[Federal Register: November 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 66275]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07no08-84]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-63,574]
Albany International Research Company, Mansfield, MA; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application postmarked September 30, 2008, a company official
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on August 18, 2008 and
published in the Federal Register on September 3, 2008 (73 FR 51530).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative TAA determination issued by the Department for workers
of Albany International Research Company, Mansfield, Massachusetts was
based on the finding that imports of prototype fabrics did not
contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject plant and
there was no shift of production to a foreign country during the
relevant period. The ``contributed importantly'' test is generally
demonstrated through a survey of the workers' firm's declining domestic
customers. In this instance, the subject firm did not sell prototype
fabrics to outside domestic customers, thus a survey was not conducted.
The subject firm did not import prototype fabrics into the United
States during the relevant period.
In the request for reconsideration the petitioner states that
employment at the subject facility will be negatively impacted by a
shift in a portion of Research and Development work to England.
According to the company official, the shift will be taking place on
December 31, 2008.
When assessing eligibility for TAA, the Department exclusively
considers import impact during the relevant time period (one year prior
to the date of the petition). Events occurring on December 31, 2008 are
outside of the relevant time period as established by the petition date
of June 19, 2008, and thus cannot be considered in this investigation.
Should conditions change in the future, the company is encouraged
to file a new petition on behalf of the worker group which will
encompass an investigative period that will include these changing
conditions.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of October 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-26536 Filed 11-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P