitat impacts. EPA's
recommendations include an adaptive management program, spill
prevention/containment mitigation, and dropping one rail-to-rail
connection. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080313, ERP No. D-UAF-J11024-UT, White Elk Military
Operations Area, Propose to Establish a New Military Operations Area
(MOA) Linked to the Utah Test, Utah and Training Range (UTTR) Airspaces
Nevada, Hill Air Force Base, UT and Nevada.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080327, ERP No. D-FHW-J40183-MT, Russell Street/South 3rd
Street Reconstruction Project, To Address Current and Projected Safety
[[Page 63470]]
and Operational Needs, Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit,
City of Missoula, Missoula County, MT.
Summary: EPA expressed concern about air and water construction
impacts and recommended additional analysis and information to fully
assess and mitigate impacts of the proposed action. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080365, ERP No. D-NPS-C61012-NY, Fort Stanwix National
Monument General Management Plan, Implementation, Funding, City of
Rome, Oneida County, NY.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the preferred alternative. Rating
LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080339, ERP No. F-BLM-J65497-UT, Monticello Field Office
Resource Management Plan, To Guide the Management of Public Land,
Southern two-third of San Juan County and small portion on the Northern
boundary within Grand County, UT.
Summary: While the Preferred Alternative should increase the level
of overall resource protection, EPA continues to have environmental
concerns with potential adverse impacts to air quality from reasonably
foreseeable oil and gas development and a reduction of landscape acres
in the Class I and II of the Visual Resource Inventory.
EIS No. 20080354, ERP No. F-NPS-D61058-VA, Manassas National
Battlefield Park General Management Plan, Implementation, Fairfax and
Prince William Counties, VA.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about impacts
to wetlands and riparian areas, especially forested wetlands, impacts
to interior trees and habitat and mitigation for wetlands and removed
forested acres.
EIS No. 20080359, ERP No. F-BIA-J65498-WY, Riverton Dome Coal Bed
Natural Gas (CBNG) and Conventional Gas Development Project,
Construction of Well Pads, Roads, Pipelines, and Production Facilities,
Wind River Indian Reservation (WRIR), Fremont Count, WY.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concern about surface
water impacts if the water management strategy changes.
EIS No. 20080366, ERP No. F-AFS-J65483-MT, Butte Resource Management
Plan, Implementation, Beaverhead, Broadwater, Deerlodge, Gallatin,
Jefferson, Lewis and Clark, Silver Bow and Park Counties, MT.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concern about riparian
impacts and impacts from motorized uses.
EIS No. 20080368, ERP No. F-AFS-J65508-MT, Debaugan Fuels Reduction
Project, Proposed Fuels Reduction Activities, Lolo National Forest,
Superior Ranger District, Mineral County, MT.
Summary: EPA continues to express concern about water quality
impacts, and noted the need for continuing road maintenance in the
project area, and the need for consistency with TMDLs.
EIS No. 20080377, ERP No. F-AFS-J65514-MT, Sheppard Creek Post-Fire
Project, Timber Salvage, Implementation, Flathead National Forest,
Flathead and Lincoln Counties, MT.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concern about water
quality impacts to Sheppard Creek.
Dated: October 21, 2008.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E8-25454 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P