[Federal Register: January 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 9)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2159-2162]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14ja08-6]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1149; FRL-8515-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Fredericksburg and Shenandoah National Park 8-Hour Ozone
Areas Movement From the Nonattainment Area List to the Maintenance Area
List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) that was submitted on August
14, 2007 by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The revisions move the
Fredericksburg and the Shenandoah National Park 8-Hour Ozone Areas from
the Nonattainment Area list to the Maintenance Area list. EPA is
approving these revisions to move the Fredericksburg 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area (Spotsylvania County, Stafford County, and
Fredericksburg City) and the Shenandoah National Park 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area (portions of the park located in Page and Madison
Counties) from the list of nonattainment areas to the list of
maintenance areas in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 14, 2008 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by February 13, 2008. If
EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2007-1149 by one of the following methods:
A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1149, Cristina Fernandez, Chief, Air
Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2007-1149. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
[[Page 2160]]
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 629
East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Linden, (215) 814-2096, or by
e-mail at linden.melissa@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 22, 2004, under the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) the Fredericksburg area and the Shenandoah
National Park area were designated as nonattainment areas. The
Shenandoah National Park area formally submitted a redesignation
request on September 21, 2005 along with a maintenance plan on
September 23, 2005. On January 3, 2006, (71 FR 24) the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the final rulemaking
actions approving the redesignation of the Shenandoah National Park
from nonattainment of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard to attainment. The
Fredericksburg area formally submitted a redesignation request on May
2, 2005 along with a maintenance plan on May 4, 2005. On December 23,
2005, (70 FR 76165) the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published the final rulemaking actions approving the redesignation of
the Fredericksburg area from nonattainment of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
to attainment. Both redesignations were done in accordance with the
Clean Air Act section 107(d)(3)(E).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On August 14, 2007, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a formal
revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision
consists of a regulatory change that moves the Fredericksburg 8-Hour
Ozone Nonattainment Area and the Shenandoah National Park 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area from the list of nonattainment areas to the list of
maintenance areas. The purpose of Virginia's State Implementation Plan
revision consists of a regulatory change to move the Fredericksburg 8-
Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area (Spotsylvania County, Stafford County,
and Fredericksburg City) and the Shenandoah National Park 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area (portions of the park located in Page and Madison
Counties) from the list of nonattainment areas found in regulation 9
VAC 5-20-204 to the list of maintenance areas found in regulation 9 VAC
5-20-203.
III. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals from the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit)
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and
information about the content of those documents that are the product
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information (1) that are generated or developed
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
that are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that
demonstrate a clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public
health or environment; or (4) that are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts * * *.'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.''
Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law
can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under
the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan,
independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by
this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the Commonwealth's request to move the
Fredericksburg area and the Shenandoah National Park area from 8-Hour
Ozone Nonattainment list to the 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance list.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's
Federal
[[Page 2161]]
Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective on March 14, 2008 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 13, 2008. If EPA
receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission; to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 14, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action to approve the revision to move the Fredericksburg area and
the Shenandoah National Park area from the 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
list to the 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance list may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 27, 2007.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for Chapter 20, section 5-20-203 and 5-20-204 to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 2162]]
Epa-Approved Virginia Regulations And Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation (9 VAC 5) Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation [former
date SIP citation]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 20...................... General Provisions..
* * * * * * *
Part II......................... Air Quality Programs
* * * * * * *
5-20-203........................ Air Quality 09/01/06 01/14/08 [Insert Fredericksburg and
Maintenance Areas. page number where Shenandoah 8-Hour
the document Ozone Areas are added.
begins].
5-20-204........................ Nonattainment Areas. 09/01/06 01/14/08 [Insert Fredericksburg and
page number where Shenandoah 8-Hour
the document Ozone Areas are
begins]. deleted.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-265 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P