[Federal Register: November 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 229)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71959-71961]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26no08-31]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1240; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 Series 600A Airplanes and Model HS.125 Series 700A Airplanes
Modified in Accordance With Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA2271SW
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model BH.125 series 600A
airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes. This proposed AD
would require inspecting the wiring diagrams containing the cockpit
blowers and comparing with the current airplane configuration, and
reworking the wiring if necessary. This proposed AD results from a
report indicating that a blower motor of the cockpit ventilation and
avionics cooling system seized up and gave off smoke. We are proposing
this AD to prevent smoke and fumes in the cockpit in the event that a
blower motor seizes and overheats due to excessive current draw.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 12,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation, Department 62, P.O. Box
[[Page 71960]]
85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; telephone 316-676-8238; fax 316-676-
6706; e-mail tmdc@hawkerbeechcraft.com; Internet https://
www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/service_support/pubs.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Shaw, Aerospace Engineer, Special
Certification Office, ASW-190, FAA Southwest Regional Office, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5188;
fax (817) 222-5785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1240;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating that a blower motor of the
cockpit ventilation and avionics cooling system seized up and gave off
smoke on a Raytheon Model Hawker 125-800 airplane. Investigation
revealed inadequate short circuit protection on the blower motor
electrical circuit. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
smoke and fumes in the cockpit in the event that a blower motor seizes
and overheats due to excessive current draw.
The cockpit blowers on certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes
modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA2271SW are identical to those on the affected Raytheon Model Hawker
125-800 airplanes. Therefore, all of these models may be subject to the
same unsafe condition.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
We previously issued AD 2005-16-02, amendment 39-14207 (70 FR
44273, August 2, 2005), applicable to certain Raytheon Model HS.125
series 700A airplanes, Model BAe.125 series 800A airplanes, and Model
Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP airplanes. That AD requires inspecting to
determine the current rating of the circuit breakers of certain cockpit
ventilation and avionics cooling system blowers; and replacing the
circuit breakers and modifying the blower wiring, as applicable.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-
3850, dated January 2008. The service bulletin describes procedures for
inspecting the wiring diagrams containing the cockpit blowers and
comparing with the current airplane configuration, and reworking the
wiring if necessary.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the(se) same type
design(s). This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously, except as
discussed under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service
Bulletin.''
Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin
Although the NOTE specified in paragraph 3.A. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850
specifies that operators should consult the Inspection Authorization,
Designated Engineering Representative, FAA, or Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation for determination as to the suitability of the service
bulletin, this proposed AD would require that the determination be
approved by the FAA.
Operators should note that, although the Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service bulletin describe procedures for
submitting a sheet recording compliance with the service bulletin, this
proposed AD would not require that action.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 40 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with this inspection proposed by this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $3,200, or $80
per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
[[Page 71961]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Arkansas Modification Center, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2008-1240;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 12, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January 2008, which have
been modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate
SA2271SW.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating that a blower motor
of the cockpit ventilation and avionics cooling system seized up and
gave off smoke. We are issuing this AD to prevent smoke and fumes in
the cockpit in the event that a blower motor seizes and overheats
due to excessive current draw.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Inspection and Rework
(f) Within 600 flight hours or 6 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the wiring diagrams
containing the cockpit blowers and compare with the current airplane
configuration, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January
2008; except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(1) If the current airplane configuration does not match the
applicable cockpit blower wiring diagrams, before further flight,
rework the wiring using a method approved by the Manager, Special
Certification Office, ASW-190, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA. For the
determination to be approved by the Manager, Special Certification
Office, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter
must specifically refer to this AD.
(2) If the current airplane configuration matches the applicable
cockpit blower wiring diagrams, before further flight, rework the
wiring in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January 2008.
No Submission of Certain Information
(g) Although Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-
3850, dated January 2008, specifies to submit certain information to
the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Special Certification Office, ASW-190,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Andy Shaw, Aerospace Engineer,
Special Certification Office, ASW-190, FAA, Southwest Regional
Office, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5188; fax (817) 222-5785; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 16, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-28168 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P