[Federal Register: March 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 16671-16672]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28mr08-70]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6697-4]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070367, ERP No. D-AFS-A65177-00
National Forest System Land Management Planning, Implementation,
Proposed Land Management Planning Rule at 36 CFR Part 219 to Finish
Rulemaking.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about annual
monitoring, and how the proposed rule would ensure that it would be
conducted. In addition, the final EIS should clarify under what
circumstances the public will receive notification for changes in
monitoring plans/strategy.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070550, ERP No. D-FHW-F40441-MN
US-14 Reconstruction Project, Improvement to Truck Highway 14 from
Front Street in New Ulm to Nicollet County Road 6 in North Mankato
Brown and Nicollet Counties, MN.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to
riparian forested wetlands and surface water quality, and requested
additional information on mitigation areas and the corridor
preservation plan.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070555, ERP No. D-DHS-K80050-CA
U.S. Border Patrol San Diego Sector, Proposed Construction,
Operation, and Maintenance of Tactical Infrastructure, San Diego
County, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections because of the
proposed filling of two riparian corridors and has concerns about
erosion impacts. EPA recommended avoiding fill in these canyons,
avoiding fence construction on steep slopes, and alternatives to
pedestrian fencing across streams.
Rating EO2.
EIS No. 20080025, ERP No. D-FTA-G59004-TX
Northwest Corridor Light Rail Transit Line (LRT) to Irving /Dallas/
Fort Worth International Airport, Construction, Dallas County, TX.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action.
Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080031, ERP No. D-AFS-F65069-MN
Glacier Project, To Maintain and Promote Native Vegetation,
Communities that are Diverse, Productive, Healthy, Implementation,
Superior National Forest, Kawishiwi Ranger District, St. Louis and Lake
Counties, MN.
Summary: EPA does not object to the action alternatives proposed.
Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070450, ERP No. DS-WPA-J08026-00
Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project, Addresses the
Impacts of Changes to the Proposed Action relative to Cooling
Alternatives and the Use of Groundwater as Backup Water Source, U.S.
Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Grant County, SD and Big Stone
County, MN.
[[Page 16672]]
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about ground water
impacts, and requested a detailed assessment of the wetland and stream-
crossing impacts of the transmission line corridors and how mercury
emissions will be addressed.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070547, ERP No. DS-COE-G39044-TX
Central City Project, Proposed Modification to the Authorized
Projects which provides Flood Damage Reduction, Habitat Improvement,
Recreation and Urban Revitalization, Upper Trinity River Central City,
Upper Trinity River Basin, Trinity River, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
Rating NC.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080036, ERP No. F-GSA-J80047-CO
Denver Federal Central Site Plan Study, Master Site Plan,
Implementation, City of Lakewood, Jefferson County, CO.
Summary: EPA's previous concerns have been resolved; therefore, EPA
does not object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20080056, ERP No. F-AFS-L65530-AK
Tonga's Land and Resource Management Plan, Plan Amendment,
Implementation, Tonga's National Forest, AK.
Summary: The final EIS addressed EPA's concerns; therefore, EPA
does not object to the project.
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E8-6422 Filed 3-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P