[Federal Register: March 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 50)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13490-13492]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13mr08-16]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0270; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-255-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model Galaxy
Airplanes and Gulfstream 200 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic lines] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.
Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight air
brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.) could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2677; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0270;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-255-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), which is the
aviation authority for Israel, has issued Israeli Airworthiness
Directive 29-07-01-11, dated May 28, 2007 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic tubes] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.
Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight air
brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.) could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The corrective
actions include repetitive visual inspections of the attaching blocks
for wear and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if any tube is loose
or damaged; an inspection of the entire length of the tubes for
chafing, damage, and cracking; replacement of chafed, damaged, or
cracked tubes; and replacement of blocks made of Teflon in the right-
hand aft fuselage equipment bay with new blocks made of Nylon 6/6. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Gulfstream has issued Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated June 29,
2007. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making
[[Page 13491]]
these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the
information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 129 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $54 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $27,606, or $214 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Formerly Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.):
Docket No. FAA-2008-0270; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-255-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 14, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Gulfstream Model Galaxy airplanes and
Gulfstream 200 airplanes, serial numbers 004 through 156,
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29:
Hydraulic Power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic tubes] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.
Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight
air brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.)
could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The
corrective actions include repetitive visual inspections of the
attaching blocks for wear and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if
any tube is loose or damaged; an inspection of the entire length of
the tubes for chafing, damage, and cracking; replacement of chafed,
damaged, or cracked tubes; and replacement of blocks made of Teflon
in the right-hand aft fuselage equipment bay with new blocks made of
Nylon 6/6.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Do the following actions.
(1) Within 50 flight hours or one month after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, unless previously accomplished
within 300 flight hours or six months prior to the effective date of
this AD: Perform a visual inspection of the clamping blocks for wear
and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if any tube is loose or
damaged. Clamping blocks are shown in detail B of Figure 2 of
Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated June 29, 2007, or in
details B and C of Figure 10, Page 0, of the Gulfstream G200
Illustrated Parts Catalog Chapter 29-10-30.
(i) If clamping blocks are not worn, repeat the inspections
specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 300 flight hours or six months, whichever comes first,
until the replacement required by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD is
done.
(ii) If any hydraulic tube is loose or damaged, before further
flight, inspect the hydraulic tubes along their entire length for
chafing, damage, and cracks.
(iii) Before further flight, repair or replace all chafed,
damaged, or cracked tubes using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI)
(or its delegated agent). Chapter 20-10-12 of the Gulfstream G200
Maintenance Manual is one approved method.
(iv) Before further flight, replace all worn clamping blocks by
doing the replacement specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD,
except as provided by paragraph (f)(1)(v) of this AD.
(v) If Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks part number (P/N) 4AS3565055-
511 are not available during the replacement specified in paragraph
(f)(1)(iv) of this AD, before further flight, install new or
serviceable Teflon clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-507. Within 300
flight hours or six months after doing the installation, do the
actions specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and repeat
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 300 flight hours or six
months, whichever comes first, until the replacement required by
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD is done.
(2) Within 600 flight hours or one year, whichever comes first,
after the effective date of this AD, unless previously accomplished:
Replace the existing Teflon clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-507 with
Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-511 in accordance with
Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated June 29, 2007.
[[Page 13492]]
Accomplishment of this replacement constitutes terminating action
for all inspections of the clamping blocks required by this AD.
Accomplishment of this replacement also constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections of the hydraulic tube required
by paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(v) of this AD.
Note 1: Succeeding scheduled maintenance checks of this area are
to be performed per the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM).
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
(1) The MCAI does not specify service information if any tube
replacement is done. This AD requires doing the replacement as
specified in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(2) The MCAI specifies doing a one-time inspection of the
installed Teflon blocks but also specifies doing repetitive
inspections of temporary replacement Teflon blocks until the
permanent replacement with Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks is done. This
AD requires repetitive inspections of all Teflon blocks until the
permanent replacement is done.
(3) The MCAI specifies that doing the replacement with Nylon 6/6
clamping blocks constitutes terminating action. This AD specifies
that doing the replacement with Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks
constitutes terminating action for the inspections of the clamping
blocks and for the repetitive inspections of the hydraulic tubes.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2677; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness Directive 29-07-01-11,
dated May 28, 2007, and Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316,
dated June 29, 2007, for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-5015 Filed 3-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P